[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v6 13/13] s390: Recognize confidential-guest-support option
From: |
David Gibson |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v6 13/13] s390: Recognize confidential-guest-support option |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Jan 2021 11:57:48 +1100 |
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 12:36:07PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
65;6201;1c> On Tue, 12 Jan 2021 09:15:26 +0100
> Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > On 12.01.21 05:45, David Gibson wrote:
> > > At least some s390 cpu models support "Protected Virtualization" (PV),
> > > a mechanism to protect guests from eavesdropping by a compromised
> > > hypervisor.
> > >
> > > This is similar in function to other mechanisms like AMD's SEV and
> > > POWER's PEF, which are controlled by the "confidential-guest-support"
> > > machine option. s390 is a slightly special case, because we already
> > > supported PV, simply by using a CPU model with the required feature
> > > (S390_FEAT_UNPACK).
> > >
> > > To integrate this with the option used by other platforms, we
> > > implement the following compromise:
> > >
> > > - When the confidential-guest-support option is set, s390 will
> > > recognize it, verify that the CPU can support PV (failing if not)
> > > and set virtio default options necessary for encrypted or protected
> > > guests, as on other platforms. i.e. if confidential-guest-support
> > > is set, we will either create a guest capable of entering PV mode,
> > > or fail outright.
> > >
> > > - If confidential-guest-support is not set, guests might still be
> > > able to enter PV mode, if the CPU has the right model. This may be
> > > a little surprising, but shouldn't actually be harmful.
> > >
> > > To start a guest supporting Protected Virtualization using the new
> > > option use the command line arguments:
> > > -object s390-pv-guest,id=pv0 -machine confidential-guest-support=pv0
> >
> >
> > This results in
> >
> > [cborntra@t35lp61 qemu]$ qemu-system-s390x -enable-kvm -nographic -m 2G
> > -kernel ~/full.normal
> > **
> > ERROR:../qom/object.c:317:type_initialize: assertion failed:
> > (parent->instance_size <= ti->instance_size)
> > Bail out! ERROR:../qom/object.c:317:type_initialize: assertion failed:
> > (parent->instance_size <= ti->instance_size)
> > Aborted (core dumped)
> >
>
> > > +static const TypeInfo s390_pv_guest_info = {
> > > + .parent = TYPE_CONFIDENTIAL_GUEST_SUPPORT,
> > > + .name = TYPE_S390_PV_GUEST,
> > > + .instance_size = sizeof(S390PVGuestState),
> > > + .interfaces = (InterfaceInfo[]) {
> > > + { TYPE_USER_CREATABLE },
> > > + { }
> > > + }
> > > +};
>
> I think this needs TYPE_OBJECT in .parent and
> TYPE_CONFIDENTIAL_GUEST_SUPPORT as an interface to fix the crash.
No, that was true of an earlier revision, but parent is correct in the
current version.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- [PATCH v6 02/13] confidential guest support: Introduce new confidential guest support class, (continued)
- [PATCH v6 02/13] confidential guest support: Introduce new confidential guest support class, David Gibson, 2021/01/11
- [PATCH v6 07/13] confidential guest support: Introduce cgs "ready" flag, David Gibson, 2021/01/11
- [PATCH v6 09/13] confidential guest support: Update documentation, David Gibson, 2021/01/11
- [PATCH v6 13/13] s390: Recognize confidential-guest-support option, David Gibson, 2021/01/11
- Re: [PATCH v6 13/13] s390: Recognize confidential-guest-support option, Christian Borntraeger, 2021/01/12
- Re: [PATCH v6 13/13] s390: Recognize confidential-guest-support option, Cornelia Huck, 2021/01/12
- Re: [PATCH v6 13/13] s390: Recognize confidential-guest-support option, Christian Borntraeger, 2021/01/12
- Re: [PATCH v6 13/13] s390: Recognize confidential-guest-support option, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2021/01/12
- Re: [PATCH v6 13/13] s390: Recognize confidential-guest-support option,
David Gibson <=
- Re: [PATCH v6 13/13] s390: Recognize confidential-guest-support option, Christian Borntraeger, 2021/01/13
- Re: [PATCH v6 13/13] s390: Recognize confidential-guest-support option, David Gibson, 2021/01/13
Re: [PATCH v6 13/13] s390: Recognize confidential-guest-support option, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2021/01/12
[PATCH v6 11/13] spapr: PEF: prevent migration, David Gibson, 2021/01/11
[PATCH v6 12/13] confidential guest support: Alter virtio default properties for protected guests, David Gibson, 2021/01/11
[PATCH v6 03/13] sev: Remove false abstraction of flash encryption, David Gibson, 2021/01/11
[PATCH v6 01/13] qom: Allow optional sugar props, David Gibson, 2021/01/11
[PATCH v6 05/13] confidential guest support: Rework the "memory-encryption" property, David Gibson, 2021/01/11