|
From: | Harsh Prateek Bora |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH RESEND 07/15] ppc: spapr: Implement nested PAPR hcall - H_GUEST_SET_CAPABILITIES |
Date: | Tue, 3 Oct 2023 10:29:55 +0530 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.14.0 |
On 9/7/23 07:39, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
On Wed Sep 6, 2023 at 2:33 PM AEST, Harsh Prateek Bora wrote:This patch implements nested PAPR hcall H_GUEST_SET_CAPABILITIES. This is used by L1 to set capabilities of the nested guest being created. The capabilities being set are subset of the capabilities returned from the previous call to H_GUEST_GET_CAPABILITIES hcall. Currently, it only supports P9/P10 capability check through PVR. Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org> Signed-off-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com> --- hw/ppc/spapr.c | 1 + hw/ppc/spapr_nested.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/hw/ppc/spapr_nested.h | 3 +++ 3 files changed, 50 insertions(+) diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c index cbab7a825f..7c6f6ee25d 100644 --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c @@ -3443,6 +3443,7 @@ static void spapr_instance_init(Object *obj) "Host serial number to advertise in guest device tree"); /* Nested */ spapr->nested.api = 0; + spapr->nested.capabilities_set = false;I would actually think about moving spapr->nested init into spapr_nested.c.
Agree, moved.
}static void spapr_machine_finalizefn(Object *obj)diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_nested.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_nested.c index 37f3a49be2..9af65f257f 100644 --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_nested.c +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_nested.c @@ -399,6 +399,51 @@ static target_ulong h_guest_get_capabilities(PowerPCCPU *cpu, return H_SUCCESS; }+static target_ulong h_guest_set_capabilities(PowerPCCPU *cpu,+ SpaprMachineState *spapr, + target_ulong opcode, + target_ulong *args) +{ + CPUPPCState *env = &cpu->env; + target_ulong flags = args[0]; + target_ulong capabilities = args[1]; + + if (flags) { /* don't handle any flags capabilities for now */ + return H_PARAMETER; + } + +May need to do a pass over whitespace.
Sure, done.
+ /* isn't supported */ + if (capabilities & H_GUEST_CAPABILITIES_COPY_MEM) { + env->gpr[4] = 0; + return H_P2; + } + + if ((env->spr[SPR_PVR] & CPU_POWERPC_POWER_SERVER_MASK) == + (CPU_POWERPC_POWER9_BASE)) { + /* We are a P9 */ + if (!(capabilities & H_GUEST_CAPABILITIES_P9_MODE)) { + env->gpr[4] = 1; + return H_P2; + } + } + + if ((env->spr[SPR_PVR] & CPU_POWERPC_POWER_SERVER_MASK) == + (CPU_POWERPC_POWER10_BASE)) { + /* We are a P10 */The 2 comments above aren't helpful. Just remove them.
Sure, done.
+ if (!(capabilities & H_GUEST_CAPABILITIES_P10_MODE)) { + env->gpr[4] = 2; + return H_P2; + } + } + + spapr->nested.capabilities_set = true;Is it okay to set twice? If not, add a check. If yes, remove capabilities_set until it's needed.
Thanks for pointing it out, adding a check as appropriate. Thanks Harsh
+ + spapr->nested.pvr_base = env->spr[SPR_PVR]; + + return H_SUCCESS; +} + void spapr_register_nested(void) { spapr_register_hypercall(KVMPPC_H_SET_PARTITION_TABLE, h_set_ptbl); @@ -410,6 +455,7 @@ void spapr_register_nested(void) void spapr_register_nested_phyp(void) { spapr_register_hypercall(H_GUEST_GET_CAPABILITIES, h_guest_get_capabilities); + spapr_register_hypercall(H_GUEST_SET_CAPABILITIES, h_guest_set_capabilities); }#elsediff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_nested.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_nested.h index ce198e9f70..a7996251cb 100644 --- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_nested.h +++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_nested.h @@ -193,6 +193,9 @@ #define H_GUEST_CAPABILITIES_COPY_MEM 0x8000000000000000 #define H_GUEST_CAPABILITIES_P9_MODE 0x4000000000000000 #define H_GUEST_CAPABILITIES_P10_MODE 0x2000000000000000 +#define H_GUEST_CAP_COPY_MEM_BMAP 0 +#define H_GUEST_CAP_P9_MODE_BMAP 1 +#define H_GUEST_CAP_P10_MODE_BMAP 2typedef struct SpaprMachineStateNestedGuest {unsigned long vcpus;
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |