[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH v0 2/6] spapr: CPU core device
From: |
David Gibson |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH v0 2/6] spapr: CPU core device |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Feb 2016 13:57:44 +1100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) |
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 09:52:38PM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> Add sPAPR specific CPU core device that is based on generic CPU core device.
> Creating this core device will result in creation of all the CPU thread
> devices that are part of this core.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao <address@hidden>
Looks good overall, a few minor points below.
> ---
> hw/ppc/Makefile.objs | 1 +
> hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c | 210
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.h | 32 ++++++
> 3 files changed, 243 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c
> create mode 100644 include/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.h
>
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/Makefile.objs b/hw/ppc/Makefile.objs
> index c1ffc77..5cc6608 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/Makefile.objs
> +++ b/hw/ppc/Makefile.objs
> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ obj-y += ppc.o ppc_booke.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PSERIES) += spapr.o spapr_vio.o spapr_events.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PSERIES) += spapr_hcall.o spapr_iommu.o spapr_rtas.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PSERIES) += spapr_pci.o spapr_rtc.o spapr_drc.o spapr_rng.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_PSERIES) += spapr_cpu_core.o
> ifeq ($(CONFIG_PCI)$(CONFIG_PSERIES)$(CONFIG_LINUX), yyy)
> obj-y += spapr_pci_vfio.o
> endif
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..c44eb61
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,210 @@
> +/*
> + * sPAPR CPU core device, acts as container of CPU thread devices.
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2016 Bharata B Rao <address@hidden>
> + *
> + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2 or later.
> + * See the COPYING file in the top-level directory.
> + */
> +#include "hw/cpu/core.h"
> +#include "hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.h"
> +#include "hw/ppc/spapr.h"
> +#include "hw/boards.h"
> +#include "qemu/error-report.h"
> +#include "qapi/visitor.h"
> +#include <sysemu/cpus.h>
> +
> +static int spapr_cpu_core_realize_child(Object *child, void *opaque)
> +{
> + Error **errp = opaque;
> +
> + object_property_set_bool(child, true, "realized", errp);
> + if (*errp) {
> + return 1;
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void spapr_cpu_core_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
> +{
> + sPAPRCPUCore *core = SPAPR_CPU_CORE(OBJECT(dev));
> + sPAPRMachineState *spapr = SPAPR_MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());
> + Error *local_err = NULL;
> +
> + if (!core->nr_threads) {
> + error_setg(errp, "nr_threads property can't be 0");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (!core->cpu_model) {
> + error_setg(errp, "cpu_model property isn't set");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * TODO: If slot isn't specified, plug this core into
> + * an existing empty slot.
> + */
> + if (!core->slot) {
> + error_setg(errp, "slot property isn't set");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + object_property_set_link(OBJECT(spapr), OBJECT(core), core->slot,
> + &local_err);
> + if (local_err) {
> + error_propagate(errp, local_err);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + object_child_foreach(OBJECT(dev), spapr_cpu_core_realize_child, errp);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * This creates the CPU threads for a given @core.
> + *
> + * In order to create the threads, we need two inputs - number of
> + * threads and the cpu_model. These are set as core object's properties.
> + * When both of them become available/set, this routine will be called from
> + * either property's set handler to create the threads.
> + *
> + * TODO: Dependence of threads creation on two properties is resulting
> + * in this not-so-clean way of creating threads from either of the
> + * property setters based on the order in which they get set. Check if
> + * this can be handled in a better manner.
> + */
> +static void spapr_cpu_core_create_threads(sPAPRCPUCore *core, Error **errp)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < core->nr_threads; i++) {
> + char id[32];
> + char type[32];
> +
> + snprintf(type, sizeof(type), "%s-%s", core->cpu_model,
> + TYPE_POWERPC_CPU);
I think you want to use cpu_class_by_name() rather than explicitly
constructing the class name here.
> + object_initialize(&core->threads[i], sizeof(core->threads[i]), type);
> +
> + snprintf(id, sizeof(id), "thread[%d]", i);
> + object_property_add_child(OBJECT(core), id,
> OBJECT(&core->threads[i]),
> + errp);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static char *spapr_cpu_core_prop_get_slot(Object *obj, Error **errp)
> +{
> + sPAPRCPUCore *core = SPAPR_CPU_CORE(obj);
> +
> + return core->slot;
> +}
> +
> +static void spapr_cpu_core_prop_set_slot(Object *obj, const char *val,
> + Error **errp)
> +{
> + sPAPRCPUCore *core = SPAPR_CPU_CORE(obj);
> +
> + core->slot = g_strdup(val);
> +}
> +
> +static char *spapr_cpu_core_prop_get_cpu_model(Object *obj, Error **errp)
> +{
> + sPAPRCPUCore *core = SPAPR_CPU_CORE(obj);
> +
> + return core->cpu_model;
> +}
> +
> +static void spapr_cpu_core_prop_set_cpu_model(Object *obj, const char *val,
> + Error **errp)
> +{
> + sPAPRCPUCore *core = SPAPR_CPU_CORE(obj);
> + MachineState *machine = MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());
> +
> + /*
> + * cpu_model can't be different from what is specified with -cpu
> + */
> + if (strcmp(val, machine->cpu_model)) {
> + error_setg(errp, "cpu_model should be %s", machine->cpu_model);
> + return;
> + }
I'm not sure if this is the right place to test this. Possibly it
should be tested in the machine hotplug handler instead.
> + core->cpu_model = g_strdup(val);
> + if (core->nr_threads && core->cpu_model) {
> + spapr_cpu_core_create_threads(core, errp);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void spapr_cpu_core_prop_get_nr_threads(Object *obj, Visitor *v,
> + const char *name, void
> *opaque,
> + Error **errp)
> +{
> + sPAPRCPUCore *core = SPAPR_CPU_CORE(obj);
> + int64_t value = core->nr_threads;
> +
> + visit_type_int(v, name, &value, errp);
> +}
> +
> +static void spapr_cpu_core_prop_set_nr_threads(Object *obj, Visitor *v,
> + const char *name, void
> *opaque,
> + Error **errp)
> +{
> + sPAPRCPUCore *core = SPAPR_CPU_CORE(obj);
> + Error *local_err = NULL;
> + int64_t value;
> +
> + visit_type_int(v, name, &value, &local_err);
> + if (local_err) {
> + error_propagate(errp, local_err);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + /* Allow only homogeneous configuration */
> + if (value != smp_threads) {
> + error_setg(errp, "nr_threads should be %d", smp_threads);
> + return;
> + }
Likewise, not sure if this is the right place for this check.
> + core->nr_threads = value;
> + core->threads = g_malloc0(core->nr_threads * sizeof(PowerPCCPU));
> +
> + if (core->nr_threads && core->cpu_model) {
> + spapr_cpu_core_create_threads(core, errp);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void spapr_cpu_core_instance_init(Object *obj)
> +{
> + object_property_add(obj, "nr_threads", "int",
> + spapr_cpu_core_prop_get_nr_threads,
> + spapr_cpu_core_prop_set_nr_threads,
> + NULL, NULL, NULL);
> + object_property_add_str(obj, "cpu_model",
> + spapr_cpu_core_prop_get_cpu_model,
> + spapr_cpu_core_prop_set_cpu_model,
> + NULL);
> + object_property_add_str(obj, "slot",
> + spapr_cpu_core_prop_get_slot,
> + spapr_cpu_core_prop_set_slot,
> + NULL);
> +}
> +
> +static void spapr_cpu_core_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
> +{
> + DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(oc);
> +
> + dc->realize = spapr_cpu_core_realize;
> +}
> +
> +static const TypeInfo spapr_cpu_core_type_info = {
> + .name = TYPE_SPAPR_CPU_CORE,
> + .parent = TYPE_CPU_CORE,
> + .instance_init = spapr_cpu_core_instance_init,
> + .instance_size = sizeof(sPAPRCPUCore),
> + .class_init = spapr_cpu_core_class_init,
> +};
> +
> +static void spapr_cpu_core_register_types(void)
> +{
> + type_register_static(&spapr_cpu_core_type_info);
> +}
> +
> +type_init(spapr_cpu_core_register_types)
> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..ed9bc7f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
> +/*
> + * sPAPR CPU core device.
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2016 Bharata B Rao <address@hidden>
> + *
> + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2 or later.
> + * See the COPYING file in the top-level directory.
> + */
> +#ifndef HW_SPAPR_CPU_CORE_H
> +#define HW_SPAPR_CPU_CORE_H
> +
> +#include "hw/qdev.h"
> +#include "hw/cpu/core.h"
> +
> +#define TYPE_SPAPR_CPU_CORE "spapr-cpu-core"
> +#define SPAPR_CPU_CORE(obj) \
> + OBJECT_CHECK(sPAPRCPUCore, (obj), TYPE_SPAPR_CPU_CORE)
> +
> +typedef struct sPAPRCPUCore {
> + /*< private >*/
> + DeviceState parent_obj;
> +
> + /*< public >*/
> + int nr_threads;
> + char *cpu_model;
I think this might be better as an ObjectClass *, rather than a
string. It avoids strdup()ing above, and works a bit more nicely with
cpu_class_by_name().
> + char *slot;
> + PowerPCCPU *threads;
> +} sPAPRCPUCore;
> +
> +#define SPAPR_CPU_CORE_SLOT_PROP "slot"
> +
> +#endif
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- [Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH v0 0/6] Core based CPU hotplug for PowerPC sPAPR, Bharata B Rao, 2016/02/25
- [Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH v0 1/6] cpu: Abstract CPU core type, Bharata B Rao, 2016/02/25
- [Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH v0 2/6] spapr: CPU core device, Bharata B Rao, 2016/02/25
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH v0 2/6] spapr: CPU core device,
David Gibson <=
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH v0 2/6] spapr: CPU core device, Thomas Huth, 2016/02/26
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH v0 2/6] spapr: CPU core device, Michael Roth, 2016/02/26
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH v0 2/6] spapr: CPU core device, David Gibson, 2016/02/29
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH v0 2/6] spapr: CPU core device, Bharata B Rao, 2016/02/29
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH v0 2/6] spapr: CPU core device, Igor Mammedov, 2016/02/29
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH v0 2/6] spapr: CPU core device, Bharata B Rao, 2016/02/29
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH v0 2/6] spapr: CPU core device, Igor Mammedov, 2016/02/29
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH v0 2/6] spapr: CPU core device, David Gibson, 2016/02/29