[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: tests/avocado/riscv_opensbi.py does not work reliable
From: |
Alistair Francis |
Subject: |
Re: tests/avocado/riscv_opensbi.py does not work reliable |
Date: |
Tue, 3 Sep 2024 09:54:49 +1000 |
On Sat, Aug 31, 2024 at 1:35 AM Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi!
>
> While running a lot of tests (i.e. with a very loaded machine), I noticed
> that tests/avocado/riscv_opensbi.py is very flaky when the host machine is
> slow. I can easily reproduce the problem when running a big compilation job
> on all CPUs in the background and then run the riscv_opensbi.py avocado
> test. One of test_riscv32_spike, test_riscv64_spike, test_riscv32_sifive_u
> or test_riscv64_sifive_u is failing most of the time (but not the virt
> machine tests).
>
> Looking at the logs, it seems like the output sometimes stops somewhere at a
> random place before the boot process reaches the spot that the test is
> looking for. Looking at riscv_htif.c, there does not seem to be any flow
I suspect this is: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/2114
> control implemented here, so I guess at least the spike test is currently
> doomed to fail occasionally. Is there anything that can be done about this
> (e.g. is flow control somehow possible here or does the interface not allow
> this?)? Otherwise, I think it might be best to mark the spike and sifive_u
Patches have been sent to the list to hopefully fix this:
https://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2024-08/msg02743.html
Just waiting on reviews and then the merge window to open up again
Alistair
> tests with QEMU_TEST_FLAKY_TESTS here to make it clear that these tests are
> not reliable by default...?
>
> Thomas
>
>
- Re: tests/avocado/riscv_opensbi.py does not work reliable,
Alistair Francis <=