Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/25] ppc-for-3.0 queue 2018-06-22

[David Gibson]

On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 07:43:04AM +0100, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> On 23/06/18 01:41, David Gibson wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 04:16:10PM +0100, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> > 11;rgb:ffff/ffff/ffff> On 22/06/18 16:03, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > > 
> > > > On 22 June 2018 at 11:35, David Gibson <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > > > The following changes since commit 
> > > > > 46012db666990ff2eed1d3dc199ab8006439a93b:
> > > > > 
> > > > >     Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/cohuck/tags/s390x-20180619' 
> > > > > into staging (2018-06-20 09:51:30 +0100)
> > > > > 
> > > > > are available in the Git repository at:
> > > > > 
> > > > >     git://github.com/dgibson/qemu.git tags/ppc-for-3.0-20180622
> > > > > 
> > > > > for you to fetch changes up to 
> > > > > e5ca28ecab5c69b7578e22391a66c97c3979ffd8:
> > > > > 
> > > > >     spapr: Don't rewrite mmu capabilities in KVM mode (2018-06-22 
> > > > > 14:19:07 +1000)
> > > > > 
> > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > ppc patch queue 2018-06-22
> > > > > 
> > > > > Another assorted patch of patches for ppc and spapr.
> > > > >       * Rework of guest pagesize handling for ppc, which avoids guest
> > > > >         visibly different behaviour between accelerators
> > > > >       * A number of Pnv cleanups, working towards more complete POWER9
> > > > >         support
> > > > >       * Migration of VPA data, a significant bugfix
> > > > 
> > > > Applied, thanks.
> > > > 
> > > > -- PMM
> > > 
> > > Looks like this is missing the 2 Mac commits I submitted that David added 
> > > to
> > > the PR this morning?
> > > 
> > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-06/msg06540.html
> > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-06/msg06536.html
> > > 
> > > David, did you forget to re-push the updated tag?
> > 
> > They just missed the window, sorry.  I merged them after I'd already
> > tagged and tested the pull request.
> 
> Okay, as long as you didn't forget them :)
> 
> My confusion came from the fact that the emails you sent for the PR
> yesterday contained my patches as patches 24 and 25, although they aren't
> included in the cover letter or the github tag.

Ah, right.  So I realized that bogus set of mails was the result of
pointing git send-email at a git range instead of the batch of mails
already prepared for the pull request.  Which meant for one they
weren't properly formatted for a PR, and also it included the couple
of patches of yours I'd applied after tagging the PR.

-- 
David Gibson                    | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
                                | _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature