[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: qemu icicle kit es
From: |
Conor Dooley |
Subject: |
Re: qemu icicle kit es |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Jan 2023 12:56:57 +0000 |
User-agent: |
K-9 Mail for Android |
On 13 January 2023 00:35:11 GMT, Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 2:03 AM Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> +CC Bin Meng
>>
>> Bin Meng, you're listed as a supporter (in master anyway) but is that
>> still accurate? I figure there's a good chance it isn't anymore?
>> Have you tested the platform from HSS init at all lately?
>
>Yes, I am still maintaining the QEMU PolarFire SoC. The WiKi page
>listed the exact HSS version I tested and if it doesn't, it should be
>a regression in QEMU. If yes, I would like to have a look at that.
That'd be great.
I submitted a few patches for fixing the direct kernel boot & hopefully haven't
broken anything!
I'll try to test it also, if I get some time.
>Running more recent HSS is known to break, because QEMU does not
>follow up quite closely with the HSS implementation as HSS has evolved
>quite quickly in the past.
Yeah, although the rate of change has slowed down now.
I think there's a decent but of emulation missing though to get a recent
version of the HSS working.
Thanks,
Conor.
- qemu icicle kit es, stage TC, 2023/01/11
- Re: qemu icicle kit es, Conor Dooley, 2023/01/11
- Re: qemu icicle kit es, stage TC, 2023/01/12
- Re: qemu icicle kit es, Conor Dooley, 2023/01/12
- Re: qemu icicle kit es, Bin Meng, 2023/01/12
- Re: qemu icicle kit es,
Conor Dooley <=
- Re: qemu icicle kit es, Conor Dooley, 2023/01/14
- Re: qemu icicle kit es, Bin Meng, 2023/01/19
- Re: qemu icicle kit es, Conor Dooley, 2023/01/26