Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v4 0/8] spapr: bootindex support

[Alexey Kardashevskiy]

On 01/22/2014 09:16 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 22/01/2014 05:19, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
>> On 12/11/2013 09:22 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>> With the great help from Paolo, I am presenting yet another try of
>>> bootindex
>>> support on sPAPR, this time with some QOM fixes. Details are in the
>>> commit messages.
>>> Please, comment. Thanks.
>>>
>>> Alexey Kardashevskiy (5):
>>>   boot: extend get_boot_devices_list() to ignore suffixes
>>>   spapr-llan: add to boot device list
>>>   spapr-vio: fix firmware names
>>>   qdev: introduce FWPathProvider interface
>>>   spapr: define interface to fix device pathname
>>>
>>> Hervé Poussineau (1):
>>>   qom: detect bad reentrance during object_class_foreach
>>>
>>> Paolo Bonzini (2):
>>>   qom: do not register interface "types" in the type table
>>>   vl: allow customizing the class of /machine
>>>
>>>  hw/core/Makefile.objs         |  1 +
>>>  hw/core/fw-path-provider.c    | 34 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>  hw/core/qdev.c                | 18 +++++++++-
>>>  hw/net/spapr_llan.c           |  3 ++
>>>  hw/nvram/fw_cfg.c             |  2 +-
>>>  hw/ppc/spapr.c                | 80
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>  hw/ppc/spapr_vio.c            |  2 ++
>>>  include/hw/boards.h           |  1 +
>>>  include/hw/fw-path-provider.h | 31 +++++++++++++++++
>>>  include/sysemu/sysemu.h       |  2 +-
>>>  qom/object.c                  | 17 +++++++--
>>>  tests/Makefile                |  1 +
>>>  vl.c                          | 11 ++++--
>>>  13 files changed, 193 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>>  create mode 100644 hw/core/fw-path-provider.c
>>>  create mode 100644 include/hw/fw-path-provider.h
>>
>>
>> Some bits from this went upstream but none of them is mine. What am I
>> missing here? Thanks.
> 
> No idea, perhaps it's because the same patches were present in multiple
> series?  Alex, are you picking up what's left?
> 
> Paolo


In the "Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] qom: detect bad reentrance during
object_class_foreach" thread Andreas told me:

===
Be patient.

1) I am on holidays and thus not available full-time.
2) Alex has already sent out his ppc PULL, so no urgency.
3) As mentioned, I plan to post QOM and CPU PULLs later today.

And no, you don't need to repost after parts of your series get applied
pretty much unmodified.
===

So I wonder if I am not just patient enough :)



-- 
Alexey