[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] binfmt: Don't consider riscv{32,64} part of the same family
From: |
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] binfmt: Don't consider riscv{32,64} part of the same family |
Date: |
Tue, 3 Dec 2024 10:59:24 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird |
Hi Andrea,
On 3/12/24 10:47, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
Currently the script won't generate a configuration file that
sets up qemu-user-riscv32 on riscv64, likely under the
assumption that 64-bit RISC-V machines can natively run 32-bit
I'm confused by the "machines" description used for user emulation.
RISC-V code.
However this functionality, while theoretically possible, in
practice is missing from most commonly available RISC-V hardware
and not enabled at the distro level. So qemu-user-riscv32 really
is the only option to run riscv32 binaries on riscv64.
We have definitions such ELF_ARCH/ELF_PLATFORM/ELF_MACHINE to
parse ELF header and select the best CPU / flags. Maybe RISC-V
lacks them?
BTW we should expose that for linux-user as target_arch_elf.h,
like bsd-user does, that would reduce all these #ifdef'ry in
linux-user/elfload.c...
Make riscv32 and riscv64 each its own family, so that the
configuration file we need to make 32-on-64 userspace emulation
work gets generated.
Does this patch aim for 9.2? Otherwise FYI I'm working on unifying
32/64-bit targets, maybe for 10.0...
Link: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/qemu/pull-request/72
Thanks: David Abdurachmanov <davidlt@rivosinc.com>
Thanks: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com>
---
scripts/qemu-binfmt-conf.sh | 7 ++-----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/scripts/qemu-binfmt-conf.sh b/scripts/qemu-binfmt-conf.sh
index 6ef9f118d9..e38b767c24 100755
--- a/scripts/qemu-binfmt-conf.sh
+++ b/scripts/qemu-binfmt-conf.sh
@@ -110,11 +110,11 @@ hppa_family=hppa
riscv32_magic='\x7fELF\x01\x01\x01\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x02\x00\xf3\x00'
riscv32_mask='\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\x00\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xfe\xff\xff\xff'
-riscv32_family=riscv
+riscv32_family=riscv32
riscv64_magic='\x7fELF\x02\x01\x01\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x02\x00\xf3\x00'
riscv64_mask='\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\x00\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xfe\xff\xff\xff'
-riscv64_family=riscv
+riscv64_family=riscv64
xtensa_magic='\x7fELF\x01\x01\x01\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x02\x00\x5e\x00'
xtensa_mask='\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\x00\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xff\xfe\xff\xff\xff'
@@ -168,9 +168,6 @@ qemu_get_family() {
sparc*)
echo "sparc"
;;
- riscv*)
- echo "riscv"
- ;;
loongarch*)
echo "loongarch"
;;
- [PATCH] binfmt: Don't consider riscv{32,64} part of the same family, Andrea Bolognani, 2024/12/03
- Re: [PATCH] binfmt: Don't consider riscv{32,64} part of the same family,
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <=
- Re: [PATCH] binfmt: Don't consider riscv{32, 64} part of the same family, Andrea Bolognani, 2024/12/03
- Re: [PATCH] binfmt: Don't consider riscv{32,64} part of the same family, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2024/12/03
- Re: [PATCH] binfmt: Don't consider riscv{32, 64} part of the same family, Peter Maydell, 2024/12/03
- Re: [PATCH] binfmt: Don't consider riscv{32,64} part of the same family, Richard Henderson, 2024/12/03
- Re: [PATCH] binfmt: Don't consider riscv{32,64} part of the same family, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2024/12/04
- Re: [PATCH] binfmt: Don't consider riscv{32,64} part of the same family, Laurent Vivier, 2024/12/05
Re: [PATCH] binfmt: Don't consider riscv{32,64} part of the same family, Laurent Vivier, 2024/12/04