[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 1/2] tests.acceptance.avocado_qemu
From: |
Cleber Rosa |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 1/2] tests.acceptance.avocado_qemu: Add support for powerpc |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Aug 2019 12:00:36 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) |
On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 07:32:55PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 01:58:20PM +0530, address@hidden wrote:
> > From: Satheesh Rajendran <address@hidden>
> >
> > Current acceptance test will not run properly in powerpc
> > environment due qemu target is different from arch, this
> > usually matches, except with bi-endian architectures like ppc64.
> > uname would return `ppc64` or `ppc64le` based `big` or `little`
> > endian but qemu `target` is always `ppc64`. Let's handle it.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <address@hidden>
> > Signed-off-by: Satheesh Rajendran <address@hidden>
>
> Reviewed-by: David Gibson <address@hidden>
>
> I sent a similar patch a little while back, but it seems it got lost.
>
>
> > ---
> > tests/acceptance/avocado_qemu/__init__.py | 3 +++
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/acceptance/avocado_qemu/__init__.py
> > b/tests/acceptance/avocado_qemu/__init__.py
> > index aee5d820ed..bd41e0443c 100644
> > --- a/tests/acceptance/avocado_qemu/__init__.py
> > +++ b/tests/acceptance/avocado_qemu/__init__.py
> > @@ -39,6 +39,9 @@ def pick_default_qemu_bin(arch=None):
> > """
> > if arch is None:
> > arch = os.uname()[4]
> > + # qemu binary path does not match arch for powerpc, handle it
> > + if 'ppc64le' in arch:
> > + arch = 'ppc64'
> > qemu_bin_relative_path = os.path.join("%s-softmmu" % arch,
> > "qemu-system-%s" % arch)
> > if is_readable_executable_file(qemu_bin_relative_path):
>
> --
> David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
> david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_
> _other_
> | _way_ _around_!
> http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
Yes, I remember that. I have the feeling the discussion evolved into
"let's do it for all other arch differences", because I found a patch
here about that. Anyway, sorry about that.
I've queued this one.
- Cleber.