qemu-s390x
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v1 06/14] s390x: introduce s390_get_memory_limit()


From: David Hildenbrand
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 06/14] s390x: introduce s390_get_memory_limit()
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 13:23:59 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

On 16.09.24 15:20, Nina Schoetterl-Glausch wrote:
On Tue, 2024-09-10 at 19:58 +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
Let's add s390_get_memory_limit(), to query what has been successfully
set via s390_set_memory_limit(). Allow setting the limit only once.

Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com>

Comment below.
---
  target/s390x/cpu-sysemu.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
  target/s390x/cpu.h        |  1 +
  2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu-sysemu.c b/target/s390x/cpu-sysemu.c
index 1cd30c1d84..1915567b3a 100644
--- a/target/s390x/cpu-sysemu.c
+++ b/target/s390x/cpu-sysemu.c
@@ -255,12 +255,27 @@ unsigned int s390_cpu_set_state(uint8_t cpu_state, 
S390CPU *cpu)
      return s390_count_running_cpus();
  }
+static uint64_t memory_limit;
+
  int s390_set_memory_limit(uint64_t new_limit, uint64_t *hw_limit)
  {
+    int ret = 0;
+
+    if (memory_limit) {
+        return -EBUSY;
+    }
      if (kvm_enabled()) {
-        return kvm_s390_set_mem_limit(new_limit, hw_limit);
+        ret = kvm_s390_set_mem_limit(new_limit, hw_limit);
+    }
+    if (!ret) {
+        memory_limit = new_limit;
      }
-    return 0;
+    return ret;
+}
+
+uint64_t s390_get_memory_limit(void)
+{

Might be nice to guard/warn against s390_set_memory_limit not having been 
called before.


What about the following on top:

diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu-sysemu.c b/target/s390x/cpu-sysemu.c
index 1915567b3a..07cb85103a 100644
--- a/target/s390x/cpu-sysemu.c
+++ b/target/s390x/cpu-sysemu.c
@@ -263,6 +263,8 @@ int s390_set_memory_limit(uint64_t new_limit, uint64_t 
*hw_limit)
if (memory_limit) {
         return -EBUSY;
+    } else if (!new_limit) {
+        return -EINVAL;
     }
     if (kvm_enabled()) {
         ret = kvm_s390_set_mem_limit(new_limit, hw_limit);
@@ -275,6 +277,8 @@ int s390_set_memory_limit(uint64_t new_limit, uint64_t 
*hw_limit)
uint64_t s390_get_memory_limit(void)
 {
+    /* We expect to be called after s390_set_memory_limit(). */
+    assert(memory_limit);
     return memory_limit;
 }


--
Cheers,

David / dhildenb




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]