[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH RFC 4/8] target/riscv: Support generic CSR indirect access
From: |
Atish Kumar Patra |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH RFC 4/8] target/riscv: Support generic CSR indirect access |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Jul 2024 16:31:14 -0700 |
On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 4:49 AM Jason Chien <jason.chien@sifive.com> wrote:
>
> The predicate functions should contain the access control by the
> state-enable CSRs, which is not presented in this patch. Do you mind
> that I take over the indirect CSR access control part? The Signed-off-by
> will be kept.
>
> Atish Patra 於 2024/2/17 上午 08:01 寫道:
> > From: Kaiwen Xue <kaiwenx@rivosinc.com>
> >
> > This adds the indirect access registers required by sscsrind/smcsrind
> > and the operations on them. Note that xiselect and xireg are used for
> > both AIA and sxcsrind, and the behavior of accessing them depends on
> > whether each extension is enabled and the value stored in xiselect.
> >
> > Co-developed-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Kaiwen Xue <kaiwenx@rivosinc.com>
> > ---
> > target/riscv/cpu_bits.h | 28 +++++++-
> > target/riscv/csr.c | 146 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 2 files changed, 169 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h b/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h
> > index 0ee91e502e8f..3a66f83009b5 100644
> > --- a/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h
> > +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h
> > @@ -176,6 +176,13 @@
> > #define CSR_MISELECT 0x350
> > #define CSR_MIREG 0x351
> >
> > +/* Machine Indirect Register Alias */
> > +#define CSR_MIREG2 0x352
> > +#define CSR_MIREG3 0x353
> > +#define CSR_MIREG4 0x355
> > +#define CSR_MIREG5 0x356
> > +#define CSR_MIREG6 0x357
> > +
> > /* Machine-Level Interrupts (AIA) */
> > #define CSR_MTOPEI 0x35c
> > #define CSR_MTOPI 0xfb0
> > @@ -225,6 +232,13 @@
> > #define CSR_SISELECT 0x150
> > #define CSR_SIREG 0x151
> >
> > +/* Supervisor Indirect Register Alias */
> > +#define CSR_SIREG2 0x152
> > +#define CSR_SIREG3 0x153
> > +#define CSR_SIREG4 0x155
> > +#define CSR_SIREG5 0x156
> > +#define CSR_SIREG6 0x157
> > +
> > /* Supervisor-Level Interrupts (AIA) */
> > #define CSR_STOPEI 0x15c
> > #define CSR_STOPI 0xdb0
> > @@ -291,6 +305,13 @@
> > #define CSR_VSISELECT 0x250
> > #define CSR_VSIREG 0x251
> >
> > +/* Virtual Supervisor Indirect Alias */
> > +#define CSR_VSIREG2 0x252
> > +#define CSR_VSIREG3 0x253
> > +#define CSR_VSIREG4 0x255
> > +#define CSR_VSIREG5 0x256
> > +#define CSR_VSIREG6 0x257
> > +
> > /* VS-Level Interrupts (H-extension with AIA) */
> > #define CSR_VSTOPEI 0x25c
> > #define CSR_VSTOPI 0xeb0
> > @@ -847,10 +868,13 @@ typedef enum RISCVException {
> > #define ISELECT_IMSIC_EIE63 0xff
> > #define ISELECT_IMSIC_FIRST ISELECT_IMSIC_EIDELIVERY
> > #define ISELECT_IMSIC_LAST ISELECT_IMSIC_EIE63
> > -#define ISELECT_MASK 0x1ff
> > +#define ISELECT_MASK_AIA 0x1ff
> > +
> > +/* MISELECT, SISELECT, and VSISELECT bits (AIA) */
> > +#define ISELECT_MASK_SXCSRIND 0xfff
> Could you rename ISELECT_MASK_SXCSRIND to ISELECT_MASK_CSRIND to keep
> the naming consistency with ISELECT_MASK_AIA?
