[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 7/8] hw/i386/xen/xen-hvm: Use the IEC binary prefix definitio
From: |
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 7/8] hw/i386/xen/xen-hvm: Use the IEC binary prefix definitions |
Date: |
Mon, 1 Jun 2020 10:33:25 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 |
On 6/1/20 9:26 AM, Paul Durrant wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philippe.mathieu.daude@gmail.com> On Behalf Of
>> Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
>> Sent: 31 May 2020 18:38
>> To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
>> Cc: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>; Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>; Peter
>> Maydell
>> <peter.maydell@linaro.org>; Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>; Eduardo
>> Habkost
>> <ehabkost@redhat.com>; Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org>; Hervé Poussineau
>> <hpoussin@reactos.org>; Marcel
>> Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>; xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org;
>> Paolo Bonzini
>> <pbonzini@redhat.com>; Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>; Cédric
>> Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>;
>> qemu-trivial@nongnu.org; Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>; qemu-arm@nongnu.org;
>> Michael S. Tsirkin
>> <mst@redhat.com>; Anthony Perard <anthony.perard@citrix.com>;
>> qemu-ppc@nongnu.org; Philippe Mathieu-
>> Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
>> Subject: [PATCH 7/8] hw/i386/xen/xen-hvm: Use the IEC binary prefix
>> definitions
>>
>> IEC binary prefixes ease code review: the unit is explicit.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
>> ---
>> hw/i386/xen/xen-hvm.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/i386/xen/xen-hvm.c b/hw/i386/xen/xen-hvm.c
>> index 82ece6b9e7..679d74e6a3 100644
>> --- a/hw/i386/xen/xen-hvm.c
>> +++ b/hw/i386/xen/xen-hvm.c
>> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>> */
>>
>> #include "qemu/osdep.h"
>> +#include "qemu/units.h"
>>
>> #include "cpu.h"
>> #include "hw/pci/pci.h"
>> @@ -230,7 +231,7 @@ static void xen_ram_init(PCMachineState *pcms,
>> * Xen does not allocate the memory continuously, it keeps a
>> * hole of the size computed above or passed in.
>> */
>> - block_len = (1ULL << 32) + x86ms->above_4g_mem_size;
>> + block_len = 4 * GiB + x86ms->above_4g_mem_size;
>
> Not strictly necessary but could we retain the brackets please?
Sure.
Laurent, if this can go via your trivial@ tree, can you do the change or
you rather I resend the whole series?
>
> Paul
>
>> }
>> memory_region_init_ram(&ram_memory, NULL, "xen.ram", block_len,
>> &error_fatal);
>> --
>> 2.21.3
>
>
>