[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Qsos-commits] qsos/libs/ruby/qsos kollab.xml
|
From: |
Romain PELISSE |
|
Subject: |
[Qsos-commits] qsos/libs/ruby/qsos kollab.xml |
|
Date: |
Thu, 22 Jun 2006 16:00:23 +0000 |
CVSROOT: /sources/qsos
Module name: qsos
Changes by: Romain PELISSE <rpelisse> 06/06/22 16:00:23
Added files:
libs/ruby/qsos : kollab.xml
Log message:
A simple test file for the XMLReader and XMLWriter unit test
CVSWeb URLs:
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/qsos/libs/ruby/qsos/kollab.xml?cvsroot=qsos&rev=1.1
Patches:
Index: kollab.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: kollab.xml
diff -N kollab.xml
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ kollab.xml 22 Jun 2006 16:00:23 -0000 1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,578 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
+<!-- $Id: kollab.xml,v 1.1 2006/06/22 16:00:23 rpelisse Exp $ -->
+<document>
+ <header>
+ <authors>
+ <author>
+ <email>address@hidden</email>
+ <name>Gonerie Le Bouder
+ </name>
+ </author>
+ </authors>
+ <dates>
+ <creation>20060307</creation>
+ <validation></validation>
+ </dates>
+ <language>en</language>
+ <appname>kolab</appname>
+ <release>2</release>
+ <licenseid>31</licenseid>
+ <licensedesc>GNU General Public License</licensedesc>
+ <url>http://www.kolab.org</url>
+ <desc>Kolab is a groupware used in the german administration</desc>
+ <demourl>http://kolab.org/screenshots.html</demourl>
+ <qsosformat>1</qsosformat>
+ <qsosappfamily>groupware</qsosappfamily>
+ <qsosspecificformat>1</qsosspecificformat>
+ </header>
+ <section name="generic" title="Generic section">
+ <desc>Common QSOS section</desc>
+ <element name="intrinsicdurability" title="Intrinsic durability">
+ <element name="maturity" title="Maturity">
+ <element name="age" title="Age">
+ <desc0>less than 3 months</desc0>
+ <desc1>if between 3 months and 3 years</desc1>
+ <desc2>after 3 years</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment>Kolab.org domain was created the 29th of Oct 2002</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="stability" title="Stability">
+ <desc0>Unstable software with numerous releases or patches
generating side effects</desc0>
+ <desc1>Stabilized production release existing but old. Difficulties
to stabilize developpement releases</desc1>
+ <desc2>Stabilized software. Releases provide bug fixes corrections
but mainly new functionalities</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="historyknowproblems" title="History, know problems">
+ <desc0>Software knows several problems which can be
prohibitive</desc0>
+ <desc1>No know major problem or crisi</desc1>
+ <desc2>History of good management of crisis situations</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="forkprobability" title="Fork probability, source of
Forking">
+ <desc0>Software is very likely to be forked in the future</desc0>
+ <desc1>Software comes from a fork but has very few chances of being
forked in the futur</desc1>
+ <desc2>Software has very little chance of being forked. It does not
come from a frok either</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="adopation" title="Adopation">
+ <element name="popularity" title="Popularity (related to: general
public, niche, ...)">
+ <desc0>Very few users identified</desc0>
+ <desc1>Detectable use on Internet</desc1>
+ <desc2>Numerous users, numerous references</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="references" title="References">
+ <desc0>None</desc0>
+ <desc1>Few refences, non critical usages</desc1>
+ <desc2>Often implemented for critical applications</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment>Kolab is know to be use in some important organisation. But
they doesn't give information for "security" raison</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="contributingcommunity" title="Contributing Community">
+ <desc0>No community or without real activity (forum, mailing list,
...)</desc0>
+ <desc1>Existing community with a notable activity</desc1>
+ <desc2>Strong community: big activity on forums, numerous
contributors and advocates</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="books" title="books">
+ <desc0>No book about the software</desc0>
+ <desc1>Less than 5 books about the software are available</desc1>
+ <desc2>More than 5 books about software are available, in several
languages</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="developmentleadership" title="Development leadership">
+ <element name="leadingteam" title="Leading team">
+ <desc0>1 to 2 individuals involved, not clearly identified</desc0>
+ <desc1>Between 2 and 5 independent people</desc1>
+ <desc2>More than 5 people</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="managementstyle" title="Management style">
+ <desc0>Complete dictatorship</desc0>
+ <desc1>Enlightened despotism</desc1>
+ <desc2>Council of architects with identified leader (e.g:
KDE)</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="activity" title="Activity">
+ <element name="developersidentificationturnover" title="Developers,
identification, turnover">