> >
> > /* Dummy [M|S|VS]ISELECT value for emulating [M|S|VS]TOPEI CSRs */
> > -#define ISELECT_IMSIC_TOPEI (ISELECT_MASK + 1)
> > +#define ISELECT_IMSIC_TOPEI (ISELECT_MASK_AIA + 1)
> >
> > /* IMSIC bits (AIA) */
> > #define IMSIC_TOPEI_IID_SHIFT 16
> > diff --git a/target/riscv/csr.c b/target/riscv/csr.c
> > index 89a1325a02a5..a1c10f1d010a 100644
> > --- a/target/riscv/csr.c
> > +++ b/target/riscv/csr.c
> > @@ -287,6 +287,17 @@ static int aia_any32(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno)
> > return any32(env, csrno);
> > }
> >
> > +static RISCVException sxcsrind_any(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno)
> Could you rename sxcsrind_any() to csrind_any() to keep naming
> consistency with aia_any()?
> > +{
> > + RISCVCPU *cpu = env_archcpu(env);
> > +
> > + if (!cpu->cfg.ext_smcsrind) {
> > + return RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return RISCV_EXCP_NONE;
> > +}
> > +
> > static int sxcsrind_or_aia_any(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno)
> > {
> > if (!riscv_cpu_cfg(env)->ext_smaia &&
> > !riscv_cpu_cfg(env)->ext_smcsrind) {
> > @@ -355,6 +366,17 @@ static int aia_smode32(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno)
> > return smode32(env, csrno);
> > }
> >
> > +static RISCVException sxcsrind_smode(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno)
> Could you rename sxcsrind_smode() to csrind_smode() to keep naming
> consistency with aia_smode()?
> > +{
> > + RISCVCPU *cpu = env_archcpu(env);
> > +
> > + if (!cpu->cfg.ext_sscsrind) {
> S-mode CSRs are defined in Smcsrind as well. If both Smcsrind and
> Sscsrind are disabled, return RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST.
> > + return RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST;
> > + }
> > +
> A virtual instruction exception should be raised here for attempts from
> VU-mode to access siselect or sireg*.
That should be covered in riscv_csrrw_check.
> > + return smode(env, csrno);
> > +}
> > +
> > static int sxcsrind_or_aia_smode(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno)
> > {
> > if (!riscv_cpu_cfg(env)->ext_ssaia &&
> > !riscv_cpu_cfg(env)->ext_sscsrind) {
> > @@ -383,6 +405,17 @@ static RISCVException hmode32(CPURISCVState *env, int
> > csrno)
> >
> > }
> >
> > +static RISCVException sxcsrind_hmode(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno)
> Could you rename sxcsrind_hmode() to csrind_hmode() to keep naming
> consistency with aia_hmode()?
> > +{
> > + RISCVCPU *cpu = env_archcpu(env);
> > +
> > + if (!cpu->cfg.ext_sscsrind) {
> VS-mode CSRs are defined in Smcsrind as well. If both Smcsrind and
> Sscsrind are disabled, return RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST.
> > + return RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return hmode(env, csrno);
> > +}
> > +
> > static int sxcsrind_or_aia_hmode(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno)
> > {
> > if (!riscv_cpu_cfg(env)->ext_ssaia &&
> > !riscv_cpu_cfg(env)->ext_sscsrind) {
> > @@ -1926,7 +1959,12 @@ static int rmw_xiselect(CPURISCVState *env, int
> > csrno, target_ulong *val,
> > *val = *iselect;
> > }
> >
> > - wr_mask &= ISELECT_MASK;
> > + if (riscv_cpu_cfg(env)->ext_smcsrind ||
> > riscv_cpu_cfg(env)->ext_sscsrind) {
> > + wr_mask &= ISELECT_MASK_SXCSRIND;
> > + } else {
> > + wr_mask &= ISELECT_MASK_AIA;
> > + }
> > +
> > if (wr_mask) {
> > *iselect = (*iselect & ~wr_mask) | (new_val & wr_mask);
> > }
> > @@ -2065,6 +2103,59 @@ done:
> > return RISCV_EXCP_NONE;
> > }
> >
> > +/*
> > + * rmw_xireg_sxcsrind: Perform indirect access to xireg and xireg2-xireg6
> > + *
> > + * Perform indirect access to xireg and xireg2-xireg6.
> > + * This is a generic interface for all xireg CSRs. Apart from AIA, all
> > other
> > + * extension using sxcsrind should be implemented here.
