qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 2/7] ppc/pnv: Fix LPC POWER8 register sanity check


From: Cédric Le Goater
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] ppc/pnv: Fix LPC POWER8 register sanity check
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 12:08:21 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

On 8/6/24 15:13, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
POWER8 does not have the ISA IRQ -> SERIRQ routing system of later
CPUs, instead all ISA IRQs are sent to the CPU via a single PSI
interrupt. There is a sanity check in the POWER8 case to ensure the
routing bits have not been set, because that would indicate a
programming error.

Those bits were incorrectly specified because of ppc bit numbering
fun. Coverity detected this as an always-zero expression.

Reported-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@redhat.com>
Resolves: Coverity CID 1558829 (partially)
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>


Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@redhat.com>

Thanks,

C.


---
  hw/ppc/pnv_lpc.c | 4 ++--
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/ppc/pnv_lpc.c b/hw/ppc/pnv_lpc.c
index 80b79dfbbc..8c203d2059 100644
--- a/hw/ppc/pnv_lpc.c
+++ b/hw/ppc/pnv_lpc.c
@@ -427,8 +427,8 @@ static void pnv_lpc_eval_serirq_routes(PnvLpcController 
*lpc)
      int irq;
if (!lpc->psi_has_serirq) {
-        if ((lpc->opb_irq_route0 & PPC_BITMASK(8, 13)) ||
-            (lpc->opb_irq_route1 & PPC_BITMASK(4, 31))) {
+        if ((lpc->opb_irq_route0 & PPC_BITMASK32(8, 13)) ||
+            (lpc->opb_irq_route1 & PPC_BITMASK32(4, 31))) {
              qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
                  "OPB: setting serirq routing on POWER8 system, ignoring.\n");
          }




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]