+ <desc0>Less than 3 developers, not clearly identified</desc0>
+ <desc1>Between 4 and 7 developers, or more unidentified developers
with important turnover</desc1>
+ <desc2>More than 7 developers, very stable team</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="activityonbugs" title="Activity on bugs">
+ <desc0>Slow reactivity in forum or on mailing list, or nothing
regarding bug fixes in releases note</desc0>
+ <desc1>Detectable activity but without process clearly exposed,
loing reaction/resolution time</desc1>
+ <desc2>Strong reactivity based on roles and tasks assignment</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="activityonfunctionnalities" title="Activity on
functionalities">
+ <desc0>No or few new functionalities</desc0>
+ <desc1>Evolution of the product driven by the core team or by user's
request without any clearly explained process</desc1>
+ <desc2>Tool(s) to manage feature requests, strong interaction with
roadmap</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="activityonreleases" title="Activity on releases">
+ <desc0>Very weak activity on both production and development
releases</desc0>
+ <desc1>Activity on production and developmenet releases. Frequent
minor releases (bug fixes)</desc1>
+ <desc2>Important activity with frequent minor releases (bugs fixes)
and planned major releases relating to the roadmap forcast</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="industrialisedsolution" title="Industrialised solution">
+ <element name="independenceofdevelopments" title="Independence of
developments">
+ <desc0>Developments realized at 100% by employees of a single
company</desc0>
+ <desc1>60% maximum</desc1>
+ <desc2>20% maximum</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="services" title="Services">
+ <element name="training" title="Training">
+ <desc0>No offer of training identified</desc0>
+ <desc1>Offer exists but is restricted geographically and to one
language or is provided by a single contractor</desc1>
+ <desc2>Rich offers provided by several contractors, in serveral
languages and split into modules of gradual levels</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="support" title="Support">
+ <desc0>No offer of support except via public forums and mailing
lists</desc0>
+ <desc1>Offer exists but is provided by a single contractor without
strong commitment quality of services</desc1>
+ <desc2>Multiple service providers with strong commitment (e.g:
guaranteed resolution time)</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="consulting" title="Consulting">
+ <desc0>No offer of consulting service</desc0>
+ <desc1>Offer exists but is restricted geographically and to one
language or is provided by a single contractor</desc1>
+ <desc2>Consulting services provied by different contractors in
serveral languages</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="documentation" title="Documentation">
+ <desc0>No user documentation</desc0>
+ <desc1>Documentation exists but shifted in time, is restricted to one
language or is poorly detailed</desc1>
+ <desc2>Documentation always up to date, translated and possibly
adapted to different target readers (end user, sysadmin, manager, ...)</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="qualityassurance" title="Quality Assurance">
+ <element name="quality" title="Quality Assurance">
+ <desc0>No QA process</desc0>
+ <desc1>Identifies QA process but not much formalized and with no
tool</desc1>
+ <desc2>Automatic testing process included in code's life-cycle with
publication of resulats</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="tools" title="Tools">
+ <desc0>No bug or feature request management tool</desc0>
+ <desc1>Standard tools provided (for instance by a hosting forge) but
poorly used</desc1>
+ <desc2>Very active use of tools for roles/tasks allocation and
progress monitoring</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment>1</comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="packaging" title="Packaging">
+ <element name="packagingsource" title="Source">
+ <desc0>Software can't be installed from source without a look of
work</desc0>
+ <desc1>Installation from source is limited depend on very strict
condition (OS, arch, lib, ...)</desc1>
+ <desc2>Installation from source is easy</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="packagingdebian" title="Debian">
+ <desc0>The software is not packaged for Debian</desc0>
+ <desc1>A Debian package exists but it has important issues or it
doesn't have an official support</desc1>
+ <desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="packagingfreebsd" title="FreeBSD">
+ <desc0>The software is not packaged for FreeBSD</desc0>
+ <desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't have
an official support</desc1>
+ <desc2>A official port exists in FreeBSD</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="packaginghpux" title="HP-UX">
+ <desc0>The software is not packaged for HP-UX</desc0>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have an official support</desc1>
+ <desc2>A strong packaged is provided for HP-UX</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+
+ <element name="packagingmacosx" title="MacOSX">
+ <desc0>The software is not packaged for MacOSX</desc0>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have an official support</desc1>
+ <desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+
+ <element name="packagingmandriva" title="Mandriva">
+ <desc0>The software is not packaged for Mandriva</desc0>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have an official support</desc1>
+ <desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="packagingnet" title="NetBSD">
+ <desc0>The software is not packaged for NetBSD</desc0>
+ <desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't have
an official support</desc1>
+ <desc2>A official port exists in NetBSD</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="packagingnet" title="OpenBSD">
+ <desc0>The software is not packaged for OpenBSD</desc0>
+ <desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't have
an official support</desc1>
+ <desc2>A official port exists in OpenBSD</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="packagingredhat" title="RedHat">
+ <desc0>The software is not packaged for RedHat/Fedora</desc0>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have an official support</desc1>
+ <desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="packagingsuse" title="Solaris">
+ <desc0>The software is not packaged for Solaris</desc0>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have an official support (e.g: SunFreeware.com )</desc1>
+ <desc2>The software is supported by Sun for Solaris</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="packagingsuse" title="SuSE">
+ <desc0>The software is not packaged for SuSE</desc0>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have an official support</desc1>
+ <desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="packagingwindows" title="Windows">
+ <desc0>The project can't be installed on Windows</desc0>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it is limited or has important issues or
just cover some specific Windows release (e.g: Windows2000 and
WindowsXP)</desc1>
+ <desc2>Windows is full supported and a package is provided</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="exploitability" title="Exploitability">
+ <element name="easeofuseergonomics" title="Ease of use, ergonomics">
+ <desc0>Difficult to use, requires an in depth knowledge of the
software functionality</desc0>
+ <desc1>Austere and very technical ergonomics</desc1>
+ <desc2>GUI including help functions and elaborated ergonomics</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="administrationmonitoring" title="Administration /
Monitoring">
+ <desc0>No administrative or monitoring functionalities</desc0>
+ <desc1>Existing, functionalities but uncomplete and or need
improvement</desc1>
+ <desc2>Complete and easy-to-use administration and monitoring
functionalities. Possible integration with external tools (e.g: SNMP, syslog,
...)</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="technicaladaptability" title="Technical adaptability">
+ <element name="modularity" title="Modularity">
+ <desc0>Monolithic software</desc0>
+ <desc1>Presence of hight level modules alowing a first level of
software adaptation</desc1>
+ <desc2>Modular conception, allowing easy adaptation of the software
by selecting modules or even develeloping new ones</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="codemodification" title="Code modification">
+ <desc0>Everything by hand</desc0>
+ <desc1>Recompilation possible but complex without any tools or
documentation</desc1>
+ <desc2>Recompilation with tools (e.g: make, ANT, ...) and
documentation provided</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="codeextension" title="Code extention">
+ <desc0>Any modification requires code recompilation</desc0>
+ <desc1>Architecture designed for static extension but requires
recompilation</desc1>
+ <desc2>Principle of plugin, architecture designed for dynamic
extension without recompilation</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="strategy" title="Strategy">
+ <element name="license" title="License">
+ <element name="permissiveness" title="Permissiveness (only if user
wants to become owner of code)">
+ <desc0>Very strict license, like GPL</desc0>
+ <desc1>Moderate permissive license located between both extremes
(GPL and BSD) dual-licensing depending on the type of user (person, company,
...) or their activities</desc1>
+ <desc2>Very permissive like BSD or Apache licenses</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+
+ <element name="protectionagainstproprietaryforks" title="Protection
against proprietary forks">
+ <desc0>Very permissive like BSD or Apache licenses</desc0>
+ <desc1>Moderate permissive license located between both extremes
(GPL and BSD), dual-licensing depending on the type of user (person, company,
...) or their activies</desc1>
+ <desc2>Very strict license, like GPL</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+
+ </element>
+ <element name="copyrightowners" title="Copyright owners">
+ <desc0>Rights held by a few individuals or entities, making it
