[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 0/3] spapr NVDIMM: consider 'nvdimm' machine option
From: |
David Gibson |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 0/3] spapr NVDIMM: consider 'nvdimm' machine option |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Aug 2020 23:17:41 +1000 |
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 06:57:46PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> This series aims to solve bug [1].
>
> First patch is a trivial cleanup, feel free to squash into
> patch 02. Patch 02 attempts a code simplification to put
> all NVDIMM related logic in the same function.
>
> Patch 03 is where the actual fix is implemented. My initial
> approach here was to make the handling of '-machine nvdimm' for
> pSeries similar to how it is handled elsewhere, but I wasn't
> able to accomplish that without either (1) breaking up existing
> pseries-5.1 guests that didn't care about this option or (2)
> make pseries-5.1 and pseries-5.2+ machines to have different
> semantics for it.
>
> I ended up doing what I was sure was sensible: if the user puts
> '-machine nvdimm=off', we must comply to that.
Applied to ppc-for-5.2, thanks.
>
>
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1848887
>
> Daniel Henrique Barboza (3):
> ppc/spapr_nvdimm: use g_autofree in spapr_nvdimm_validate_opts()
> spapr, spapr_nvdimm: fold NVDIMM validation in the same place
> ppc/spapr_nvdimm: do not enable support with 'nvdimm=off'
>
> hw/ppc/spapr.c | 18 ++++++------------
> hw/ppc/spapr_nvdimm.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> include/hw/ppc/spapr_nvdimm.h | 4 ++--
> 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature