[Qsos-commits] qsos/sheet global.xml

[Goneri Le Bouder]

CVSROOT:        /sources/qsos
Module name:    qsos
Changes by:     Goneri Le Bouder <goneri>       07/01/29 10:42:38

Removed files:
        sheet          : global.xml 

Log message:
        the file is not used anymore. See include/*

CVSWeb URLs:
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/qsos/sheet/global.xml?cvsroot=qsos&r1=1.10&r2=0

Patches:
Index: global.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: global.xml
diff -N global.xml
--- global.xml  5 May 2006 10:17:14 -0000       1.10
+++ /dev/null   1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
@@ -1,379 +0,0 @@
-<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
-<document>
-  <header>
-    <authors>
-    </authors>
-    <dates>
-      <creation></creation>
-      <validation></validation>
-    </dates>
-    <language>en</language>
-    <appname></appname>
-    <release></release>
-    <licenseid></licenseid>
-    <licensedesc></licensedesc>
-    <url></url>
-    <desc></desc>
-    <demourl></demourl>
-    <qsosformat>1.6</qsosformat>
-    <qsosappfamily></qsosappfamily>
-    <qsosspecificformat></qsosspecificformat>
-  </header>
-  <section name="generic" title="Generic section">
-    <desc>Generic criteria from QSOS version 1.6</desc>
-    <element name="intrinsicdurability" title="Intrinsic durability">
-      <desc>Intrinsic durability</desc>
-      <element name="maturity" title="Maturity">
-        <desc>Maturity</desc>
-        <element name="age" title="Age">
-          <desc0>less than 3 months</desc0>
-          <desc1>if between 3 months and 3 years</desc1>
-          <desc2>after 3 years</desc2>
-          <score></score>
-          <comment></comment>
-        </element>
-        <element name="stability" title="Stability">
-          <desc0>Unstable software with numerous releases or patches 
generating side effects</desc0>
-          <desc1>Stabilized production release existing but old. Difficulties 
to stabilize developpement releases</desc1>
-          <desc2>Stabilized software. Releases provide bug fixes corrections 
but mainly new functionalities</desc2>
-          <score></score>
-          <comment></comment>
-        </element>
-        <element name="historyknowproblems" title="History, know problems">
-          <desc0>Software knows several problems which can be 
prohibitive</desc0>
-          <desc1>No know major problem or crisis</desc1>
-          <desc2>History of good management of crisis situations</desc2>
-          <score></score>
-          <comment></comment>
-        </element>
-        <element name="forkprobability" title="Fork probability, source of 
Forking">
-          <desc0>Software is very likely to be forked in the future</desc0>
-          <desc1>Software comes from a fork but has very few chances of being 
forked in the future</desc1>
-          <desc2>Software has very little chance of being forked. It does not 
come from a fork either</desc2>
-          <score></score>
-          <comment></comment>
-        </element>
-      </element>
-      <element name="adoption" title="Adoption">
-        <desc>Adoption by community and industry</desc>
-        <element name="popularity" title="Popularity (related to: general 
public, niche, ...)">
-          <desc0>Very few users identified</desc0>
-          <desc1>Detectable use on Internet</desc1>
-          <desc2>Numerous users, numerous references</desc2>
-          <score></score>
-          <comment></comment>
-        </element>
-        <element name="references" title="References">
-          <desc0>None</desc0>
-          <desc1>Few refences, non critical usages</desc1>
-          <desc2>Often implemented for critical applications</desc2>
-          <score></score>
-          <comment></comment>
-        </element>
-        <element name="contributingcommunity" title="Contributing Community">
-          <desc0>No community or without real activity (forum, mailing list, 
...)</desc0>
-          <desc1>Existing community with a notable activity</desc1>
-          <desc2>Strong community: big activity on forums, numerous 
contributors and advocates</desc2>
-          <score></score>
-          <comment></comment>
-        </element>
-        <element name="books" title="books">
-          <desc0>No book about the software</desc0>
-          <desc1>Less than 5 books about the software are available</desc1>
-          <desc2>More than 5 books about software are available, in several 
languages</desc2>
-          <score></score>
-          <comment></comment>
-        </element>
-      </element>
-      <element name="developmentleadership" title="Development leadership">
-        <desc>Organisation and leadership of developments</desc>
-        <element name="leadingteam" title="Leading team">
-          <desc0>1 to 2 individuals involved, not clearly identified</desc0>
-          <desc1>Between 2 and 5 independent people</desc1>
-          <desc2>More than 5 people</desc2>
-          <score></score>
-          <comment></comment>
-        </element>
-        <element name="managementstyle" title="Management style">
-          <desc0>Complete dictatorship</desc0>
-          <desc1>Enlightened despotism</desc1>
