|
From: | Harsh Prateek Bora |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH 2/5] spapr: Fix vpa dispatch count for record-replay |
Date: | Fri, 20 Dec 2024 15:36:04 +0530 |
User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird |
On 12/20/24 14:59, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
On Fri, 20 Dec 2024, Harsh Prateek Bora wrote:Hi Nick, On 12/19/24 09:10, Nicholas Piggin wrote:The dispatch count is a field in guest memory that the hypervisor increments when preempting and dispatching the guest. This was not being done deterministically with respect to icount, because tcg exec exit is not deterministic (e.g., an async event could cause it). Change vpa dispatch count increment to keep track of whether the vCPU is considered dispatched or not, and only consider it preempted when calling cede / confer / join / stop-self / etc. Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> --- include/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.h | 3 +++ hw/ppc/spapr.c | 36 ++------------------------------- hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c | 1 + 4 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)<snipped>diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c index 5e1d020e3df..907e09c2c36 100644 --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c@@ -487,6 +487,36 @@ static target_ulong h_register_vpa(PowerPCCPU *cpu, SpaprMachineState *spapr,return ret; }+void vpa_dispatch(CPUState *cs, SpaprCpuState *spapr_cpu, bool dispatch)+{ + uint32_t counter; + + if (!dispatch) { + assert(spapr_cpu->dispatched); + } else { + assert(!spapr_cpu->dispatched); + }Would it look better as: assert(!(dispatch == spapr_cpu->dispatched));That's more cryptic than the one above. Maybe with ternary operator to avoid the if? Likeassert(dispatch ? spapr_cpu->dispatched : !spapr_cpu->dispatched)
Yeh, initially I thought of ternary op, but thought of it as more cryptic. I guess either is fine. Minor correction though:
assert(dispatch ? !spapr_cpu->dispatched : spapr_cpu->dispatched) regards, Harsh
Regards, BALATON Zoltan+ spapr_cpu->dispatched = dispatch; + + return;Returning here unconditionally makes below code unreachable.+ + if (!spapr_cpu->vpa_addr) { + return; + }This could be moved to beginning or just after assert. regards, Harsh+ + /* These are only called by TCG, KVM maintains dispatch state */+ counter = ldl_be_phys(cs->as, spapr_cpu->vpa_addr + VPA_DISPATCH_COUNTER);+ counter++; + if ((counter & 1) != dispatch) { + qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, + "VPA: incorrect dispatch counter value for " + "%s partition %u, correcting.\n", + dispatch ? "preempted" : "running", counter); + counter++; + }+ stl_be_phys(cs->as, spapr_cpu->vpa_addr + VPA_DISPATCH_COUNTER, counter);+} + static target_ulong h_cede(PowerPCCPU *cpu, SpaprMachineState *spapr, target_ulong opcode, target_ulong *args) {@@ -505,6 +535,7 @@ static target_ulong h_cede(PowerPCCPU *cpu, SpaprMachineState *spapr,if (!cpu_has_work(cs)) { cs->halted = 1; + vpa_dispatch(cs, spapr_cpu, false); cs->exception_index = EXCP_HLT; cs->exit_request = 1; ppc_maybe_interrupt(env); @@ -531,6 +562,8 @@ static target_ulong h_confer_self(PowerPCCPU *cpu) cs->exit_request = 1; ppc_maybe_interrupt(&cpu->env); + vpa_dispatch(cs, spapr_cpu, false); + return H_SUCCESS; } diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c index f329693c554..8ce42302234 100644 --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c@@ -216,6 +216,7 @@ static void rtas_stop_self(PowerPCCPU *cpu, SpaprMachineState *spapr,*/ env->spr[SPR_PSSCR] |= PSSCR_EC; cs->halted = 1; + vpa_dispatch(cs, spapr_cpu_state(cpu), false); ppc_store_lpcr(cpu, env->spr[SPR_LPCR] & ~pcc->lpcr_pm); kvmppc_set_reg_ppc_online(cpu, 0); qemu_cpu_kick(cs);
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |