Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v3 1/5] ppc: spapr: Register and handle HCALL to receive updated RTAS region

[Aravinda Prasad]

On Tuesday 22 August 2017 09:03 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 03:12:49PM +0530, Aravinda Prasad wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Thursday 17 August 2017 07:04 AM, David Gibson wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 02:42:13PM +0530, Aravinda Prasad wrote:
>>>> Receive updates from SLOF about the updated rtas-base.
>>>> A separate patch for SLOF [1] adds functionality to invoke
>>>> a private HCALL whenever OS issues instantiate-rtas with
>>>> a new rtas-base.
>>>>
>>>> This is required as QEMU needs to know the updated rtas-base
>>>> as it allocates error reporting structure in RTAS space upon
>>>> a machine check exception.
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2014-August/120386.html
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Aravinda Prasad <address@hidden>
>>>> Reviewed-by: David Gibson <address@hidden>
>>>
>>> Actually, I take back this R-b, see below.
>>>
>>> In any case I'm not willing to apply the patches which depend on this
>>> until the corresponding SLOF update is merged as well.
>>
>> As Nikunj mentioned, SLOF updates are already merged.
> 
> In qemu as well as SLOF master, ok, good.  Commit message could do
> with updating to reflect that.

Will update.

> 
>>>>  hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c   |    8 ++++++++
>>>>  include/hw/ppc/spapr.h |    4 +++-
>>>>  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c
>>>> index 72ea5a8..e66c72e 100644
>>>> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c
>>>> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c
>>>> @@ -1062,6 +1062,13 @@ static target_ulong h_rtas(PowerPCCPU *cpu, 
>>>> sPAPRMachineState *spapr,
>>>>                             nret, rtas_r3 + 12 + 4*nargs);
>>>>  }
>>>>  
>>>> +static target_ulong h_rtas_update(PowerPCCPU *cpu, sPAPRMachineState 
>>>> *spapr,
>>>> +                                  target_ulong opcode, target_ulong *args)
>>>> +{
>>>> +    spapr->rtas_addr = args[0];
>>>> +    return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>>  static target_ulong h_logical_load(PowerPCCPU *cpu, sPAPRMachineState 
>>>> *spapr,
>>>>                                     target_ulong opcode, target_ulong 
>>>> *args)
>>>>  {
>>>> @@ -1717,6 +1724,7 @@ static void hypercall_register_types(void)
>>>>  
>>>>      /* qemu/KVM-PPC specific hcalls */
>>>>      spapr_register_hypercall(KVMPPC_H_RTAS, h_rtas);
>>>> +    spapr_register_hypercall(KVMPPC_H_RTAS_UPDATE, h_rtas_update);
>>>>  
>>>>      /* ibm,client-architecture-support support */
>>>>      spapr_register_hypercall(KVMPPC_H_CAS, h_client_architecture_support);
>>>> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
>>>> index 2a303a7..46012b3 100644
>>>> --- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
>>>> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
>>>> @@ -90,6 +90,7 @@ struct sPAPRMachineState {
>>>>  
>>>>      hwaddr rma_size;
>>>>      int vrma_adjust;
>>>> +    hwaddr rtas_addr;
>>>
>>> This can now change at runtime, which means it needs to be migrated -
>>> that's not happening in your patches yet.
>>
>> Yes. Need a bit of help in understanding the migration process.
>>
>> As rtas_addr is updated by SLOF, I think we need to modify SLOF to issue
>> KVMPPC_H_RTAS_UPDATE HCALL with the new rtas_addr during migration. But
>> I am not sure if SLOF is notified of migrations.
> 
> Uh.. no.  By the time you're migrating chances are SLOF isn't even
> running any more, and it wouldn't make sense for it to be aware of
> migration anyway.
> 
> Instead we need to add the rtas_addr field to the vmstate information
> for the spapr machine object.  However, we can't just add it plain,
> because that would break backwards migration.  Instead we'll need to
> add another sub-vmstate which will migrate rtas_addr if it differs
> from the default value.
> 

ok.

-- 
Regards,
Aravinda