> > + */
> > +static int rmw_xireg_sxcsrind(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
> > + target_ulong isel, target_ulong *val,
> > + target_ulong new_val, target_ulong wr_mask)
> Could you rename rmw_xireg_sxcsrind() to rmw_xireg_csrind() to keep the
> naming consistency with rmw_xireg_aia()?
> > +{
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int rmw_xiregi(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, target_ulong *val,
> > + target_ulong new_val, target_ulong wr_mask)
> > +{
> > + bool virt = false;
> > + int ret = -EINVAL;
> > + target_ulong isel;
> > +
> > + ret = smstateen_acc_ok(env, 0, SMSTATEEN0_SVSLCT);
> > + if (ret != RISCV_EXCP_NONE) {
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Translate CSR number for VS-mode */
> > + csrno = sxcsrind_xlate_vs_csrno(env, csrno);
> > +
> > + if (CSR_MIREG <= csrno && csrno <= CSR_MIREG6 &&
> > + csrno != CSR_MIREG4 - 1) {
> > + isel = env->miselect;
> > + } else if (CSR_SIREG <= csrno && csrno <= CSR_SIREG6 &&
> > + csrno != CSR_SIREG4 - 1) {
> > + isel = env->siselect;
> > + } else if (CSR_VSIREG <= csrno && csrno <= CSR_VSIREG6 &&
> > + csrno != CSR_VSIREG4 - 1) {
> > + isel = env->vsiselect;
> > + virt = true;
> > + } else {
> > + goto done;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return rmw_xireg_sxcsrind(env, csrno, isel, val, new_val, wr_mask);
> > +
> > +done:
> > + if (ret) {
> > + return (env->virt_enabled && virt) ?
> A virtual instruction exception is raised for attempts from VS-mode or
> VU-mode to directly access vsiselect or vsireg* in riscv_csrrw_check(),
> we don't need to check again here.
The check is for invalid value while accessing siregi variants.
Thanks for the review. Addressed all other suggestions in v2.
> > + RISCV_EXCP_VIRT_INSTRUCTION_FAULT : RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST;
> > + }
> > + return RISCV_EXCP_NONE;
> > +}
> > +
> > static int rmw_xireg(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, target_ulong *val,
> > target_ulong new_val, target_ulong wr_mask)
> > {
> > @@ -2096,8 +2187,21 @@ static int rmw_xireg(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
> > target_ulong *val,
> > goto done;
> > };
> >
> > + /*
> > + * Use the xiselect range to determine actual op on xireg.
> > + *
> > + * Since we only checked the existence of AIA or Indirect Access in the
> > + * predicate, we should check the existence of the exact extension when
> > + * we get to a specific range and return illegal instruction exception
> > even
> > + * in VS-mode.
> > + */
> > if (xiselect_aia_range(isel)) {
> > return rmw_xireg_aia(env, csrno, isel, val, new_val, wr_mask);
> > + } else if (riscv_cpu_cfg(env)->ext_smcsrind ||
> > + riscv_cpu_cfg(env)->ext_sscsrind) {
> > + return rmw_xireg_sxcsrind(env, csrno, isel, val, new_val, wr_mask);
> > + } else {
> > + return RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST;
> > }
> >
> > done:
> > @@ -2480,7 +2584,7 @@ static RISCVException write_mstateen0(CPURISCVState
> > *env, int csrno,
> > * TODO: Do we need to check ssaia as well ? Can we enable ssaia
> > without
> > * smaia ?
