[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v5 11/15] target/riscv: mmu changes for zicfiss shadow stack
From: |
Deepak Gupta |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v5 11/15] target/riscv: mmu changes for zicfiss shadow stack protection |
Date: |
Tue, 20 Aug 2024 11:55:05 -0700 |
On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 07:20:48PM +1000, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 8/20/24 17:35, Deepak Gupta wrote:
+ /* If shadow stack instruction initiated this access, treat it as store */
+ if (mmu_idx & MMU_IDX_SS_WRITE) {
+ access_type = MMU_DATA_STORE;
+ }
+
I think I forgot to address this. Do you still want me to fix this up like you
had suggested?
Yes, this still needs fixing.
IIRC, you mentioned to use TARGET_INSN_START_EXTRA_WORDS=2. Honestly I don't
know
what it means and how its used. Based on git grep and some readup,
are you expecting something
along the below lines?
"""
diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.h b/target/riscv/cpu.h
index fee31b8037..dfd2efa941 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu.h
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu.h
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ typedef struct CPUArchState CPURISCVState;
* RISC-V-specific extra insn start words:
* 1: Original instruction opcode
*/
-#define TARGET_INSN_START_EXTRA_WORDS 1
+#define TARGET_INSN_START_EXTRA_WORDS 2
#define RV(x) ((target_ulong)1 << (x - 'A'))
diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
index f74a1216b1..b266177e46 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
@@ -1271,6 +1271,11 @@ static void raise_mmu_exception(CPURISCVState
*env, target_ulong address,
{
CPUState *cs = env_cpu(env);
+ if (!pmp_violation &&
+ tcg_ctx->gen_insn_data[TARGET_INSN_START_EXTRA_WORDS-1] & 1) {
+ tcg_ctx->gen_insn_data[TARGET_INSN_START_EXTRA_WORDS-1] &= ~1;
+ access_type = MMU_DATA_STORE;
+ }
The first thing to understand is that the unwind data is stored by the
compiler and recovered by the unwinder.
The unwind data is exposed to the target via one of two methods:
(1) TCGCPUOps.restore_state_to_opc, i.e. riscv_restore_state_to_opc.
The data[] argument contains the extra words.
With this method, the extra words are restored to env and are
available in a later call to riscv_cpu_do_interrupt.
Compare env->bins from the first extra word, which is used exactly so.
This is probably the easiest and best option.
You'd promote LOAD* to STORE_AMO* while dispatching the interrupt.
(2) cpu_unwind_state_data()
With this method, you have immediate access to the extra words,
and don't need to store them anywhere else.
This is supposed to be used when we are *not* going to raise
an exception, merely look something up and continue execution.
Otherwise, we'd be performing the unwind operation twice,
and it's not cheap.
So, tcg_ctx->gen_insn_data[] is not something you'd ever touch,
and this is the wrong spot to do anything.
Thanks for more information and guiding me through this.
Not going to say that I still understand everything. But I looked
at one arm example. Before I do something more with it. I wanted to run
it by you.
Something on the below lines? I've one question as well for you in comment.
""""
diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.h b/target/riscv/cpu.h
index fee31b8037..b4e04fe849 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu.h
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu.h
@@ -46,8 +46,14 @@ typedef struct CPUArchState CPURISCVState;
/*
* RISC-V-specific extra insn start words:
* 1: Original instruction opcode
+ * 2: more information about instruction
*/
-#define TARGET_INSN_START_EXTRA_WORDS 1
+#define TARGET_INSN_START_EXTRA_WORDS 2
+
+/*
+ * b0: Whether a shadow stack operation/instruction or not.
+ */
+#define RISCV_INSN_START_WORD2_SS_OP 1
#define RV(x) ((target_ulong)1 << (x - 'A'))
@@ -226,6 +232,7 @@ struct CPUArchState {
bool elp;
/* shadow stack register for zicfiss extension */
target_ulong ssp;
+ bool ss_op;
/* sw check code for sw check exception */
target_ulong sw_check_code;
#ifdef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
index f74a1216b1..c28b13d42c 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
@@ -1777,6 +1777,10 @@ void riscv_cpu_do_interrupt(CPUState *cs)
target_ulong mtval2 = 0;
if (!async) {
+ /* shadow stack op, promote load page fault to store page fault */
+ if (env->ss_op && cause == RISCV_EXCP_LOAD_PAGE_FAULT) {
+ cause = RISCV_EXCP_STORE_PAGE_FAULT;
+ }
/* set tval to badaddr for traps with address information */
switch (cause) {
case RISCV_EXCP_SEMIHOST:
diff --git a/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c b/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c
index 4da26cb926..c0f21fe3db 100644
--- a/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c
+++ b/target/riscv/tcg/tcg-cpu.c
@@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ static void riscv_restore_state_to_opc(CPUState *cs,
env->pc = pc;
}
env->bins = data[1];
+ env->ss_op = data[2] & RISCV_INSN_START_WORD2_SS_OP;
}
static const TCGCPUOps riscv_tcg_ops = {
diff --git a/target/riscv/translate.c b/target/riscv/translate.c
index 580aa23c5b..6f952db823 100644
--- a/target/riscv/translate.c
+++ b/target/riscv/translate.c
@@ -1271,7 +1271,7 @@ static void riscv_tr_insn_start(DisasContextBase *dcbase,
CPUState *cpu)
pc_next &= ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK;
}
- tcg_gen_insn_start(pc_next, 0);
+ tcg_gen_insn_start(pc_next, 0, 0);
ctx->insn_start_updated = false;
}
@@ -1301,6 +1301,14 @@ static void riscv_tr_translate_insn(DisasContextBase *dcbase, CPUState *cpu)
ctx->base.is_jmp = DISAS_NORETURN;
}
+ /* shadow stack index means shadow stack instruction is translated */
+ if (ctx->mem_idx & MMU_IDX_SS_WRITE) {
+ /* Is this needed to set true? */
+ ctx->insn_start_updated = true;
+ tcg_set_insn_start_param(ctx->base.insn_start, 2,
+ RISCV_INSN_START_WORD2_SS_OP);
+ }
+
/* Only the first insn within a TB is allowed to cross a page boundary. */
if (ctx->base.is_jmp == DISAS_NEXT) {
if (ctx->itrigger || !is_same_page(&ctx->base, ctx->base.pc_next)) {
"""
r~
- [PATCH v5 14/15] disas/riscv: enable disassembly for zicfiss instructions, (continued)
- [PATCH v5 14/15] disas/riscv: enable disassembly for zicfiss instructions, Deepak Gupta, 2024/08/19
- [PATCH v5 06/15] target/riscv: zicfilp `lpad` impl and branch tracking, Deepak Gupta, 2024/08/19
- [PATCH v5 05/15] target/riscv: tracking indirect branches (fcfi) for zicfilp, Deepak Gupta, 2024/08/19
- [PATCH v5 10/15] target/riscv: tb flag for shadow stack instructions, Deepak Gupta, 2024/08/19
- [PATCH v5 15/15] disas/riscv: enable disassembly for compressed sspush/sspopchk, Deepak Gupta, 2024/08/19
- [PATCH v5 11/15] target/riscv: mmu changes for zicfiss shadow stack protection, Deepak Gupta, 2024/08/19
[PATCH v5 08/15] target/riscv: Add zicfiss extension, Deepak Gupta, 2024/08/19
[PATCH v5 12/15] target/riscv: implement zicfiss instructions, Deepak Gupta, 2024/08/19
[PATCH v5 09/15] target/riscv: introduce ssp and enabling controls for zicfiss, Deepak Gupta, 2024/08/19