[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 4/7] ppc/pnv: Simplify pnv_bmc_create()
From: |
Cédric Le Goater |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 4/7] ppc/pnv: Simplify pnv_bmc_create() |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Jan 2021 08:46:01 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0 |
On 1/28/21 1:46 AM, Joel Stanley wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jan 2021 at 17:14, Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> wrote:
>>
>> and reuse pnv_bmc_set_pnor() to share the setting of the PNOR.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
>> ---
>> hw/ppc/pnv_bmc.c | 7 +------
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/ppc/pnv_bmc.c b/hw/ppc/pnv_bmc.c
>> index 67ebb16c4d5f..86d16b493539 100644
>> --- a/hw/ppc/pnv_bmc.c
>> +++ b/hw/ppc/pnv_bmc.c
>> @@ -260,13 +260,8 @@ IPMIBmc *pnv_bmc_create(PnvPnor *pnor)
>> Object *obj;
>>
>> obj = object_new(TYPE_IPMI_BMC_SIMULATOR);
>> - object_ref(OBJECT(pnor));
>> - object_property_add_const_link(obj, "pnor", OBJECT(pnor));
>
> I assume it's ok to move the link set to after the realise of the BMC object?
When 2 objects need to be linked, one has to be realized first.
I suppose this is why it is allowed but I am not expert in that area.
Greg ?
That was the case already when defining a "ipmi-bmc-sim" device on the
command line.
C.
>> qdev_realize(DEVICE(obj), NULL, &error_fatal);
>> -
>> - /* Install the HIOMAP protocol handlers to access the PNOR */
>> - ipmi_sim_register_netfn(IPMI_BMC_SIMULATOR(obj), IPMI_NETFN_OEM,
>> - &hiomap_netfn);
>> + pnv_bmc_set_pnor(IPMI_BMC(obj), pnor);
>>
>> return IPMI_BMC(obj);
>> }
>> --
>> 2.26.2
>>
>>
Re: [PATCH 4/7] ppc/pnv: Simplify pnv_bmc_create(), David Gibson, 2021/01/27
[PATCH 5/7] ppc/pnv: Discard internal BMC initialization when BMC is external, Cédric Le Goater, 2021/01/26