qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 1/1] spapr.c: remove 'ibm,chip-id' from DT


From: Cédric Le Goater
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] spapr.c: remove 'ibm,chip-id' from DT
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 16:42:37 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0

On 3/11/21 4:15 PM, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> The attribute 'ibm,chip-id' does not exist in PAPR. This alone would be
> enough reason to remove it from the spapr DT, but before doing that,
> let's give a brief context on how and why it was introduced.
> 
> 'ibm,chip-id' was added in the spapr DT by commit 10582ff83279. This
> commit references kernel commit 256f2d4b463d ("powerpc: Use ibm, chip-id
> property to compute cpu_core_mask if available"). In this kernel commit,
> the 'ibm,chip-id' DT attribute is being used to calculate the
> cpu_core_mask in traverse_siblings_chip_id(). This function still need
> to consider 'ibm,chip-id' not being available as well to avoid breaking
> older guests.
> 
> Later on, kernel commit df52f6714071 ("powerpc/smp: Rework CPU topology
> construction") removed traverse_siblings_chip_id() and its callers,
> making the CPU topology calculation independent of the 'ibm,chip-id'
> attribute. Today, the kernel uses 'ibm,chip-id' for PowerNV related code
> only - the pseries kernel does not rely on it.

PowerNV uses the "ibm,associativity" property of the CPU to find the 
node id. "ibm,chip-id" is only used in low level PowerNV drivers : 
LPC, XSCOM, RNG, VAS, NX.

> All that said, since it's not in PAPR and the pseries kernel does not
> rely on it, let's remove ibm,chip-id from the DT.

yes. The H_HOME_NODE_ASSOCIATIVITY hcall is used to determined the 
node id. 

> CC: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
> Suggested-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Tested-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>

Thanks,

C.

> ---
>  hw/ppc/spapr.c | 4 ----
>  1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> index 85fe65f894..d2e448fd9c 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> @@ -657,7 +657,6 @@ static void spapr_dt_cpu(CPUState *cs, void *fdt, int 
> offset,
>      uint32_t page_sizes_prop[64];
>      size_t page_sizes_prop_size;
>      unsigned int smp_threads = ms->smp.threads;
> -    uint32_t vcpus_per_socket = smp_threads * ms->smp.cores;
>      uint32_t pft_size_prop[] = {0, cpu_to_be32(spapr->htab_shift)};
>      int compat_smt = MIN(smp_threads, ppc_compat_max_vthreads(cpu));
>      SpaprDrc *drc;
> @@ -744,9 +743,6 @@ static void spapr_dt_cpu(CPUState *cs, void *fdt, int 
> offset,
>  
>      spapr_dt_pa_features(spapr, cpu, fdt, offset);
>  
> -    _FDT((fdt_setprop_cell(fdt, offset, "ibm,chip-id",
> -                           cs->cpu_index / vcpus_per_socket)));
> -
>      _FDT((fdt_setprop(fdt, offset, "ibm,pft-size",
>                        pft_size_prop, sizeof(pft_size_prop))));
>  
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]