[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Qsos-commits] qsos/sheet RDBMS/mysql/mysql-4.1.qsos RDBMS/mys...
|
From: |
Gonéri Le Bouder |
|
Subject: |
[Qsos-commits] qsos/sheet RDBMS/mysql/mysql-4.1.qsos RDBMS/mys... |
|
Date: |
Mon, 24 Apr 2006 16:13:52 +0000 |
CVSROOT: /sources/qsos
Module name: qsos
Branch:
Changes by: Gonéri Le Bouder <address@hidden> 06/04/24 16:13:52
Modified files:
sheet/RDBMS/mysql: mysql-4.1.qsos mysql-5.0.qsos
sheet/RDBMS/postgresql: postgresql-8.0.qsos
sheet/bugTracker/otrs: otrs.qsos
sheet/groupware/kolab: kolab.qsos
sheet/portal/jbossPortal: jbossPortal.qsos
Log message:
a lot of minor changes.
This changes are partialy autogenerated.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/qsos/qsos/sheet/RDBMS/mysql/mysql-4.1.qsos.diff?tr1=1.3&tr2=1.4&r1=text&r2=text
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/qsos/qsos/sheet/RDBMS/mysql/mysql-5.0.qsos.diff?tr1=1.1&tr2=1.2&r1=text&r2=text
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/qsos/qsos/sheet/RDBMS/postgresql/postgresql-8.0.qsos.diff?tr1=1.1&tr2=1.2&r1=text&r2=text
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/qsos/qsos/sheet/bugTracker/otrs/otrs.qsos.diff?tr1=1.5&tr2=1.6&r1=text&r2=text
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/qsos/qsos/sheet/groupware/kolab/kolab.qsos.diff?tr1=1.11&tr2=1.12&r1=text&r2=text
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/qsos/qsos/sheet/portal/jbossPortal/jbossPortal.qsos.diff?tr1=1.6&tr2=1.7&r1=text&r2=text
Patches:
Index: qsos/sheet/RDBMS/mysql/mysql-4.1.qsos
diff -u qsos/sheet/RDBMS/mysql/mysql-4.1.qsos:1.3
qsos/sheet/RDBMS/mysql/mysql-4.1.qsos:1.4
--- qsos/sheet/RDBMS/mysql/mysql-4.1.qsos:1.3 Sun Apr 23 20:47:08 2006
+++ qsos/sheet/RDBMS/mysql/mysql-4.1.qsos Mon Apr 24 16:13:52 2006
@@ -3,13 +3,13 @@
<header>
<authors>
<author>
- <name>Raphael Semeteys</name>
<email>address@hidden</email>
+ <name>Raphael Semeteys</name>
</author>
</authors>
<dates>
<creation>20050411</creation>
- <validation/>
+ <validation></validation>
</dates>
<language>en</language>
<appname>MySQL Server</appname>
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
<demourl>Not applicable</demourl>
<qsosformat>1.6</qsosformat>
<qsosappfamily>RDBMS</qsosappfamily>
- <qsosspecificformat>1.0</qsosspecificformat>
+ <qsosspecificformat>1</qsosspecificformat>
</header>
<section name="generic" title="Generic section">
<desc>Generic criteria from QSOS version 1.6</desc>
@@ -45,15 +45,15 @@
</element>
<element name="historyknowproblems" title="History, know problems">
<desc0>Software knows several problems which can be
prohibitive</desc0>
- <desc1>No know major problem or crisi</desc1>
+ <desc1>No know major problem or crisis</desc1>
<desc2>History of good management of crisis situations</desc2>
<score>1</score>
<comment>For a long time MySQL was not much considered by DBA, due
to table locks on MyISAM tables and the lack of functionalities like stored
procedures or transactions</comment>
</element>
<element name="forkprobability" title="Fork probability, source of
Forking">
<desc0>Software is very likely to be forked in the future</desc0>
- <desc1>Software comes from a fork but has very few chances of being
forked in the futur</desc1>
- <desc2>Software has very little chance of being forked. It does not
come from a frok either</desc2>
+ <desc1>Software comes from a fork but has very few chances of being
forked in the future</desc1>
+ <desc2>Software has very little chance of being forked. It does not
come from a fork either</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment>Mature product. MySQL AB. owns a large part of source code
and even if InnoDB storage engine is owned by Oracle (via InnoBase), MySQL
seems to be protected against forks</comment>
</element>
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@
<desc1>Detectable activity but without process clearly exposed,
loing reaction/resolution time</desc1>
<desc2>Strong reactivity based on roles and tasks assignment</desc2>
<score>2</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="activityonfunctionalities" title="Activity on
functionalities">
<desc0>No or few new functionalities</desc0>
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@
<element name="quality" title="Quality Assurance">
<desc0>No QA process</desc0>
<desc1>Identifies QA process but not much formalized and with no
tool</desc1>
- <desc2>Automatic testing process included in code's life-cycle with
publication of resulats</desc2>
+ <desc2>Automatic testing process included in code's life-cycle with
publication of results</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment>Integrated test suite (make test), extensible with an
interpretor (mysqltest) and with possibility to automatically submit bug
reports (mysqlbug)</comment>
</element>
@@ -191,85 +191,85 @@
<desc0>No bug or feature request management tool</desc0>
<desc1>Standard tools provided (for instance by a hosting forge) but
poorly used</desc1>
<desc2>Very active use of tools for roles/tasks allocation and
progress monitoring</desc2>
- <score/>
+ <score></score>
<comment>Complete bug tracking and feature request tool available
(affectations, statistics, search). cf. http://bugs.mysql.com</comment>
</element>
</element>
<element name="packaging" title="Packaging">
<desc>Packaging for various operating systems</desc>
<element name="packagingsource" title="Source">
- <desc0>Software can't be installed from source without a look of
work</desc0>
- <desc1>Installation from source is limited depend on very strict
condition (OS, arch, lib, ...)</desc1>
+ <desc0>Software can't be installed from source without lot of
work</desc0>
+ <desc1>Installation from source is limited and depends on very
strict conditions (OS, arch, lib, ...)</desc1>
<desc2>Installation from source is easy</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment>Installation from source is well documented in the MySQL
Reference Manual</comment>
</element>
<element name="packagingdebian" title="Debian">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for Debian</desc0>
- <desc1>A Debian package exists but it has important issues or it
doesn't have an official support</desc1>
+ <desc1>A Debian package exists but it has important issues or it
doesn't have official support</desc1>
<desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
<score>2</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="packagingfreebsd" title="FreeBSD">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for FreeBSD</desc0>
- <desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't have
an official support</desc1>
+ <desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't have
official support</desc1>
<desc2>A official port exists in FreeBSD</desc2>
<score>2</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="packaginghpux" title="HP-UX">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for HP-UX</desc0>
- <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have an official support</desc1>
- <desc2>A strong packaged is provided for HP-UX</desc2>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support</desc1>
+ <desc2>A stable package is provided for HP-UX</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment>MySQL AB provides depot files</comment>
</element>
<element name="packagingmacosx" title="MacOSX">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for MacOSX</desc0>
- <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have an official support</desc1>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support</desc1>
<desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
<score>1</score>
<comment>MySQL AB provides dmg files</comment>
</element>
<element name="packagingmandriva" title="Mandriva">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for Mandriva</desc0>
- <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have an official support</desc1>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support</desc1>
<desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
<score>2</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="packagingnet" title="NetBSD">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for NetBSD</desc0>
- <desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't have
an official support</desc1>
+ <desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't have
official support</desc1>
<desc2>A official port exists in NetBSD</desc2>
<score>2</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="packagingopen" title="OpenBSD">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for OpenBSD</desc0>
- <desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't have
an official support</desc1>
+ <desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't have
official support</desc1>
<desc2>A official port exists in OpenBSD</desc2>
<score>1</score>
<comment>Only version 4.0 has an official port. However MySQL
provides tar.gz for 4.1 version.</comment>
</element>
<element name="packagingredhat" title="RedHat">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for RedHat/Fedora</desc0>
- <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have an official support</desc1>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support</desc1>
<desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment>The MySQL server package is available in the Extras Channel
from Red Hat Network (RHN). MySQL AB also provides RPM for Red Hat Entreprise
Linux.</comment>
</element>
<element name="packagingsolaris" title="Solaris">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for Solaris</desc0>
- <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have an official support (e.g: SunFreeware.com )</desc1>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support (e.g: SunFreeware.com )</desc1>
<desc2>The software is supported by Sun for Solaris</desc2>
<score>1</score>
<comment>MySQL is "managed" by Sun but not fully supported (Sun
provides existing patches and escalates new bugs to the developer
community)</comment>
</element>
<element name="packagingsuse" title="SuSE">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for SuSE</desc0>
- <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have an official support</desc1>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support</desc1>
<desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
<score>1</score>
<comment>Only version 4.0 is included in SuSE Linux Enterprise
Server 9. However MySQL provides RPM for 4.1 version.</comment>
@@ -333,14 +333,14 @@
<desc1>Moderate permissive license located between both extremes
(GPL and BSD) dual-licensing depending on the type of user (person, company,
...) or their activities</desc1>
<desc2>Very permissive like BSD or Apache licenses</desc2>
<score>0</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="protectionagainstproprietaryforks" title="Protection
against proprietary forks">
<desc0>Very permissive like BSD or Apache licenses</desc0>
<desc1>Moderate permissive license located between both extremes
(GPL and BSD), dual-licensing depending on the type of user (person, company,
...) or their activies</desc1>
<desc2>Very strict license, like GPL</desc2>
<score>2</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
</element>
<element name="copyrightowners" title="Copyright owners">
@@ -384,73 +384,73 @@
<desc>Standard RDBMS features</desc>
<element name="sqlcompliance" title="SQL compliance">
<desc>Compliance levels with SQL standards</desc>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
<element name="sql92" title="SQL-92 compliance">
<desc0>Limited to Entry-level only</desc0>
<desc1>Transitional or Intermediate support levels</desc1>
<desc2>Full support level</desc2>
<score>0</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="sql99" title="SQL-99 compliance">
<desc0>Limited to Core level only</desc0>
<desc1>Some optional features are implemented and compliant</desc1>
<desc2>Most of options in packages (Framework, Foundation, Call Level
Interface, Persistent Stored Modules, and Host Language Bindings) are
implemented</desc2>
<score>0</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="sql2003" title="SQL:2003 compliance">
<desc0>Features implemented far from SQL:2003 core compliance</desc0>
<desc1>Most of SQL:2003 core features are implemented and
compliant</desc1>
<desc2>SQL:2003 core compliant and most of options in packages
(SQL/Framework, SQL/Foundation, SQL/CLI, SQL/PSM, SQL/MED, SQL/OLB,
SQL/Schemata, SQL/JRT, SQL/XML) are implemented</desc2>
<score>0</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
</element>
<element name="classicsqlfeatures" title="Classic SQL features">
<desc>Classic SQL features</desc>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
<element name="tableconstraints" title="Table constraints">
<desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
<desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
<desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
<score>0</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="namedconstraints" title="Named constraints">
<desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
<desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
<desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
<score>2</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="columnconstraints" title="Column constraints">
<desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
<desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
<desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
<score>0</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="nullconstraints" title="NULL constraints">
<desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
<desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
<desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
<score>2</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="columndefaultvalues" title="Column's default values">
<desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
<desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
<desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
<score>2</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="functionsdefaultvalues" title="Functions for default
values">
<desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
<desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
<desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
<score>0</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="foreignkeys" title="Foreign keys support">
<desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
@@ -464,12 +464,12 @@
<desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
<desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
<score>0</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
</element>
<element name="security" title="Security">
<desc>Security features</desc>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
<element name="accesscontrol" title="Access control levels">
<desc>Levels of access control supported (usaername, table, base,
etc...)</desc>
<comment>username, table, base and client's hostname</comment>
@@ -483,12 +483,12 @@
<desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
<desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
<score>2</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
</element>
<element name="transactions" title="Transactions">
<desc>Transactional aspects</desc>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
<element name="transactionalengine" title="Transactional engine">
<desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
<desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
@@ -512,12 +512,12 @@
<desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
<desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
<score>0</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
</element>
<element name="othersqlfeatures" title="Other SQL features">
<desc>Other SQL features</desc>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
<element name="views" title="Views">
<desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
<desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
@@ -551,21 +551,21 @@
<desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
<desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
<score>2</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="tablespaces" title="Tablespaces">
<desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
<desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
<desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
<score>2</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="unicode" title="UNICODE">
<desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
<desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
<desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
<score>2</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
</element>
</section>
@@ -587,21 +587,21 @@
<desc1>Master/Slave replication</desc1>
<desc2>Mutli-master replication</desc2>
<score>1</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="olap" title="OLAP">
<desc0>Not supported</desc0>
<desc1>Partially supported</desc1>
<desc2>Fully supported</desc2>
<score>0</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="xmlfeatures" title="XML features">
<desc0>No XML features</desc0>
<desc1>Very few XML features</desc1>
<desc2>XML data is deeply integrated in the system</desc2>
<score>0</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="gis" title="GIS features">
<desc0>No spatial features</desc0>
