[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] hw/riscv: shakti_c: Mark as not user creatable
From: |
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] hw/riscv: shakti_c: Mark as not user creatable |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Sep 2021 17:35:01 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.1.0 |
Hi Alistair,
On 9/27/21 09:13, Alistair Francis wrote:
> From: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
>
> Mark the shakti_c machine as not user creatable as it uses serial_hd.
>
> Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/639
> Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
> ---
> hw/riscv/shakti_c.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/riscv/shakti_c.c b/hw/riscv/shakti_c.c
> index 2f084d3c8d..603992d442 100644
> --- a/hw/riscv/shakti_c.c
> +++ b/hw/riscv/shakti_c.c
> @@ -150,6 +150,8 @@ static void shakti_c_soc_class_init(ObjectClass *klass,
> void *data)
> {
> DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(klass);
> dc->realize = shakti_c_soc_state_realize;
> + /* Reason: Uses serial_hds in realize function, thus can't be used twice
> */
> + dc->user_creatable = false;
I agree with the logical change, but not totally with the comment.
Well, the comment itself is not incorrect. But the error happens before:
ERROR:tcg/tcg.c:479:tcg_register_thread: assertion failed: (n <
tcg_max_ctxs)
The reason is TYPE_RISCV_HART_ARRAY creates CPUs in
riscv_hart_realize(), and this machine use the default CPU limit
of one CPU:
static void shakti_c_machine_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
{
MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_CLASS(klass);
mc->desc = "RISC-V Board compatible with Shakti SDK";
mc->init = shakti_c_machine_state_init;
mc->default_cpu_type = TYPE_RISCV_CPU_SHAKTI_C;
}
The default values come from:
static void machine_class_base_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
{
MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_CLASS(oc);
mc->max_cpus = mc->max_cpus ?: 1;
mc->min_cpus = mc->min_cpus ?: 1;
mc->default_cpus = mc->default_cpus ?: 1;
So the crash happens when we try to create the 2nd CPU.
> }
>
> static void shakti_c_soc_instance_init(Object *obj)
>