[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] spapr: Improve handling of memory unplug with old guests
From: |
Greg Kurz |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] spapr: Improve handling of memory unplug with old guests |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Jan 2021 18:01:27 +0100 |
On Wed, 13 Jan 2021 12:20:58 +1100
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 06:31:27PM +0100, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > Since commit 1e8b5b1aa16b ("spapr: Allow memory unplug to always succeed")
> > trying to unplug memory from a guest that doesn't support it (eg. rhel6)
> > no longer generates an error like it used to. Instead, it leaves the
> > memory around : only a subsequent reboot or manual use of drmgr within
> > the guest can complete the hot-unplug sequence. A flag was added to
> > SpaprMachineClass so that this new behavior only applies to the default
> > machine type.
> >
> > We can do better. CAS processes all pending hot-unplug requests. This
> > means that we don't really care about what the guest supports if
> > the hot-unplug request happens before CAS.
> >
> > All guests that we care for, even old ones, set enough bits in OV5
> > that lead to a non-empty bitmap in spapr->ov5_cas. Use that as a
> > heuristic to decide if CAS has already occured or not.
> >
> > Always accept unplug requests that happen before CAS since CAS will
> > process them. Restore the previous behavior of rejecting them after
> > CAS when we know that the guest doesn't support memory hot-unplug.
> >
> > This behavior is suitable for all machine types : this allows to
> > drop the pre_6_0_memory_unplug flag.
> >
> > Fixes: 1e8b5b1aa16b ("spapr: Allow memory unplug to always succeed")
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
>
> Applied, sorry it too me so long.
>
No problem. Any estimate for your next PR ?
> > ---
> > hw/ppc/spapr.c | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
> > hw/ppc/spapr_events.c | 3 +--
> > hw/ppc/spapr_ovec.c | 7 +++++++
> > include/hw/ppc/spapr.h | 2 +-
> > include/hw/ppc/spapr_ovec.h | 1 +
> > 5 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> > index 2c403b574e37..6c47466fc2f1 100644
> > --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> > +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> > @@ -4048,6 +4048,18 @@ static void
> > spapr_machine_device_unplug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev,
> > }
> > }
> >
> > +bool spapr_memory_hot_unplug_supported(SpaprMachineState *spapr)
> > +{
> > + return spapr_ovec_test(spapr->ov5_cas, OV5_HP_EVT) ||
> > + /*
> > + * CAS will process all pending unplug requests.
> > + *
> > + * HACK: a guest could theoretically have cleared all bits in OV5,
> > + * but none of the guests we care for do.
> > + */
>
> Hrm. This is pretty ugly - I thought we had a better canonical way of
> determining if CAS had already happened this boot, but it appears
> not. I don't want to delay this patch, since it is an important fix,
> but it would be nice if you could do a later cleanup to have a nicer
> way of detecting CAS-hasn't-happened.
>
Yeah, I fully agree this is ugly. I'll try to find something nicer later.
Thanks for taking it anyway !
