qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 4/7] ppc/pnv: Simplify pnv_bmc_create()


From: Cédric Le Goater
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] ppc/pnv: Simplify pnv_bmc_create()
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 08:46:01 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0

On 1/28/21 1:46 AM, Joel Stanley wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jan 2021 at 17:14, Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> wrote:
>>
>> and reuse pnv_bmc_set_pnor() to share the setting of the PNOR.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
>> ---
>>  hw/ppc/pnv_bmc.c | 7 +------
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/ppc/pnv_bmc.c b/hw/ppc/pnv_bmc.c
>> index 67ebb16c4d5f..86d16b493539 100644
>> --- a/hw/ppc/pnv_bmc.c
>> +++ b/hw/ppc/pnv_bmc.c
>> @@ -260,13 +260,8 @@ IPMIBmc *pnv_bmc_create(PnvPnor *pnor)
>>      Object *obj;
>>
>>      obj = object_new(TYPE_IPMI_BMC_SIMULATOR);
>> -    object_ref(OBJECT(pnor));
>> -    object_property_add_const_link(obj, "pnor", OBJECT(pnor));
> 
> I assume it's ok to move the link set to after the realise of the BMC object?
 

When 2 objects need to be linked, one has to be realized first. 
I suppose this is why it is allowed but I am not expert in that area. 

Greg  ?

That was the case already when defining a "ipmi-bmc-sim" device on the 
command line. 

C. 


>>      qdev_realize(DEVICE(obj), NULL, &error_fatal);
>> -
>> -    /* Install the HIOMAP protocol handlers to access the PNOR */
>> -    ipmi_sim_register_netfn(IPMI_BMC_SIMULATOR(obj), IPMI_NETFN_OEM,
>> -                            &hiomap_netfn);
>> +    pnv_bmc_set_pnor(IPMI_BMC(obj), pnor);
>>
>>      return IPMI_BMC(obj);
>>  }
>> --
>> 2.26.2
>>
>>




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]