qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 3/4] target/ppc: Fix THREAD_SIBLING_FOREACH for mult-socket


From: Miles Glenn
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] target/ppc: Fix THREAD_SIBLING_FOREACH for mult-socket
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 10:26:57 -0600

Reviewed-by: Glenn Miles <milesg@linux.ibm.com>

On Mon, 2024-11-25 at 23:20 +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> From: Glenn Miles <milesg@linux.ibm.com>
> 
> The THREAD_SIBLING_FOREACH macro wasn't excluding threads from
> other chips. Add chip_index field to the thread state and add
> a check for the new field in the macro.
> 
> Fixes: b769d4c8f4c6 ("target/ppc: Add initial flags and helpers for
> SMT support")
> Signed-off-by: Glenn Miles <milesg@linux.ibm.com>
> [npiggin: set chip_index for spapr too]
> Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
> ---
>  target/ppc/cpu.h        | 7 +++++--
>  hw/ppc/pnv_core.c       | 2 ++
>  hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c | 1 +
>  3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/target/ppc/cpu.h b/target/ppc/cpu.h
> index 0b4f1013b8..2ffac2ed03 100644
> --- a/target/ppc/cpu.h
> +++ b/target/ppc/cpu.h
> @@ -1253,6 +1253,7 @@ struct CPUArchState {
>      /* For SMT processors */
>      bool has_smt_siblings;
>      int core_index;
> +    int chip_index;
>  
>  #if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
>      /* MMU context, only relevant for full system emulation */
> @@ -1412,8 +1413,10 @@ struct CPUArchState {
>  
>  #define THREAD_SIBLING_FOREACH(cs, cs_sibling)                  \
>      CPU_FOREACH(cs_sibling)                                     \
> -        if (POWERPC_CPU(cs)->env.core_index ==                  \
> -            POWERPC_CPU(cs_sibling)->env.core_index)
> +        if ((POWERPC_CPU(cs)->env.chip_index ==                 \
> +             POWERPC_CPU(cs_sibling)->env.chip_index) &&        \
> +            (POWERPC_CPU(cs)->env.core_index ==                 \
> +             POWERPC_CPU(cs_sibling)->env.core_index))
>  
>  #define SET_FIT_PERIOD(a_, b_, c_, d_)          \
>  do {                                            \
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/pnv_core.c b/hw/ppc/pnv_core.c
> index cbfac49862..e6b02294b1 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/pnv_core.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/pnv_core.c
> @@ -322,6 +322,8 @@ static void pnv_core_cpu_realize(PnvCore *pc,
> PowerPCCPU *cpu, Error **errp,
>      pir_spr->default_value = pir;
>      tir_spr->default_value = tir;
>  
> +    env->chip_index = pc->chip->chip_id;
> +
>      if (pc->big_core) {
>          /* 2 "small cores" get the same core index for SMT
> operations */
>          env->core_index = core_hwid >> 1;
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c
> index ada439e831..135f86a622 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c
> @@ -313,6 +313,7 @@ static PowerPCCPU *spapr_create_vcpu(SpaprCpuCore
> *sc, int i, Error **errp)
>          return NULL;
>      }
>  
> +    env->chip_index = sc->node_id;
>      env->core_index = cc->core_id;
>  
>      cpu->node_id = sc->node_id;




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]