[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v3 00/24] Multifd π device state transfer support with VFIO c
From: |
CΓ©dric Le Goater |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v3 00/24] Multifd π device state transfer support with VFIO consumer |
Date: |
Fri, 6 Dec 2024 11:24:04 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird |
Hello !
[ ... ]
Did you test also with commit 5504a8126115 and relevant patches reverted,
per mentioned above [1]? Or vanilla master branch?
I am on master and I didn't revert the "Dynamic sized kvm memslots array"
series, which we know has benefits for other VM configs and workloads.
For testing purposing, we could add a toggle defining a constant number of
memslots maybe ? and 0 would mean grow-on-demand ?
I wonder whether it shows the same regression in your setup.
I didn't look at performance yet and downtime with mlx5 VFs was not a
big issue either. So I am expecting QE to share test results with vGPUs
under load.
Thanks,
C.
- Re: [PATCH v3 00/24] Multifd π device state transfer support with VFIO consumer, Peter Xu, 2024/12/04
- Re: [PATCH v3 00/24] Multifd π device state transfer support with VFIO consumer, Maciej S. Szmigiero, 2024/12/06
- Re: [PATCH v3 00/24] Multifd π device state transfer support with VFIO consumer, Peter Xu, 2024/12/06
- Re: [PATCH v3 00/24] Multifd π device state transfer support with VFIO consumer, Maciej S. Szmigiero, 2024/12/10
- Re: [PATCH v3 00/24] Multifd π device state transfer support with VFIO consumer, Peter Xu, 2024/12/12
- Re: [PATCH v3 00/24] Multifd π device state transfer support with VFIO consumer, Yanghang Liu, 2024/12/19
- Re: [PATCH v3 00/24] Multifd π device state transfer support with VFIO consumer, CΓ©dric Le Goater, 2024/12/19
- Re: [PATCH v3 00/24] Multifd π device state transfer support with VFIO consumer, Yanghang Liu, 2024/12/19