[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v5 09/16] tests/qtest: Update tests using PL011 UART
From: |
Peter Maydell |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v5 09/16] tests/qtest: Update tests using PL011 UART |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Jul 2024 16:47:11 +0100 |
On Fri, 19 Jul 2024 at 19:11, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> We weren't enabling the PL011 TX UART before using it
> on the raspi and virt machines. Update the ASM code
> prefixing:
>
> *UART_CTRL = UART_ENABLE | TX_ENABLE;
>
> to:
>
> while (true) {
> *UART_DATA = 'T';
> }
>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
> ---
> tests/qtest/boot-serial-test.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/qtest/boot-serial-test.c b/tests/qtest/boot-serial-test.c
> index 3b92fa5d50..5cb309ccf0 100644
> --- a/tests/qtest/boot-serial-test.c
> +++ b/tests/qtest/boot-serial-test.c
> @@ -70,18 +70,23 @@ static const uint8_t kernel_plml605[] = {
> };
>
> static const uint8_t bios_raspi2[] = {
> - 0x08, 0x30, 0x9f, 0xe5, /* ldr r3,[pc,#8] Get base
> */
> + 0x10, 0x30, 0x9f, 0xe5, /* ldr r3,[pc,#8] Get
> base */
The instruction bytes have changed but the disassembly comment has not...
> + 0x10, 0x20, 0x9f, 0xe5, /* ldr r2,[pc,#8] Get CR
> */
> + 0xb0, 0x23, 0xc3, 0xe1, /* strh r2,[r3, #48] Set CR
> */
> 0x54, 0x20, 0xa0, 0xe3, /* mov r2,#'T' */
> - 0x00, 0x20, 0xc3, 0xe5, /* strb r2,[r3] */
> - 0xfb, 0xff, 0xff, 0xea, /* b loop */
> + 0x00, 0x20, 0xc3, 0xe5, /* strb r2,[r3] loop: */
This placement of the "loop:" label is odd -- usually the label
goes before the instruction that a branch to the label will
start executing at.
> + 0xfd, 0xff, 0xff, 0xea, /* b loop */
Here also the bytes changed but not the disassembly. Since
'b' is a relative branch, why does the offset change?
> 0x00, 0x10, 0x20, 0x3f, /* 0x3f201000 = UART0 base addr
> */
> + 0x01, 0x01, 0x00, 0x00, /* 0x101 = CR UARTEN|TXE */
> };
>
> static const uint8_t kernel_aarch64[] = {
> - 0x81, 0x0a, 0x80, 0x52, /* mov w1, #0x54 */
> 0x02, 0x20, 0xa1, 0xd2, /* mov x2, #0x9000000 */
> + 0x21, 0x20, 0x80, 0x52, /* mov w1, #0x101 */
> + 0x41, 0x60, 0x00, 0x79, /* strh w1, [x2, #48] */
> + 0x81, 0x0a, 0x80, 0x52, /* mov w1, #0x54 */
> 0x41, 0x00, 0x00, 0x39, /* strb w1, [x2] */
> - 0xfd, 0xff, 0xff, 0x17, /* b -12 (loop) */
> + 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0x17, /* b -4 (loop) */
Another unexplained offset change here.
> };
>
> static const uint8_t kernel_nrf51[] = {
> --
> 2.41.0
thanks
-- PMM
- Re: [PATCH v5 02/16] hw/char/pl011: Remove unused 'readbuff' field, (continued)
- [PATCH v5 03/16] hw/char/pl011: Move pl011_put_fifo() earlier, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2024/07/19
- [PATCH v5 04/16] hw/char/pl011: Move pl011_loopback_enabled|tx() around, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2024/07/19
- [PATCH v5 05/16] hw/char/pl011: Split RX/TX path of pl011_reset_fifo(), Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2024/07/19
- [PATCH v5 06/16] hw/char/pl011: Extract pl011_write_txdata() from pl011_write(), Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2024/07/19
- [PATCH v5 07/16] hw/char/pl011: Extract pl011_read_rxdata() from pl011_read(), Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2024/07/19
- [PATCH v5 08/16] hw/char/pl011: Warn when using disabled transmitter, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2024/07/19
- [PATCH v5 09/16] tests/qtest: Update tests using PL011 UART, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2024/07/19
- Re: [PATCH v5 09/16] tests/qtest: Update tests using PL011 UART,
Peter Maydell <=
- [PATCH v5 10/16] hw/char/pl011: Check if receiver is enabled, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2024/07/19
- [PATCH v5 13/16] hw/char/pl011: Introduce pl011_xmit() as GSource, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2024/07/19
- [PATCH v5 11/16] hw/char/pl011: Rename RX FIFO methods, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2024/07/19
- [RFC PATCH v5 16/16] hw/char/pl011: Implement TX FIFO, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2024/07/19
- [PATCH v5 12/16] hw/char/pl011: Add transmit FIFO to PL011State, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2024/07/19
- [PATCH v5 15/16] hw/char/pl011: Drain TX FIFO when no backend connected, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2024/07/19
- [PATCH v5 14/16] hw/char/pl011: Consider TX FIFO overrun error, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2024/07/19