[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] ppc/spapr: Don't kill the guest if a recovered FWNMI
From: |
David Gibson |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] ppc/spapr: Don't kill the guest if a recovered FWNMI machine check delivery fails |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Mar 2020 11:30:42 +1100 |
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 12:29:06AM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> Try to be tolerant of FWNMI delivery errors if the machine check had been
> recovered by the host.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <address@hidden>
Applied to ppc-for-5.0.
> ---
> hw/ppc/spapr_events.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_events.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_events.c
> index c8964eb25d..b90ecb8afe 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_events.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_events.c
> @@ -833,13 +833,25 @@ static void spapr_mce_dispatch_elog(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> bool recovered)
> /* get rtas addr from fdt */
> rtas_addr = spapr_get_rtas_addr();
> if (!rtas_addr) {
> - error_report(
> + if (!recovered) {
> + error_report(
> "FWNMI: Unable to deliver machine check to guest: rtas_addr not found.");
> - qemu_system_guest_panicked(NULL);
> + qemu_system_guest_panicked(NULL);
> + } else {
> + warn_report(
> +"FWNMI: Unable to deliver machine check to guest: rtas_addr not found. "
> +"Machine check recovered.");
> + }
> g_free(ext_elog);
> return;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * Must not set interlock if the MCE does not get delivered to the guest
> + * in the error case above.
> + */
> + spapr->fwnmi_machine_check_interlock = cpu->vcpu_id;
> +
> stq_be_phys(&address_space_memory, rtas_addr + RTAS_ERROR_LOG_OFFSET,
> env->gpr[3]);
> cpu_physical_memory_write(rtas_addr + RTAS_ERROR_LOG_OFFSET +
> @@ -876,9 +888,15 @@ void spapr_mce_req_event(PowerPCCPU *cpu, bool recovered)
> * that CPU called "ibm,nmi-interlock")
> */
> if (spapr->fwnmi_machine_check_interlock == cpu->vcpu_id) {
> - error_report(
> + if (!recovered) {
> + error_report(
> "FWNMI: Unable to deliver machine check to guest: nested machine check.");
> - qemu_system_guest_panicked(NULL);
> + qemu_system_guest_panicked(NULL);
> + } else {
> + warn_report(
> +"FWNMI: Unable to deliver machine check to guest: nested machine check. "
> +"Machine check recovered.");
> + }
> return;
> }
> qemu_cond_wait_iothread(&spapr->fwnmi_machine_check_interlock_cond);
> @@ -906,7 +924,6 @@ void spapr_mce_req_event(PowerPCCPU *cpu, bool recovered)
> warn_report("Received a fwnmi while migration was in progress");
> }
>
> - spapr->fwnmi_machine_check_interlock = cpu->vcpu_id;
> spapr_mce_dispatch_elog(cpu, recovered);
> }
>
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] ppc/spapr: KVM FWNMI should not be enabled until guest requests it, (continued)