Re: [PATCH 0/3] Assorted fixes for PMU

[Peter Maydell]

On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 at 20:29, Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com> wrote:
>
> This series contains few miscallenous fixes related to hpmcounters
> and related code. The first patch fixes an issue with cycle/instret
> counters overcouting while the remaining two are more for specification
> compliance.

I've noticed a number of riscv patchsets from various people
recently where the subject line for the cover letter doesn't
include any indication that it's a riscv related patchset.
For instance this one is just "Assorted fixes for PMU", which
could easily be an Arm PMU series. Could you all try to make sure
that cover letter subject lines indicate the architecture or
other subcomponent they affect, please? This helps people who
are skimming over the mailing list looking for patches relevant
to them.

thanks
-- PMM