> > */
> > - if (riscv_cpu_cfg(env)->ext_smaia) {
> > + if (riscv_cpu_cfg(env)->ext_smaia || riscv_cpu_cfg(env)->ext_smcsrind)
> > {
> > wr_mask |= SMSTATEEN0_SVSLCT;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -2569,7 +2673,7 @@ static RISCVException write_hstateen0(CPURISCVState
> > *env, int csrno,
> > wr_mask |= SMSTATEEN0_FCSR;
> > }
> >
> > - if (riscv_cpu_cfg(env)->ext_ssaia) {
> > + if (riscv_cpu_cfg(env)->ext_ssaia || riscv_cpu_cfg(env)->ext_sscsrind)
> > {
> > wr_mask |= SMSTATEEN0_SVSLCT;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -4866,6 +4970,18 @@ riscv_csr_operations csr_ops[CSR_TABLE_SIZE] = {
> > [CSR_MIREG] = { "mireg", sxcsrind_or_aia_any, NULL, NULL,
> > rmw_xireg },
> >
> > + /* Machine Indirect Register Alias */
> > + [CSR_MIREG2] = { "mireg2", sxcsrind_any, NULL, NULL, rmw_xiregi,
> > + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 },
> > + [CSR_MIREG3] = { "mireg3", sxcsrind_any, NULL, NULL, rmw_xiregi,
> > + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 },
> > + [CSR_MIREG4] = { "mireg4", sxcsrind_any, NULL, NULL, rmw_xiregi,
> > + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 },
> > + [CSR_MIREG5] = { "mireg5", sxcsrind_any, NULL, NULL, rmw_xiregi,
> > + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 },
> > + [CSR_MIREG6] = { "mireg6", sxcsrind_any, NULL, NULL, rmw_xiregi,
> > + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 },
> > +
> > /* Machine-Level Interrupts (AIA) */
> > [CSR_MTOPEI] = { "mtopei", aia_any, NULL, NULL, rmw_xtopei },
> > [CSR_MTOPI] = { "mtopi", aia_any, read_mtopi },
> > @@ -4987,6 +5103,18 @@ riscv_csr_operations csr_ops[CSR_TABLE_SIZE] = {
> > [CSR_SIREG] = { "sireg", sxcsrind_or_aia_smode, NULL, NULL,
> > rmw_xireg
> > },
> >
> > + /* Supervisor Indirect Register Alias */
> > + [CSR_SIREG2] = { "sireg2", sxcsrind_smode, NULL, NULL, rmw_xiregi,
> > + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0
> > },
> > + [CSR_SIREG3] = { "sireg3", sxcsrind_smode, NULL, NULL, rmw_xiregi,
> > + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0
> > },
> > + [CSR_SIREG4] = { "sireg4", sxcsrind_smode, NULL, NULL, rmw_xiregi,
> > + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0
> > },
> > + [CSR_SIREG5] = { "sireg5", sxcsrind_smode, NULL, NULL, rmw_xiregi,
> > + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0
> > },
> > + [CSR_SIREG6] = { "sireg6", sxcsrind_smode, NULL, NULL, rmw_xiregi,
> > + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0
> > },
> > +
> > /* Supervisor-Level Interrupts (AIA) */
> > [CSR_STOPEI] = { "stopei", aia_smode, NULL, NULL, rmw_xtopei
> > },
> > [CSR_STOPI] = { "stopi", aia_smode, read_stopi },
> > @@ -5069,6 +5197,18 @@ riscv_csr_operations csr_ops[CSR_TABLE_SIZE] = {
> > [CSR_VSIREG] = { "vsireg", sxcsrind_or_aia_hmode, NULL,
> > NULL,
> > rmw_xireg
> > },
> >
> > + /* Virtual Supervisor Indirect Alias */
> > + [CSR_VSIREG2] = { "vsireg2", sxcsrind_hmode, NULL, NULL,
> > rmw_xiregi,
> > + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0
> > },
> > + [CSR_VSIREG3] = { "vsireg3", sxcsrind_hmode, NULL, NULL,
> > rmw_xiregi,
> > + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0
> > },
> > + [CSR_VSIREG4] = { "vsireg4", sxcsrind_hmode, NULL, NULL,
> > rmw_xiregi,
> > + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0
> > },
> > + [CSR_VSIREG5] = { "vsireg5", sxcsrind_hmode, NULL, NULL,
> > rmw_xiregi,
> > + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0
> > },
> > + [CSR_VSIREG6] = { "vsireg6", sxcsrind_hmode, NULL, NULL,
> > rmw_xiregi,
> > + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0
> > },
> > +
> > /* VS-Level Interrupts (H-extension with AIA) */
> > [CSR_VSTOPEI] = { "vstopei", aia_hmode, NULL, NULL,
> > rmw_xtopei },
> > [CSR_VSTOPI] = { "vstopi", aia_hmode, read_vstopi },
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [PATCH RFC 4/8] target/riscv: Support generic CSR indirect access,
Atish Kumar Patra <=