[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] acpi/ghes: Support GPIO error source.
From: |
Jonathan Cameron |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] acpi/ghes: Support GPIO error source. |
Date: |
Thu, 1 Aug 2024 15:32:57 +0100 |
On Thu, 1 Aug 2024 14:56:37 +0200
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> wrote:
> Em Tue, 30 Jul 2024 10:40:28 +0200
> Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> escreveu:
>
> > > diff --git a/include/hw/acpi/ghes.h b/include/hw/acpi/ghes.h
> > > index 674f6958e905..4f1ab1a73a06 100644
> > > --- a/include/hw/acpi/ghes.h
> > > +++ b/include/hw/acpi/ghes.h
> > > @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ enum AcpiGhesNotifyType {
> > >
> > > enum {
> > > ACPI_HEST_SRC_ID_SEA = 0,
> > > + ACPI_HEST_SRC_ID_GPIO = 1,
> > is it defined by some spec, or just a made up number?
>
> I don't know. Maybe Jonathan or Shiju knows better, as the original patch
> came from them, but I didn't find any parts of the ACPI spec defining the
> values for source ID.
>
> Checking at build_ghes_v2() implementation, this is used on two places:
>
> 1. as GHESv2 source ID:
> /*
> * Type:
> * Generic Hardware Error Source version 2(GHESv2 - Type 10)
> */
> build_append_int_noprefix(table_data, ACPI_GHES_SOURCE_GENERIC_ERROR_V2,
> 2);
> /* Source Id */
> build_append_int_noprefix(table_data, source_id, 2);
> /* Related Source Id */
> build_append_int_noprefix(table_data, 0xffff, 2);
>
> as an address offset:
>
> address_offset = table_data->len;
> /* Error Status Address */
> build_append_gas(table_data, AML_AS_SYSTEM_MEMORY, 0x40, 0,
> 4 /* QWord access */, 0);
> bios_linker_loader_add_pointer(linker, ACPI_BUILD_TABLE_FILE,
> address_offset + GAS_ADDR_OFFSET, sizeof(uint64_t),
> ACPI_GHES_ERRORS_FW_CFG_FILE, source_id * sizeof(uint64_t));
>
> So, if I had to guess, I'd say that this was made up, in a way that
> the size of the table will fit just two sources, starting from zero.
>
> So, I'll change the code to just:
>
> enum {
> ACPI_HEST_SRC_ID_SEA = 0,
> ACPI_HEST_SRC_ID_GPIO,
LGTM. The naming is perhaps not ideal but the scheme predates my
involvement so I'm not sure of the reasoning. Could change it
to QEMU_ACPI...
to make it really really clear these aren't an ACPI spec thing, but
may not be worth it.
J
> /* future ids go here */
> ACPI_HEST_SRC_ID_RESERVED,
> };
>
> To remove the false impression that this could be originated from the
> spec.
>
> Thanks,
> Mauro
>