@@ -642,4 +642,4 @@
<comment>The EXPLAIN function is limited</comment>
</element>
</section>
-</document>
\ No newline at end of file
+</document>
Index: qsos/sheet/RDBMS/mysql/mysql-5.0.qsos
diff -u qsos/sheet/RDBMS/mysql/mysql-5.0.qsos:1.1
qsos/sheet/RDBMS/mysql/mysql-5.0.qsos:1.2
--- qsos/sheet/RDBMS/mysql/mysql-5.0.qsos:1.1 Sun Apr 23 20:47:44 2006
+++ qsos/sheet/RDBMS/mysql/mysql-5.0.qsos Mon Apr 24 16:13:52 2006
@@ -3,13 +3,13 @@
<header>
<authors>
<author>
- <name>Raphael Semeteys</name>
<email>address@hidden</email>
+ <name>Raphael Semeteys</name>
</author>
</authors>
<dates>
<creation>20051025</creation>
- <validation/>
+ <validation></validation>
</dates>
<language>en</language>
<appname>MySQL Server</appname>
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
<demourl>Not applicable</demourl>
<qsosformat>1.6</qsosformat>
<qsosappfamily>RDBMS</qsosappfamily>
- <qsosspecificformat>1.0</qsosspecificformat>
+ <qsosspecificformat>1</qsosspecificformat>
</header>
<section name="generic" title="Generic section">
<desc>Generic criteria from QSOS version 1.6</desc>
@@ -45,15 +45,15 @@
</element>
<element name="historyknowproblems" title="History, know problems">
<desc0>Software knows several problems which can be
prohibitive</desc0>
- <desc1>No know major problem or crisi</desc1>
+ <desc1>No know major problem or crisis</desc1>
<desc2>History of good management of crisis situations</desc2>
<score>1</score>
<comment>For a long time MySQL was not much considered by DBA, due
to table locks on MyISAM tables and the lack of functionalities like stored
procedures or transactions</comment>
</element>
<element name="forkprobability" title="Fork probability, source of
Forking">
<desc0>Software is very likely to be forked in the future</desc0>
- <desc1>Software comes from a fork but has very few chances of being
forked in the futur</desc1>
- <desc2>Software has very little chance of being forked. It does not
come from a frok either</desc2>
+ <desc1>Software comes from a fork but has very few chances of being
forked in the future</desc1>
+ <desc2>Software has very little chance of being forked. It does not
come from a fork either</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment>Mature product. MySQL AB. owns a large part of source code
and even if InnoDB storage engine is owned by Oracle (via InnoBase), MySQL
seems to be protected against forks</comment>
</element>
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@
<desc1>Detectable activity but without process clearly exposed,
loing reaction/resolution time</desc1>
<desc2>Strong reactivity based on roles and tasks assignment</desc2>
<score>2</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="activityonfunctionalities" title="Activity on
functionalities">
<desc0>No or few new functionalities</desc0>
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@
<element name="quality" title="Quality Assurance">
<desc0>No QA process</desc0>
<desc1>Identifies QA process but not much formalized and with no
tool</desc1>
- <desc2>Automatic testing process included in code's life-cycle with
publication of resulats</desc2>
+ <desc2>Automatic testing process included in code's life-cycle with
publication of results</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment>Integrated test suite (make test), extensible with an
interpretor (mysqltest) and with possibility to automatically submit bug
reports (mysqlbug)</comment>
</element>
@@ -191,85 +191,85 @@
<desc0>No bug or feature request management tool</desc0>
<desc1>Standard tools provided (for instance by a hosting forge) but
poorly used</desc1>
<desc2>Very active use of tools for roles/tasks allocation and
progress monitoring</desc2>
- <score/>
+ <score></score>
<comment>Complete bug tracking and feature request tool available
(affectations, statistics, search). cf. http://bugs.mysql.com</comment>
</element>
</element>
<element name="packaging" title="Packaging">
<desc>Packaging for various operating systems</desc>
<element name="packagingsource" title="Source">
- <desc0>Software can't be installed from source without a look of
work</desc0>
- <desc1>Installation from source is limited depend on very strict
condition (OS, arch, lib, ...)</desc1>
+ <desc0>Software can't be installed from source without lot of
work</desc0>
+ <desc1>Installation from source is limited and depends on very
strict conditions (OS, arch, lib, ...)</desc1>
<desc2>Installation from source is easy</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment>Installation from source is well documented in the MySQL
Reference Manual</comment>
</element>
<element name="packagingdebian" title="Debian">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for Debian</desc0>
- <desc1>A Debian package exists but it has important issues or it
doesn't have an official support</desc1>
+ <desc1>A Debian package exists but it has important issues or it
doesn't have official support</desc1>
<desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
<score>1</score>
<comment>A package exists in the "unstable" distribution</comment>
</element>
<element name="packagingfreebsd" title="FreeBSD">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for FreeBSD</desc0>
- <desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't have
an official support</desc1>
+ <desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't have
official support</desc1>
<desc2>A official port exists in FreeBSD</desc2>
<score>2</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="packaginghpux" title="HP-UX">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for HP-UX</desc0>
- <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have an official support</desc1>
- <desc2>A strong packaged is provided for HP-UX</desc2>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support</desc1>
+ <desc2>A stable package is provided for HP-UX</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment>MySQL AB provides depot files</comment>
</element>
<element name="packagingmacosx" title="MacOSX">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for MacOSX</desc0>
- <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have an official support</desc1>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support</desc1>
<desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
<score>1</score>
<comment>MySQL AB provides dmg files</comment>
</element>
<element name="packagingmandriva" title="Mandriva">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for Mandriva</desc0>
- <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have an official support</desc1>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support</desc1>
<desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
<score>2</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="packagingnet" title="NetBSD">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for NetBSD</desc0>
- <desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't have
an official support</desc1>
+ <desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't have
official support</desc1>
<desc2>A official port exists in NetBSD</desc2>
<score>2</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="packagingopen" title="OpenBSD">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for OpenBSD</desc0>
- <desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't have
an official support</desc1>
+ <desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't have
official support</desc1>
<desc2>A official port exists in OpenBSD</desc2>
<score>1</score>
<comment>Only version 4.0 has an official port. However MySQL
provides tar.gz for 5.0 version.</comment>
</element>
<element name="packagingredhat" title="RedHat">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for RedHat/Fedora</desc0>
- <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have an official support</desc1>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support</desc1>
<desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment>MySQL AB provides RPM for Red Hat Entreprise Linux, but
MySQL 5.0 is not officially supported by Red Hat.</comment>
</element>
<element name="packagingsolaris" title="Solaris">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for Solaris</desc0>
- <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have an official support (e.g: SunFreeware.com )</desc1>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support (e.g: SunFreeware.com )</desc1>
<desc2>The software is supported by Sun for Solaris</desc2>
<score>1</score>
<comment>MySQL is "managed" by Sun but not fully supported (Sun
provides existing patches and escalates new bugs to the developer
community)</comment>
</element>
<element name="packagingsuse" title="SuSE">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for SuSE</desc0>
- <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have an official support</desc1>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support</desc1>
<desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
<score>1</score>
<comment>Only version 4.0 is included in SuSE Linux Enterprise
Server 9. However MySQL provides RPM for 4.1 version.</comment>
@@ -333,14 +333,14 @@
<desc1>Moderate permissive license located between both extremes
(GPL and BSD) dual-licensing depending on the type of user (person, company,
...) or their activities</desc1>
<desc2>Very permissive like BSD or Apache licenses</desc2>
<score>0</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="protectionagainstproprietaryforks" title="Protection
against proprietary forks">
<desc0>Very permissive like BSD or Apache licenses</desc0>
<desc1>Moderate permissive license located between both extremes
(GPL and BSD), dual-licensing depending on the type of user (person, company,
...) or their activies</desc1>
<desc2>Very strict license, like GPL</desc2>
<score>2</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
</element>
<element name="copyrightowners" title="Copyright owners">
@@ -384,73 +384,73 @@
<desc>Standard RDBMS features</desc>
<element name="sqlcompliance" title="SQL compliance">
<desc>Compliance levels with SQL standards</desc>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
<element name="sql92" title="SQL-92 compliance">
<desc0>Limited to Entry-level only</desc0>
<desc1>Transitional or Intermediate support levels</desc1>
<desc2>Full support level</desc2>
<score>0</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="sql99" title="SQL-99 compliance">
<desc0>Limited to Core level only</desc0>
<desc1>Some optional features are implemented and compliant</desc1>
<desc2>Most of options in packages (Framework, Foundation, Call Level
Interface, Persistent Stored Modules, and Host Language Bindings) are
implemented</desc2>
<score>0</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="sql2003" title="SQL:2003 compliance">
<desc0>Features implemented far from SQL:2003 core compliance</desc0>
<desc1>Most of SQL:2003 core features are implemented and
compliant</desc1>
<desc2>SQL:2003 core compliant and most of options in packages
(SQL/Framework, SQL/Foundation, SQL/CLI, SQL/PSM, SQL/MED, SQL/OLB,
SQL/Schemata, SQL/JRT, SQL/XML) are implemented</desc2>
<score>1</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
</element>
<element name="classicsqlfeatures" title="Classic SQL features">
<desc>Classic SQL features</desc>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
<element name="tableconstraints" title="Table constraints">
<desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
<desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
<desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
<score>0</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="namedconstraints" title="Named constraints">
<desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
<desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
<desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
<score>2</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="columnconstraints" title="Column constraints">
<desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
<desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
<desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
<score>0</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="nullconstraints" title="NULL constraints">
<desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
<desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
<desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
<score>2</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="columndefaultvalues" title="Column's default values">
<desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
<desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
<desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
<score>2</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="functionsdefaultvalues" title="Functions for default
values">
<desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
<desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
<desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
<score>0</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="foreignkeys" title="Foreign keys support">
<desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
@@ -464,12 +464,12 @@
<desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
<desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
<score>0</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
</element>
<element name="security" title="Security">
<desc>Security features</desc>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
<element name="accesscontrol" title="Access control levels">
<desc>Levels of access control supported (usaername, table, base,
etc...)</desc>
<comment>username, table, base and client's hostname</comment>
@@ -483,12 +483,12 @@
<desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
<desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
<score>2</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
</element>
<element name="transactions" title="Transactions">
<desc>Transactional aspects</desc>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
<element name="transactionalengine" title="Transactional engine">
<desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
<desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
@@ -512,12 +512,12 @@
<desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
<desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
<score>2</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
</element>
<element name="othersqlfeatures" title="Other SQL features">
<desc>Other SQL features</desc>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
<element name="views" title="Views">
<desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
<desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
@@ -544,28 +544,28 @@
<desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
<desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
<score>2</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="subselects" title="Subselects">
<desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
<desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
<desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
<score>2</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="tablespaces" title="Tablespaces">
<desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
<desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
<desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
<score>2</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="unicode" title="UNICODE">
<desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
<desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
<desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
<score>2</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
</element>
</section>
@@ -587,14 +587,14 @@
<desc1>Master/Slave replication</desc1>
<desc2>Mutli-master replication</desc2>
<score>1</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="olap" title="OLAP">
<desc0>Not supported</desc0>
<desc1>Partially supported</desc1>
<desc2>Fully supported</desc2>
<score>0</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="xmlfeatures" title="XML features">
<desc0>No XML features</desc0>
@@ -642,4 +642,4 @@
<comment>The EXPLAIN function is limited</comment>
</element>
</section>
-</document>
\ No newline at end of file
+</document>
Index: qsos/sheet/RDBMS/postgresql/postgresql-8.0.qsos
diff -u qsos/sheet/RDBMS/postgresql/postgresql-8.0.qsos:1.1
qsos/sheet/RDBMS/postgresql/postgresql-8.0.qsos:1.2
--- qsos/sheet/RDBMS/postgresql/postgresql-8.0.qsos:1.1 Sun Apr 23 22:54:25 2006
+++ qsos/sheet/RDBMS/postgresql/postgresql-8.0.qsos Mon Apr 24 16:13:52 2006
@@ -3,13 +3,13 @@
<header>
<authors>
<author>
- <name>Raphael Semeteys</name>
<email>address@hidden</email>
+ <name>Raphael Semeteys</name>
</author>
</authors>
<dates>
<creation>20051025</creation>
- <validation/>
+ <validation></validation>
</dates>
<language>en</language>
<appname>PostgreSQL</appname>
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
<demourl>Not applicable</demourl>
<qsosformat>1.6</qsosformat>
<qsosappfamily>RDBMS</qsosappfamily>
- <qsosspecificformat>1.0</qsosspecificformat>
+ <qsosspecificformat></qsosspecificformat>
</header>
<section name="generic" title="Generic section">
<desc>Generic criteria from QSOS version 1.6</desc>
@@ -45,15 +45,15 @@
</element>
<element name="historyknowproblems" title="History, know problems">
<desc0>Software knows several problems which can be
prohibitive</desc0>
- <desc1>No know major problem or crisi</desc1>
+ <desc1>No know major problem or crisis</desc1>
<desc2>History of good management of crisis situations</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment>PostgreSQL is generally considered by DBA as the most
advanced open source RDBMS</comment>
</element>
<element name="forkprobability" title="Fork probability, source of
Forking">
<desc0>Software is very likely to be forked in the future</desc0>
- <desc1>Software comes from a fork but has very few chances of being
forked in the futur</desc1>
- <desc2>Software has very little chance of being forked. It does not
come from a frok either</desc2>
+ <desc1>Software comes from a fork but has very few chances of being
forked in the future</desc1>
+ <desc2>Software has very little chance of being forked. It does not
come from a fork either</desc2>
<score>1</score>
<comment>The BSD license theorically allows proprietary forks,
however the large community existing around PostgreSQL reduces this
risk</comment>
</element>
@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@
<desc1>Offer exists but is restricted geographically and to one
language or is provided by a single contractor</desc1>
<desc2>Rich offers provided by several contractors, in serveral
languages and split into modules of gradual levels</desc2>
<score>2</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="support" title="Support">
<desc0>No offer of support except via public forums and mailing
lists</desc0>
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@
<element name="quality" title="Quality Assurance">
<desc0>No QA process</desc0>
<desc1>Identifies QA process but not much formalized and with no
tool</desc1>
- <desc2>Automatic testing process included in code's life-cycle with
publication of resulats</desc2>
+ <desc2>Automatic testing process included in code's life-cycle with
publication of results</desc2>
<score>1</score>
<comment>No clearly defined process. Code verification scripts are
used before each release. There is a build farm where one can publish build
results (http://www.pgbuildfarm.org)</comment>
</element>
@@ -198,78 +198,78 @@
<element name="packaging" title="Packaging">
<desc>Packaging for various operating systems</desc>
<element name="packagingsource" title="Source">
- <desc0>Software can't be installed from source without a look of
work</desc0>
- <desc1>Installation from source is limited depend on very strict
condition (OS, arch, lib, ...)</desc1>
+ <desc0>Software can't be installed from source without lot of
work</desc0>
+ <desc1>Installation from source is limited and depends on very
strict conditions (OS, arch, lib, ...)</desc1>
<desc2>Installation from source is easy</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment>Installation from source is well documented</comment>
</element>
<element name="packagingdebian" title="Debian">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for Debian</desc0>
- <desc1>A Debian package exists but it has important issues or it
doesn't have an official support</desc1>
+ <desc1>A Debian package exists but it has important issues or it
doesn't have official support</desc1>
<desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
<score>1</score>
<comment>A package exists in the "testing" distribution</comment>
</element>
<element name="packagingfreebsd" title="FreeBSD">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for FreeBSD</desc0>
- <desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't have
an official support</desc1>
+ <desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't have
official support</desc1>
<desc2>A official port exists in FreeBSD</desc2>
<score>2</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="packaginghpux" title="HP-UX">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for HP-UX</desc0>
- <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have an official support</desc1>
- <desc2>A strong packaged is provided for HP-UX</desc2>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support</desc1>
+ <desc2>A stable package is provided for HP-UX</desc2>
<score>0</score>
<comment>You need to build from sources.</comment>
</element>
<element name="packagingmacosx" title="MacOSX">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for MacOSX</desc0>
- <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have an official support</desc1>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support</desc1>
<desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
<score>1</score>
<comment>Packages are available through the FINK project
(http://fink.sourceforge.net)</comment>
</element>
<element name="packagingmandriva" title="Mandriva">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for Mandriva</desc0>
- <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have an official support</desc1>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support</desc1>
<desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
<score>2</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="packagingnet" title="NetBSD">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for NetBSD</desc0>
- <desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't have
an official support</desc1>
+ <desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't have
official support</desc1>
<desc2>A official port exists in NetBSD</desc2>
<score>2</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="packagingopen" title="OpenBSD">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for OpenBSD</desc0>
- <desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't have
an official support</desc1>
+ <desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't have
official support</desc1>
<desc2>A official port exists in OpenBSD</desc2>
<score>2</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="packagingredhat" title="RedHat">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for RedHat/Fedora</desc0>
- <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have an official support</desc1>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support</desc1>
<desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
<score>1</score>
<comment>Project provides RPM for Red Hat Entreprise Linux, but only
version 7.4 is officially supported by Red Hat.</comment>
</element>
<element name="packagingsolaris" title="Solaris">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for Solaris</desc0>
- <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have an official support (e.g: SunFreeware.com )</desc1>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support (e.g: SunFreeware.com )</desc1>
<desc2>The software is supported by Sun for Solaris</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment>Sun fully supports PostgreSQL on SOlaris.</comment>
</element>
<element name="packagingsuse" title="SuSE">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for SuSE</desc0>
- <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have an official support</desc1>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support</desc1>
<desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
<score>0</score>
<comment>Project provides no package for SuSE. Novell supports only
7.4 version.</comment>
@@ -307,7 +307,7 @@
<desc1>Presence of hight level modules alowing a first level of
software adaptation</desc1>
<desc2>Modular conception, allowing easy adaptation of the software by
selecting modules or even develeloping new ones</desc2>
<score>1</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="codemodification" title="Code modification">
<desc0>Everything by hand</desc0>
@@ -333,14 +333,14 @@
<desc1>Moderate permissive license located between both extremes
(GPL and BSD) dual-licensing depending on the type of user (person, company,
...) or their activities</desc1>
<desc2>Very permissive like BSD or Apache licenses</desc2>
<score>2</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="protectionagainstproprietaryforks" title="Protection
against proprietary forks">
<desc0>Very permissive like BSD or Apache licenses</desc0>
<desc1>Moderate permissive license located between both extremes
(GPL and BSD), dual-licensing depending on the type of user (person, company,
...) or their activies</desc1>
<desc2>Very strict license, like GPL</desc2>
<score>0</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
</element>
<element name="copyrightowners" title="Copyright owners">
@@ -348,7 +348,7 @@
<desc1>Rights held by numerous individuals owning the code in a
homogeneous way, making relicense very difficult</desc1>
<desc2>Rights held by a legal entity in whom the community trusts
(e.g: FSF or ASF)</desc2>
<score>1</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="modificationofsourcecode" title="Modification of source
code">
<desc0>No pratical way to propose code modification</desc0>
@@ -369,7 +369,7 @@
<desc1>Software has an unique sponsor who might determine its
strategy</desc1>
<desc2>Software is sponsored by industry</desc2>
<score>0</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="strategicalindependence" title="Strategical independence">
<desc0>No detectable strategy or strong dependency on one unique actor
(person, company, sponsor)</desc0>
@@ -384,13 +384,13 @@
<desc>Standard RDBMS features</desc>
<element name="sqlcompliance" title="SQL compliance">
<desc>Compliance levels with SQL standards</desc>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
<element name="sql92" title="SQL-92 compliance">
<desc0>Limited to Entry-level only</desc0>
<desc1>Transitional or Intermediate support levels</desc1>
<desc2>Full support level</desc2>
<score>2</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="sql99" title="SQL-99 compliance">
<desc0>Limited to Core level only</desc0>
@@ -404,72 +404,72 @@
<desc1>Most of SQL:2003 core features are implemented and
compliant</desc1>
<desc2>SQL:2003 core compliant and most of options in packages
(SQL/Framework, SQL/Foundation, SQL/CLI, SQL/PSM, SQL/MED, SQL/OLB,
SQL/Schemata, SQL/JRT, SQL/XML) are implemented</desc2>
<score>0</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
</element>
<element name="classicsqlfeatures" title="Classic SQL features">
<desc>Classic SQL features</desc>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
<element name="tableconstraints" title="Table constraints">
<desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
<desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
<desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
<score>2</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="namedconstraints" title="Named constraints">
<desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
<desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
<desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
<score>2</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="columnconstraints" title="Column constraints">
<desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
<desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
<desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
<score>2</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="nullconstraints" title="NULL constraints">
<desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
<desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
<desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
<score>2</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="columndefaultvalues" title="Column's default values">
<desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
<desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
<desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
<score>2</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="functionsdefaultvalues" title="Functions for default
values">
<desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
<desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
<desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
<score>2</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="foreignkeys" title="Foreign keys support">
<desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
<desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
<desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
<score>2</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="fkupdates" title="Foreign key updates">
<desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
<desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
<desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
<score>0</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
</element>
<element name="security" title="Security">
<desc>Security features</desc>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
<element name="accesscontrol" title="Access control levels">
<desc>Levels of access control supported (usaername, table, base,
etc...)</desc>
<comment>username, kerberos (4 and 5), ident, PAM</comment>
@@ -483,18 +483,18 @@
<desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
<desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
<score>2</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
</element>
<element name="transactions" title="Transactions">
<desc>Transactional aspects</desc>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
<element name="transactionalengine" title="Transactional engine">
<desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
<desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
<desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
<score>2</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="transactionmodes" title="Transactional modes">
<desc>Transactional modes (or isolation level) supported</desc>
@@ -505,67 +505,67 @@
<desc1>Pages locks</desc1>
<desc2>Row locks</desc2>
<score>2</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="xacompliance" title="XA compliance">
<desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
<desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
<desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
<score>0</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
</element>
<element name="othersqlfeatures" title="Other SQL features">
<desc>Other SQL features</desc>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
<element name="views" title="Views">
<desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
<desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
<desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
<score>2</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="storedprocedures" title="Stored procedures">
<desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
<desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
<desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
<score>2</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="triggers" title="Triggers">
<desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
<desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
<desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
<score>2</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="schemas" title="Schemas">
<desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
<desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
<desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
<score>2</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="subselects" title="Subselects">
<desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
<desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
<desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
<score>2</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="tablespaces" title="Tablespaces">
<desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
<desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
<desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
<score>2</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="unicode" title="UNICODE">
<desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
<desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
<desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
<score>2</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
</element>
</section>
@@ -580,7 +580,7 @@
<desc1>Active/Passive clustering possible</desc1>
<desc2>Active/Active clustering possible</desc2>
<score>0</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="replication" title="Replication">
<desc0>No replication features</desc0>
@@ -594,14 +594,14 @@
<desc1>Partially supported</desc1>
<desc2>Fully supported</desc2>
<score>0</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="xmlfeatures" title="XML features">
<desc0>No XML features</desc0>
<desc1>Very few XML features</desc1>
<desc2>XML data is deeply integrated in the system</desc2>
<score>0</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="gis" title="GIS features">
<desc0>No spatial features</desc0>
@@ -632,7 +632,7 @@
<desc1>Tool(s) available but limited (features or plateforms)</desc1>
<desc2>Available tool(s) is(are) complete and easily integrable
(scripts, API, ...)</desc2>
<score>0</score>
- <comment/>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="optimizetools" title="Optimization tools">
<desc0>No tool available</desc0>
@@ -642,4 +642,4 @@
<comment>EXPLAIN and EXPLAIN ANALYZE functions, RedHat Visual
Explain</comment>
</element>
</section>
-</document>
\ No newline at end of file
+</document>
Index: qsos/sheet/bugTracker/otrs/otrs.qsos
diff -u qsos/sheet/bugTracker/otrs/otrs.qsos:1.5
qsos/sheet/bugTracker/otrs/otrs.qsos:1.6
--- qsos/sheet/bugTracker/otrs/otrs.qsos:1.5 Tue Apr 18 09:46:40 2006
+++ qsos/sheet/bugTracker/otrs/otrs.qsos Mon Apr 24 16:13:52 2006
@@ -17,32 +17,25 @@
<licenseid>31</licenseid>
<licensedesc>GNU General Public License</licensedesc>
<url>http://www.otrs.org</url>
-
<desc>OTRS is an Open source Ticket Request System (also well known as
trouble ticket system) with many features to manage customer telephone calls
and e-mails</desc>
<demourl>http://otrs.org/demo/</demourl>
-
-
<qsosformat>1.6</qsosformat>
<qsosappfamily>bugTrackerTools</qsosappfamily>
<qsosspecificformat>1</qsosspecificformat>
</header>
-
-
-
<section name="generic" title="Generic section">
- <desc>Common QSOS section</desc>
-
+ <desc>Generic criteria from QSOS version 1.6</desc>
<element name="intrinsicdurability" title="Intrinsic durability">
+ <desc>Intrinsic durability</desc>
<element name="maturity" title="Maturity">
+ <desc>Maturity</desc>
<element name="age" title="Age">
<desc0>less than 3 months</desc0>
<desc1>if between 3 months and 3 years</desc1>
<desc2>after 3 years</desc2>
<score>2</score>
-
- <comment>Otrs.org domain was created in ? 2001 </comment>
-
- </element>
+ <comment>Otrs.org domain was created in ? 2001 </comment>
+ </element>
<element name="stability" title="Stability">
<desc0>Unstable software with numerous releases or patches
generating side effects</desc0>
<desc1>Stabilized production release existing but old. Difficulties
to stabilize developpement releases</desc1>
@@ -52,23 +45,21 @@
</element>
<element name="historyknowproblems" title="History, know problems">
<desc0>Software knows several problems which can be
prohibitive</desc0>
- <desc1>No know major problem or crisi</desc1>
+ <desc1>No know major problem or crisis</desc1>
<desc2>History of good management of crisis situations</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="forkprobability" title="Fork probability, source of
Forking">
<desc0>Software is very likely to be forked in the future</desc0>
- <desc1>Software comes from a fork but has very few chances of being
forked in the futur</desc1>
- <desc2>Software has very little chance of being forked. It does not
come from a frok either</desc2>
-
- <score></score>
-
- <comment></comment>
+ <desc1>Software comes from a fork but has very few chances of being
forked in the future</desc1>
+ <desc2>Software has very little chance of being forked. It does not
come from a fork either</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
</element>
-
- <element name="adopation" title="Adopation">
+ <element name="adoption" title="Adoption">
+ <desc>Adoption by community and industry</desc>
<element name="popularity" title="Popularity (related to: general
public, niche, ...)">
<desc0>Very few users identified</desc0>
<desc1>Detectable use on Internet</desc1>
@@ -98,28 +89,25 @@
<comment></comment>
</element>
</element>
-
<element name="developmentleadership" title="Development leadership">
+ <desc>Organisation and leadership of developments</desc>
<element name="leadingteam" title="Leading team">
<desc0>1 to 2 individuals involved, not clearly identified</desc0>
<desc1>Between 2 and 5 independent people</desc1>
<desc2>More than 5 people</desc2>
<score>1</score>
<comment></comment>
- </element>
-
-
- <element name="managementstyle" title="Management style">
+ </element>
+ <element name="managementstyle" title="Management style">
<desc0>Complete dictatorship</desc0>
<desc1>Enlightened despotism</desc1>
<desc2>Council of architects with identified leader (e.g:
KDE)</desc2>
<score>1</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
-
</element>
-
<element name="activity" title="Activity">
+ <desc>Activity of the project and around the software</desc>
<element name="developersidentificationturnover" title="Developers,
identification, turnover">
<desc0>Less than 3 developers, not clearly identified</desc0>
<desc1>Between 4 and 7 developers, or more unidentified developers
with important turnover</desc1>
@@ -127,27 +115,22 @@
<score>2</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
-
- <element name="activityonbugs" title="Activity on bugs">
+ <element name="activityonbugs" title="Activity on bugs">
<desc0>Slow reactivity in forum or on mailing list, or nothing
regarding bug fixes in releases note</desc0>
<desc1>Detectable activity but without process clearly exposed,
loing reaction/resolution time</desc1>
<desc2>Strong reactivity based on roles and tasks assignment</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
-
-
-
- <element name="activityonfunctionalities" title="Activity on
functionalities">
+ <element name="activityonfunctionalities" title="Activity on
functionalities">
<desc0>No or few new functionalities</desc0>
<desc1>Evolution of the product driven by the core team or by user's
request without any clearly explained process</desc1>
<desc2>Tool(s) to manage feature requests, strong interaction with
roadmap</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
-
- <!---??????????????????????????-->
- <element name="activityonreleases" title="Activity on releases">
+ <!---??????????????????????????-->
+ <element name="activityonreleases" title="Activity on releases">
<desc0>Very weak activity on both production and development
releases</desc0>
<desc1>Activity on production and developmenet releases. Frequent
minor releases (bug fixes)</desc1>
<desc2>Important activity with frequent minor releases (bugs fixes)
and planned major releases relating to the roadmap forcast</desc2>
@@ -156,9 +139,8 @@
</element>
</element>
</element>
-
-
- <element name="industrialisedsolution" title="Industrialised solution">
+ <element name="industrializedsolution" title="Industrialized solution">
+ <desc>Industrialization level of the project</desc>
<element name="independenceofdevelopments" title="Independence of
developments">
<desc0>Developments realized at 100% by employees of a single
company</desc0>
<desc1>60% maximum</desc1>
@@ -166,7 +148,8 @@
<score>2</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
- <element name="services" title="Services">
+ <element name="services" title="Services">
+ <desc>Services offering</desc>
<element name="training" title="Training">
<desc0>No offer of training identified</desc0>
<desc1>Offer exists but is restricted geographically and to one
language or is provided by a single contractor</desc1>
@@ -197,10 +180,11 @@
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="qualityassurance" title="Quality Assurance">
+ <desc>Quality assurance process</desc>
<element name="quality" title="Quality Assurance">
<desc0>No QA process</desc0>
<desc1>Identifies QA process but not much formalized and with no
tool</desc1>
- <desc2>Automatic testing process included in code's life-cycle with
publication of resulats</desc2>
+ <desc2>Automatic testing process included in code's life-cycle with
publication of results</desc2>
<score>1</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
@@ -213,81 +197,80 @@
</element>
</element>
<element name="packaging" title="Packaging">
+ <desc>Packaging for various operating systems</desc>
<element name="packagingsource" title="Source">
- <desc0>Software can't be installed from source without a look of
work</desc0>
- <desc1>Installation from source is limited depend on very strict
condition (OS, arch, lib, ...)</desc1>
+ <desc0>Software can't be installed from source without lot of
work</desc0>
+ <desc1>Installation from source is limited and depends on very
strict conditions (OS, arch, lib, ...)</desc1>
<desc2>Installation from source is easy</desc2>
<score></score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="packagingdebian" title="Debian">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for Debian</desc0>
- <desc1>A Debian package exists but it has important issues or it
doesn't have an official support</desc1>
+ <desc1>A Debian package exists but it has important issues or it
doesn't have official support</desc1>
<desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="packagingfreebsd" title="FreeBSD">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for FreeBSD</desc0>
- <desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't have
an official support</desc1>
+ <desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't have
official support</desc1>
<desc2>A official port exists in FreeBSD</desc2>
<score></score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="packaginghpux" title="HP-UX">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for HP-UX</desc0>
- <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have an official support</desc1>
- <desc2>A strong packaged is provided for HP-UX</desc2>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support</desc1>
+ <desc2>A stable package is provided for HP-UX</desc2>
<score></score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
-
<element name="packagingmacosx" title="MacOSX">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for MacOSX</desc0>
- <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have an official support</desc1>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support</desc1>
<desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
<score></score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
-
<element name="packagingmandriva" title="Mandriva">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for Mandriva</desc0>
- <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have an official support</desc1>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support</desc1>
<desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
<score></score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="packagingnet" title="NetBSD">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for NetBSD</desc0>
- <desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't have
an official support</desc1>
+ <desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't have
official support</desc1>
<desc2>A official port exists in NetBSD</desc2>
<score></score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
- <element name="packagingnet" title="OpenBSD">
+ <element name="packagingopen" title="OpenBSD">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for OpenBSD</desc0>
- <desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't have
an official support</desc1>
+ <desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't have
official support</desc1>
<desc2>A official port exists in OpenBSD</desc2>
<score></score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="packagingredhat" title="RedHat">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for RedHat/Fedora</desc0>
- <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have an official support</desc1>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support</desc1>
<desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
<score></score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
- <element name="packagingsuse" title="Solaris">
+ <element name="packagingsolaris" title="Solaris">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for Solaris</desc0>
- <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have an official support (e.g: SunFreeware.com )</desc1>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support (e.g: SunFreeware.com )</desc1>
<desc2>The software is supported by Sun for Solaris</desc2>
<score></score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="packagingsuse" title="SuSE">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for SuSE</desc0>
- <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have an official support</desc1>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support</desc1>
<desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
<score></score>
<comment></comment>
@@ -300,435 +283,303 @@
<comment></comment>
</element>
</element>
-
-
-
- <element name="exploitability" title="Exploitability">
- <element name="easeofuseergonomics" title="Ease of use, ergonomics">
- <desc0>Difficult to use, requires an in depth knowledge of the
software functionality</desc0>
- <desc1>Austere and very technical ergonomics</desc1>
- <desc2>GUI including help functions and elaborated ergonomics</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
-
- <element name="administrationmonitoring" title="Administration /
Monitoring">
- <desc0>No administrative or monitoring functionalities</desc0>
- <desc1>Existing, functionalities but uncomplete and or need
improvement</desc1>
- <desc2>Complete and easy-to-use administration and monitoring
functionalities. Possible integration with external tools (e.g: SNMP, syslog,
...)</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- </element>
-
-
- <element name="technicaladaptability" title="Technical adaptability">
- <element name="modularity" title="Modularity">
- <desc0>Monolithic software</desc0>
- <desc1>Presence of hight level modules alowing a first level of
software adaptation</desc1>
- <desc2>Modular conception, allowing easy adaptation of the software
by selecting modules or even develeloping new ones</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
-
-
- <element name="codemodification" title="Code modification">
- <desc0>Everything by hand</desc0>
- <desc1>Recompilation possible but complex without any tools or
documentation</desc1>
- <desc2>Recompilation with tools (e.g: make, ANT, ...) and
documentation provided</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="codeextension" title="Code extention">
- <desc0>Any modification requires code recompilation</desc0>
- <desc1>Architecture designed for static extension but requires
recompilation</desc1>
- <desc2>Principle of plugin, architecture designed for dynamic
extension without recompilation</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- </element>
- <element name="strategy" title="Strategy">
- <element name="license" title="License">
- <element name="permissiveness" title="Permissiveness (only if user
wants to become owner of code)">
- <desc0>Very strict license, like GPL</desc0>
- <desc1>Moderate permissive license located between both extremes
(GPL and BSD) dual-licensing depending on the type of user (person, company,
...) or their activities</desc1>
- <desc2>Very permissive like BSD or Apache licenses</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
-
- <element name="protectionagainstproprietaryforks" title="Protection
against proprietary forks">
- <desc0>Very permissive like BSD or Apache licenses</desc0>
- <desc1>Moderate permissive license located between both extremes
(GPL and BSD), dual-licensing depending on the type of user (person, company,
...) or their activies</desc1>
- <desc2>Very strict license, like GPL</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
-
- </element>
- <element name="copyrightowners" title="Copyright owners">
- <desc0>Rights held by a few individuals or entities, making it
easier to change the license</desc0>
- <desc1>Rights held by numerous individuals owning the code in a
homogeneous way, making relicense very difficult</desc1>
- <desc2>Rights held by a legal entity in whom the community trusts
(e.g: FSF or ASF)</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="modificationofsourcecode" title="Modification of source
code">
- <desc0>No pratical way to propose code modification</desc0>
- <desc1>Tools provided to access and modify code (like CVS or SVN)
but not really used to develop the software</desc1>
- <desc2>The code modification process is well defined, exposed and
respected, based on roles assignment</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="roadmap" title="Roadmap">
- <desc0>No published roadmap</desc0>
- <desc1>Existing roadmap without planning</desc1>
- <desc2>Versionned roadmap, with planning and measure of
delays</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
-
- <element name="sponsor" title="Sponsor">
- <desc0>Software has no sponsor, the core team is not paid</desc0>
- <desc1>Software has an unique sponsor who might determine its
strategy</desc1>
- <desc2>Software is sponsored by industry</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
-
- <element name="strategicalindependence" title="Strategical
independence">
- <desc0>No detectable strategy or strong dependency on one unique
actor (person, company, sponsor)</desc0>
- <desc1>Strategical vision shared with several other free and open
source projects but without strong commitment from copyrights owners</desc1>
- <desc2>Strong independence of the code team, legal entity holding
rights, strong involvement in the standardization process</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- </element>
-
-
- <element name="servicesprovinding" title="Services provinding">
- <element name="maintenability" title="Maintenability">
- <element name="qualityofsourcecode" title="Quality of source code">
- <desc0>Not very readable code or of poor quality, incoherence in
coding styles</desc0>
- <desc1>Readable code but not really complemented in detail</desc1>
- <desc2>Readable and commented code, implementing classic design
patterns with a coherent and applied coding policy</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="technologicaldispersion" title="Technological
dispersion">
- <desc0>Use of numerous different languages</desc0>
- <desc1>One main language with certain modules coded in other
languages for specific and limited requirements</desc1>
- <desc2>One unique language</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="intrinsicomplexity" title="Intrinsic complexity">
- <desc0>Very complex code requiring high level of expertise to
perfom modifications without generating side effeetcs</desc0>
- <desc1>Not very complex code but still requiring expertise
programming languages and software design</desc1>
- <desc2>Simple code and design, easy to modify</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="technicaldocumentation" title="Technical
documentation">
- <desc0>No documentation (development guide or automatically
generated doc like javadoc)</desc0>
- <desc1>Incomplete or old documentation without conception and
architectural considerations</desc1>
- <desc2>Detailed an up to date documentation, including conception,
architecure designe and coding considerations</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- </element>
- <element name="codemastery" title="Code mastery">
- <element name="codemasterydirect" title="Direct">
- <desc0>No direct expertise of the source code</desc0>
- <desc1>Mastery of code but limited to a single person or to only a
part of the source</desc1>
- <desc2>Several individuals mastering the code and covering
together the totality of the source</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="exploitability" title="Exploitability">
+ <desc>Exploitability level</desc>
+ <element name="easeofuseergonomics" title="Ease of use, ergonomics">
+ <desc0>Difficult to use, requires an in depth knowledge of the
software functionality</desc0>
+ <desc1>Austere and very technical ergonomics</desc1>
+ <desc2>GUI including help functions and elaborated ergonomics</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="administrationmonitoring" title="Administration /
Monitoring">
+ <desc0>No administrative or monitoring functionalities</desc0>
+ <desc1>Existing, functionalities but uncomplete and or need
improvement</desc1>
+ <desc2>Complete and easy-to-use administration and monitoring
functionalities. Possible integration with external tools (e.g: SNMP, syslog,
...)</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="technicaladaptability" title="Technical adaptability">
+ <desc>Technical adaptability</desc>
+ <element name="modularity" title="Modularity">
+ <desc0>Monolithic software</desc0>
+ <desc1>Presence of hight level modules alowing a first level of
software adaptation</desc1>
+ <desc2>Modular conception, allowing easy adaptation of the software by
selecting modules or even develeloping new ones</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="codemodification" title="Code modification">
+ <desc0>Everything by hand</desc0>
+ <desc1>Recompilation possible but complex without any tools or
documentation</desc1>
+ <desc2>Recompilation with tools (e.g: make, ANT, ...) and
documentation provided</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="codeextension" title="Code extention">
+ <desc0>Any modification requires code recompilation</desc0>
+ <desc1>Architecture designed for static extension but requires
recompilation</desc1>
+ <desc2>Principle of plugin, architecture designed for dynamic
extension without recompilation</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="strategy" title="Strategy">
+ <desc>Project's strategy</desc>
+ <element name="license" title="License">
+ <desc>License</desc>
+ <element name="permissiveness" title="Permissiveness (only if user
wants to become owner of code)">
+ <desc0>Very strict license, like GPL</desc0>
+ <desc1>Moderate permissive license located between both extremes
(GPL and BSD) dual-licensing depending on the type of user (person, company,
...) or their activities</desc1>
+ <desc2>Very permissive like BSD or Apache licenses</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="protectionagainstproprietaryforks" title="Protection
against proprietary forks">
+ <desc0>Very permissive like BSD or Apache licenses</desc0>
+ <desc1>Moderate permissive license located between both extremes
(GPL and BSD), dual-licensing depending on the type of user (person, company,
...) or their activies</desc1>
+ <desc2>Very strict license, like GPL</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
</element>
+ <element name="copyrightowners" title="Copyright owners">
+ <desc0>Rights held by a few individuals or entities, making it easier
to change the license</desc0>
+ <desc1>Rights held by numerous individuals owning the code in a
homogeneous way, making relicense very difficult</desc1>
+ <desc2>Rights held by a legal entity in whom the community trusts
(e.g: FSF or ASF)</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="modificationofsourcecode" title="Modification of source
code">
+ <desc0>No pratical way to propose code modification</desc0>
+ <desc1>Tools provided to access and modify code (like CVS or SVN) but
not really used to develop the software</desc1>
+ <desc2>The code modification process is well defined, exposed and
respected, based on roles assignment</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="roadmap" title="Roadmap">
+ <desc0>No published roadmap</desc0>
+ <desc1>Existing roadmap without planning</desc1>
+ <desc2>Versionned roadmap, with planning and measure of delays</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="sponsor" title="Sponsor">
+ <desc0>Software has no sponsor, the core team is not paid</desc0>
+ <desc1>Software has an unique sponsor who might determine its
strategy</desc1>
+ <desc2>Software is sponsored by industry</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="strategicalindependence" title="Strategical independence">
+ <desc0>No detectable strategy or strong dependency on one unique actor
(person, company, sponsor)</desc0>
+ <desc1>Strategical vision shared with several other free and open
source projects but without strong commitment from copyrights owners</desc1>
+ <desc2>Strong independence of the code team, legal entity holding
rights, strong involvement in the standardization process</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
</element>
</section>
-
-
-
-
-
- <section name="bugTrackercomposant" title="bug tracker Composant" >
+ <section name="bugTrackercomposant" title="bug tracker Composant">
<comment>Specific bug tracker component tools</comment>
<desc></desc>
-
-
- <element name="ticketHistoric" title="ticket Historic" >
-
+ <element name="ticketHistoric" title="ticket Historic">
<desc0>Journalised detail badly defined,not accessible</desc0>
<desc1>Journalised detail doesn't work correctly</desc1>
<desc2>Journalised detail is well performing</desc2>
-
<comment>
detail of actions realised during the treatment of a ticket.
</comment>
- <score>2</score>
+ <score>2</score>
</element>
-
- <element name="ticketUserView" title="ticket User View" >
- <desc0>It cannot only restrict the visibility of a customer to his
tickets</desc0>
- <desc1>Eestricting the visibility of a customer to his tickets by
changing the source code doesn't work very well</desc1>
- <desc2>Possibility of restricting the visibility of a customer to his
tickets by web interface</desc2>
+ <element name="ticketUserView" title="ticket User View">
+ <desc0>It cannot only restrict the visibility of a customer to his
tickets</desc0>
+ <desc1>Eestricting the visibility of a customer to his tickets by
changing the source code doesn't work very well</desc1>
+ <desc2>Possibility of restricting the visibility of a customer to his
tickets by web interface</desc2>
<comment>
Possibility of only restricting the visibility of a customer to
his tickets.
</comment>
- <score>2</score>
+ <score>2</score>
</element>
-
-
-
- <element name="controlledAssignment" title="controlled Assignment" >
+ <element name="controlledAssignment" title="controlled Assignment">
<desc0>The customers assign themselves their tickets </desc0>
<desc1>It can customize customer assignment, Customers can assign
themselves their tickets to a member of support team</desc1>
<desc2>Customers can't assign themselves their tickets to a member of
support team</desc2>
<comment>
Customers can't assign themselves their tickets to a member of
support team.
</comment>
- <score>2</score>
+ <score>2</score>
</element>
-
-
-
- <element name="delegationOfCreation" title="Delegation of creation" >
+ <element name="delegationOfCreation" title="Delegation of creation">
<desc0>Administrator can't create ticket with an user's name</desc0>
<desc1>It's difficult for an administrator to create a ticket with an
user's name,or it doesn't work correctly</desc1>
<desc2>Easy for an administrator to create a ticket with an user's
name</desc2>
<comment>
Possibility for an administrator to create a ticket with an
user's name
</comment>
- <score>2</score>
+ <score>2</score>
</element>
-
-
-
-
- <element name="personalizedFields" title="personalized fields" >
+ <element name="personalizedFields" title="personalized fields">
<desc0>No personalized fields</desc0>
<desc1>Personalized fields don't work very well</desc1>
<desc2>Personalized fields is carried out by a modification in files
DTL(like HTML language), easy to manage</desc2>
<comment>
Possibility to add fields in the ticket's features
</comment>
- <score>2</score>
+ <score>2</score>
</element>
-
-
-
-
- <element name="enclosingFiles" title="Enclosing files" >
+ <element name="enclosingFiles" title="Enclosing files">
<desc0>A ticket can't enclose a file</desc0>
<desc1>Enclosed files don't work correctly</desc1>
<desc2>Easy to enclose a file to a ticket</desc2>
-
<comment>
Possibility to enclose files to a un ticket.
</comment>
- <score>2</score>
+ <score>2</score>
</element>
-
- <element name="Reminder" title="Reminder" >
+ <element name="Reminder" title="Reminder">
<desc0>Reminder is not supported</desc0>
<desc1>Reminder required externe module or don't work correctly</desc1>
<desc2>Reminder is included on this tools, easy to manage</desc2>
-
<comment>
Automatic recall after a certain amount of time of inactivity
on a ticket.
</comment>
- <score>2</score>
-
+ <score>2</score>
</element>
-
- <element name="notificationEmail" title="Notification Email" >
+ <element name="notificationEmail" title="Notification Email">
<desc0>No Configuration of notification email </desc0>
<desc1>Configuration of notification email doesn't work correctly</desc1>
<desc2>Configuration notification email is managed by web
interface</desc2>
-
<comment>
Possibility to configure notification email when there are a
modification of a ticket
</comment>
- <score></score>
-
+ <score></score>
</element>
-
- <element name="enteringChannelEmail " title="entering channel email " >
+ <element name="enteringChannelEmail " title="entering channel email ">
<desc0>Impossible to interact OTRS via email</desc0>
<desc1>The interaction with OTRS via email doesn't work correctly</desc1>
<desc2>It can interact (eg:create tickets) in an immediate way</desc2>
-
<comment>
Possibility to interact with OTRS via email (eg. ticket's creation via
email).
</comment>
- <score>2</score>
-
+ <score>2</score>
</element>
-
- <element name="full-textResearch" title="full-text research" >
+ <element name="full-textResearch" title="full-text research">
<desc0>We can't carry out a research on the whole tickets </desc0>
<desc1>The research function doesn't include comments and notices</desc1>
<desc2>Easy to research information on the whole tickets (including
comments or notices)</desc2>
-
<comment>
Possibility to research on the whole tickets (including comments or
notices).
</comment>
- <score>2</score>
-
+ <score>2</score>
</element>
-
- <element name="Rights management" title="Rights management" >
+ <element name="Rights management" title="Rights management">
<desc0>Impossible to manage users rights</desc0>
<desc1>Rules and rights ' management via source code or don't work
correctly </desc1>
<desc2>Rules and rights ' management via source code by web interface,
very easy</desc2>
-
<comment>
Integrated management of rules and rights
</comment>
- <score>2</score>
-
+ <score>2</score>
</element>
-
- <element name="publicPrivateManagement" title= "public/private management">
+ <element name="publicPrivateManagement" title="public/private management">
<desc0>Information for customers and support team are not
separated</desc0>
<desc1>Separations betwen information that consummers can see and those
that are only available for are possible but difficult to do or don't work
correctly </desc1>
<desc2>Tools supply information visible by customers separated with
those available only for the support team</desc2>
-
<comment>
Separations beetwen information that consumers can see and those that
are only available for
</comment>
- <score>1</score>
+ <score>1</score>
</element>
-
-
<!--????????????????? A APPROFONDIR ???????????????????-->
- <element name="timesmanagement" title="time's management" >
+ <element name="timesmanagement" title="time's management">
<desc0>No management regarding ticket's time</desc0>
<desc1>Time is initialized during the creation of ticket and impossible
to update it</desc1>
<desc2>Possibility to update and follow the time in every ticket</desc2>
-
<comment>
Possibility to update and follow the time past in every ticket
</comment>
- <score>1</score>
-
+ <score>1</score>
</element>
-
- <element name="Statistics" title="Statistics" >
+ <element name="Statistics" title="Statistics">
<desc0>No statistic's module</desc0>
<desc1>statistic's module not covering only one number of limited cases
or not functioning correctly</desc1>
<desc2>statistic's module fonctionnal bringing a real advantage to the
application</desc2>
-
<comment>
Possibility of generation of statistics about activity of
support (bugs number, reactivity)
</comment>
- <score>1</score>
-
+ <score>1</score>
</element>
- </section>
-
-
-
- <section name="authentificationExternalBackend " title="authentification
external backend" >
-
- <element name="LDAPBackend" title="LDAP Backend" >
+ </section>
+ <section name="authentificationExternalBackend " title="authentification
external backend">
+ <element name="LDAPBackend" title="LDAP Backend">
<desc0>Authentification LDAP impossible</desc0>
<desc1>Authentification LDAP don't work correctly</desc1>
<desc2>Authentification LDAP is performing and bring a real advantage to
application</desc2>
-
<comment>Authentication with LDAP Backend</comment>
<score>1</score>
</element>
-
- <element name="databaseBackend" title="Database Backend" >
+ <element name="databaseBackend" title="Database Backend">
<desc0>Authentification DB Backend impossible</desc0>
<desc1>Authentification DB Backend doesn't work correctly</desc1>
<desc2>Authentification LDAP is performing and bring a real advantage to
application</desc2>
-
<comment>Authentification with database Backend (default)</comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
-
- </section>
-
-
- <section name="customerAuthentificationBackendAndStorage" title="Customer
authentification backend and storage" >
-
+ </section>
+ <section name="customerAuthentificationBackendAndStorage" title="Customer
authentification backend and storage">
<element name="Database" title="Database">
<desc0>Authentification/storage of Customer group impossible</desc0>
<desc1>Authentification/storage of Customer group isn't
performing</desc1>
<desc2>Authentification/storage of Customer group works very well</desc2>
-
<comment>Possibility of Authentification and storage of Customer group
via Database Backend</comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
-
- <element name="LDAP" title="LDAP">
+ <element name="LDAP" title="LDAP">
<desc0>Authentification/storage of Customer group impossible</desc0>
<desc1>Authentification of Customer group is performing but update data
via web interface is impossible</desc1>
<desc2>Authentification/storage of Customer group works very well</desc2>
-
<comment>Possibility of Authentification and storage of Customer group
via LDAP Backend</comment>
<score>1</score>
</element>
-
- <element name="HTTPBasic" title="HTTPBasic">
+ <element name="HTTPBasic" title="HTTPBasic">
<desc0>Authentification of Customer group impossible</desc0>
<desc1>Authentification of Customer group doesn't work very well</desc1>
<desc2>Authentification of Customer group is performing</desc2>
-
<comment>Possibility of Authentification and storage of Customer group
via HTTPBasic</comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
-
-
- <element name="RADIUS" title="RADIUS">
+ <element name="RADIUS" title="RADIUS">
<desc0>Authentification of Customer group impossible</desc0>
<desc1>Authentification of Customer group doesn't work very well</desc1>
<desc2>Authentification of Customer group is performing</desc2>
-
<comment>Possibility of Authentification of Customer group via Radius
Server</comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
-
</section>
-
-
-
-
<section name="administration" title="administration">
<comment></comment>
<element name="webinterface" title="web interface">
- <desc0>No administration via Web interface </desc0>
- <desc1>Administration via web interface requires a modification in the
source code or doesn't work well</desc1>
- <desc2>Administration via web interface work very well</desc2>
-
-
+ <desc0>No administration via Web interface </desc0>
+ <desc1>Administration via web interface requires a modification in the
source code or doesn't work well</desc1>
+ <desc2>Administration via web interface work very well</desc2>
<comment></comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
-
- <element name="commandline" title="command line" >
+ <element name="commandline" title="command line">
<desc0>Administration via commandline impossible</desc0>
<desc1>Administration via commandline is difficult or isn't performing
</desc1>
<desc2>Administration via command line work very well</desc2>
-
<comment> Do OTRS come with script or can be managed from a console?
</comment>
<score>0</score>
</element>
-
- <element name="installationcomplexity" title="installation complexity" >
+ <element name="installationcomplexity" title="installation complexity">
<desc0>OTRS installation requires much time and complex configuration 's
scripts</desc0>
<desc1>OTRS installation requires much time, no scripts to develop and
the readme is detailed</desc1>
<desc2>OTRS installation is done by one clic</desc2>
-
<comment>Do the installation need a lot of time or/and a strong
skill</comment>
<score>1</score>
</element>
</section>
-
-
</document>
Index: qsos/sheet/groupware/kolab/kolab.qsos
diff -u qsos/sheet/groupware/kolab/kolab.qsos:1.11
qsos/sheet/groupware/kolab/kolab.qsos:1.12
--- qsos/sheet/groupware/kolab/kolab.qsos:1.11 Mon Apr 24 13:44:04 2006
+++ qsos/sheet/groupware/kolab/kolab.qsos Mon Apr 24 16:13:52 2006
@@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
-<!-- $Id: kolab.qsos,v 1.11 2006/04/24 13:44:04 goneri Exp $ -->
-<document>
+<!-- $Id: kolab.qsos,v 1.12 2006/04/24 16:13:52 goneri Exp $ --><document>
<header>
<authors>
<author>
@@ -25,9 +24,11 @@
<qsosspecificformat>1</qsosspecificformat>
</header>
<section name="generic" title="Generic section">
- <desc>Common QSOS section</desc>
+ <desc>Generic criteria from QSOS version 1.6</desc>
<element name="intrinsicdurability" title="Intrinsic durability">
+ <desc>Intrinsic durability</desc>
<element name="maturity" title="Maturity">
+ <desc>Maturity</desc>
<element name="age" title="Age">
<desc0>less than 3 months</desc0>
<desc1>if between 3 months and 3 years</desc1>
@@ -44,20 +45,21 @@
</element>
<element name="historyknowproblems" title="History, know problems">
<desc0>Software knows several problems which can be
prohibitive</desc0>
- <desc1>No know major problem or crisi</desc1>
+ <desc1>No know major problem or crisis</desc1>
<desc2>History of good management of crisis situations</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="forkprobability" title="Fork probability, source of
Forking">
<desc0>Software is very likely to be forked in the future</desc0>
- <desc1>Software comes from a fork but has very few chances of being
forked in the futur</desc1>
- <desc2>Software has very little chance of being forked. It does not
come from a frok either</desc2>
+ <desc1>Software comes from a fork but has very few chances of being
forked in the future</desc1>
+ <desc2>Software has very little chance of being forked. It does not
come from a fork either</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
</element>
- <element name="adoption" title="Adopation">
+ <element name="adoption" title="Adoption">
+ <desc>Adoption by community and industry</desc>
<element name="popularity" title="Popularity (related to: general
public, niche, ...)">
<desc0>Very few users identified</desc0>
<desc1>Detectable use on Internet</desc1>
@@ -88,13 +90,14 @@
</element>
</element>
<element name="developmentleadership" title="Development leadership">
+ <desc>Organisation and leadership of developments</desc>
<element name="leadingteam" title="Leading team">
<desc0>1 to 2 individuals involved, not clearly identified</desc0>
<desc1>Between 2 and 5 independent people</desc1>
<desc2>More than 5 people</desc2>
<score>1</score>
<comment></comment>
- </element>
+ </element>
<element name="managementstyle" title="Management style">
<desc0>Complete dictatorship</desc0>
<desc1>Enlightened despotism</desc1>
@@ -104,6 +107,7 @@
</element>
</element>
<element name="activity" title="Activity">
+ <desc>Activity of the project and around the software</desc>
<element name="developersidentificationturnover" title="Developers,
identification, turnover">
<desc0>Less than 3 developers, not clearly identified</desc0>
<desc1>Between 4 and 7 developers, or more unidentified developers
with important turnover</desc1>
@@ -134,7 +138,8 @@
</element>
</element>
</element>
- <element name="industrializedsolution" title="Industrialised solution">
+ <element name="industrializedsolution" title="Industrialized solution">
+ <desc>Industrialization level of the project</desc>
<element name="independenceofdevelopments" title="Independence of
developments">
<desc0>Developments realized at 100% by employees of a single
company</desc0>
<desc1>60% maximum</desc1>
@@ -142,7 +147,8 @@
<score>2</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
- <element name="services" title="Services">
+ <element name="services" title="Services">
+ <desc>Services offering</desc>
<element name="training" title="Training">
<desc0>No offer of training identified</desc0>
<desc1>Offer exists but is restricted geographically and to one
language or is provided by a single contractor</desc1>
@@ -173,10 +179,11 @@
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="qualityassurance" title="Quality Assurance">
+ <desc>Quality assurance process</desc>
<element name="quality" title="Quality Assurance">
<desc0>No QA process</desc0>
<desc1>Identifies QA process but not much formalized and with no
tool</desc1>
- <desc2>Automatic testing process included in code's life-cycle with
publication of resulats</desc2>
+ <desc2>Automatic testing process included in code's life-cycle with
publication of results</desc2>
<score>1</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
@@ -189,81 +196,80 @@
</element>
</element>
<element name="packaging" title="Packaging">
+ <desc>Packaging for various operating systems</desc>
<element name="packagingsource" title="Source">
- <desc0>Software can't be installed from source without a look of
work</desc0>
- <desc1>Installation from source is limited depend on very strict
condition (OS, arch, lib, ...)</desc1>
+ <desc0>Software can't be installed from source without lot of
work</desc0>
+ <desc1>Installation from source is limited and depends on very
strict conditions (OS, arch, lib, ...)</desc1>
<desc2>Installation from source is easy</desc2>
<score></score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="packagingdebian" title="Debian">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for Debian</desc0>
- <desc1>A Debian package exists but it has important issues or it
doesn't have an official support</desc1>
+ <desc1>A Debian package exists but it has important issues or it
doesn't have official support</desc1>
<desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
<score></score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="packagingfreebsd" title="FreeBSD">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for FreeBSD</desc0>
- <desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't have
an official support</desc1>
+ <desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't have
official support</desc1>
<desc2>A official port exists in FreeBSD</desc2>
<score></score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="packaginghpux" title="HP-UX">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for HP-UX</desc0>
- <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have an official support</desc1>
- <desc2>A strong packaged is provided for HP-UX</desc2>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support</desc1>
+ <desc2>A stable package is provided for HP-UX</desc2>
<score></score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
-
<element name="packagingmacosx" title="MacOSX">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for MacOSX</desc0>
- <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have an official support</desc1>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support</desc1>
<desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
<score></score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
-
<element name="packagingmandriva" title="Mandriva">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for Mandriva</desc0>
- <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have an official support</desc1>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support</desc1>
<desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
<score></score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="packagingnet" title="NetBSD">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for NetBSD</desc0>
- <desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't have
an official support</desc1>
+ <desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't have
official support</desc1>
<desc2>A official port exists in NetBSD</desc2>
<score></score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="packagingopen" title="OpenBSD">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for OpenBSD</desc0>
- <desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't have
an official support</desc1>
+ <desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't have
official support</desc1>
<desc2>A official port exists in OpenBSD</desc2>
<score></score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="packagingredhat" title="RedHat">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for RedHat/Fedora</desc0>
- <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have an official support</desc1>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support</desc1>
<desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
<score></score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="packagingsolaris" title="Solaris">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for Solaris</desc0>
- <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have an official support (e.g: SunFreeware.com )</desc1>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support (e.g: SunFreeware.com )</desc1>
<desc2>The software is supported by Sun for Solaris</desc2>
<score></score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="packagingsuse" title="SuSE">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for SuSE</desc0>
- <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have an official support</desc1>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support</desc1>
<desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
<score></score>
<comment></comment>
@@ -276,144 +282,104 @@
<comment></comment>
</element>
</element>
- <element name="exploitability" title="Exploitability">
- <element name="easeofuseergonomics" title="Ease of use, ergonomics">
- <desc0>Difficult to use, requires an in depth knowledge of the
software functionality</desc0>
- <desc1>Austere and very technical ergonomics</desc1>
- <desc2>GUI including help functions and elaborated ergonomics</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="administrationmonitoring" title="Administration /
Monitoring">
- <desc0>No administrative or monitoring functionalities</desc0>
- <desc1>Existing, functionalities but uncomplete and or need
improvement</desc1>
- <desc2>Complete and easy-to-use administration and monitoring
functionalities. Possible integration with external tools (e.g: SNMP, syslog,
...)</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="exploitability" title="Exploitability">
+ <desc>Exploitability level</desc>
+ <element name="easeofuseergonomics" title="Ease of use, ergonomics">
+ <desc0>Difficult to use, requires an in depth knowledge of the
software functionality</desc0>
+ <desc1>Austere and very technical ergonomics</desc1>
+ <desc2>GUI including help functions and elaborated ergonomics</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
- <element name="technicaladaptability" title="Technical adaptability">
- <element name="modularity" title="Modularity">
- <desc0>Monolithic software</desc0>
- <desc1>Presence of hight level modules alowing a first level of
software adaptation</desc1>
- <desc2>Modular conception, allowing easy adaptation of the software
by selecting modules or even develeloping new ones</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="codemodification" title="Code modification">
- <desc0>Everything by hand</desc0>
- <desc1>Recompilation possible but complex without any tools or
documentation</desc1>
- <desc2>Recompilation with tools (e.g: make, ANT, ...) and
documentation provided</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="codeextension" title="Code extention">
- <desc0>Any modification requires code recompilation</desc0>
- <desc1>Architecture designed for static extension but requires
recompilation</desc1>
- <desc2>Principle of plugin, architecture designed for dynamic
extension without recompilation</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- </element>
- <element name="strategy" title="Strategy">
- <element name="license" title="License">
- <element name="permissiveness" title="Permissiveness (only if user
wants to become owner of code)">
- <desc0>Very strict license, like GPL</desc0>
- <desc1>Moderate permissive license located between both extremes
(GPL and BSD) dual-licensing depending on the type of user (person, company,
...) or their activities</desc1>
- <desc2>Very permissive like BSD or Apache licenses</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
-
- <element name="protectionagainstproprietaryforks" title="Protection
against proprietary forks">
- <desc0>Very permissive like BSD or Apache licenses</desc0>
- <desc1>Moderate permissive license located between both extremes
(GPL and BSD), dual-licensing depending on the type of user (person, company,
...) or their activies</desc1>
- <desc2>Very strict license, like GPL</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
-
- </element>
- <element name="copyrightowners" title="Copyright owners">
- <desc0>Rights held by a few individuals or entities, making it
easier to change the license</desc0>
- <desc1>Rights held by numerous individuals owning the code in a
homogeneous way, making relicense very difficult</desc1>
- <desc2>Rights held by a legal entity in whom the community trusts
(e.g: FSF or ASF)</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="modificationofsourcecode" title="Modification of source
code">
- <desc0>No pratical way to propose code modification</desc0>
- <desc1>Tools provided to access and modify code (like CVS or SVN)
but not really used to develop the software</desc1>
- <desc2>The code modification process is well defined, exposed and
respected, based on roles assignment</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="roadmap" title="Roadmap">
- <desc0>No published roadmap</desc0>
- <desc1>Existing roadmap without planning</desc1>
- <desc2>Versionned roadmap, with planning and measure of
delays</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="sponsor" title="Sponsor">
- <desc0>Software has no sponsor, the core team is not paid</desc0>
- <desc1>Software has an unique sponsor who might determine its
strategy</desc1>
- <desc2>Software is sponsored by industry</desc2>
+ <element name="administrationmonitoring" title="Administration /
Monitoring">
+ <desc0>No administrative or monitoring functionalities</desc0>
+ <desc1>Existing, functionalities but uncomplete and or need
improvement</desc1>
+ <desc2>Complete and easy-to-use administration and monitoring
functionalities. Possible integration with external tools (e.g: SNMP, syslog,
...)</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="technicaladaptability" title="Technical adaptability">
+ <desc>Technical adaptability</desc>
+ <element name="modularity" title="Modularity">
+ <desc0>Monolithic software</desc0>
+ <desc1>Presence of hight level modules alowing a first level of
software adaptation</desc1>
+ <desc2>Modular conception, allowing easy adaptation of the software by
selecting modules or even develeloping new ones</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="codemodification" title="Code modification">
+ <desc0>Everything by hand</desc0>
+ <desc1>Recompilation possible but complex without any tools or
documentation</desc1>
+ <desc2>Recompilation with tools (e.g: make, ANT, ...) and
documentation provided</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="codeextension" title="Code extention">
+ <desc0>Any modification requires code recompilation</desc0>
+ <desc1>Architecture designed for static extension but requires
recompilation</desc1>
+ <desc2>Principle of plugin, architecture designed for dynamic
extension without recompilation</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="strategy" title="Strategy">
+ <desc>Project's strategy</desc>
+ <element name="license" title="License">
+ <desc>License</desc>
+ <element name="permissiveness" title="Permissiveness (only if user
wants to become owner of code)">
+ <desc0>Very strict license, like GPL</desc0>
+ <desc1>Moderate permissive license located between both extremes
(GPL and BSD) dual-licensing depending on the type of user (person, company,
...) or their activities</desc1>
+ <desc2>Very permissive like BSD or Apache licenses</desc2>
<score></score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
- <element name="strategicalindependence" title="Strategical
independence">
- <desc0>No detectable strategy or strong dependency on one unique
actor (person, company, sponsor)</desc0>
- <desc1>Strategical vision shared with several other free and open
source projects but without strong commitment from copyrights owners</desc1>
- <desc2>Strong independence of the code team, legal entity holding
rights, strong involvement in the standardization process</desc2>
+ <element name="protectionagainstproprietaryforks" title="Protection
against proprietary forks">
+ <desc0>Very permissive like BSD or Apache licenses</desc0>
+ <desc1>Moderate permissive license located between both extremes
(GPL and BSD), dual-licensing depending on the type of user (person, company,
...) or their activies</desc1>
+ <desc2>Very strict license, like GPL</desc2>
<score></score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
</element>
- <element name="servicesprovinding" title="Services provinding">
- <element name="maintenability" title="Maintenability">
- <element name="qualityofsourcecode" title="Quality of source code">
- <desc0>Not very readable code or of poor quality, incoherence in
coding styles</desc0>
- <desc1>Readable code but not really complemented in detail</desc1>
- <desc2>Readable and commented code, implementing classic design
patterns with a coherent and applied coding policy</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="technologicaldispersion" title="Technological
dispersion">
- <desc0>Use of numerous different languages</desc0>
- <desc1>One main language with certain modules coded in other
languages for specific and limited requirements</desc1>
- <desc2>One unique language</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="intrinsicomplexity" title="Intrinsic complexity">
- <desc0>Very complex code requiring high level of expertise to
perfom modifications without generating side effeetcs</desc0>
- <desc1>Not very complex code but still requiring expertise
programming languages and software design</desc1>
- <desc2>Simple code and design, easy to modify</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="technicaldocumentation" title="Technical
documentation">
- <desc0>No documentation (development guide or automatically
generated doc like javadoc)</desc0>
- <desc1>Incomplete or old documentation without conception and
architectural considerations</desc1>
- <desc2>Detailed an up to date documentation, including conception,
architecure designe and coding considerations</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- </element>
- <element name="codemastery" title="Code mastery">
- <element name="codemasterydirect" title="Direct">
- <desc0>No direct expertise of the source code</desc0>
- <desc1>Mastery of code but limited to a single person or to only a
part of the source</desc1>
- <desc2>Several individuals mastering the code and covering
together the totality of the source</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- </element>
+ <element name="copyrightowners" title="Copyright owners">
+ <desc0>Rights held by a few individuals or entities, making it easier
to change the license</desc0>
+ <desc1>Rights held by numerous individuals owning the code in a
homogeneous way, making relicense very difficult</desc1>
+ <desc2>Rights held by a legal entity in whom the community trusts
(e.g: FSF or ASF)</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="modificationofsourcecode" title="Modification of source
code">
+ <desc0>No pratical way to propose code modification</desc0>
+ <desc1>Tools provided to access and modify code (like CVS or SVN) but
not really used to develop the software</desc1>
+ <desc2>The code modification process is well defined, exposed and
respected, based on roles assignment</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="roadmap" title="Roadmap">
+ <desc0>No published roadmap</desc0>
+ <desc1>Existing roadmap without planning</desc1>
+ <desc2>Versionned roadmap, with planning and measure of delays</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="sponsor" title="Sponsor">
+ <desc0>Software has no sponsor, the core team is not paid</desc0>
+ <desc1>Software has an unique sponsor who might determine its
strategy</desc1>
+ <desc2>Software is sponsored by industry</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="strategicalindependence" title="Strategical independence">
+ <desc0>No detectable strategy or strong dependency on one unique actor
(person, company, sponsor)</desc0>
+ <desc1>Strategical vision shared with several other free and open
source projects but without strong commitment from copyrights owners</desc1>
+ <desc2>Strong independence of the code team, legal entity holding
rights, strong involvement in the standardization process</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
</element>
</section>
-
<section name="composant" title="Composants of the project">
<comment></comment>
<desc>Different composant from the groupware</desc>
@@ -434,7 +400,6 @@
<comment>Content is stored in IMAP shared folder</comment>
</element>
</section>
-
<section name="administration" title="Administration GUI">
<comment></comment>
<element name="webinterface" title="Web interface">
@@ -452,7 +417,6 @@
<score></score>
</element>
</section>
-
<section name="groupwarecomposant" title="Supported groupware composant">
<comment></comment>
<element name="calendar" title="Calendar">
@@ -484,7 +448,6 @@
<score>2</score>
</element>
</section>
-
<section name="standard" title="Standard support">
<comment></comment>
<element name="icaloverwebdav" title="iCalendar over WebDav">
@@ -516,7 +479,6 @@
<score>0</score>
</element>
</section>
-
<section name="supportedclients" title="Supported client">
<comment></comment>
<element name="web" title="Web client">
@@ -555,7 +517,6 @@
<score>2</score>
</element>
</section>
-
<section name="codequality" title="Code quality">
<element name="remoteapi" title="Remote access API">
<desc0>not remote remote API</desc0>
@@ -572,6 +533,4 @@
<score>1</score>
</element>
</section>
-
-
</document>
Index: qsos/sheet/portal/jbossPortal/jbossPortal.qsos
diff -u qsos/sheet/portal/jbossPortal/jbossPortal.qsos:1.6
qsos/sheet/portal/jbossPortal/jbossPortal.qsos:1.7
--- qsos/sheet/portal/jbossPortal/jbossPortal.qsos:1.6 Tue Apr 18 09:46:40 2006
+++ qsos/sheet/portal/jbossPortal/jbossPortal.qsos Mon Apr 24 16:13:52 2006
@@ -24,9 +24,11 @@
<qsosspecificformat>1</qsosspecificformat>
</header>
<section name="generic" title="Generic section">
- <desc>Common QSOS section</desc>
+ <desc>Generic criteria from QSOS version 1.6</desc>
<element name="intrinsicdurability" title="Intrinsic durability">
+ <desc>Intrinsic durability</desc>
<element name="maturity" title="Maturity">
+ <desc>Maturity</desc>
<element name="age" title="Age">
<desc0>less than 3 months</desc0>
<desc1>if between 3 months and 3 years</desc1>
@@ -43,20 +45,21 @@
</element>
<element name="historyknowproblems" title="History, know problems">
<desc0>Software knows several problems which can be
prohibitive</desc0>
- <desc1>No know major problem or crisi</desc1>
+ <desc1>No know major problem or crisis</desc1>
<desc2>History of good management of crisis situations</desc2>
<score>2</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="forkprobability" title="Fork probability, source of
Forking">
<desc0>Software is very likely to be forked in the future</desc0>
- <desc1>Software comes from a fork but has very few chances of being
forked in the futur</desc1>
- <desc2>Software has very little chance of being forked. It does not
come from a frok either</desc2>
+ <desc1>Software comes from a fork but has very few chances of being
forked in the future</desc1>
+ <desc2>Software has very little chance of being forked. It does not
come from a fork either</desc2>
<score></score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
</element>
- <element name="adopation" title="Adopation">
+ <element name="adoption" title="Adoption">
+ <desc>Adoption by community and industry</desc>
<element name="popularity" title="Popularity (related to: general
public, niche, ...)">
<desc0>Very few users identified</desc0>
<desc1>Detectable use on Internet</desc1>
@@ -88,6 +91,7 @@
</element>
</element>
<element name="developmentleadership" title="Development leadership">
+ <desc>Organisation and leadership of developments</desc>
<element name="leadingteam" title="Leading team">
<desc0>1 to 2 individuals involved, not clearly identified</desc0>
<desc1>Between 2 and 5 independent people</desc1>
@@ -104,6 +108,7 @@
</element>
</element>
<element name="activity" title="Activity">
+ <desc>Activity of the project and around the software</desc>
<element name="developersidentificationturnover" title="Developers,
identification, turnover">
<desc0>Less than 3 developers, not clearly identified</desc0>
<desc1>Between 4 and 7 developers, or more unidentified developers
with important turnover</desc1>
@@ -135,7 +140,8 @@
</element>
</element>
</element>
- <element name="industrialisedsolution" title="Industrialised solution">
+ <element name="industrializedsolution" title="Industrialized solution">
+ <desc>Industrialization level of the project</desc>
<element name="independenceofdevelopments" title="Independence of
developments">
<desc0>Developments realized at 100% by employees of a single
company</desc0>
<desc1>60% maximum</desc1>
@@ -144,6 +150,7 @@
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="services" title="Services">
+ <desc>Services offering</desc>
<element name="training" title="Training">
<desc0>No offer of training identified</desc0>
<desc1>Offer exists but is restricted geographically and to one
language or is provided by a single contractor</desc1>
@@ -174,10 +181,11 @@
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="qualityassurance" title="Quality Assurance">
+ <desc>Quality assurance process</desc>
<element name="quality" title="Quality Assurance">
<desc0>No QA process</desc0>
<desc1>Identifies QA process but not much formalized and with no
tool</desc1>
- <desc2>Automatic testing process included in code's life-cycle with
publication of resulats</desc2>
+ <desc2>Automatic testing process included in code's life-cycle with
publication of results</desc2>
<score>1</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
@@ -190,79 +198,80 @@
</element>
</element>
<element name="packaging" title="Packaging">
+ <desc>Packaging for various operating systems</desc>
<element name="packagingsource" title="Source">
- <desc0>Software can't be installed from source without a look of
work</desc0>
- <desc1>Installation from source is limited depend on very strict
condition (OS, arch, lib, ...)</desc1>
+ <desc0>Software can't be installed from source without lot of
work</desc0>
+ <desc1>Installation from source is limited and depends on very
strict conditions (OS, arch, lib, ...)</desc1>
<desc2>Installation from source is easy</desc2>
<score></score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="packagingdebian" title="Debian">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for Debian</desc0>
- <desc1>A Debian package exists but it has important issues or it
doesn't have an official support</desc1>
+ <desc1>A Debian package exists but it has important issues or it
doesn't have official support</desc1>
<desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
<score>0</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="packagingfreebsd" title="FreeBSD">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for FreeBSD</desc0>
- <desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't have
an official support</desc1>
+ <desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't have
official support</desc1>
<desc2>A official port exists in FreeBSD</desc2>
<score>0</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="packaginghpux" title="HP-UX">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for HP-UX</desc0>
- <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have an official support</desc1>
- <desc2>A strong packaged is provided for HP-UX</desc2>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support</desc1>
+ <desc2>A stable package is provided for HP-UX</desc2>
<score>0</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="packagingmacosx" title="MacOSX">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for MacOSX</desc0>
- <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have an official support</desc1>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support</desc1>
<desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
<score>0</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="packagingmandriva" title="Mandriva">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for Mandriva</desc0>
- <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have an official support</desc1>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support</desc1>
<desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
<score>0</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="packagingnet" title="NetBSD">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for NetBSD</desc0>
- <desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't have
an official support</desc1>
+ <desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't have
official support</desc1>
<desc2>A official port exists in NetBSD</desc2>
<score>0</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
- <element name="packagingnet" title="OpenBSD">
+ <element name="packagingopen" title="OpenBSD">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for OpenBSD</desc0>
- <desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't have
an official support</desc1>
+ <desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't have
official support</desc1>
<desc2>A official port exists in OpenBSD</desc2>
<score>0</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="packagingredhat" title="RedHat">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for RedHat/Fedora</desc0>
- <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have an official support</desc1>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support</desc1>
<desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
<score>0</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
- <element name="packagingsuse" title="Solaris">
+ <element name="packagingsolaris" title="Solaris">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for Solaris</desc0>
- <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have an official support (e.g: SunFreeware.com )</desc1>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support (e.g: SunFreeware.com )</desc1>
<desc2>The software is supported by Sun for Solaris</desc2>
<score>0</score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
<element name="packagingsuse" title="SuSE">
<desc0>The software is not packaged for SuSE</desc0>
- <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have an official support</desc1>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support</desc1>
<desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
<score>0</score>
<comment></comment>
@@ -275,138 +284,101 @@
<comment></comment>
</element>
</element>
- <element name="exploitability" title="Exploitability">
- <element name="easeofuseergonomics" title="Ease of use, ergonomics">
- <desc0>Difficult to use, requires an in depth knowledge of the
software functionality</desc0>
- <desc1>Austere and very technical ergonomics</desc1>
- <desc2>GUI including help functions and elaborated ergonomics</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="administrationmonitoring" title="Administration /
Monitoring">
- <desc0>No administrative or monitoring functionalities</desc0>
- <desc1>Existing, functionalities but uncomplete and or need
improvement</desc1>
- <desc2>Complete and easy-to-use administration and monitoring
functionalities. Possible integration with external tools (e.g: SNMP, syslog,
...)</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="exploitability" title="Exploitability">
+ <desc>Exploitability level</desc>
+ <element name="easeofuseergonomics" title="Ease of use, ergonomics">
+ <desc0>Difficult to use, requires an in depth knowledge of the
software functionality</desc0>
+ <desc1>Austere and very technical ergonomics</desc1>
+ <desc2>GUI including help functions and elaborated ergonomics</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
- <element name="technicaladaptability" title="Technical adaptability">
- <element name="modularity" title="Modularity">
- <desc0>Monolithic software</desc0>
- <desc1>Presence of hight level modules alowing a first level of
software adaptation</desc1>
- <desc2>Modular conception, allowing easy adaptation of the software
by selecting modules or even develeloping new ones</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="codemodification" title="Code modification">
- <desc0>Everything by hand</desc0>
- <desc1>Recompilation possible but complex without any tools or
documentation</desc1>
- <desc2>Recompilation with tools (e.g: make, ANT, ...) and
documentation provided</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="codeextension" title="Code extention">
- <desc0>Any modification requires code recompilation</desc0>
- <desc1>Architecture designed for static extension but requires
recompilation</desc1>
- <desc2>Principle of plugin, architecture designed for dynamic
extension without recompilation</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
+ <element name="administrationmonitoring" title="Administration /
Monitoring">
+ <desc0>No administrative or monitoring functionalities</desc0>
+ <desc1>Existing, functionalities but uncomplete and or need
improvement</desc1>
+ <desc2>Complete and easy-to-use administration and monitoring
functionalities. Possible integration with external tools (e.g: SNMP, syslog,
...)</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
- <element name="strategy" title="Strategy">
- <element name="license" title="License">
- <element name="permissiveness" title="Permissiveness (only if user
wants to become owner of code)">
- <desc0>Very strict license, like GPL</desc0>
- <desc1>Moderate permissive license located between both extremes
(GPL and BSD) dual-licensing depending on the type of user (person, company,
...) or their activities</desc1>
- <desc2>Very permissive like BSD or Apache licenses</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="protectionagainstproprietaryforks" title="Protection
against proprietary forks">
- <desc0>Very permissive like BSD or Apache licenses</desc0>
- <desc1>Moderate permissive license located between both extremes
(GPL and BSD), dual-licensing depending on the type of user (person, company,
...) or their activies</desc1>
- <desc2>Very strict license, like GPL</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- </element>
- <element name="copyrightowners" title="Copyright owners">
- <desc0>Rights held by a few individuals or entities, making it
easier to change the license</desc0>
- <desc1>Rights held by numerous individuals owning the code in a
homogeneous way, making relicense very difficult</desc1>
- <desc2>Rights held by a legal entity in whom the community trusts
(e.g: FSF or ASF)</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="modificationofsourcecode" title="Modification of source
code">
- <desc0>No pratical way to propose code modification</desc0>
- <desc1>Tools provided to access and modify code (like CVS or SVN)
but not really used to develop the software</desc1>
- <desc2>The code modification process is well defined, exposed and
respected, based on roles assignment</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="roadmap" title="Roadmap">
- <desc0>No published roadmap</desc0>
- <desc1>Existing roadmap without planning</desc1>
- <desc2>Versionned roadmap, with planning and measure of
delays</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="sponsor" title="Sponsor">
- <desc0>Software has no sponsor, the core team is not paid</desc0>
- <desc1>Software has an unique sponsor who might determine its
strategy</desc1>
- <desc2>Software is sponsored by industry</desc2>
+ </element>
+ <element name="technicaladaptability" title="Technical adaptability">
+ <desc>Technical adaptability</desc>
+ <element name="modularity" title="Modularity">
+ <desc0>Monolithic software</desc0>
+ <desc1>Presence of hight level modules alowing a first level of
software adaptation</desc1>
+ <desc2>Modular conception, allowing easy adaptation of the software by
selecting modules or even develeloping new ones</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="codemodification" title="Code modification">
+ <desc0>Everything by hand</desc0>
+ <desc1>Recompilation possible but complex without any tools or
documentation</desc1>
+ <desc2>Recompilation with tools (e.g: make, ANT, ...) and
documentation provided</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="codeextension" title="Code extention">
+ <desc0>Any modification requires code recompilation</desc0>
+ <desc1>Architecture designed for static extension but requires
recompilation</desc1>
+ <desc2>Principle of plugin, architecture designed for dynamic
extension without recompilation</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="strategy" title="Strategy">
+ <desc>Project's strategy</desc>
+ <element name="license" title="License">
+ <desc>License</desc>
+ <element name="permissiveness" title="Permissiveness (only if user
wants to become owner of code)">
+ <desc0>Very strict license, like GPL</desc0>
+ <desc1>Moderate permissive license located between both extremes
(GPL and BSD) dual-licensing depending on the type of user (person, company,
...) or their activities</desc1>
+ <desc2>Very permissive like BSD or Apache licenses</desc2>
<score></score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
- <element name="strategicalindependence" title="Strategical
independence">
- <desc0>No detectable strategy or strong dependency on one unique
actor (person, company, sponsor)</desc0>
- <desc1>Strategical vision shared with several other free and open
source projects but without strong commitment from copyrights owners</desc1>
- <desc2>Strong independence of the code team, legal entity holding
rights, strong involvement in the standardization process</desc2>
+ <element name="protectionagainstproprietaryforks" title="Protection
against proprietary forks">
+ <desc0>Very permissive like BSD or Apache licenses</desc0>
+ <desc1>Moderate permissive license located between both extremes
(GPL and BSD), dual-licensing depending on the type of user (person, company,
...) or their activies</desc1>
+ <desc2>Very strict license, like GPL</desc2>
<score></score>
<comment></comment>
</element>
</element>
- <element name="servicesprovinding" title="Services provinding">
- <element name="maintenability" title="Maintenability">
- <element name="qualityofsourcecode" title="Quality of source code">
- <desc0>Not very readable code or of poor quality, incoherence in
coding styles</desc0>
- <desc1>Readable code but not really complemented in detail</desc1>
- <desc2>Readable and commented code, implementing classic design
patterns with a coherent and applied coding policy</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="technologicaldispersion" title="Technological
dispersion">
- <desc0>Use of numerous different languages</desc0>
- <desc1>One main language with certain modules coded in other
languages for specific and limited requirements</desc1>
- <desc2>One unique language</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="intrinsicomplexity" title="Intrinsic complexity">
- <desc0>Very complex code requiring high level of expertise to
perfom modifications without generating side effeetcs</desc0>
- <desc1>Not very complex code but still requiring expertise
programming languages and software design</desc1>
- <desc2>Simple code and design, easy to modify</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="technicaldocumentation" title="Technical
documentation">
- <desc0>No documentation (development guide or automatically
generated doc like javadoc)</desc0>
- <desc1>Incomplete or old documentation without conception and
architectural considerations</desc1>
- <desc2>Detailed an up to date documentation, including conception,
architecure designe and coding considerations</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- </element>
- <element name="codemastery" title="Code mastery">
- <element name="codemasterydirect" title="Direct">
- <desc0>No direct expertise of the source code</desc0>
- <desc1>Mastery of code but limited to a single person or to only a
part of the source</desc1>
- <desc2>Several individuals mastering the code and covering
together the totality of the source</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- </element>
+ <element name="copyrightowners" title="Copyright owners">
+ <desc0>Rights held by a few individuals or entities, making it easier
to change the license</desc0>
+ <desc1>Rights held by numerous individuals owning the code in a
homogeneous way, making relicense very difficult</desc1>
+ <desc2>Rights held by a legal entity in whom the community trusts
(e.g: FSF or ASF)</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="modificationofsourcecode" title="Modification of source
code">
+ <desc0>No pratical way to propose code modification</desc0>
+ <desc1>Tools provided to access and modify code (like CVS or SVN) but
not really used to develop the software</desc1>
+ <desc2>The code modification process is well defined, exposed and
respected, based on roles assignment</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="roadmap" title="Roadmap">
+ <desc0>No published roadmap</desc0>
+ <desc1>Existing roadmap without planning</desc1>
+ <desc2>Versionned roadmap, with planning and measure of delays</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="sponsor" title="Sponsor">
+ <desc0>Software has no sponsor, the core team is not paid</desc0>
+ <desc1>Software has an unique sponsor who might determine its
strategy</desc1>
+ <desc2>Software is sponsored by industry</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="strategicalindependence" title="Strategical independence">
+ <desc0>No detectable strategy or strong dependency on one unique actor
(person, company, sponsor)</desc0>
+ <desc1>Strategical vision shared with several other free and open
source projects but without strong commitment from copyrights owners</desc1>
+ <desc2>Strong independence of the code team, legal entity holding
rights, strong involvement in the standardization process</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
</element>
</element>
</section>
@@ -631,14 +603,12 @@
<score>2</score>
</element>
</element>
-
<section name="storage" title="storage">
<element name="LDAPstorage" title="LDAPstorage">
<desc0>No LDAP storage</desc0>
<desc1>LDAP storage is partial or doesn't work correctly</desc1>
<desc2>LDAP storage is performing and brings a real advantage for the
tools</desc2>
- <comment>
- </comment>
+ <comment></comment>
<score>2</score>
</element>
<element name="SGBDstorage" title="SGBD storage">
@@ -649,7 +619,6 @@
<score>2</score>
</element>
</section>
-
<element name="development" title="development">
<element name="multi-IDEsupport" title="mutli-IDE support">
<desc0>No IDE support</desc0>
| [Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Qsos-commits] qsos/sheet RDBMS/mysql/mysql-4.1.qsos RDBMS/mys...,
Gonéri Le Bouder <=