qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 06/24] hw/ppc: Only register spapr_nvdimm_properties if CONFI


From: Richard Henderson
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/24] hw/ppc: Only register spapr_nvdimm_properties if CONFIG_LIBPMEM
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 07:53:40 -0600
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

On 12/16/24 05:36, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
On Sun, 15 Dec 2024, Richard Henderson wrote:
Do not register an empty set of properties.

Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
---
hw/ppc/spapr_nvdimm.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_nvdimm.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_nvdimm.c
index 2ef6f29f3d..6f875d73b2 100644
--- a/hw/ppc/spapr_nvdimm.c
+++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_nvdimm.c
@@ -884,22 +884,22 @@ static void spapr_nvdimm_unrealize(NVDIMMDevice *dimm)
    vmstate_unregister(NULL, &vmstate_spapr_nvdimm_states, dimm);
}

-static const Property spapr_nvdimm_properties[] = {
#ifdef CONFIG_LIBPMEM
+static const Property spapr_nvdimm_properties[] = {
    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("pmem-override", SpaprNVDIMMDevice, pmem_override, false),
-#endif
-    DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),

Is it too early to remove END_OF_LIST in this patch?

Yes.  I thought I'd fixed this when shuffling the patches around.
Ho hum.


r~



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]