qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCHv5 07/12] libqos: Implement mmio accessors in terms


From: Alexey Kardashevskiy
Subject: Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCHv5 07/12] libqos: Implement mmio accessors in terms of mem{read, write}
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:47:43 +1100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0

On 24/10/16 15:59, David Gibson wrote:
> In the libqos PCI code we now have accessors both for registers (byte
> significance preserving) and for streaming data (byte address order
> preserving).  These exist in both the interface for qtest drivers and in
> the machine specific backends.
> 
> However, the register-style accessors aren't actually necessary in the
> backend.  They can be implemented in terms of the byte address order
> preserving accessors by the libqos wrappers.  This works because PCI is
> always little endian.
> 
> This does assume that the back end byte address order preserving accessors
> will perform the equivalent of a single bus transaction for short lengths.
> This is the case, and in fact they currently end up using the same
> cpu_physical_memory_rw() implementation within the qtest accelerator.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Gibson <address@hidden>
> Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier <address@hidden>
> Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz <address@hidden>
> ---
>  tests/libqos/pci-pc.c    | 38 --------------------------------------
>  tests/libqos/pci-spapr.c | 44 --------------------------------------------
>  tests/libqos/pci.c       | 20 ++++++++++++++------
>  tests/libqos/pci.h       |  8 --------
>  4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 96 deletions(-)
> 

[...]

> diff --git a/tests/libqos/pci.h b/tests/libqos/pci.h
> index 2b08362..ce6ed08 100644
> --- a/tests/libqos/pci.h
> +++ b/tests/libqos/pci.h
> @@ -27,18 +27,10 @@ struct QPCIBus {
>      uint16_t (*pio_readw)(QPCIBus *bus, uint32_t addr);
>      uint32_t (*pio_readl)(QPCIBus *bus, uint32_t addr);
>  
> -    uint8_t (*mmio_readb)(QPCIBus *bus, uint32_t addr);
> -    uint16_t (*mmio_readw)(QPCIBus *bus, uint32_t addr);
> -    uint32_t (*mmio_readl)(QPCIBus *bus, uint32_t addr);
> -
>      void (*pio_writeb)(QPCIBus *bus, uint32_t addr, uint8_t value);
>      void (*pio_writew)(QPCIBus *bus, uint32_t addr, uint16_t value);
>      void (*pio_writel)(QPCIBus *bus, uint32_t addr, uint32_t value);
>  
> -    void (*mmio_writeb)(QPCIBus *bus, uint32_t addr, uint8_t value);
> -    void (*mmio_writew)(QPCIBus *bus, uint32_t addr, uint16_t value);
> -    void (*mmio_writel)(QPCIBus *bus, uint32_t addr, uint32_t value);
> -
>      void (*memread)(QPCIBus *bus, uint32_t addr, void *buf, size_t len);
>      void (*memwrite)(QPCIBus *bus, uint32_t addr, const void *buf, size_t 
> len);
>  
> 

You added them in "libqos: Handle PCI IO de-multiplexing in common code"
(few patched before) and removing them now - if you moved this patch
earlier, it would reduce the series, or what do I miss?




-- 
Alexey



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]