[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Qsos-commits] qsos/sheet/ldap ApacheDS/ApacheDS-1.5.4.qsos Fe...
|
From: |
Hery Randriamanamihaga |
|
Subject: |
[Qsos-commits] qsos/sheet/ldap ApacheDS/ApacheDS-1.5.4.qsos Fe... |
|
Date: |
Fri, 24 Oct 2008 10:36:52 +0000 |
CVSROOT: /sources/qsos
Module name: qsos
Changes by: Hery Randriamanamihaga <hery> 08/10/24 10:36:52
Added files:
sheet/ldap/ApacheDS: ApacheDS-1.5.4.qsos
sheet/ldap/FedoraDS: FedoraDS-1.1.qsos
sheet/ldap/OpenDS: OpenDS-1.1.qsos
sheet/ldap/openldap: openldap-2.4.11.qsos
Log message:
Evaluations of ldap servers - Contribution of David Pillant
<address@hidden>
CVSWeb URLs:
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/qsos/sheet/ldap/ApacheDS/ApacheDS-1.5.4.qsos?cvsroot=qsos&rev=1.1
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/qsos/sheet/ldap/FedoraDS/FedoraDS-1.1.qsos?cvsroot=qsos&rev=1.1
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/qsos/sheet/ldap/OpenDS/OpenDS-1.1.qsos?cvsroot=qsos&rev=1.1
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/qsos/sheet/ldap/openldap/openldap-2.4.11.qsos?cvsroot=qsos&rev=1.1
Patches:
Index: ApacheDS/ApacheDS-1.5.4.qsos
===================================================================
RCS file: ApacheDS/ApacheDS-1.5.4.qsos
diff -N ApacheDS/ApacheDS-1.5.4.qsos
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ ApacheDS/ApacheDS-1.5.4.qsos 24 Oct 2008 10:36:51 -0000 1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,997 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
+<document>
+ <header>
+ <authors>
+ <author>
+ <email>address@hidden</email>
+ <name>David Pillant</name>
+ </author>
+ </authors>
+ <dates>
+ <creation>2008-10-24</creation>
+ <validation></validation>
+ </dates>
+ <language>en</language>
+ <appname>ApacheDS</appname>
+ <release>1.5.4</release>
+ <licenseid>23</licenseid>
+ <licensedesc>The Apache License 2.0</licensedesc>
+ <url>http://directory.apache.org/</url>
+ <desc></desc>
+ <demourl></demourl>
+ <qsosformat>1.7</qsosformat>
+ <qsosappfamily>LDAP</qsosappfamily>
+ <qsosappname></qsosappname>
+ <qsosspecificformat></qsosspecificformat>
+ </header>
+ <section name="generic" title="Generic section">
+ <desc>Generic criteria from QSOS version 1.6</desc>
+ <element name="intrinsicdurability" title="Intrinsic durability">
+ <desc>Intrinsic durability</desc>
+ <element name="maturity" title="Maturity">
+ <desc>Maturity</desc>
+ <element name="age" title="Age">
+ <desc0>less than 3 months</desc0>
+ <desc1>if between 3 months and 3 years</desc1>
+ <desc2>after 3 years</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment>September 2003</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="stability" title="Stability">
+ <desc0>Unstable software with numerous releases or patches
generating side effects</desc0>
+ <desc1>Stabilized production release existing but old.
Difficulties to stabilize development releases</desc1>
+ <desc2>Stabilized software. Releases provide bug fixes
corrections but mainly new functionalities</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="historyknownproblems" title="History, known
problems">
+ <desc0>Software knows several problems which can be
prohibitive</desc0>
+ <desc1>No know major problem or crisis</desc1>
+ <desc2>History of good management of crisis situations</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment>only on issue reopened
+72% closed</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="forkprobability" title="Fork probability, source of
Forking">
+ <desc0>Software is very likely to be forked in the
future</desc0>
+ <desc1>Software comes from a fork but has very few chances of
being forked in the future</desc1>
+ <desc2>Software has very little chance of being forked. It does
not come from a fork either</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="adoption" title="Adoption">
+ <desc>Adoption by community and industry</desc>
+ <element name="popularity" title="Popularity (related to: general
public, niche, ...)">
+ <desc0>Very few users identified</desc0>
+ <desc1>Detectable use on Internet</desc1>
+ <desc2>Numerous users, numerous references</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="references" title="References">
+ <desc0>None</desc0>
+ <desc1>Few refences, non critical usages</desc1>
+ <desc2>Often implemented for critical applications</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="contributingcommunity" title="Contributing
Community">
+ <desc0>No community or without real activity (forum, mailing
list, ...)</desc0>
+ <desc1>Existing community with a notable activity</desc1>
+ <desc2>Strong community: big activity on forums, numerous
contributors and advocates</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+
<comment>http://directory.apache.org/community%26resources/the-team.html</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="books" title="books">
+ <desc0>No book about the software</desc0>
+ <desc1>Less than 5 books about the software are
available</desc1>
+ <desc2>More than 5 books about software are available, in
several languages</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="developmentleadership" title="Development leadership">
+ <desc>Organisation and leadership of developments</desc>
+ <element name="leadingteam" title="Leading team">
+ <desc0>1 to 2 individuals involved, not clearly
identified</desc0>
+ <desc1>Between 2 and 5 independent people</desc1>
+ <desc2>More than 5 people</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+
<comment>http://directory.apache.org/community%26resources/the-team.html</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="managementstyle" title="Management style">
+ <desc0>Complete dictatorship</desc0>
+ <desc1>Enlightened despotism</desc1>
+ <desc2>Council of architects with identified leader (e.g:
KDE)</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+
<comment>http://directory.apache.org/community%26resources/the-team.html</comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="activity" title="Activity">
+ <desc>Activity of the project and around the software</desc>
+ <element name="developersidentificationturnover"
title="Developers, identification, turnover">
+ <desc0>Less than 3 developers, not clearly identified</desc0>
+ <desc1>Between 4 and 7 developers, or more unidentified
developers with important turnover</desc1>
+ <desc2>More than 7 developers, very stable team</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+
<comment>http://directory.apache.org/community%26resources/the-team.html</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="activityonbugs" title="Activity on bugs">
+ <desc0>Slow reactivity in forum or on mailing list, or nothing
regarding bug fixes in releases note</desc0>
+ <desc1>Detectable activity but without process clearly exposed,
long reaction/resolution time</desc1>
+ <desc2>Strong reactivity based on roles and tasks
assignment</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+
<comment>http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="activityonfunctionalities" title="Activity on
functionalities">
+ <desc0>No or few new functionalities</desc0>
+ <desc1>Evolution of the product driven by the core team or by
user's request without any clearly explained process</desc1>
+ <desc2>Tool(s) to manage feature requests, strong interaction
with roadmap</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+
<comment>http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER?report=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project:roadmap-panel</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="activityonreleases" title="Activity on releases">
+ <desc0>Very weak activity on both production and development
releases</desc0>
+ <desc1>Activity on production and development releases.
