qemu-stable
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] hw/intc/arm_gic: Fix interrupt ID in GICD_SGIR register


From: P J P
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hw/intc/arm_gic: Fix interrupt ID in GICD_SGIR register
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2021 17:27:20 +0530 (IST)

+-- On Sun, 31 Jan 2021, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote --+
| On 1/31/21 11:34 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
| > Per the ARM Generic Interrupt Controller Architecture specification
| > (document "ARM IHI 0048B.b (ID072613)"), the SGIINTID field is 4 bit,
| > not 10:
| > 
| >     - Table 4-21 GICD_SGIR bit assignments
| > 
| >     The Interrupt ID of the SGI to forward to the specified CPU
| >     interfaces. The value of this field is the Interrupt ID, in
| >     the range 0-15, for example a value of 0b0011 specifies
| >     Interrupt ID 3.
| > 
| > diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gic.c b/hw/intc/arm_gic.c
| > index af41e2fb448..75316329516 100644
| > --- a/hw/intc/arm_gic.c
| > +++ b/hw/intc/arm_gic.c
| > @@ -1476,7 +1476,7 @@ static void gic_dist_writel(void *opaque, hwaddr 
offset,
| >          int target_cpu;
| >  
| >          cpu = gic_get_current_cpu(s);
| > -        irq = value & 0x3ff;
| > +        irq = value & 0xf;
| >          switch ((value >> 24) & 3) {
| >          case 0:
| >              mask = (value >> 16) & ALL_CPU_MASK;
| > 

* Looks okay.


| > Correct the irq mask to fix an undefined behavior (which eventually
| > lead to a heap-buffer-overflow, see [Buglink]):
| > 
| >    $ echo 'writel 0x8000f00 0xff4affb0' | qemu-system-aarch64 -M 
virt,accel=qtest -qtest stdio
| >    [I 1612088147.116987] OPENED
| >   [R +0.278293] writel 0x8000f00 0xff4affb0
| >   ../hw/intc/arm_gic.c:1498:13: runtime error: index 944 out of bounds for 
type 'uint8_t [16][8]'
| >   SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: undefined-behavior 
../hw/intc/arm_gic.c:1498:13
| > 
| > Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
| > Fixes: 9ee6e8bb853 ("ARMv7 support.")
| > Buglink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1913916
| > Buglink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1913917
| 
| > ---
| > Isnt it worth a CVE to help distributions track backports?
| > ---

* Please send such report(s) to 'qemu-security' list to be triaged as 
  potential security ones.


Thank you.
--
Prasad J Pandit / Red Hat Product Security Team
8685 545E B54C 486B C6EB 271E E285 8B5A F050 DE8D

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]