Re: [PATCH] ppc: qtest already exports qtest_rtas_call()

[Cédric Le Goater]

On 10/31/23 11:15, Juan Quintela wrote:
> David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 05:41:36PM +0100, Cédric le Goater wrote:
> > > On 10/30/23 17:38, Juan Quintela wrote:
> > > > Having two functions with the same name is a bad idea.  As spapr only
> > > > uses the function locally, made it static.
> > > >
> > > > When you compile with clang, you get this compilation error:
> > > >
> > > > /usr/bin/ld: tests/qtest/libqos/libqos.fa.p/.._libqtest.c.o: in function 
> > > > `qtest_rtas_call':
> > > > /scratch/qemu/clang/full/all/../../../../../mnt/code/qemu/full/tests/qtest/libqtest.c:1195:
> > > > multiple definition of `qtest_rtas_call';
> > > > libqemu-ppc64-softmmu.fa.p/hw_ppc_spapr_rtas.c.o:/scratch/qemu/clang/full/all/../../../../../mnt/code/qemu/full/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c:536:
> > > > first defined here
> > > > clang-16: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see 
> > > > invocation)
> > > > ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.
> > > > make: *** [Makefile:162: run-ninja] Error 1
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
> > I think changing the name of one of the functions would be even
> > better.  Making it static means it won't confuse the compiler, but it
> > can still confuse people.
Since it is a spapr file, something like :

  static uint64_t spapr_qtest_rtas_call(...)

?

Thanks,

C.


> I think that made it static when it is not used anywhere else is a good
> idea.
>
> After that, I don't understand it enough to make a rename that makes
> sense.
>
> This patch is the typical fix for "make all" with clang fails here.
> I let ppc maintainers to do anything more sensible.
>
> Later, Juan.