Cheers,
--
Greg
> > + spapr_ovec_empty(spapr->ov5_cas);
> > +}
> > +
> > static void spapr_machine_device_unplug_request(HotplugHandler
> > *hotplug_dev,
> > DeviceState *dev, Error
> > **errp)
> > {
> > @@ -4056,16 +4068,9 @@ static void
> > spapr_machine_device_unplug_request(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev,
> > SpaprMachineClass *smc = SPAPR_MACHINE_CLASS(mc);
> >
> > if (object_dynamic_cast(OBJECT(dev), TYPE_PC_DIMM)) {
> > - if (!smc->pre_6_0_memory_unplug ||
> > - spapr_ovec_test(sms->ov5_cas, OV5_HP_EVT)) {
> > + if (spapr_memory_hot_unplug_supported(sms)) {
> > spapr_memory_unplug_request(hotplug_dev, dev, errp);
> > } else {
> > - /* NOTE: this means there is a window after guest reset, prior
> > to
> > - * CAS negotiation, where unplug requests will fail due to the
> > - * capability not being detected yet. This is a bit different
> > than
> > - * the case with PCI unplug, where the events will be queued
> > and
> > - * eventually handled by the guest after boot
> > - */
> > error_setg(errp, "Memory hot unplug not supported for this
> > guest");
> > }
> > } else if (object_dynamic_cast(OBJECT(dev), TYPE_SPAPR_CPU_CORE)) {
> > @@ -4543,11 +4548,8 @@ DEFINE_SPAPR_MACHINE(6_0, "6.0", true);
> > */
> > static void spapr_machine_5_2_class_options(MachineClass *mc)
> > {
> > - SpaprMachineClass *smc = SPAPR_MACHINE_CLASS(mc);
> > -
> > spapr_machine_6_0_class_options(mc);
> > compat_props_add(mc->compat_props, hw_compat_5_2, hw_compat_5_2_len);
> > - smc->pre_6_0_memory_unplug = true;
> > }
> >
> > DEFINE_SPAPR_MACHINE(5_2, "5.2", false);
> > diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_events.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_events.c
> > index 6aedd988b3d0..d51daedfa6e0 100644
> > --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_events.c
> > +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_events.c
> > @@ -658,8 +658,7 @@ static void spapr_hotplug_req_event(uint8_t hp_id,
> > uint8_t hp_action,
> > /* we should not be using count_indexed value unless the guest
> > * supports dedicated hotplug event source
> > */
> > - g_assert(!SPAPR_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(spapr)->pre_6_0_memory_unplug ||
> > - spapr_ovec_test(spapr->ov5_cas, OV5_HP_EVT));
> > + g_assert(spapr_memory_hot_unplug_supported(spapr));
> > hp->drc_id.count_indexed.count =
> > cpu_to_be32(drc_id->count_indexed.count);
> > hp->drc_id.count_indexed.index =
> > diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_ovec.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_ovec.c
> > index dd003f1763fd..b2567caa5cf4 100644
> > --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_ovec.c
> > +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_ovec.c
> > @@ -125,6 +125,13 @@ bool spapr_ovec_test(SpaprOptionVector *ov, long bitnr)
> > return test_bit(bitnr, ov->bitmap) ? true : false;
> > }
> >
> > +bool spapr_ovec_empty(SpaprOptionVector *ov)
> > +{
> > + g_assert(ov);
> > +
> > + return bitmap_empty(ov->bitmap, OV_MAXBITS);
> > +}
> > +
> > static void guest_byte_to_bitmap(uint8_t entry, unsigned long *bitmap,
> > long bitmap_offset)
> > {
> > diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
> > index 1cc19575f548..3ad2ff713279 100644
> > --- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
> > +++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
> > @@ -142,7 +142,6 @@ struct SpaprMachineClass {
> > hwaddr rma_limit; /* clamp the RMA to this size */
> > bool pre_5_1_assoc_refpoints;
> > bool pre_5_2_numa_associativity;
> > - bool pre_6_0_memory_unplug;
> >
> > bool (*phb_placement)(SpaprMachineState *spapr, uint32_t index,
> > uint64_t *buid, hwaddr *pio,
> > @@ -950,4 +949,5 @@ bool spapr_check_pagesize(SpaprMachineState *spapr,
> > hwaddr pagesize,
> >
> > void spapr_set_all_lpcrs(target_ulong value, target_ulong mask);
> > hwaddr spapr_get_rtas_addr(void);
> > +bool spapr_memory_hot_unplug_supported(SpaprMachineState *spapr);
> > #endif /* HW_SPAPR_H */
> > diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_ovec.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_ovec.h
> > index d4dee9e06a01..48b716a060c2 100644
> > --- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_ovec.h
> > +++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_ovec.h
> > @@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ void spapr_ovec_cleanup(SpaprOptionVector *ov);
> > void spapr_ovec_set(SpaprOptionVector *ov, long bitnr);
> > void spapr_ovec_clear(SpaprOptionVector *ov, long bitnr);
> > bool spapr_ovec_test(SpaprOptionVector *ov, long bitnr);
> > +bool spapr_ovec_empty(SpaprOptionVector *ov);
> > SpaprOptionVector *spapr_ovec_parse_vector(target_ulong table_addr, int
> > vector);
> > int spapr_dt_ovec(void *fdt, int fdt_offset,
> > SpaprOptionVector *ov, const char *name);
> >
> >
>
pgpxyHHAaF_GJ.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature