[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 4/4] spapr_pci: populate ibm, loc-
From: |
Nikunj A Dadhania |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 4/4] spapr_pci: populate ibm, loc-code |
Date: |
Tue, 19 May 2015 13:44:04 +0530 |
User-agent: |
Notmuch/0.17+27~gae47d61 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) |
Alexey Kardashevskiy <address@hidden> writes:
> On 05/19/2015 04:56 PM, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
>> Alexey Kardashevskiy <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> On 05/19/2015 02:51 PM, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
>>>> Alexey Kardashevskiy <address@hidden> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> On 05/07/2015 05:21 PM, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
>>>>>> Each hardware instance has a platform unique location code. The OF
>>>>>> device tree that describes a part of a hardware entity must include
>>>>>> the “ibm,loc-code” property with a value that represents the location
>>>>>> code for that hardware entity.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Populate ibm,loc-code.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1) PCI passthru devices need to identify with its own ibm,loc-code
>>>>>> available on the host. In failure cases use:
>>>>>> vfio_<name>:<phb-index>:<slot>.<fn>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2) Emulated devices encode as following:
>>>>>> qemu_<name>:<phb-index>:<slot>.<fn>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Nikunj A Dadhania <address@hidden>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c | 98
>>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c
>>>>>> index 12f1b9c..d901007 100644
>>>>>> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c
>>>>>> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c
>>>>>> @@ -769,6 +769,81 @@ static uint32_t
>>>>>> spapr_phb_get_pci_drc_index(sPAPRPHBState *phb,
>>>>>> return drck->get_index(drc);
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +static bool spapr_phb_vfio_get_devspec_value(PCIDevice *pdev, char
>>>>>> **value)
>>>>>
>>>>> Does it have to be a separate function?
>>>>
>>>> For better readability, i would prefer it this way.
>>>
>>> This is why I asked - I was having problems understanding the difference
>>> between these two having 6 words names ;) Do not insist though.
>>>
>>
>> This is what I have now, simplified:
>>
>> +static char *spapr_phb_vfio_get_loc_code(sPAPRPHBState *sphb, PCIDevice
>> *pdev)
>> +{
>> + char *path = NULL, *buf = NULL;
>> + char *host = NULL;
>> +
>> + /* Get the PCI VFIO host id */
>> + host = object_property_get_str(OBJECT(pdev), "host", NULL);
>> + if (!host) {
>> + goto err_out;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Construct the path of the file that will give us the DT location */
>> + path = g_strdup_printf("/sys/bus/pci/devices/%s/devspec", host);
>> + g_free(host);
>> + if (path && !g_file_get_contents(path, &buf, NULL, NULL)) {
>> + goto err_out;
>> + }
>> + g_free(path);
>> +
>> + /* Construct and read from host device tree the loc-code */
>> + path = g_strdup_printf("/proc/device-tree%s/ibm,loc-code", buf);
>> + g_free(buf);
>> + if (path && !g_file_get_contents(path, &buf, NULL, NULL)) {
>> + goto err_out;
>> + }
>> + return buf;
>> +
>> +err_out:
>> + g_free(path);
>> + return NULL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static char *spapr_phb_get_loc_code(sPAPRPHBState *sphb, PCIDevice *pdev)
>> +{
>> + if (object_dynamic_cast(OBJECT(pdev), "vfio-pci")) {
>> + char *buf = spapr_phb_vfio_get_loc_code(sphb, pdev);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * In case of failures reading the loc-code, make it up
>> + * indicating a vfio device
>> + */
>> + if (!buf) {
>> + buf = g_strdup_printf("vfio_%s:%02d:%02d.%1d", pdev->name,
>> + sphb->index, PCI_SLOT(pdev->devfn),
>> + PCI_FUNC(pdev->devfn));
>> + }
>> + return buf;
>> + } else {
>> + return g_strdup_printf("qemu_%s:%02d:%02d.%1d", pdev->name,
>> + sphb->index, PCI_SLOT(pdev->devfn),
>> + PCI_FUNC(pdev->devfn));
>> + }
>> +}
>
>
> I'd do this but I do not insist :)
That is fine as well.
>
> static char *spapr_phb_get_loc_code(sPAPRPHBState *sphb, PCIDevice *pdev)
> {
> char *buf;
> char *devtype = "qemu";
>
> if (object_dynamic_cast(OBJECT(pdev), "vfio-pci")) {
> buf = spapr_phb_vfio_get_loc_code(sphb, pdev);
> if (buf) {
> return buf;
> }
> devtype = "vfio";
That has to be a snprintf.
> }
>
> /*
> * In case of failures reading the loc-code, make it up
> * indicating a vfio device
> */
> buf = g_strdup_printf("%s_%s:%02d:%02d.%1d",
> devtype, pdev->name,
> sphb->index, PCI_SLOT(pdev->devfn),
> PCI_FUNC(pdev->devfn));
> return buf;
> }
Regards
Nikunj
- [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v4 1/4] spapr_pci: encode missing 64-bit memory address space, (continued)
- [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v4 1/4] spapr_pci: encode missing 64-bit memory address space, Nikunj A Dadhania, 2015/05/07
- [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v4 2/4] spapr_pci: encode class code including Prog IF register, Nikunj A Dadhania, 2015/05/07
- [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v4 3/4] spapr_pci: enumerate and add PCI device tree, Nikunj A Dadhania, 2015/05/07
- [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v4 4/4] spapr_pci: populate ibm,loc-code, Nikunj A Dadhania, 2015/05/07
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v4 4/4] spapr_pci: populate ibm,loc-code, Alexey Kardashevskiy, 2015/05/08
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 4/4] spapr_pci: populate ibm, loc-code, Nikunj A Dadhania, 2015/05/19
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 4/4] spapr_pci: populate ibm, loc-code, Alexey Kardashevskiy, 2015/05/19
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 4/4] spapr_pci: populate ibm, loc-code, Nikunj A Dadhania, 2015/05/19
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 4/4] spapr_pci: populate ibm, loc-code, Nikunj A Dadhania, 2015/05/19
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 4/4] spapr_pci: populate ibm, loc-code, Alexey Kardashevskiy, 2015/05/19
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 4/4] spapr_pci: populate ibm, loc-code,
Nikunj A Dadhania <=
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 4/4] spapr_pci: populate ibm, loc-code, Alexey Kardashevskiy, 2015/05/19
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 4/4] spapr_pci: populate ibm, loc-code, Nikunj A Dadhania, 2015/05/19
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 4/4] spapr_pci: populate ibm, loc-code, Alexander Graf, 2015/05/19
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 4/4] spapr_pci: populate ibm, loc-code, Nikunj A Dadhania, 2015/05/19