[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] next-kbd: convert to use qemu_input_handler_register(
From: |
Daniel P . Berrangé |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] next-kbd: convert to use qemu_input_handler_register() |
Date: |
Tue, 5 Nov 2024 09:04:29 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/2.2.13 (2024-03-09) |
On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 10:46:45PM +0000, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> On 04/11/2024 10:04, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 08:11:05PM +0000, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> > > Convert the next-kbd device from the legacy UI
> > > qemu_add_kbd_event_handler()
> > > function to use qemu_input_handler_register().
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk>
> > > ---
> > > hw/m68k/next-kbd.c | 166 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> > > 1 file changed, 111 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/hw/m68k/next-kbd.c b/hw/m68k/next-kbd.c
> > > index bc67810f31..283e98e9eb 100644
> > > --- a/hw/m68k/next-kbd.c
> > > +++ b/hw/m68k/next-kbd.c
> >
> >
> > > -static const unsigned char next_keycodes[128] = {
> > > - 0x00, 0x49, 0x4A, 0x4B, 0x4C, 0x4D, 0x50, 0x4F,
> > > - 0x4E, 0x1E, 0x1F, 0x20, 0x1D, 0x1C, 0x1B, 0x00,
> > > - 0x42, 0x43, 0x44, 0x45, 0x48, 0x47, 0x46, 0x06,
> > > - 0x07, 0x08, 0x00, 0x00, 0x2A, 0x00, 0x39, 0x3A,
> > > - 0x3B, 0x3C, 0x3D, 0x40, 0x3F, 0x3E, 0x2D, 0x2C,
> > > - 0x2B, 0x26, 0x00, 0x00, 0x31, 0x32, 0x33, 0x34,
> > > - 0x35, 0x37, 0x36, 0x2e, 0x2f, 0x30, 0x00, 0x00,
> > > - 0x00, 0x38, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00,
> > > - 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
> > > - 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
> > > - 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
> > > - 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
> >
> > The original code used '0' (or equivalently 0x00) to
> > indicate an unmapped scancode.
> >
> > > +#define NEXTKBD_NO_KEY 0xff
> >
> > Now you're using 0xff for missing mappings, but....
> >
> > > +
> > > +static const int qcode_to_nextkbd_keycode[] = {
> > > + /* Make sure future additions are automatically set to
> > > NEXTKBD_NO_KEY */
> > > + [0 ... Q_KEY_CODE__MAX] = NEXTKBD_NO_KEY,
> > > +
> > > + [Q_KEY_CODE_ESC] = 0x49,
> > > + [Q_KEY_CODE_1] = 0x4a,
> > > + [Q_KEY_CODE_2] = 0x4b,
> > > + [Q_KEY_CODE_3] = 0x4c,
> > > + [Q_KEY_CODE_4] = 0x4d,
> > > + [Q_KEY_CODE_5] = 0x50,
> > > + [Q_KEY_CODE_6] = 0x4f,
> > > + [Q_KEY_CODE_7] = 0x4e,
> > > + [Q_KEY_CODE_8] = 0x1e,
> > > + [Q_KEY_CODE_9] = 0x1f,
> > > + [Q_KEY_CODE_0] = 0x20,
> > > + [Q_KEY_CODE_MINUS] = 0x1d,
> > > + [Q_KEY_CODE_EQUAL] = 0x1c,
> > > + [Q_KEY_CODE_BACKSPACE] = 0x1b,
> > > + [Q_KEY_CODE_TAB] = 0x00,
> >
> > ...you've left 0x00 here and....
>
> Ooops yes that line can be removed.
>
> > > + [Q_KEY_CODE_Q] = 0x42,
> > > + [Q_KEY_CODE_W] = 0x43,
> > > + [Q_KEY_CODE_E] = 0x44,
> > > + [Q_KEY_CODE_R] = 0x45,
> > > + [Q_KEY_CODE_T] = 0x48,
> > > + [Q_KEY_CODE_Y] = 0x47,
> > > + [Q_KEY_CODE_U] = 0x46,
> > > + [Q_KEY_CODE_I] = 0x06,
> > > + [Q_KEY_CODE_O] = 0x07,
> > > + [Q_KEY_CODE_P] = 0x08,
> > > + [Q_KEY_CODE_RET] = 0x2a,
> > > + [Q_KEY_CODE_A] = 0x39,
> > > + [Q_KEY_CODE_S] = 0x3a,
> > > +
> > > + [Q_KEY_CODE_D] = 0x3b,
> > > + [Q_KEY_CODE_F] = 0x3c,
> > > + [Q_KEY_CODE_G] = 0x3d,
> > > + [Q_KEY_CODE_H] = 0x40,
> > > + [Q_KEY_CODE_J] = 0x3f,
> > > + [Q_KEY_CODE_K] = 0x3e,
> > > + [Q_KEY_CODE_L] = 0x2d,
> > > + [Q_KEY_CODE_SEMICOLON] = 0x2c,
> > > + [Q_KEY_CODE_APOSTROPHE] = 0x2b,
> > > + [Q_KEY_CODE_GRAVE_ACCENT] = 0x26,
> > > + [Q_KEY_CODE_SHIFT] = 0x00,
>
> This should be kept.
>
> > > + [Q_KEY_CODE_BACKSLASH] = 0x00,
> >
> > ...here, and ...
>
> Indeed, that line can also be removed.
>
> > > + [Q_KEY_CODE_Z] = 0x31,
> > > + [Q_KEY_CODE_X] = 0x32,
> > > + [Q_KEY_CODE_C] = 0x33,
> > > + [Q_KEY_CODE_V] = 0x34,
> > > +
> > > + [Q_KEY_CODE_B] = 0x35,
> > > + [Q_KEY_CODE_N] = 0x37,
> > > + [Q_KEY_CODE_M] = 0x36,
> > > + [Q_KEY_CODE_COMMA] = 0x2e,
> > > + [Q_KEY_CODE_DOT] = 0x2f,
> > > + [Q_KEY_CODE_SLASH] = 0x30,
> > > + [Q_KEY_CODE_SHIFT_R] = 0x00,
> >
> > ...here, which is surely not a correct conversion
>
> And this one should also be kept.
>
> The reason the two shift keys need to be kept as zero is so that they pass
> the "if (keycode == NEXTKBD_NO_KEY) { return; }" check in nextkbd_event().
IMHO that code sould just be flipped in ordering. Do the
special case
if (qcode == Q_KEY_CODE_SHIFT_R)
handling before even running the table lookup, since the
lookup is redundant, at which point you don't need to
have 2 distinct special values in the lookup table.
> > I'm going to see about adding NeXT scancodes to the giant
> > database of keycodes at:
> >
> > https://gitlab.com/keycodemap/keycodemapdb
> >
> > then we can auto-generate this table as we do for most of
> > the other QEMU keyboard drivers.
>
> That would be great! Is this also possible for the ADB keyboard device,
> since that is where I looked for inspiration when looking at next-kbd?
Yes, that's likely possible - we've already got data in keycodemapdb for
Apple ADB
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
[PATCH v3 2/2] ui/input-legacy.c: remove unused legacy qemu_add_kbd_event_handler() function, Mark Cave-Ayland, 2024/11/01