qemu-stable
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PULL 5/5] linux-user: Fix qemu-arm to run static armhf binaries


From: Michael Tokarev
Subject: Re: [PULL 5/5] linux-user: Fix qemu-arm to run static armhf binaries
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 18:14:21 +0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0

19.07.2023 18:52, Helge Deller wrote:
qemu-user crashes immediately when running static binaries on the armhf
architecture. The problem is the memory layout where the executable is
loaded before the interpreter library, in which case the reserved brk
region clashes with the interpreter code and is released before qemu
tries to start the program.

At load time qemu calculates a brk value for interpreter and executable
each.  The fix is to choose the higher one of both.

Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
Cc: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Reported-by:  Venkata.Pyla@toshiba-tsip.com
Closes: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1040981
---
  linux-user/elfload.c | 7 +++++++
  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/linux-user/elfload.c b/linux-user/elfload.c
index a26200d9f3..94951630b1 100644
--- a/linux-user/elfload.c
+++ b/linux-user/elfload.c
@@ -3615,6 +3615,13 @@ int load_elf_binary(struct linux_binprm *bprm, struct 
image_info *info)

      if (elf_interpreter) {
          load_elf_interp(elf_interpreter, &interp_info, bprm->buf);
+        /*
+         * adjust brk address if the interpreter was loaded above the main
+         * executable, e.g. happens with static binaries on armhf
+         */
+        if (interp_info.brk > info->brk) {
+            info->brk = interp_info.brk;
+        }

So, this is kinda amusing.
This broke arm64, ppc64el and s390x:

arm64$ ./qemu-aarch64 /bin/sh -c '/bin/ls -dCFl *[t]* >/dev/null'
qemu: uncaught target signal 11 (Segmentation fault) - core dumped
Segmentation fault

(it was just a quick test from debian qemu-user package).

Reverting this patch makes it work again..

*Sigh*.

(This is currently broken in debian unstable too, - this is how I
noticed the breakage).

Thanks,

/mjt



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]