[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] target/riscv: Don't overwrite the reset vector
From: |
Bin Meng |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] target/riscv: Don't overwrite the reset vector |
Date: |
Sat, 16 May 2020 17:03:06 +0800 |
On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 3:51 AM Alistair Francis <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 9:54 PM Bin Meng <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 5:51 AM Alistair Francis <address@hidden> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 10:54 AM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
> > > <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 5/7/20 9:13 PM, Alistair Francis wrote:
> > > > > If the reset vector is set in the init function don't set it again in
> > > > > realise.
> > > >
> > > > typo "realize".
> > >
> > > It's not a typo, just correct English :)
> > >
> > > I have changed it.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <address@hidden>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > target/riscv/cpu.c | 20 +++++++++++---------
> > > > > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> > > > > index 059d71f2c7..8f837edf8d 100644
> > > > > --- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
> > > > > +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> > > > > @@ -111,6 +111,14 @@ static void set_feature(CPURISCVState *env, int
> > > > > feature)
> > > > > env->features |= (1ULL << feature);
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > +static int get_resetvec(CPURISCVState *env)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > +#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
> > > > > + return env->resetvec;
> > > > > +#endif
> > > > > + return 0;
> > > >
> > > > Don't you get an error about double return? Maybe use #else?
> > >
> > > Apparently not, I have changed it though.
> > >
> > > Alistair
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > > static void set_resetvec(CPURISCVState *env, int resetvec)
> > > > > {
> > > > > #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
> > > > > @@ -123,7 +131,6 @@ static void riscv_any_cpu_init(Object *obj)
> > > > > CPURISCVState *env = &RISCV_CPU(obj)->env;
> > > > > set_misa(env, RVXLEN | RVI | RVM | RVA | RVF | RVD | RVC | RVU);
> > > > > set_priv_version(env, PRIV_VERSION_1_11_0);
> > > > > - set_resetvec(env, DEFAULT_RSTVEC);
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > #if defined(TARGET_RISCV32)
> > > > > @@ -140,7 +147,6 @@ static void rv32gcsu_priv1_09_1_cpu_init(Object
> > > > > *obj)
> > > > > CPURISCVState *env = &RISCV_CPU(obj)->env;
> > > > > set_misa(env, RV32 | RVI | RVM | RVA | RVF | RVD | RVC | RVS |
> > > > > RVU);
> > > > > set_priv_version(env, PRIV_VERSION_1_09_1);
> > > > > - set_resetvec(env, DEFAULT_RSTVEC);
> > > > > set_feature(env, RISCV_FEATURE_MMU);
> > > > > set_feature(env, RISCV_FEATURE_PMP);
> > > > > }
> > > > > @@ -150,7 +156,6 @@ static void rv32gcsu_priv1_10_0_cpu_init(Object
> > > > > *obj)
> > > > > CPURISCVState *env = &RISCV_CPU(obj)->env;
> > > > > set_misa(env, RV32 | RVI | RVM | RVA | RVF | RVD | RVC | RVS |
> > > > > RVU);
> > > > > set_priv_version(env, PRIV_VERSION_1_10_0);
> > > > > - set_resetvec(env, DEFAULT_RSTVEC);
> > > > > set_feature(env, RISCV_FEATURE_MMU);
> > > > > set_feature(env, RISCV_FEATURE_PMP);
> > > > > }
> > > > > @@ -160,7 +165,6 @@ static void rv32imacu_nommu_cpu_init(Object *obj)
> > > > > CPURISCVState *env = &RISCV_CPU(obj)->env;
> > > > > set_misa(env, RV32 | RVI | RVM | RVA | RVC | RVU);
> > > > > set_priv_version(env, PRIV_VERSION_1_10_0);
> > > > > - set_resetvec(env, DEFAULT_RSTVEC);
> > > > > set_feature(env, RISCV_FEATURE_PMP);
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > @@ -169,7 +173,6 @@ static void rv32imafcu_nommu_cpu_init(Object *obj)
> > > > > CPURISCVState *env = &RISCV_CPU(obj)->env;
> > > > > set_misa(env, RV32 | RVI | RVM | RVA | RVF | RVC | RVU);
> > > > > set_priv_version(env, PRIV_VERSION_1_10_0);
> > > > > - set_resetvec(env, DEFAULT_RSTVEC);
> > > > > set_feature(env, RISCV_FEATURE_PMP);
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > @@ -187,7 +190,6 @@ static void rv64gcsu_priv1_09_1_cpu_init(Object
> > > > > *obj)
> > > > > CPURISCVState *env = &RISCV_CPU(obj)->env;
> > > > > set_misa(env, RV64 | RVI | RVM | RVA | RVF | RVD | RVC | RVS |
> > > > > RVU);
> > > > > set_priv_version(env, PRIV_VERSION_1_09_1);
> > > > > - set_resetvec(env, DEFAULT_RSTVEC);
> > > > > set_feature(env, RISCV_FEATURE_MMU);
> > > > > set_feature(env, RISCV_FEATURE_PMP);
> > > > > }
> > > > > @@ -197,7 +199,6 @@ static void rv64gcsu_priv1_10_0_cpu_init(Object
> > > > > *obj)
> > > > > CPURISCVState *env = &RISCV_CPU(obj)->env;
> > > > > set_misa(env, RV64 | RVI | RVM | RVA | RVF | RVD | RVC | RVS |
> > > > > RVU);
> > > > > set_priv_version(env, PRIV_VERSION_1_10_0);
> > > > > - set_resetvec(env, DEFAULT_RSTVEC);
> > > > > set_feature(env, RISCV_FEATURE_MMU);
> > > > > set_feature(env, RISCV_FEATURE_PMP);
> > > > > }
> > > > > @@ -207,7 +208,6 @@ static void rv64imacu_nommu_cpu_init(Object *obj)
> > > > > CPURISCVState *env = &RISCV_CPU(obj)->env;
> > > > > set_misa(env, RV64 | RVI | RVM | RVA | RVC | RVU);
> > > > > set_priv_version(env, PRIV_VERSION_1_10_0);
> > > > > - set_resetvec(env, DEFAULT_RSTVEC);
> > > > > set_feature(env, RISCV_FEATURE_PMP);
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > @@ -399,7 +399,9 @@ static void riscv_cpu_realize(DeviceState *dev,
> > > > > Error **errp)
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > set_priv_version(env, priv_version);
> > > > > - set_resetvec(env, DEFAULT_RSTVEC);
> > > > > + if (!get_resetvec(env)) {
> >
> > What if we have a RISC-V CPU whose reset vector is at address 0?
>
> That won't work then. I think if that happens we could swap to a
> negative number.
>
env->resetvec is declared as target_ulong so negative number does not work here.
How about just remove set_resetvec() in riscv_cpu_realize()? Or
introduce a new config parameter for the reset vector, and only
override it if the config parameter is given, like other properties?
Regards,
Bin
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] riscv/boot: Add a missing header include, (continued)
[PATCH v2 2/9] target/riscv: Don't overwrite the reset vector, Alistair Francis, 2020/05/07
[PATCH v2 3/9] target/riscv: Add the lowRISC Ibex CPU, Alistair Francis, 2020/05/07
[PATCH v2 4/9] riscv: Initial commit of OpenTitan machine, Alistair Francis, 2020/05/07
[PATCH v2 5/9] hw/char: Initial commit of Ibex UART, Alistair Francis, 2020/05/07
Re: [PATCH v2 5/9] hw/char: Initial commit of Ibex UART, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2020/05/15