qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] tests/tcg: Do not use inttypes.h in multiarch/system/memory.


From: Ilya Leoshkevich
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tests/tcg: Do not use inttypes.h in multiarch/system/memory.c
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 12:26:27 +0100
User-agent: Evolution 3.52.4 (3.52.4-2.fc40)

On Mon, 2024-11-04 at 11:34 +0000, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 10/29/24 23:29, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> > On Thu, 2024-10-10 at 11:20 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > > On 10/10/24 10:58, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> > > > make check-tcg fails on Fedora with the following error
> > > > message:
> > > > 
> > > >       alpha-linux-gnu-gcc [...]
> > > > qemu/tests/tcg/multiarch/system/memory.c -o memory [...]
> > > >       qemu/tests/tcg/multiarch/system/memory.c:17:10: fatal
> > > > error:
> > > > inttypes.h: No such file or directory
> > > >          17 | #include <inttypes.h>
> > > >             |          ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > >       compilation terminated.
> > > > 
> > > > The reason is that Fedora has cross-compilers, but no cross-
> > > > glibc
> > > > headers. Fix by hardcoding the format specifiers and dropping
> > > > the
> > > > include.
> > > > 
> > > > An alternative fix would be to introduce a configure check for
> > > > inttypes.h. But this would make it impossible to use Fedora
> > > > cross-compilers for softmmu tests, which used to work so far.
> > > > 
> > > > Fixes: ecbcc9ead2f8 ("tests/tcg: add a system test to check
> > > > memory
> > > > instrumentation")
> > > > Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> > 
> > [...]
> > 
> > Thanks for the review!
> > 
> > Could someone please pick this one and also [1] up?
> > Both patches are aimed at improving the situation with the test
> > builds.
> > 
> > [1]
> > https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20241023131250.48510-1-iii@linux.ibm.com/
> 
> Queued, thanks.
> 
> r~

Hi Richard,

I noticed that this patch doesn't seem to be in master yet. Could it be
that it was overlooked, or is there some issue with it that I missed?

Best regards,
Ilya



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]