qemu-s390x
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] cpu-models: add "disable-deprecated-feats" option to


From: Markus Armbruster
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] cpu-models: add "disable-deprecated-feats" option to cpu model expansion
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 08:31:23 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)

Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com> writes:

> On 4/24/24 02:19, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com> writes:
>> 
>>> This optional parameter for query-cpu-model-expansion enables CPU
>>> model features flagged as deprecated to appear in the resulting
>>> list of properties.
>>>
>>> This commit does not add support beyond adding a new argument
>>> to the query. All queries with this option present will result
>>> in an error claiming this option is not supported.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com>
>>> ---
>>>  qapi/machine-target.json         | 7 ++++++-
>>>  target/arm/arm-qmp-cmds.c        | 7 +++++++
>>>  target/i386/cpu-sysemu.c         | 7 +++++++
>>>  target/s390x/cpu_models_sysemu.c | 7 +++++++
>>>  4 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/qapi/machine-target.json b/qapi/machine-target.json
>>> index 29e695aa06..b9da284d2d 100644
>>> --- a/qapi/machine-target.json
>>> +++ b/qapi/machine-target.json
>>> @@ -285,6 +285,10 @@
>>>  #
>>>  # @type: expansion type, specifying how to expand the CPU model
>>>  #
>>> +# @disable-deprecated-feats: include CPU model features that are
>>> +#     flagged as deprecated. If supported, these features will appear
>>> +#     in the properties list paired with false.
>> 
>> What's the default?
>> 
>> Which command result(s) does this affect?  Suggest to explain using
>> unabridged example QMP input and output before and after this series.
>
> Fair enough. Bool defaults to false but that's not apparent in the
> description. I will add more detail.

I didn't mean to ask for example QMP in the doc comment.  I need you to
explain the new member to me.  Once I understand what the thing does, I
may have suggestions on improving the doc comment.

[...]

> Thanks for your feedback!

You're welcome!




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]