qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[PATCH 2/4] hw/misc/bcm2835_property: Avoid overflow in OTP access prope


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] hw/misc/bcm2835_property: Avoid overflow in OTP access properties
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 14:10:27 +0100

Coverity points out that in our handling of the property
RPI_FWREQ_SET_CUSTOMER_OTP we have a potential overflow.  This
happens because we read start_num and number from the guest as
unsigned 32 bit integers, but then the variable 'n' we use as a loop
counter as we iterate from start_num to start_num + number is only an
"int".  That means that if the guest passes us a very large start_num
we will interpret it as negative.  This will result in an assertion
failure inside bcm2835_otp_set_row(), which checks that we didn't
pass it an invalid row number.

A similar issue applies to all the properties for accessing OTP rows
where we are iterating through with a start and length read from the
guest.

Use uint32_t for the loop counter to avoid this problem. Because in
all cases 'n' is only used as a loop counter, we can do this as
part of the for(), restricting its scope to exactly where we need it.

Resolves: Coverity CID 1549401
Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
---
 hw/misc/bcm2835_property.c | 9 ++++-----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/misc/bcm2835_property.c b/hw/misc/bcm2835_property.c
index e28fdca9846..7eb623b4e90 100644
--- a/hw/misc/bcm2835_property.c
+++ b/hw/misc/bcm2835_property.c
@@ -30,7 +30,6 @@ static void bcm2835_property_mbox_push(BCM2835PropertyState 
*s, uint32_t value)
     uint32_t tot_len;
     size_t resplen;
     uint32_t tmp;
-    int n;
     uint32_t start_num, number, otp_row;
 
     /*
@@ -337,7 +336,7 @@ static void bcm2835_property_mbox_push(BCM2835PropertyState 
*s, uint32_t value)
 
             resplen = 8 + 4 * number;
 
-            for (n = start_num; n < start_num + number &&
+            for (uint32_t n = start_num; n < start_num + number &&
                  n < BCM2835_OTP_CUSTOMER_OTP_LEN; n++) {
                 otp_row = bcm2835_otp_get_row(s->otp,
                                               BCM2835_OTP_CUSTOMER_OTP + n);
@@ -366,7 +365,7 @@ static void bcm2835_property_mbox_push(BCM2835PropertyState 
*s, uint32_t value)
                 break;
             }
 
-            for (n = start_num; n < start_num + number &&
+            for (uint32_t n = start_num; n < start_num + number &&
                  n < BCM2835_OTP_CUSTOMER_OTP_LEN; n++) {
                 otp_row = ldl_le_phys(&s->dma_as,
                                       value + 20 + ((n - start_num) << 2));
@@ -383,7 +382,7 @@ static void bcm2835_property_mbox_push(BCM2835PropertyState 
*s, uint32_t value)
 
             resplen = 8 + 4 * number;
 
-            for (n = start_num; n < start_num + number &&
+            for (uint32_t n = start_num; n < start_num + number &&
                  n < BCM2835_OTP_PRIVATE_KEY_LEN; n++) {
                 otp_row = bcm2835_otp_get_row(s->otp,
                                               BCM2835_OTP_PRIVATE_KEY + n);
@@ -403,7 +402,7 @@ static void bcm2835_property_mbox_push(BCM2835PropertyState 
*s, uint32_t value)
                 break;
             }
 
-            for (n = start_num; n < start_num + number &&
+            for (uint32_t n = start_num; n < start_num + number &&
                  n < BCM2835_OTP_PRIVATE_KEY_LEN; n++) {
                 otp_row = ldl_le_phys(&s->dma_as,
                                       value + 20 + ((n - start_num) << 2));
-- 
2.34.1




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]