[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 07/23] hw/block/nvme: Use definition to avoid dynamic stack a
From: |
Keith Busch |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 07/23] hw/block/nvme: Use definition to avoid dynamic stack allocation |
Date: |
Wed, 5 May 2021 14:22:38 -0700 |
On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 11:10:31PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> The compiler isn't clever enough to figure 'SEG_CHUNK_SIZE' is
> a constant! Help it by using a definitions instead.
I don't understand. It's labeled 'const', so any reasonable compiler
will place it in the 'text' segment of the executable rather than on the
stack. While that's compiler specific, is there really a compiler doing
something bad with this? If not, I do prefer the 'const' here if only
because it limits the symbol scope ('static const' is also preferred if
that helps).
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
> ---
> hw/block/nvme.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/block/nvme.c b/hw/block/nvme.c
> index 5fe082ec34c..2f6d4925826 100644
> --- a/hw/block/nvme.c
> +++ b/hw/block/nvme.c
> @@ -812,7 +812,7 @@ static uint16_t nvme_map_sgl(NvmeCtrl *n, NvmeSg *sg,
> NvmeSglDescriptor sgl,
> * descriptors and segment chain) than the command transfer size, so it
> is
> * not bounded by MDTS.
> */
> - const int SEG_CHUNK_SIZE = 256;
> +#define SEG_CHUNK_SIZE 256
>
> NvmeSglDescriptor segment[SEG_CHUNK_SIZE], *sgld, *last_sgld;
> uint64_t nsgld;
> --
> 2.26.3
>
- Re: [PATCH 04/23] chardev/baum: Avoid dynamic stack allocation, (continued)
[PATCH 07/23] hw/block/nvme: Use definition to avoid dynamic stack allocation, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2021/05/05
- Re: [PATCH 07/23] hw/block/nvme: Use definition to avoid dynamic stack allocation,
Keith Busch <=
- Re: [PATCH 07/23] hw/block/nvme: Use definition to avoid dynamic stack allocation, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2021/05/05
- Re: [PATCH 07/23] hw/block/nvme: Use definition to avoid dynamic stack allocation, Eric Blake, 2021/05/05
- Re: [PATCH 07/23] hw/block/nvme: Use definition to avoid dynamic stack allocation, Warner Losh, 2021/05/05
- Re: [PATCH 07/23] hw/block/nvme: Use definition to avoid dynamic stack allocation, Keith Busch, 2021/05/05
- Re: [PATCH 07/23] hw/block/nvme: Use definition to avoid dynamic stack allocation, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2021/05/06
- Re: [PATCH 07/23] hw/block/nvme: Use definition to avoid dynamic stack allocation, Richard Henderson, 2021/05/07
Re: [PATCH 07/23] hw/block/nvme: Use definition to avoid dynamic stack allocation, Klaus Jensen, 2021/05/06
Re: [PATCH 07/23] hw/block/nvme: Use definition to avoid dynamic stack allocation, Richard Henderson, 2021/05/07
[PATCH 08/23] hw/block/nvme: Avoid dynamic stack allocation, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2021/05/05