easier to change the license</desc0>
+ <desc1>Rights held by numerous individuals owning the code in a
homogeneous way, making relicense very difficult</desc1>
+ <desc2>Rights held by a legal entity in whom the community trusts
(e.g: FSF or ASF)</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="modificationofsourcecode" title="Modification of source
code">
+ <desc0>No pratical way to propose code modification</desc0>
+ <desc1>Tools provided to access and modify code (like CVS or SVN)
but not really used to develop the software</desc1>
+ <desc2>The code modification process is well defined, exposed and
respected, based on roles assignment</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="roadmap" title="Roadmap">
+ <desc0>No published roadmap</desc0>
+ <desc1>Existing roadmap without planning</desc1>
+ <desc2>Versionned roadmap, with planning and measure of
delays</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="sponsor" title="Sponsor">
+ <desc0>Software has no sponsor, the core team is not paid</desc0>
+ <desc1>Software has an unique sponsor who might determine its
strategy</desc1>
+ <desc2>Software is sponsored by industry</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="strategicalindependence" title="Strategical
independence">
+ <desc0>No detectable strategy or strong dependency on one unique
actor (person, company, sponsor)</desc0>
+ <desc1>Strategical vison shared with serveral other free and open
source projects but without strong commitment from copyrights owners</desc1>
+ <desc2>Strong independence of the code team, legal entity holding
rights, strong involvement in the standardization process</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="servicesprovinding" title="Services provinding">
+ <element name="maintenability" title="Maintenability">
+ <element name="qualityofsourcecode" title="Quality of source code">
+ <desc0>Not very readable code or of poor quality, incoherence in
coding styles</desc0>
+ <desc1>Readable code but not really complemented in detail</desc1>
+ <desc2>Readable and commented code, implementing classic design
patterns with a coherent and applied coding policy</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="technologicaldispersion" title="Technological
dispersion">
+ <desc0>Use of numerous different languages</desc0>
+ <desc1>One main language with certain modules coded in other
languages for specific and limited requirements</desc1>
+ <desc2>One unique language</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="intrinsicomplexity" title="Intrinsic complexity">
+ <desc0>Very complex code requiring high level of expertise to
perfom modifications without generating side effeetcs</desc0>
+ <desc1>Not very complex code but still requiring expertise
programming languages and software design</desc1>
+ <desc2>Simple code and design, easy to modify</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="technicaldocumentation" title="Technical
documentation">
+ <desc0>No documentation (development guide or automatically
generated doc like javadoc)</desc0>
+ <desc1>Incomplete or old documentation without conception and
architectural considerations</desc1>
+ <desc2>Detailed an up to date documentation, including conception,
architecure designe and coding considerations</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="codemastery" title="Code mastery">
+ <element name="codemasterydirect" title="Direct">
+ <desc0>No direct expertise of the source code</desc0>
+ <desc1>Mastery of code but limited to a single person or to only a
part of the source</desc1>
+ <desc2>Several individuals mastering the code and covering
together the totality of the source</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ </section>
+
+ <section name="composant" title="Composants of the project">
+ <comment></comment>
+ <desc>Different composant from the groupware</desc>
+ <element name="auth" title="Authentification backend">
+ <desc>Authentification backend</desc>
+ <comment>OpenLDAP</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="mail" title="Mail">
+ <desc>Mail server</desc>
+ <comment>Cyrus-IMAP</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="mta" title="Mail Transport Agent">
+ <desc>Mail Transport Agent</desc>
+ <comment>Postfix</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="storage" title="Storage backend">
+ <desc>Storage backend</desc>
+ <comment>Content is stored in IMAP shared folder</comment>
+ </element>
+ </section>
+
+ <section name="administration" title="Administration GUI">
+ <comment></comment>
+ <element name="webinterface" title="Web interface">
+ <desc0>No web interface</desc0>
+ <desc1>an web interface is provided but limited</desc1>
+ <desc2>everything can be completed with the Web interface</desc2>
+ <comment></comment>
+ <score>2</score>
+ </element>
+ <element name="commandline" title="Console mode">
+ <desc0>Nothing</desc0>
+ <desc1>Some tools exists, but limited. No text based configuration file
or not human readable (e.g: complexe XML)</desc1>
+ <desc2>Total access to the server configuration with powerful tools and
well designer text configuration file</desc2>
+ <comment></comment>
+ <score></score>
+ </element>
+ </section>
+
+ <section name="groupwarecomposant" title="Supported groupware composant">
+ <comment></comment>
+ <element name="calendar" title="Calendar">
+ <desc0>no calendar provied</desc0>
+ <desc1>a calendar is provied, but leak some important feature</desc1>
+ <desc2>a well integrated calendar is provied</desc2>
+ <comment></comment>
+ <score>2</score>
+ </element>
+ <element name="taskmanager" title="Taskmanager">
+ <desc0>no task manager provied</desc0>
+ <desc1>a task manager is provied but leak some important feature</desc1>
+ <desc2>Task manager fully supported</desc2>
+ <comment></comment>
+ <score>2</score>
+ </element>
+ <element name="notemanager" title="Notemanager">
+ <desc0>no note manager provided</desc0>
+ <desc1>a limited note manager is provided</desc1>
+ <desc2>a well integred note manager is provided</desc2>
+ <comment></comment>
+ <score>2</score>
+ </element>
+ <element name="contactmanager" title="Contact manager">
+ <desc0>can't add contact in the server</desc0>
+ <desc1>contact manager exists but is limited</desc1>
+ <desc2>contact manager fully supported</desc2>
+ <comment>yes</comment>
+ <score>2</score>
+ </element>
+ </section>
+
+ <section name="standard" title="Standard support">
+ <comment></comment>
+ <element name="icaloverwebdav" title="iCalendar over WebDav">
+ <desc0>iCalendar over WebDav not supported</desc0>
+ <desc1>iCalendar over WebDav partially supported</desc1>
+ <desc2>iCalendar over WebDav works</desc2>
+ <comment></comment>
+ <score>1</score>
+ </element>
+ <element name="caldav" title="CalDav">
+ <desc0>CalDav over WebDav not supported</desc0>
+ <desc1>CalDav over WebDav partially supported</desc1>
+ <desc2>CalDav over WebDav works</desc2>
+ <comment>not supported</comment>
+ <score>0</score>
+ </element>
+ <element name="groupdav" title="Groupdav">
+ <desc0>Groupdav over WebDav not supported</desc0>
+ <desc1>Groupdav over WebDav partially supported</desc1>
+ <desc2>Groupdav over WebDav works</desc2>
+ <comment>not supported</comment>
+ <score>0</score>
+ </element>
+ <element name="syncml" title="SyncML">
+ <desc0>SyncML over WebDav not supported</desc0>
+ <desc1>SyncML over WebDav partially supported</desc1>
+ <desc2>SyncML over WebDav works</desc2>
+ <comment>not supported</comment>
+ <score>0</score>
+ </element>
+ </section>
+
+ <section name="supportedclients" title="Supported client">
+ <comment></comment>
+ <element name="web" title="Web client">
+ <desc0>Web interface doesn't exist</desc0>
+ <desc1>Web interface is provied but limited or need some work for its
integration</desc1>
+ <desc2>Web interface directly provided with the project</desc2>
+ <comment>eGroupware or Hord can be pluged</comment>
+ <score>1</score>
+ </element>
+ <element name="outlook" title="Microsoft Outlook">
+ <desc0>Microsoft Outlook not supported</desc0>
+ <desc1>Microsoft Outlook connector is provided but have some
limitation</desc1>
+ <desc2>a free Microsoft Outlook connector</desc2>
+ <comment>Two commercial and not free connected exist. The best is
Toltec's one.</comment>
+ <score>1</score>
+ </element>
+ <element name="evolution" title="Novell Evolution">
+ <desc0>Novell Evolution can't be used</desc0>
+ <desc1>Novell Evolution can be used but with some limitation</desc1>
+ <desc2>Novell Evolution fully supported</desc2>
+ <comment></comment>
+ <score>2</score>
+ </element>
+ <element name="kde" title="KDE">
+ <desc0>KDE PIM (Korganizer, kmail, ...) can't be used with this
groupware</desc0>
+ <desc1>KDE can be used but with some limitation </desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully support of KDE</desc2>
+ <comment>KDE PIM was the first supported client</comment>
+ <score>2</score>
+ </element>
+ <element name="ical" title="Apple iCal">
+ <desc0>Apple's iCal can't be used</desc0>
+ <desc1>Apple's iCal works but with some limitation</desc1>
+ <desc2>Apple's iCal fully supported</desc2>
+ <comment></comment>
+ <score>2</score>
+ </element>
+ </section>
+
+ <section name="codequality" title="Code quality">
+ <element name="remoteapi" title="Remote access API">
+ <desc0>not remote remote API</desc0>
+ <desc1>remote API (SOAP, XML/RPC, REST) exists but is limited or
buggy</desc1>
+ <desc2>powerful remote API (SOAP, XML/RPC, REST) provied</desc2>
+ <comment>none for Kolab2, a wish for Kolab3 exists for support of a
remote procedure call infrastucture</comment>
+ <score>0</score>
+ </element>
+ <element name="api" title="code API">
+ <desc0>No API provied to extend the server, or very limited and not
documented</desc0>
+ <desc1>An API is provied but limited of not fully documented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Well documented and complet API</desc2>
+ <comment>A Perl lib is provided but Kolab core can't be change easily.
The best way to extend it, is to provide additional service plugged on the LDAP
directory server.</comment>
+ <score>1</score>
+ </element>
+ </section>
+
+
+</document>
| [Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Qsos-commits] qsos/libs/ruby/qsos kollab.xml,
Romain PELISSE <=