-          <desc2>Council of architects with identified leader (e.g: 
KDE)</desc2>
-          <score></score>
-          <comment></comment>
-        </element>
-      </element>
-      <element name="activity" title="Activity">
-        <desc>Activity of the project and around the software</desc>
-        <element name="developersidentificationturnover" title="Developers, 
identification, turnover">
-          <desc0>Less than 3 developers, not clearly identified</desc0>
-          <desc1>Between 4 and 7 developers, or more unidentified developers 
with important turnover</desc1>
-          <desc2>More than 7 developers, very stable team</desc2>
-          <score></score>
-          <comment></comment>
-        </element>
-        <element name="activityonbugs" title="Activity on bugs">
-          <desc0>Slow reactivity in forum or on mailing list, or nothing 
regarding bug fixes in releases note</desc0>
-          <desc1>Detectable activity but without process clearly exposed, 
loing reaction/resolution time</desc1>
-          <desc2>Strong reactivity based on roles and tasks assignment</desc2>
-          <score></score>
-          <comment></comment>
-        </element>
-        <element name="activityonfunctionalities" title="Activity on 
functionalities">
-          <desc0>No or few new functionalities</desc0>
-          <desc1>Evolution of the product driven by the core team or by user's 
request without any clearly explained process</desc1>
-          <desc2>Tool(s) to manage feature requests, strong interaction with 
roadmap</desc2>
-          <score></score>
-          <comment></comment>
-        </element>
-        <element name="activityonreleases" title="Activity on releases">
-          <desc0>Very weak activity on both production and development 
releases</desc0>
-          <desc1>Activity on production and developmenet releases. Frequent 
minor releases (bug fixes)</desc1>
-          <desc2>Important activity with frequent minor releases (bugs fixes) 
and planned major releases relating to the roadmap forcast</desc2>
-          <score></score>
-          <comment></comment>
-        </element>
-      </element>
-    </element>
-    <element name="industrializedsolution" title="Industrialized solution">
-      <desc>Industrialization level of the project</desc>
-      <element name="independenceofdevelopments" title="Independence of 
developments">
-        <desc0>Developments realized at 100% by employees of a single 
company</desc0>
-        <desc1>60% maximum</desc1>
-        <desc2>20% maximum</desc2>
-        <score></score>
-        <comment></comment>
-      </element>
-      <element name="services" title="Services">
-        <desc>Services offering</desc>
-        <element name="training" title="Training">
-          <desc0>No offer of training identified</desc0>
-          <desc1>Offer exists but is restricted geographically and to one 
language or is provided by a single contractor</desc1>
-          <desc2>Rich offers provided by several contractors, in serveral 
languages and split into modules of gradual levels</desc2>
-          <score></score>
-          <comment></comment>
-        </element>
-        <element name="support" title="Support">
-          <desc0>No offer of support except via public forums and mailing 
lists</desc0>
-          <desc1>Offer exists but is provided by a single contractor without 
strong commitment quality of services</desc1>
-          <desc2>Multiple service providers with strong commitment (e.g: 
guaranteed resolution time)</desc2>
-          <score></score>
-          <comment></comment>
-        </element>
-        <element name="consulting" title="Consulting">
-          <desc0>No offer of consulting service</desc0>
-          <desc1>Offer exists but is restricted geographically and to one 
language or is provided by a single contractor</desc1>
-          <desc2>Consulting services provided by different contractors in 
serveral languages</desc2>
-          <score></score>
-          <comment></comment>
-        </element>
-      </element>
-      <element name="documentation" title="Documentation">
-        <desc0>No user documentation</desc0>
-        <desc1>Documentation exists but shifted in time, is restricted to one 
language or is poorly detailed</desc1>
-        <desc2>Documentation always up to date, translated and possibly 
adapted to different target readers (end user, sysadmin, manager, ...)</desc2>
-        <score></score>
-        <comment></comment>
-      </element>
-      <element name="qualityassurance" title="Quality Assurance">
-        <desc>Quality assurance process</desc>
-        <element name="quality" title="Quality Assurance">
-          <desc0>No QA process</desc0>
-          <desc1>Identifies QA process but not much formalized and with no 
tool</desc1>
-          <desc2>Automatic testing process included in code's life-cycle with 
publication of results</desc2>
-          <score></score>
-          <comment></comment>
-        </element>
-        <element name="tools" title="Tools">
-          <desc0>No bug or feature request management tool</desc0>
-          <desc1>Standard tools provided (for instance by a hosting forge) but 
poorly used</desc1>
-          <desc2>Very active use of tools for roles/tasks allocation and 
