[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Supporting clang on windows
From: |
Peter Maydell |
Subject: |
Re: Supporting clang on windows |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Nov 2024 17:05:11 +0000 |
On Mon, 25 Nov 2024 at 16:48, Pierrick Bouvier
<pierrick.bouvier@linaro.org> wrote:
> Before sending the a series removing gcc_struct and editing the
> documentation, do we all agree here it's the right move forward?
> If yes, should we apply this to 9.2 release?
I would prefer not to put it into the 9.2 release -- it's one
of those "small change with global effects" which it's hard to be
sure don't have unexpected consequences[*], this isn't a
regression, and we're already some way into the freeze-and-rc
process.
[*] though in this case the stuff you've done with comparing
binaries is great and very reassuring
thanks
-- PMM
- Supporting clang on windows, Pierrick Bouvier, 2024/11/23
- Re: Supporting clang on windows, Paolo Bonzini, 2024/11/24
- Re: Supporting clang on windows, Pierrick Bouvier, 2024/11/24
- Re: Supporting clang on windows, Paolo Bonzini, 2024/11/25
- Re: Supporting clang on windows, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2024/11/25
- Re: Supporting clang on windows, Paolo Bonzini, 2024/11/25
- Re: Supporting clang on windows, Peter Maydell, 2024/11/25
- Re: Supporting clang on windows, Thomas Huth, 2024/11/25
- Re: Supporting clang on windows, Pierrick Bouvier, 2024/11/25
- Re: Supporting clang on windows,
Peter Maydell <=
- Re: Supporting clang on windows, Pierrick Bouvier, 2024/11/25
- Re: Supporting clang on windows, Pierrick Bouvier, 2024/11/26
- Re: Supporting clang on windows, Pierrick Bouvier, 2024/11/25
- Re: Supporting clang on windows, Thomas Huth, 2024/11/25
Re: Supporting clang on windows, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2024/11/24
Re: Supporting clang on windows, Richard Henderson, 2024/11/25