qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v4 03/20] ppc/pnv: add a core mask to PnvChip


From: David Gibson
Subject: Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v4 03/20] ppc/pnv: add a core mask to PnvChip
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 15:32:21 +1100
User-agent: Mutt/1.7.0 (2016-08-17)

On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 09:24:39AM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> This will be used to build real HW ids for the cores and enforce some
> limits on the available cores per chip.

Is there actually a practical reason to allow the user (or machine
type) to override the default core mask?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <address@hidden>

Apart from the above and one comment below,

Reviewed-by: David Gibson <address@hidden>

> ---
> 
>  Changes since v3 :
> 
>  - reworked pnv_chip_core_sanitize() to return errors and to check the
>    maximum of cores against the instance cores_mask
>   
>  Changes since v2 :
> 
>  - added POWER9 support
>  - removed cores_max 
>  - introduces a pnv_chip_core_sanitize() helper to check the core
>    ids_mask and the maximum number of cores
> 
>  hw/ppc/pnv.c         | 78 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  include/hw/ppc/pnv.h |  4 +++
>  2 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/pnv.c b/hw/ppc/pnv.c
> index 08f72dbdca97..fc930be94f53 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/pnv.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/pnv.c
> @@ -227,11 +227,44 @@ static void ppc_powernv_init(MachineState *machine)
>          snprintf(chip_name, sizeof(chip_name), "chip[%d]", CHIP_HWID(i));
>          object_property_add_child(OBJECT(pnv), chip_name, chip, 
> &error_fatal);
>          object_property_set_int(chip, CHIP_HWID(i), "chip-id", &error_fatal);
> +        object_property_set_int(chip, smp_cores, "nr-cores", &error_fatal);
> +        /*
> +         * We could customize cores_mask for the chip here. May be
> +         * using a powernv machine property, like 'num-chips'. Let the
> +         * chip choose the default for now.

I don't think you need any special mechanism for this.  If you just
remove this explicit assignment the chip default will apply, but the
user can alter it using -global.