progress monitoring</desc2>
-          <score></score>
-          <comment></comment>
-        </element>
-      </element>
-      <element name="packaging" title="Packaging">
-        <desc>Packaging for various operating systems</desc>
-        <element name="packagingsource" title="Source">
-          <desc0>Software can't be installed from source without lot of 
work</desc0>
-          <desc1>Installation from source is limited and depends on very 
strict conditions (OS, arch, lib, ...)</desc1>
-          <desc2>Installation from source is easy</desc2>
-          <score></score>
-          <comment></comment>
-        </element>
-        <element name="packagingdebian" title="Debian">
-          <desc0>The software is not packaged for Debian</desc0>
-          <desc1>A Debian package exists but it has important issues or it 
doesn't have official support</desc1>
-          <desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
-          <score></score>
-          <comment></comment>
-        </element>
-        <element name="packagingfreebsd" title="FreeBSD">
-          <desc0>The software is not packaged for FreeBSD</desc0>
-          <desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't have 
official support</desc1>
-          <desc2>A official port exists in FreeBSD</desc2>
-          <score></score>
-          <comment></comment>
-        </element>
-        <element name="packaginghpux" title="HP-UX">
-          <desc0>The software is not packaged for HP-UX</desc0>
-          <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't 
have official support</desc1>
-          <desc2>A stable package is provided for HP-UX</desc2>
-          <score></score>
-          <comment></comment>
-        </element>
-        <element name="packagingmacosx" title="MacOSX">
-          <desc0>The software is not packaged for MacOSX</desc0>
-          <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't 
have official support</desc1>
-          <desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
-          <score></score>
-          <comment></comment>
-        </element>
-        <element name="packagingmandriva" title="Mandriva">
-          <desc0>The software is not packaged for Mandriva</desc0>
-          <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't 
have official support</desc1>
-          <desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
-          <score></score>
-          <comment></comment>
-        </element>
-        <element name="packagingnet" title="NetBSD">
-          <desc0>The software is not packaged for NetBSD</desc0>
-          <desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't have 
official support</desc1>
-          <desc2>A official port exists in NetBSD</desc2>
-          <score></score>
-          <comment></comment>
-        </element>
-        <element name="packagingopen" title="OpenBSD">
-          <desc0>The software is not packaged for OpenBSD</desc0>
-          <desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't have 
official support</desc1>
-          <desc2>A official port exists in OpenBSD</desc2>
-          <score></score>
-          <comment></comment>
-        </element>
-        <element name="packagingredhat" title="RedHat">
-          <desc0>The software is not packaged for RedHat/Fedora</desc0>
-          <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't 
have official support</desc1>
-          <desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
-          <score></score>
-          <comment></comment>
-        </element>
-        <element name="packagingsolaris" title="Solaris">
-          <desc0>The software is not packaged for Solaris</desc0>
-          <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't 
have official support (e.g: SunFreeware.com )</desc1>
-          <desc2>The software is supported by Sun for Solaris</desc2>
-          <score></score>
-          <comment></comment>
-        </element>
-        <element name="packagingsuse" title="SuSE">
-          <desc0>The software is not packaged for SuSE</desc0>
-          <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't 
have official support</desc1>
-          <desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
-          <score></score>
-          <comment></comment>
-        </element>
-        <element name="packagingwindows" title="Windows">
-          <desc0>The project can't be installed on Windows</desc0>
-          <desc1>A package exists but it is limited or has important issues or 
just cover some specific Windows release (e.g: Windows2000 and 
WindowsXP)</desc1>
-          <desc2>Windows is full supported and a package is provided</desc2>
-          <score></score>
-          <comment></comment>
-        </element>
-      </element>
-    </element>
-    <element name="exploitability" title="Exploitability">
-      <desc>Exploitability level</desc>
-      <element name="easeofuseergonomics" title="Ease of use, ergonomics">
-        <desc0>Difficult to use, requires an in depth knowledge of the 
software functionality</desc0>
-        <desc1>Austere and very technical ergonomics</desc1>
-        <desc2>GUI including help functions and elaborated ergonomics</desc2>
