Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 07/10] pseries: Clean up error handling in spapr_rtas_register()

[Thomas Huth]

On 20.01.2016 06:53, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 01/20/2016 03:53 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 01/19/2016 05:21 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>
>>>> You could drop the redundant () while touching this, as in:
>>>
>>>
>>> Seriously? Why? I personally find it really annoying (but I stay silent)
>>> when people omit braces in cases like this.
>>>
>>>
>>>> assert(token >= RTAS_TOKEN_BASE && token < RTAS_TOKEN_MAX);
>>
>> Because it's the prevailing style. I estimate that less than 10% of qemu
>> over-parenthesizes, mostly because && and || are well-known C operator
>> precedence:
>>
>> $ git grep ' && ' | wc
>>     6462   57034  482477
>> $ git grep ') && (' | wc
>>      578    6151   48655
>>
>> Of course, that's a rough estimate, as it has false positives on 'if
>> (foo() && (b || c))', and false negatives on conditionals where there is
>> a unary rather than binary operator on either side of &&; but I'm sure
>> you could write a Coccinelle script if you wanted more accurate counting.
>>
>> But you are equally right that as long as HACKING doesn't document it,
>> and checkpatch.pl doesn't flag it, then you can over-parenthesize binary
>> arguments to the short-circuiting operators to your aesthetic tastes.
> 
> C Operator Precedence is well-known and still confusing, I cannot get
> used to the fact that </>/==/etc have higher priority than &/&&/etc so
> not seeing braces in the cases like above makes me nervous. Yes, I am
> sort of retarded :(
> 
> So, we can keep doing this over-parenthesizing, good, thanks :)

For me, it's the other way round: If I notice too many parentheses while
reading source code, I have to start thinking - because I then assume
that there is something special with the statement so that the
parentheses are needed. If I then discover that it was just unnecessary
waste of time, I start complaining... So please try to get rid of your
parenthesitis, or you've got to live with my complaints ;-)

 Thomas