> +         */
> +        object_property_set_int(chip, 0x0, "cores-mask", &error_fatal);
>          object_property_set_bool(chip, true, "realized", &error_fatal);
>      }
>      g_free(chip_typename);
>  }
>  
> +/* Allowed core identifiers on a POWER8 Processor Chip :
> + *
> + * <EX0 reserved>
> + *  EX1  - Venice only
> + *  EX2  - Venice only
> + *  EX3  - Venice only
> + *  EX4
> + *  EX5
> + *  EX6
> + * <EX7,8 reserved> <reserved>
> + *  EX9  - Venice only
> + *  EX10 - Venice only
> + *  EX11 - Venice only
> + *  EX12
> + *  EX13
> + *  EX14
> + * <EX15 reserved>
> + */
> +#define POWER8E_CORE_MASK  (0x7070ull)
> +#define POWER8_CORE_MASK   (0x7e7eull)
> +
> +/*
> + * POWER9 has 24 cores, ids starting at 0x20
> + */
> +#define POWER9_CORE_MASK   (0xffffff00000000ull)
> +
>  static void pnv_chip_power8e_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
>  {
>      DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(klass);
> @@ -240,6 +273,7 @@ static void pnv_chip_power8e_class_init(ObjectClass 
> *klass, void *data)
>      k->cpu_model = "POWER8E";
>      k->chip_type = PNV_CHIP_POWER8E;
>      k->chip_cfam_id = 0x221ef04980000000ull;  /* P8 Murano DD2.1 */
> +    k->cores_mask = POWER8E_CORE_MASK;
>      dc->desc = "PowerNV Chip POWER8E";
>  }
>  
> @@ -258,6 +292,7 @@ static void pnv_chip_power8_class_init(ObjectClass 
> *klass, void *data)
>      k->cpu_model = "POWER8";
>      k->chip_type = PNV_CHIP_POWER8;
>      k->chip_cfam_id = 0x220ea04980000000ull; /* P8 Venice DD2.0 */
> +    k->cores_mask = POWER8_CORE_MASK;
>      dc->desc = "PowerNV Chip POWER8";
>  }
>  
> @@ -276,6 +311,7 @@ static void pnv_chip_power8nvl_class_init(ObjectClass 
> *klass, void *data)
>      k->cpu_model = "POWER8NVL";
>      k->chip_type = PNV_CHIP_POWER8NVL;
>      k->chip_cfam_id = 0x120d304980000000ull;  /* P8 Naples DD1.0 */
> +    k->cores_mask = POWER8_CORE_MASK;
>      dc->desc = "PowerNV Chip POWER8NVL";
>  }
>  
> @@ -294,6 +330,7 @@ static void pnv_chip_power9_class_init(ObjectClass 
> *klass, void *data)
>      k->cpu_model = "POWER9";
>      k->chip_type = PNV_CHIP_POWER9;
>      k->chip_cfam_id = 0x100d104980000000ull; /* P9 Nimbus DD1.0 */
> +    k->cores_mask = POWER9_CORE_MASK;
>      dc->desc = "PowerNV Chip POWER9";
>  }
>  
> @@ -304,13 +341,52 @@ static const TypeInfo pnv_chip_power9_info = {
>      .class_init    = pnv_chip_power9_class_init,
>  };
>  
> +static void pnv_chip_core_sanitize(PnvChip *chip, Error **errp)
> +{
> +    PnvChipClass *pcc = PNV_CHIP_GET_CLASS(chip);
> +    int cores_max;
> +
> +    /*
> +     * No custom mask for this chip, let's use the default one from *
> +     * the chip class
> +     */
> +    if (!chip->cores_mask) {
> +        chip->cores_mask = pcc->cores_mask;
> +    }
> +
> +    /* filter alien core ids ! some are reserved */
> +    if ((chip->cores_mask & pcc->cores_mask) != chip->cores_mask) {
> +        error_setg(errp, "warning: invalid core mask for chip !");
> +        return;
> +    }
> +    chip->cores_mask &= pcc->cores_mask;
> +
> +    /* now that we have a sane layout, let check the number of cores */
> +    cores_max = hweight_long(chip->cores_mask);
> +    if (chip->nr_cores > cores_max) {
> +        error_setg(errp, "warning: too many cores for chip ! Limit is %d",
> +                   cores_max);
> +        return;
> +    }
> +}
> +
>  static void pnv_chip_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>  {
> -    /* left purposely empty */
> +    PnvChip *chip = PNV_CHIP(dev);
> +    Error *error = NULL;
> +
> +    /* Early checks on the core settings */
> +    pnv_chip_core_sanitize(chip, &error);
> +    if (error) {
> +        error_propagate(errp, error);
> +        return;
> +    }
>  }
>  
>  static Property pnv_chip_properties[] = {
>      DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("chip-id", PnvChip, chip_id, 0),
> +    DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("nr-cores", PnvChip, nr_cores, 1),
> +    DEFINE_PROP_UINT64("cores-mask", PnvChip, cores_mask, 0x0),
>      DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
>  };
>  
> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/pnv.h b/include/hw/ppc/pnv.h
> index da543ed81636..2c225c928974 100644
> --- a/include/hw/ppc/pnv.h
> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/pnv.h
> @@ -42,6 +42,9 @@ typedef struct PnvChip {
>  
>      /*< public >*/
>      uint32_t     chip_id;
> +
> +    uint32_t  nr_cores;
> +    uint64_t  cores_mask;
>  } PnvChip;
>  
>  typedef struct PnvChipClass {
> @@ -52,6 +55,7 @@ typedef struct PnvChipClass {
>      const char *cpu_model;
>      PnvChipType  chip_type;
>      uint64_t     chip_cfam_id;
> +    uint64_t     cores_mask;
>  } PnvChipClass;
>  
>  #define TYPE_PNV_CHIP_POWER8E TYPE_PNV_CHIP "-POWER8E"

-- 
David Gibson                    | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
                                | _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]