[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] target/ppc: Improve Radix xlate level validation
From: |
Fabiano Rosas |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] target/ppc: Improve Radix xlate level validation |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Jun 2022 15:34:43 -0300 |
Leandro Lupori <leandro.lupori@eldorado.org.br> writes:
> Check if the number and size of Radix levels are valid on
> POWER9/POWER10 CPUs, according to the supported Radix Tree
> Configurations described in their User Manuals.
>
> Signed-off-by: Leandro Lupori <leandro.lupori@eldorado.org.br>
> ---
> target/ppc/mmu-radix64.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/ppc/mmu-radix64.c b/target/ppc/mmu-radix64.c
> index 9a8a2e2875..339cf5b4d8 100644
> --- a/target/ppc/mmu-radix64.c
> +++ b/target/ppc/mmu-radix64.c
> @@ -236,17 +236,39 @@ static void ppc_radix64_set_rc(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> MMUAccessType access_type,
> }
> }
>
> +static bool ppc_radix64_is_valid_level(int level, int psize, uint64_t nls)
> +{
> + /*
> + * Check if this is a valid level, according to POWER9 and POWER10
> + * Processor User's Manuals, sections 4.10.4.1 and 5.10.6.1,
> respectively:
> + * Supported Radix Tree Configurations and Resulting Page Sizes.
> + *
> + * NOTE: these checks are valid for POWER9 and POWER10 CPUs only. If
> + * new CPUs that support other Radix configurations are added
> + * (e.g., Microwatt), then a new method should be added to
> + * PowerPCCPUClass, with this function being the POWER9/POWER10
> + * implementation.
> + */
Sorry, this got too specific now. I could not respond in time before you
sent the v2. Let's cut the mentions to the code:
Note: these checks are specific to POWER9 and POWER10 CPUs. Any future
CPUs that supports a different Radix MMU configuration will need their
own implementation.
> + switch (level) {
> + case 0: /* Root Page Dir */
> + return psize == 52 && nls == 13;
> + case 1:
> + case 2:
> + return nls == 9;
> + case 3:
> + return nls == 9 || nls == 5;
> + default:
> + qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, "invalid radix level: %d\n", level);
> + return false;
> + }
> +}
> +
> static int ppc_radix64_next_level(AddressSpace *as, vaddr eaddr,
> uint64_t *pte_addr, uint64_t *nls,
> int *psize, uint64_t *pte, int
> *fault_cause)
> {
> uint64_t index, pde;
>
> - if (*nls < 5) { /* Directory maps less than 2**5 entries */
> - *fault_cause |= DSISR_R_BADCONFIG;
> - return 1;
> - }
> -
> /* Read page <directory/table> entry from guest address space */
> pde = ldq_phys(as, *pte_addr);
> if (!(pde & R_PTE_VALID)) { /* Invalid Entry */
> @@ -270,12 +292,8 @@ static int ppc_radix64_walk_tree(AddressSpace *as, vaddr
> eaddr,
> hwaddr *raddr, int *psize, uint64_t *pte,
> int *fault_cause, hwaddr *pte_addr)
> {
> - uint64_t index, pde, rpn , mask;
> -
> - if (nls < 5) { /* Directory maps less than 2**5 entries */
> - *fault_cause |= DSISR_R_BADCONFIG;
> - return 1;
> - }
> + uint64_t index, pde, rpn, mask;
> + int level = 0;
>
> index = eaddr >> (*psize - nls); /* Shift */
> index &= ((1UL << nls) - 1); /* Mask */
> @@ -283,6 +301,11 @@ static int ppc_radix64_walk_tree(AddressSpace *as, vaddr
> eaddr,
> do {
> int ret;
>
> + if (!ppc_radix64_is_valid_level(level++, *psize, nls)) {
> + *fault_cause |= DSISR_R_BADCONFIG;
> + return 1;
> + }
> +
> ret = ppc_radix64_next_level(as, eaddr, pte_addr, &nls, psize, &pde,
> fault_cause);
> if (ret) {
> @@ -456,6 +479,7 @@ static int ppc_radix64_process_scoped_xlate(PowerPCCPU
> *cpu,
> }
> } else {
> uint64_t rpn, mask;
> + int level = 0;
>
> index = (eaddr & R_EADDR_MASK) >> (*g_page_size - nls); /* Shift */
> index &= ((1UL << nls) - 1); /* Mask */
> @@ -475,6 +499,11 @@ static int ppc_radix64_process_scoped_xlate(PowerPCCPU
> *cpu,
> return ret;
> }
>
> + if (!ppc_radix64_is_valid_level(level++, *g_page_size, nls)) {
> + fault_cause |= DSISR_R_BADCONFIG;
> + return 1;
> + }
> +
> ret = ppc_radix64_next_level(cs->as, eaddr & R_EADDR_MASK,
> &h_raddr,
> &nls, g_page_size, &pte,
> &fault_cause);
> if (ret) {