[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-stable] [PATCH for 1.5] ui/gtk.c: Fix *BSD build of Gtk+ UI
From: |
Brad Smith |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-stable] [PATCH for 1.5] ui/gtk.c: Fix *BSD build of Gtk+ UI |
Date: |
Fri, 24 May 2013 14:47:39 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 07:06:57PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> 23.05.2013 02:38, Brad Smith wrote:
> > Fix the build of the Gtk+ UI on *BSD systems.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Brad Smith <address@hidden>
> > Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <address@hidden>
> > Message-id: address@hidden
> > Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <address@hidden>
> >
> > diff --git a/include/qemu-common.h b/include/qemu-common.h
> > index af769f5..c944bb7 100644
> > --- a/include/qemu-common.h
> > +++ b/include/qemu-common.h
> > @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
> > #if defined(__GLIBC__)
> > # include <pty.h>
> > #elif defined CONFIG_BSD
> > +# include <termios.h>
> > # if defined(__FreeBSD__) || defined(__FreeBSD_kernel__) ||
> > defined(__DragonFly__)
> > # include <libutil.h>
> > # else
> >
>
> Do we really need to have all this in a common header file?
> Together with termios, libutil, pty and other unrelated stuff?
>
> Oh well..
Kinda late nit picking about it now.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.