-        <score></score>
-        <comment></comment>
-      </element>
-      <element name="administrationmonitoring" title="Administration / 
Monitoring">
-        <desc0>No administrative or monitoring functionalities</desc0>
-        <desc1>Existing, functionalities but uncomplete and or need 
improvement</desc1>
-        <desc2>Complete and easy-to-use administration and monitoring 
functionalities. Possible integration with external tools (e.g: SNMP, syslog, 
...)</desc2>
-        <score></score>
-        <comment></comment>
-      </element>
-    </element>
-    <element name="technicaladaptability" title="Technical adaptability">
-      <desc>Technical adaptability</desc>
-      <element name="modularity" title="Modularity">
-        <desc0>Monolithic software</desc0>
-        <desc1>Presence of hight level modules allowing a first level of 
software adaptation</desc1>
-        <desc2>Modular conception, allowing easy adaptation of the software by 
selecting or creating modules</desc2>
-        <score></score>
-        <comment></comment>
-      </element>
-      <element name="codemodification" title="Code modification">
-        <desc0>Everything by hand</desc0>
-        <desc1>Recompilation possible but complex without any tools or 
documentation</desc1>
-        <desc2>Recompilation with tools (e.g: make, ANT, ...) and 
documentation provided</desc2>
-        <score></score>
-        <comment></comment>
-      </element>
-      <element name="codeextension" title="Code extention">
-        <desc0>Any modification requires code recompilation</desc0>
-        <desc1>Architecture designed for static extension but requires 
recompilation</desc1>
-        <desc2>Principle of plugin, architecture designed for dynamic 
extension without recompilation</desc2>
-        <score></score>
-        <comment></comment>
-      </element>
-    </element>
-    <element name="strategy" title="Strategy">
-      <desc>Project's strategy</desc>
-      <element name="license" title="License">
-        <desc>License</desc>
-        <element name="permissiveness" title="Permissiveness (only if user 
wants to become owner of code)">
-          <desc0>Very strict license, like GPL</desc0>
-          <desc1>Moderate permissive license located between both extremes 
(GPL and BSD) dual-licensing depending on the type of user (person, company, 
...) or their activities</desc1>
-          <desc2>Very permissive like BSD or Apache licenses</desc2>
-          <score></score>
-          <comment></comment>
-        </element>
-        <element name="protectionagainstproprietaryforks" title="Protection 
against proprietary forks">
-          <desc0>Very permissive like BSD or Apache licenses</desc0>
-          <desc1>Moderate permissive license located between both extremes 
(GPL and BSD), dual-licensing depending on the type of user (person, company, 
...) or their activies</desc1>
-          <desc2>Very strict license, like GPL</desc2>
-          <score></score>
-          <comment></comment>
-        </element>
-      </element>
-      <element name="copyrightowners" title="Copyright owners">
-        <desc0>Rights held by a few individuals or entities, making it easier 
to change the license</desc0>
-        <desc1>Rights held by numerous individuals owning the code in a 
homogeneous way, making relicense very difficult</desc1>
-        <desc2>Rights held by a legal entity in whom the community trusts 
(e.g: FSF or ASF)</desc2>
-        <score></score>
-        <comment></comment>
-      </element>
-      <element name="modificationofsourcecode" title="Modification of source 
code">
-        <desc0>No pratical way to propose code modification</desc0>
-        <desc1>Tools provided to access and modify code (like CVS or SVN) but 
not really used to develop the software</desc1>
-        <desc2>The code modification process is well defined, exposed and 
respected, based on roles assignment</desc2>
-        <score></score>
-        <comment></comment>
-      </element>
-      <element name="roadmap" title="Roadmap">
-        <desc0>No published roadmap</desc0>
-        <desc1>Existing roadmap without planning</desc1>
-        <desc2>Versionned roadmap, with planning and measure of delays</desc2>
-        <score></score>
-        <comment></comment>
-      </element>
-      <element name="sponsor" title="Sponsor">
-        <desc0>Software has no sponsor, the core team is not paid</desc0>
-        <desc1>Software has an unique sponsor who might determine its 
strategy</desc1>
-        <desc2>Software is sponsored by industry</desc2>
-        <score></score>
-        <comment></comment>
-      </element>
-      <element name="strategicalindependence" title="Strategical independence">
-        <desc0>No detectable strategy or strong dependency on one unique actor 
(person, company, sponsor)</desc0>
-        <desc1>Strategical vision shared with several other free and open 
source projects but without strong commitment from copyrights owners</desc1>
-        <desc2>Strong independence of the code team, legal entity holding 
rights, strong involvement in the standardization process</desc2>
-        <score></score>
-        <comment></comment>
-      </element>
-    </element>
-  </section>
-</document>