|
From: | Mark Cave-Ayland |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] mos6522: fix linking error when CONFIG_MOS6522 is not set |
Date: | Sun, 8 May 2022 10:30:06 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.8.0 |
On 07/05/2022 00:44, Murilo Opsfelder Araújo wrote:
On 5/2/22 06:43, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:On 30/04/2022 00:31, Murilo Opsfelder Araujo wrote:When CONFIG_MOS6522 is not set, building ppc64-softmmu target fails:/usr/bin/ld: libqemu-ppc64-softmmu.fa.p/monitor_misc.c.o:(.data+0x1158): undefined reference to `hmp_info_via' clang-13: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)Add CONFIG_MOS6522 check for hmp_info_via in hmp-commands-info.hx to fix such linking error. Fixes: 409e9f7131e5 (mos6522: add "info via" HMP command for debugging) Signed-off-by: Murilo Opsfelder Araujo <muriloo@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk> Cc: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com> --- hmp-commands-info.hx | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/hmp-commands-info.hx b/hmp-commands-info.hx index adfa085a9b..9ad784dd9f 100644 --- a/hmp-commands-info.hx +++ b/hmp-commands-info.hx @@ -881,6 +881,7 @@ SRST ERST #if defined(TARGET_M68K) || defined(TARGET_PPC) +#if defined(CONFIG_MOS6522) { .name = "via", .args_type = "", @@ -889,6 +890,7 @@ ERST .cmd = hmp_info_via, }, #endif +#endif SRST ``info via``Hmmm. The patch in its proposed form isn't correct, since device CONFIG_* defines aren't declared when processing hmp-commands-info.hx. This was something that was discovered and discussed in the original thread for which the current workaround is to use the per-target TARGET_* defines instead.I've sent a v2 of this patch that addresses this, i.e.: the CONFIG_* options are available in hmp-commands-info.hx:20220506011632.183257-1-muriloo@linux.ibm.com/">https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20220506011632.183257-1-muriloo@linux.ibm.com/ I hope it can resolve the build issue in the short-term. I'd appreciate if you or anyone on this thread could review it. Thank you, Mark, for the discussion and knowledge sharing!
No worries. I suspect there must be a reason why this wasn't suggested when I submitted the original patch, but that knowledge would clearly lie with the HMP and QMP maintainers.
ATB, Mark.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |