[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH v0 3/6] spapr: Represent boot CPUs as spapr-cp
From: |
Bharata B Rao |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH v0 3/6] spapr: Represent boot CPUs as spapr-cpu-core devices |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Feb 2016 09:32:38 +0530 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 02:45:35PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 09:52:39PM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> > Initialize boot CPUs as spapr-cpu-core devices and create links from
> > machine object to these core devices. These links can be considered
> > as CPU slots in which core devices will get hot-plugged. spapr-cpu-core
> > device's slot property indicates the slot where it is plugged. Information
> > about all the CPU slots can be obtained by walking these links.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao <address@hidden>
> > ---
> > hw/ppc/spapr.c | 65
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > include/hw/ppc/spapr.h | 3 +++
> > 2 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> > index e214a34..1f0d232 100644
> > --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> > +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> > @@ -64,6 +64,7 @@
> >
> > #include "hw/compat.h"
> > #include "qemu-common.h"
> > +#include "hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.h"
> >
> > #include <libfdt.h>
> >
> > @@ -1720,6 +1721,21 @@ static void spapr_validate_node_memory(MachineState
> > *machine, Error **errp)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Check to see if core is being hot-plugged into an already populated
> > slot.
> > + */
> > +static void spapr_cpu_core_allow_set_link(Object *obj, const char *name,
> > + Object *val, Error **errp)
> > +{
> > + Object *core = object_property_get_link(qdev_get_machine(), name,
> > NULL);
> > +
> > + if (core) {
> > + char *path = object_get_canonical_path(core);
> > + error_setg(errp, "Slot %s already populated with %s", name, path);
> > + g_free(path);
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > /* pSeries LPAR / sPAPR hardware init */
> > static void ppc_spapr_init(MachineState *machine)
> > {
> > @@ -1728,7 +1744,6 @@ static void ppc_spapr_init(MachineState *machine)
> > const char *kernel_filename = machine->kernel_filename;
> > const char *kernel_cmdline = machine->kernel_cmdline;
> > const char *initrd_filename = machine->initrd_filename;
> > - PowerPCCPU *cpu;
> > PCIHostState *phb;
> > int i;
> > MemoryRegion *sysmem = get_system_memory();
> > @@ -1742,6 +1757,8 @@ static void ppc_spapr_init(MachineState *machine)
> > long load_limit, fw_size;
> > bool kernel_le = false;
> > char *filename;
> > + int spapr_cores = smp_cpus / smp_threads;
> > + int spapr_max_cores = max_cpus / smp_threads;
> >
> > msi_supported = true;
> >
> > @@ -1800,13 +1817,38 @@ static void ppc_spapr_init(MachineState *machine)
> > if (machine->cpu_model == NULL) {
> > machine->cpu_model = kvm_enabled() ? "host" : "POWER7";
> > }
> > - for (i = 0; i < smp_cpus; i++) {
> > - cpu = cpu_ppc_init(machine->cpu_model);
> > - if (cpu == NULL) {
> > - error_report("Unable to find PowerPC CPU definition");
> > - exit(1);
> > +
> > + spapr->cores = g_malloc0(spapr_max_cores * sizeof(Object));
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < spapr_max_cores; i++) {
> > + Object *spapr_cpu_core = object_new(TYPE_SPAPR_CPU_CORE);
>
> So.. if I understand correctly this will always construct maxcpus
> threads at startup. I's just that the ones beyond initial cpus won't
> be realized. Was that your intention? I thought the plan was to only
> construct the hotplugged cpus when they were hotplugged (in contrast
> to my earlier proposal).
Oops! The intention was to to create only cores for smp_cpus
and let device_add create the rest. Will fix.
>
> > + char name[32];
> > +
> > + object_property_set_str(spapr_cpu_core, machine->cpu_model,
> > "cpu_model",
> > + &error_fatal);
> > + object_property_set_int(spapr_cpu_core, smp_threads, "nr_threads",
> > + &error_fatal);
> > + /*
> > + * Create links from machine objects to all possible cores.
> > + */
> > + snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "%s[%d]",
> > SPAPR_MACHINE_CPU_CORE_PROP, i);
>
> Why do SPAPR_MACHINE_CPU_CORE_PROP and SPAPR_CPU_CORE_SLOT_PROP get
> #defines, but the other properties get bare strings? I find the bare
> strings are usually easier to follow.
Let me check the convention regarding properties and stick to the
common usage.
>
> > + object_property_add_link(OBJECT(spapr), name, TYPE_SPAPR_CPU_CORE,
> > + (Object **)&spapr->cores[i],
> > + spapr_cpu_core_allow_set_link, 0,
> > + &error_fatal);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Set the link from machine object to core object for all
> > + * boot time CPUs specified with -smp and realize them.
> > + * For rest of the hotpluggable cores this is happens from
> > + * the core hotplug/realization path.
> > + */
> > + if (i < spapr_cores) {
> > + object_property_set_str(spapr_cpu_core, name,
> > + SPAPR_CPU_CORE_SLOT_PROP,
> > &error_fatal);
> > + object_property_set_bool(spapr_cpu_core, true, "realized",
> > + &error_fatal);
> > }
> > - spapr_cpu_init(spapr, cpu, &error_fatal);
> > }
> >
> > if (kvm_enabled()) {
> > @@ -2209,6 +2251,7 @@ static void spapr_machine_device_plug(HotplugHandler
> > *hotplug_dev,
> > DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
> > {
> > sPAPRMachineClass *smc = SPAPR_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(qdev_get_machine());
> > + sPAPRMachineState *ms = SPAPR_MACHINE(hotplug_dev);
> >
> > if (object_dynamic_cast(OBJECT(dev), TYPE_PC_DIMM)) {
> > int node;
> > @@ -2245,6 +2288,11 @@ static void spapr_machine_device_plug(HotplugHandler
> > *hotplug_dev,
> > }
> >
> > spapr_memory_plug(hotplug_dev, dev, node, errp);
> > + } else if (object_dynamic_cast(OBJECT(dev), TYPE_CPU)) {
> > + CPUState *cs = CPU(dev);
> > + PowerPCCPU *cpu = POWERPC_CPU(cs);
> > +
> > + spapr_cpu_init(ms, cpu, errp);
>
> I tend to thin the spapr_cpu_init() should be done from the core's
> create_threads() function, but I'm willing to be persuaded otherwise.
In addition to core device, every cpu thread device will go through
->plug() invocation via its realization path. And spapr_cpu_init()
is needed for every CPU thread. Let me check if it is possible to
invoke this from core's routines.
Regards,
Bharata.