Frequent minor releases (bug fixes)</desc1>
+ <desc2>Important activity with frequent minor releases (bugs
fixes) and planned major releases relating to the roadmap forcast</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+
<comment>http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER?report=com.sourcelabs.jira.plugin.portlet.releases:releases-projecttab</comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="industrializedsolution" title="Industrialized solution">
+ <desc>Industrialization level of the project</desc>
+ <element name="independenceofdevelopments" title="Independence of
developments">
+ <desc0>Developments realized at 100% by employees of a single
company</desc0>
+ <desc1>60% maximum</desc1>
+ <desc2>20% maximum</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="services" title="Services">
+ <desc>Services offering</desc>
+ <element name="training" title="Training">
+ <desc0>No offer of training identified</desc0>
+ <desc1>Offer exists but is restricted geographically and to one
language or is provided by a single contractor</desc1>
+ <desc2>Rich offers provided by several contractors, in several
languages and split into modules of gradual levels</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="support" title="Support">
+ <desc0>No offer of support except via public forums and mailing
lists</desc0>
+ <desc1>Offer exists but is provided by a single contractor
without strong commitment quality of services</desc1>
+ <desc2>Multiple service providers with strong commitment (e.g:
guaranteed resolution time)</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="consulting" title="Consulting">
+ <desc0>No offer of consulting service</desc0>
+ <desc1>Offer exists but is restricted geographically and to one
language or is provided by a single contractor</desc1>
+ <desc2>Consulting services provided by different contractors in
several languages</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="documentation" title="Documentation">
+ <desc0>No user documentation</desc0>
+ <desc1>Documentation exists but shifted in time, is restricted to
one language or is poorly detailed</desc1>
+ <desc2>Documentation always up to date, translated and possibly
adapted to different target readers (end user, sysadmin, manager, ...)</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="qualityassurance" title="Quality Assurance">
+ <desc>Quality assurance process</desc>
+ <element name="quality" title="Quality Assurance">
+ <desc0>No QA process</desc0>
+ <desc1>Identifies QA process but not much formalized and with
no tool</desc1>
+ <desc2>Automatic testing process included in code's life-cycle
with publication of results</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+
<comment>http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER?report=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project:openissues-panel</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="tools" title="Tools">
+ <desc0>No bug or feature request management tool</desc0>
+ <desc1>Standard tools provided (for instance by a hosting
forge) but poorly used</desc1>
+ <desc2>Very active use of tools for roles/tasks allocation and
progress monitoring</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+
<comment>http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER?report=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project:openissues-panel</comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="packaging" title="Packaging">
+ <desc>Packaging for various operating systems</desc>
+ <element name="packagingsource" title="Source">
+ <desc0>Software can't be installed from source without lot of
work</desc0>
+ <desc1>Installation from source is limited and depends on very
strict conditions (OS, arch, lib, ...)</desc1>
+ <desc2>Installation from source is easy</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+
<comment>http://directory.apache.org/community%26resources/sources.html</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="packagingdebian" title="Debian">
+ <desc0>The software is not packaged for Debian</desc0>
+ <desc1>A Debian package exists but it has important issues or
it doesn't have official support</desc1>
+ <desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="packagingfreebsd" title="FreeBSD">
+ <desc0>The software is not packaged for FreeBSD</desc0>
+ <desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support</desc1>
+ <desc2>A official port exists in FreeBSD</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="packaginghpux" title="HP-UX">
+ <desc0>The software is not packaged for HP-UX</desc0>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it
doesn't have official support</desc1>
+ <desc2>A stable package is provided for HP-UX</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="packagingmacosx" title="MacOSX">
+ <desc0>The software is not packaged for MacOSX</desc0>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it
doesn't have official support</desc1>
+ <desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="packagingmandriva" title="Mandriva">
+ <desc0>The software is not packaged for Mandriva</desc0>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it
doesn't have official support</desc1>
+ <desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="packagingnet" title="NetBSD">
+ <desc0>The software is not packaged for NetBSD</desc0>
+ <desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support</desc1>
+ <desc2>A official port exists in NetBSD</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="packagingopen" title="OpenBSD">
+ <desc0>The software is not packaged for OpenBSD</desc0>
+ <desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support</desc1>
+ <desc2>A official port exists in OpenBSD</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="packagingredhat" title="RedHat">
+ <desc0>The software is not packaged for RedHat/Fedora</desc0>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it
doesn't have official support</desc1>
+ <desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="packagingsolaris" title="Solaris">
+ <desc0>The software is not packaged for Solaris</desc0>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it
doesn't have official support (e.g: SunFreeware.com )</desc1>
+ <desc2>The software is supported by Sun for Solaris</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="packagingsuse" title="SuSE">
+ <desc0>The software is not packaged for SuSE</desc0>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it
doesn't have official support</desc1>
+ <desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="packagingwindows" title="Windows">
+ <desc0>The project can't be installed on Windows</desc0>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it is limited or has important
issues or just cover some specific Windows release (e.g: Windows2000 and
WindowsXP)</desc1>
+ <desc2>Windows is full supported and a package is
provided</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="exploitability" title="Exploitability">
+ <desc>Exploitability level</desc>
+ <element name="easeofuseergonomics" title="Ease of use, ergonomics">
+ <desc0>Difficult to use, requires an in depth knowledge of the
software functionality</desc0>
+ <desc1>Austere and very technical ergonomics</desc1>
+ <desc2>GUI including help functions and elaborated
ergonomics</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="administrationmonitoring" title="Administration /
Monitoring">
+ <desc0>No administrative or monitoring functionalities</desc0>
+ <desc1>Existing, functionalities but incomplete and or need
improvement</desc1>
+ <desc2>Complete and easy-to-use administration and monitoring
functionalities. Possible integration with external tools (e.g: SNMP, syslog,
...)</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment>no administration and monitoring consoles</comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="technicaladaptability" title="Technical adaptability">
+ <desc>Technical adaptability</desc>
+ <element name="modularity" title="Modularity">
+ <desc0>Monolithic software</desc0>
+ <desc1>Presence of hight level modules allowing a first level of
software adaptation</desc1>
+ <desc2>Modular conception, allowing easy adaptation of the
software by selecting or creating modules</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="codemodification" title="Code modification">
+ <desc0>Everything by hand</desc0>
+ <desc1>Recompilation possible but complex without any tools or
documentation</desc1>
+ <desc2>Recompilation with tools (e.g: make, ANT, ...) and
documentation provided</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="codeextension" title="Code extension">
+ <desc0>Any modification requires code recompilation</desc0>
+ <desc1>Architecture designed for static extension but requires
recompilation</desc1>
+ <desc2>Principle of plugin, architecture designed for dynamic
extension without recompilation</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="strategy" title="Strategy">
+ <desc>Project's strategy</desc>
+ <element name="license" title="License">
+ <desc>License</desc>
+ <element name="permissiveness" title="Permissiveness (only if user
wants to become owner of code)">
+ <desc0>Very strict license, like GPL</desc0>
+ <desc1>Moderate permissive license located between both
extremes (GPL and BSD) dual-licensing depending on the type of user (person,
company, ...) or their activities</desc1>
+ <desc2>Very permissive like BSD or Apache licenses</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment>Apache v2.0</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="protectionagainstproprietaryforks"
title="Protection against proprietary forks">
+ <desc0>Very permissive like BSD or Apache licenses</desc0>
+ <desc1>Moderate permissive license located between both
extremes (GPL and BSD), dual-licensing depending on the type of user (person,
company, ...) or their activies</desc1>
+ <desc2>Very strict license, like GPL</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment>Apache v2.0</comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="copyrightowners" title="Copyright owners">
+ <desc0>Rights held by a few individuals or entities, making it
easier to change the license</desc0>
+ <desc1>Rights held by numerous individuals owning the code in a
homogeneous way, making relicense very difficult</desc1>
+ <desc2>Rights held by a legal entity in whom the community trusts
(e.g: FSF or ASF)</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment>Apache Software Foundation</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="modificationofsourcecode" title="Modification of
source code">
+ <desc0>No practical way to propose code modification</desc0>
+ <desc1>Tools provided to access and modify code (like CVS or SVN)
but not really used to develop the software</desc1>
+ <desc2>The code modification process is well defined, exposed and
respected, based on roles assignment</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+
<comment>http://directory.apache.org/community%26resources/the-team.html</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="roadmap" title="Roadmap">
+ <desc0>No published roadmap</desc0>
+ <desc1>Existing roadmap without planning</desc1>
+ <desc2>Versionned roadmap, with planning and measure of
delays</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+
<comment>http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DIRxPMGT/2.0+Roadmap</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="sponsor" title="Sponsor">
+ <desc0>Software has no sponsor, the core team is not paid</desc0>
+ <desc1>Software has an unique sponsor who might determine its
strategy</desc1>
+ <desc2>Software is sponsored by industry</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment>Google, microsoft, yahoo, hp,etc...</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="strategicalindependence" title="Strategic
independence">
+ <desc0>No detectable strategy or strong dependency on one unique
actor(person, company,sponsor)</desc0>
+ <desc1>Strategic vision shared with several other free and open
source projects but without strong commitment from copyrights owners</desc1>
+ <desc2>Strong independence of the code team, legal entity holding
rights, strong involvement in the standardization process</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ </section>
+ <section name="technicalsection" title="Technical section">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <element name="rfcimplementation" title="RFC Implementation">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <comment></comment>
+ <element name="ldaprequests" title="LDAP Requests">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <comment></comment>
+ <element name="rfc4510implementation" title="RFC 4510
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4510?
+(Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Technical Specification
Roadmap)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+
<comment>http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/31742/ApacheCon2006-ADS.pdf?version=1</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4511implementation" title="RFC 4511
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4511?
+(The Protocol)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+
<comment>http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DIRxSRVx11/Supported+RFCs</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4512implementation" title="RFC 4512
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4512?
+( Directory Information Models)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+
<comment>http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DIRxSRVx11/Supported+RFCs</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4513implementation" title="RFC 4513
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4513?
+(Authentication Methods and Security Mechanisms)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+
<comment>http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DIRxSRVx11/Supported+RFCs</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4514implementation" title="RFC 4514
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4514?
+(String Representation of Distinguished Names)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+
<comment>http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DIRxSRVx11/Supported+RFCs</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4515implementation" title="RFC 4515
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4515?
+(String Representation of Search Filters)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+
<comment>http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DIRxSRVx11/Supported+RFCs</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4516implementation" title="RFC 4516
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4516?
+(Uniform Resource Locator)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+
<comment>http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DIRxSRVx11/Supported+RFCs</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4517implementation" title="RFC 4517
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4517?
+(Syntaxes and Matching Rules)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+
<comment>http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DIRxSRVx11/Supported+RFCs</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4518implementation" title="RFC 4518
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4518?
+( Internationalized String Preparation)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+
<comment>http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DIRxSRVx11/Supported+RFCs</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4519implementation" title="RFC 4519
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4519?
+(Schema for User Applications)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+
<comment>http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DIRxSRVx11/Supported+RFCs</comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="ldapbestpractices" title="LDAP Best Practices">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <comment></comment>
+ <element name="rfc4520implementation" title="RFC 4520
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4520?
+(Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Considerations for the Lightweight
Directory Access Protocol (LDAP))</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4521implementation" title="RFC 4521
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4521?
+(Considerations for Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP)
Extensions)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="ldapextensions" title="LDAP Extensions">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <comment></comment>
+ <element name="rfc2247implementation" title="RFC 2247
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 2247?
+ (Use of DNS domains in distinguished names)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment>Supported</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc2307implementation" title="RFC 2307
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 2307?
+(Using LDAP as a Network Information Service)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment>Supported</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc2589implementation" title="RFC 2589
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 2589?
+(Dynamic Directory Services Extensions)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc2798implementation" title="RFC 2798
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 2798?
+(inetOrgPerson LDAP Object Class)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc2849implementation" title="RFC 2849
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 2849?
+(The LDAP Data Interchange Format (LDIF))</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc3062implementation" title="RFC 3062
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 3062?
+( LDAP Password Modify Extended Operation)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment>Supported</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc3296implementation" title="RFC 3296
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 3296?
+(Named Subordinate References in LDAP Directories)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc3671implementation" title="RFC 3671
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 3671?
+(Collective Attributes in LDAP)
+</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc3672implementation" title="RFC 3672
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 3672?
+(Subentries in LDAP)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc3687implementation" title="RFC 3687
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 3687?
+(LDAP Component Matching Rules)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment>Supported</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc3698implementation" title="RFC 3698
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 3698?
+(LDAP: Additional Matching Rules)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment>Supported</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc3829implementation" title="RFC 3829
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 3829?
+(LDAP Authorization Identity Controls)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment>Supported</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc3909implementation" title="RFC 3909
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 3909?
+(LDAP Cancel Operation)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment>Supported</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc3928implementation" title="RFC 3928
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 3928?
+(LDAP Client Update Protocol)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment>Supported</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4370implementation" title="RFC 4370
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4370?
+(LDAP Proxied Authorization Control)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4522implementation" title="RFC 4522
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4522?
+(LDAP: Binary Encoding Option)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment>Supported</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4523implementation" title="RFC 4523
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4523?
+(LDAP: X.509 Certificate Schema)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment>Supported</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4524implementation" title="RFC 4524
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4524?
+(LDAP: COSINE Schema)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment>Supported</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4525implementation" title="RFC 4525
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4525?
+(LDAP: Modify-Increment Extension)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment>Supported</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4526implementation" title="RFC 4526
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4526?
+(LDAP: Absolute True and False Filters)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment>Supported</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc2247implementation" title="RFC 2247
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 2247?</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4527implementation" title="RFC 4527
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4527?
+(LDAP: Read Entry Controls)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment>Supported</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4533implementation" title="RFC 4533
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4533?
+(LDAP Content Sync Operation)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment>Supported</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4422implementation" title="RFC 4422
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4422?
+ (Simple Authentication and Security Layer (SASL))</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4752implementation" title="RFC 4752
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4752?
+ (The Kerberos V5 ("GSSAPI") Simple Authentication and Security
Layer (SASL) Mechanism)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfcBeheraimplementation" title="Draft Behera ldap
password policy implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the Draft behera?
+ (Password policy for LDAP directories)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment>Future version (1.5.6)</comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="performance" title="Performance">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <comment></comment>
+ <element name="threadpooling" title="Thread pooling">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No thread pooling support</desc0>
+ <desc1>Thread pooling is partial or doesn't work correctly</desc1>
+ <desc2>Thread pooling is performing</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="proxycachesupport" title="Proxy cache support">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No proxy cache support</desc0>
+ <desc1>Proxy cache is partial or doesn't work correctly</desc1>
+ <desc2>Proxy cache is performing</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="applicationserverintegration" title="Application Server
integration">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <comment></comment>
+ <element name="websphereintegration" title="WebSphere integration">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>WebSphere is not supported</desc0>
+ <desc1>WebSphere support documented but not tested</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully WebSphere support</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+
<comment>http://chintanrajyaguru.com/blog/tech/apache-ds-and-was-6.1-installing-and-configuring-apache-ds.html</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="tomcatintegration" title="Tomcat integration">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>Tomcat is not supported</desc0>
+ <desc1>Tomcat support documented but not tested</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully Tomcat support</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment>http://www.screaming-penguin.com/node/5677</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="jbossintegration" title="JBoss integration">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>JBoss is not supported</desc0>
+ <desc1>JBoss support documented but not tested</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully JBoss support</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="weblogicintegration" title="Weblogic integration">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>Weblogic is not supported</desc0>
+ <desc1>Weblogic support documented but not tested</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully Weblogic support</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="geronimointegration" title="Geronimo integration">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>Geronimo is not supported</desc0>
+ <desc1>Geronimo support documented but not tested</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully Geronimo support</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+
<comment>http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC11/ldap-realm.html</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="jonasintegration" title="JOnas integration">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>JOnas is not supported</desc0>
+ <desc1>JOnas support documented but not tested</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully JOnas support</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="architecture" title="Architecture">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <comment></comment>
+ <element name="loadbalancing" title="Load balancing / Failover">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No Load balancing/Failover support</desc0>
+ <desc1>Load balancing/Failover is partial or doesn't work
correctly</desc1>
+ <desc2>Load balancing/Failover is performing</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment>future version 1.6</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="sslsupport" title="SSL Support">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No SSL support</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partial SSL support</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully SSL support and integration</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+
<comment>http://directory.apache.org/apacheds/1.5/start-tls-with-apacheds.html</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="transactionmanagement" title="Transaction management">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No transactional support</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partial transactional support</desc1>
+ <desc2>Full transactional support</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="simpleauthentificationandsecuritylayer" title="Simple
Authentification and Security Layer">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No SASL support</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partial SASL support</desc1>
+ <desc2>Full SASL support</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+
<comment>http://directory.apache.org/apacheds/1.5/howto-do-sasl-gssapi-authentication-to-apacheds.html</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="databasesupport" title="Database support">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No database support</desc0>
+ <desc1>Default database support</desc1>
+ <desc2>Database can be changed</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="ossupport" title="OS Support">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <comment></comment>
+ <element name="linux-redhat" title="Linux-RedHat">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>The software is not packaged for RedHat</desc0>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support</desc1>
+ <desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ </section>
+ <section name="functionalsection" title="Functional section">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <element name="administrationconsole" title="Administration console">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No console of administration is available</desc0>
+ <desc1>Limited and incomplete administration console</desc1>
+ <desc2>Complete administration console</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="scriptsadministration" title="Administration scripts">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No available script to administrate the server</desc0>
+ <desc1>Some scripts are available (start, stop, update,
import/export...)</desc1>
+ <desc2>Available language to write powerful scripts</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="attributemanagement" title="Attributes management">
+ <desc>Some attributes required but not in RFC</desc>
+ <comment></comment>
+ <element name="passwordmanagement" title="Password management">
+ <desc>Pre-requisites of management password in HR</desc>
+ <comment></comment>
+ <element name="managementofencryptedpassword" title="Encrypted
password management ">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No encrypted password option</desc0>
+ <desc1>Encrypted password option is documented but not
tested</desc1>
+ <desc2>Encrypted password option is available</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="managementof11previouspassword" title="Password
history">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No Management of 11 previous passwords option</desc0>
+ <desc1>Management of 11 previous passwords option is documented
but not tested</desc1>
+ <desc2>Management of 25 previous passwords is available</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment>Future version (1.5.6)</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="wrongpasswordcounter" title="Wrong password
counter">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No Wrong password counter option</desc0>
+ <desc1>Wrong password counter option is documented but not
tested</desc1>
+ <desc2>Wrong password counter option is available</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment>Future version (1.5.6)</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="templatepasswordmanagement" title="Template
password management">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No configuration of the password template</desc0>
+ <desc1>Some rules are implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>All rules are implemented</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="accountmanagement" title="Account management">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <comment></comment>
+ <element name="lokedattribute" title="Locked attribute">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No Locked attribute option</desc0>
+ <desc1>Locked attribute option is documented but not
tested</desc1>
+ <desc2>Locked attribute option is available</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment>Future version (1.5.6)</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="firstconnectionattribute1" title="First connection
attribute">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No First connection option</desc0>
+ <desc1>First connection option is documented but not
tested</desc1>
+ <desc2>First connection option is available</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment>Future version (1.5.6)</comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="monitoringsystem" title="Monitoring system">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>Don't generate any monitoring file</desc0>
+ <desc1>Monitoring file generation doesn't work correctly</desc1>
+ <desc2>Many options are available to define monitoring</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment>Use external tools</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="integrationdevelopmentenvironment" title="Integration
Development Environment">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No IDE supported</desc0>
+ <desc1>Limited IDE integration</desc1>
+ <desc2>An IDE is delivered with LDAP server</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment>Apache Directory Studio</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="integratedinassosolution" title="Integrated in a SSO
solution">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No Identity management solution available with this LDAP
server</desc0>
+ <desc1>Possible integration with external Identity management
solution</desc1>
+ <desc2>LDAP Server is delivered with an identity management
solution</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment>TripleSec</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="slicemodel" title="Slice model">
+ <desc>Slice model integration</desc>
+ <comment></comment>
+ <element name="portmanagement" title="Port management">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No port management</desc0>
+ <desc1>Some ports are configurable</desc1>
+ <desc2>All ports are configurable</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+
<comment>http://directory.apache.org/apacheds/1.5/service-configuration.html</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="partitionmanagement" title="Partition management">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>Standard installation available</desc0>
+ <desc1>Configurable installation available</desc1>
+ <desc2>Powerful installation and architecture available</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ </section>
+</document>
\ No newline at end of file
Index: FedoraDS/FedoraDS-1.1.qsos
===================================================================
RCS file: FedoraDS/FedoraDS-1.1.qsos
diff -N FedoraDS/FedoraDS-1.1.qsos
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ FedoraDS/FedoraDS-1.1.qsos 24 Oct 2008 10:36:51 -0000 1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,996 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
+<document>
+ <header>
+ <authors>
+ <author>
+ <email>address@hidden</email>
+ <name>David Pillant</name>
+ </author>
+ </authors>
+ <dates>
+ <creation>2008-10-24</creation>
+ <validation></validation>
+ </dates>
+ <language>en</language>
+ <appname>FedoraDS</appname>
+ <release>1.1.3</release>
+ <licenseid>31</licenseid>
+ <licensedesc>GNU GPL</licensedesc>
+ <url>http://directory.fedoraproject.org/</url>
+ <desc></desc>
+ <demourl></demourl>
+ <qsosformat>1.7</qsosformat>
+ <qsosappfamily>LDAP</qsosappfamily>
+ <qsosappname></qsosappname>
+ <qsosspecificformat></qsosspecificformat>
+ </header>
+ <section name="generic" title="Generic section">
+ <desc>Generic criteria from QSOS version 1.6</desc>
+ <element name="intrinsicdurability" title="Intrinsic durability">
+ <desc>Intrinsic durability</desc>
+ <element name="maturity" title="Maturity">
+ <desc>Maturity</desc>
+ <element name="age" title="Age">
+ <desc0>less than 3 months</desc0>
+ <desc1>if between 3 months and 3 years</desc1>
+ <desc2>after 3 years</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment>First release june 2005</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="stability" title="Stability">
+ <desc0>Unstable software with numerous releases or patches
generating side effects</desc0>
+ <desc1>Stabilized production release existing but old.
Difficulties to stabilize development releases</desc1>
+ <desc2>Stabilized software. Releases provide bug fixes
corrections but mainly new functionalities</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment>http://directory.fedoraproject.org/</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="historyknownproblems" title="History, known
problems">
+ <desc0>Software knows several problems which can be
prohibitive</desc0>
+ <desc1>No know major problem or crisis</desc1>
+ <desc2>History of good management of crisis situations</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="forkprobability" title="Fork probability, source of
Forking">
+ <desc0>Software is very likely to be forked in the
future</desc0>
+ <desc1>Software comes from a fork but has very few chances of
being forked in the future</desc1>
+ <desc2>Software has very little chance of being forked. It does
not come from a fork either</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="adoption" title="Adoption">
+ <desc>Adoption by community and industry</desc>
+ <element name="popularity" title="Popularity (related to: general
public, niche, ...)">
+ <desc0>Very few users identified</desc0>
+ <desc1>Detectable use on Internet</desc1>
+ <desc2>Numerous users, numerous references</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="references" title="References">
+ <desc0>None</desc0>
+ <desc1>Few refences, non critical usages</desc1>
+ <desc2>Often implemented for critical applications</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="contributingcommunity" title="Contributing
Community">
+ <desc0>No community or without real activity (forum, mailing
list, ...)</desc0>
+ <desc1>Existing community with a notable activity</desc1>
+ <desc2>Strong community: big activity on forums, numerous
contributors and advocates</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="books" title="books">
+ <desc0>No book about the software</desc0>
+ <desc1>Less than 5 books about the software are
available</desc1>
+ <desc2>More than 5 books about software are available, in
several languages</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="developmentleadership" title="Development leadership">
+ <desc>Organisation and leadership of developments</desc>
+ <element name="leadingteam" title="Leading team">
+ <desc0>1 to 2 individuals involved, not clearly
identified</desc0>
+ <desc1>Between 2 and 5 independent people</desc1>
+ <desc2>More than 5 people</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="managementstyle" title="Management style">
+ <desc0>Complete dictatorship</desc0>
+ <desc1>Enlightened despotism</desc1>
+ <desc2>Council of architects with identified leader (e.g:
KDE)</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="activity" title="Activity">
+ <desc>Activity of the project and around the software</desc>
+ <element name="developersidentificationturnover"
title="Developers, identification, turnover">
+ <desc0>Less than 3 developers, not clearly identified</desc0>
+ <desc1>Between 4 and 7 developers, or more unidentified
developers with important turnover</desc1>
+ <desc2>More than 7 developers, very stable team</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="activityonbugs" title="Activity on bugs">
+ <desc0>Slow reactivity in forum or on mailing list, or nothing
regarding bug fixes in releases note</desc0>
+ <desc1>Detectable activity but without process clearly exposed,
long reaction/resolution time</desc1>
+ <desc2>Strong reactivity based on roles and tasks
assignment</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="activityonfunctionalities" title="Activity on
functionalities">
+ <desc0>No or few new functionalities</desc0>
+ <desc1>Evolution of the product driven by the core team or by
user's request without any clearly explained process</desc1>
+ <desc2>Tool(s) to manage feature requests, strong interaction
with roadmap</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="activityonreleases" title="Activity on releases">
+ <desc0>Very weak activity on both production and development
releases</desc0>
+ <desc1>Activity on production and development releases.
Frequent minor releases (bug fixes)</desc1>
+ <desc2>Important activity with frequent minor releases (bugs
fixes) and planned major releases relating to the roadmap forcast</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="industrializedsolution" title="Industrialized solution">
+ <desc>Industrialization level of the project</desc>
+ <element name="independenceofdevelopments" title="Independence of
developments">
+ <desc0>Developments realized at 100% by employees of a single
company</desc0>
+ <desc1>60% maximum</desc1>
+ <desc2>20% maximum</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="services" title="Services">
+ <desc>Services offering</desc>
+ <element name="training" title="Training">
+ <desc0>No offer of training identified</desc0>
+ <desc1>Offer exists but is restricted geographically and to one
language or is provided by a single contractor</desc1>
+ <desc2>Rich offers provided by several contractors, in several
languages and split into modules of gradual levels</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="support" title="Support">
+ <desc0>No offer of support except via public forums and mailing
lists</desc0>
+ <desc1>Offer exists but is provided by a single contractor
without strong commitment quality of services</desc1>
+ <desc2>Multiple service providers with strong commitment (e.g:
guaranteed resolution time)</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="consulting" title="Consulting">
+ <desc0>No offer of consulting service</desc0>
+ <desc1>Offer exists but is restricted geographically and to one
language or is provided by a single contractor</desc1>
+ <desc2>Consulting services provided by different contractors in
several languages</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="documentation" title="Documentation">
+ <desc0>No user documentation</desc0>
+ <desc1>Documentation exists but shifted in time, is restricted to
one language or is poorly detailed</desc1>
+ <desc2>Documentation always up to date, translated and possibly
adapted to different target readers (end user, sysadmin, manager, ...)</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="qualityassurance" title="Quality Assurance">
+ <desc>Quality assurance process</desc>
+ <element name="quality" title="Quality Assurance">
+ <desc0>No QA process</desc0>
+ <desc1>Identifies QA process but not much formalized and with
no tool</desc1>
+ <desc2>Automatic testing process included in code's life-cycle
with publication of results</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+
<comment>http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Developers</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="tools" title="Tools">
+ <desc0>No bug or feature request management tool</desc0>
+ <desc1>Standard tools provided (for instance by a hosting
forge) but poorly used</desc1>
+ <desc2>Very active use of tools for roles/tasks allocation and
progress monitoring</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="packaging" title="Packaging">
+ <desc>Packaging for various operating systems</desc>
+ <element name="packagingsource" title="Source">
+ <desc0>Software can't be installed from source without lot of
work</desc0>
+ <desc1>Installation from source is limited and depends on very
strict conditions (OS, arch, lib, ...)</desc1>
+ <desc2>Installation from source is easy</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="packagingdebian" title="Debian">
+ <desc0>The software is not packaged for Debian</desc0>
+ <desc1>A Debian package exists but it has important issues or
it doesn't have official support</desc1>
+ <desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="packagingfreebsd" title="FreeBSD">
+ <desc0>The software is not packaged for FreeBSD</desc0>
+ <desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support</desc1>
+ <desc2>A official port exists in FreeBSD</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="packaginghpux" title="HP-UX">
+ <desc0>The software is not packaged for HP-UX</desc0>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it
doesn't have official support</desc1>
+ <desc2>A stable package is provided for HP-UX</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="packagingmacosx" title="MacOSX">
+ <desc0>The software is not packaged for MacOSX</desc0>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it
doesn't have official support</desc1>
+ <desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="packagingmandriva" title="Mandriva">
+ <desc0>The software is not packaged for Mandriva</desc0>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it
doesn't have official support</desc1>
+ <desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="packagingnet" title="NetBSD">
+ <desc0>The software is not packaged for NetBSD</desc0>
+ <desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support</desc1>
+ <desc2>A official port exists in NetBSD</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="packagingopen" title="OpenBSD">
+ <desc0>The software is not packaged for OpenBSD</desc0>
+ <desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support</desc1>
+ <desc2>A official port exists in OpenBSD</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="packagingredhat" title="RedHat">
+ <desc0>The software is not packaged for RedHat/Fedora</desc0>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it
doesn't have official support</desc1>
+ <desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="packagingsolaris" title="Solaris">
+ <desc0>The software is not packaged for Solaris</desc0>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it
doesn't have official support (e.g: SunFreeware.com )</desc1>
+ <desc2>The software is supported by Sun for Solaris</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="packagingsuse" title="SuSE">
+ <desc0>The software is not packaged for SuSE</desc0>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it
doesn't have official support</desc1>
+ <desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="packagingwindows" title="Windows">
+ <desc0>The project can't be installed on Windows</desc0>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it is limited or has important
issues or just cover some specific Windows release (e.g: Windows2000 and
WindowsXP)</desc1>
+ <desc2>Windows is full supported and a package is
provided</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="exploitability" title="Exploitability">
+ <desc>Exploitability level</desc>
+ <element name="easeofuseergonomics" title="Ease of use, ergonomics">
+ <desc0>Difficult to use, requires an in depth knowledge of the
software functionality</desc0>
+ <desc1>Austere and very technical ergonomics</desc1>
+ <desc2>GUI including help functions and elaborated
ergonomics</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="administrationmonitoring" title="Administration /
Monitoring">
+ <desc0>No administrative or monitoring functionalities</desc0>
+ <desc1>Existing, functionalities but incomplete and or need
improvement</desc1>
+ <desc2>Complete and easy-to-use administration and monitoring
functionalities. Possible integration with external tools (e.g: SNMP, syslog,
...)</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="technicaladaptability" title="Technical adaptability">
+ <desc>Technical adaptability</desc>
+ <element name="modularity" title="Modularity">
+ <desc0>Monolithic software</desc0>
+ <desc1>Presence of hight level modules allowing a first level of
software adaptation</desc1>
+ <desc2>Modular conception, allowing easy adaptation of the
software by selecting or creating modules</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="codemodification" title="Code modification">
+ <desc0>Everything by hand</desc0>
+ <desc1>Recompilation possible but complex without any tools or
documentation</desc1>
+ <desc2>Recompilation with tools (e.g: make, ANT, ...) and
documentation provided</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="codeextension" title="Code extension">
+ <desc0>Any modification requires code recompilation</desc0>
+ <desc1>Architecture designed for static extension but requires
recompilation</desc1>
+ <desc2>Principle of plugin, architecture designed for dynamic
extension without recompilation</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="strategy" title="Strategy">
+ <desc>Project's strategy</desc>
+ <element name="license" title="License">
+ <desc>License</desc>
+ <element name="permissiveness" title="Permissiveness (only if user
wants to become owner of code)">
+ <desc0>Very strict license, like GPL</desc0>
+ <desc1>Moderate permissive license located between both
extremes (GPL and BSD) dual-licensing depending on the type of user (person,
company, ...) or their activities</desc1>
+ <desc2>Very permissive like BSD or Apache licenses</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="protectionagainstproprietaryforks"
title="Protection against proprietary forks">
+ <desc0>Very permissive like BSD or Apache licenses</desc0>
+ <desc1>Moderate permissive license located between both
extremes (GPL and BSD), dual-licensing depending on the type of user (person,
company, ...) or their activies</desc1>
+ <desc2>Very strict license, like GPL</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="copyrightowners" title="Copyright owners">
+ <desc0>Rights held by a few individuals or entities, making it
easier to change the license</desc0>
+ <desc1>Rights held by numerous individuals owning the code in a
homogeneous way, making relicense very difficult</desc1>
+ <desc2>Rights held by a legal entity in whom the community trusts
(e.g: FSF or ASF)</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="modificationofsourcecode" title="Modification of
source code">
+ <desc0>No practical way to propose code modification</desc0>
+ <desc1>Tools provided to access and modify code (like CVS or SVN)
but not really used to develop the software</desc1>
+ <desc2>The code modification process is well defined, exposed and
respected, based on roles assignment</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="roadmap" title="Roadmap">
+ <desc0>No published roadmap</desc0>
+ <desc1>Existing roadmap without planning</desc1>
+ <desc2>Versionned roadmap, with planning and measure of
delays</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment>http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Roadmap</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="sponsor" title="Sponsor">
+ <desc0>Software has no sponsor, the core team is not paid</desc0>
+ <desc1>Software has an unique sponsor who might determine its
strategy</desc1>
+ <desc2>Software is sponsored by industry</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="strategicalindependence" title="Strategic
independence">
+ <desc0>No detectable strategy or strong dependency on one unique
actor(person, company,sponsor)</desc0>
+ <desc1>Strategic vision shared with several other free and open
source projects but without strong commitment from copyrights owners</desc1>
+ <desc2>Strong independence of the code team, legal entity holding
rights, strong involvement in the standardization process</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ </section>
+ <section name="technicalsection" title="Technical section">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <element name="rfcimplementation" title="RFC Implementation">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <comment></comment>
+ <element name="ldaprequests" title="LDAP Requests">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <comment></comment>
+ <element name="rfc4510implementation" title="RFC 4510
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4510?
+(Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Technical Specification
Roadmap)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4511implementation" title="RFC 4511
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4511?
+(The Protocol)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4512implementation" title="RFC 4512
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4512?
+( Directory Information Models)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4513implementation" title="RFC 4513
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4513?
+(Authentication Methods and Security Mechanisms)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4514implementation" title="RFC 4514
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4514?
+(String Representation of Distinguished Names)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4515implementation" title="RFC 4515
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4515?
+(String Representation of Search Filters)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4516implementation" title="RFC 4516
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4516?
+(Uniform Resource Locator)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4517implementation" title="RFC 4517
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4517?
+(Syntaxes and Matching Rules)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4518implementation" title="RFC 4518
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4518?
+( Internationalized String Preparation)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4519implementation" title="RFC 4519
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4519?
+(Schema for User Applications)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="ldapbestpractices" title="LDAP Best Practices">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <comment></comment>
+ <element name="rfc4520implementation" title="RFC 4520
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4520?
+(Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Considerations for the Lightweight
Directory Access Protocol (LDAP))</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4521implementation" title="RFC 4521
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4521?
+(Considerations for Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP)
Extensions)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="ldapextensions" title="LDAP Extensions">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <comment></comment>
+ <element name="rfc2247implementation" title="RFC 2247
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 2247?
+ (Use of DNS domains in distinguished names)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc2307implementation" title="RFC 2307
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 2307?
+(Using LDAP as a Network Information Service)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc2589implementation" title="RFC 2589
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 2589?
+(Dynamic Directory Services Extensions)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc2798implementation" title="RFC 2798
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 2798?
+(inetOrgPerson LDAP Object Class)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc2849implementation" title="RFC 2849
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 2849?
+(The LDAP Data Interchange Format (LDIF))</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc3062implementation" title="RFC 3062
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 3062?
+( LDAP Password Modify Extended Operation)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc3296implementation" title="RFC 3296
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 3296?
+(Named Subordinate References in LDAP Directories)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc3671implementation" title="RFC 3671
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 3671?
+(Collective Attributes in LDAP)
+</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc3672implementation" title="RFC 3672
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 3672?
+(Subentries in LDAP)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc3687implementation" title="RFC 3687
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 3687?
+(LDAP Component Matching Rules)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc3698implementation" title="RFC 3698
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 3698?
+(LDAP: Additional Matching Rules)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc3829implementation" title="RFC 3829
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 3829?
+(LDAP Authorization Identity Controls)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc3909implementation" title="RFC 3909
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 3909?
+(LDAP Cancel Operation)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc3928implementation" title="RFC 3928
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 3928?
+(LDAP Client Update Protocol)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4370implementation" title="RFC 4370
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4370?
+(LDAP Proxied Authorization Control)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4522implementation" title="RFC 4522
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4522?
+(LDAP: Binary Encoding Option)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4523implementation" title="RFC 4523
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4523?
+(LDAP: X.509 Certificate Schema)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4524implementation" title="RFC 4524
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4524?
+(LDAP: COSINE Schema)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4525implementation" title="RFC 4525
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4525?
+(LDAP: Modify-Increment Extension)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4526implementation" title="RFC 4526
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4526?
+(LDAP: Absolute True and False Filters)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc2247implementation" title="RFC 2247
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 2247?</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4527implementation" title="RFC 4527
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4527?
+(LDAP: Read Entry Controls)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4533implementation" title="RFC 4533
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4533?
+(LDAP Content Sync Operation)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4422implementation" title="RFC 4422
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4422?
+ (Simple Authentication and Security Layer (SASL))</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4752implementation" title="RFC 4752
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4752?
+ (The Kerberos V5 ("GSSAPI") Simple Authentication and Security
Layer (SASL) Mechanism)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfcBeheraimplementation" title="Draft Behera ldap
password policy implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the Draft behera?
+ (Password policy for LDAP directories)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="performance" title="Performance">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <comment></comment>
+ <element name="threadpooling" title="Thread pooling">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No thread pooling support</desc0>
+ <desc1>Thread pooling is partial or doesn't work correctly</desc1>
+ <desc2>Thread pooling is performing</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="proxycachesupport" title="Proxy cache support">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No proxy cache support</desc0>
+ <desc1>Proxy cache is partial or doesn't work correctly</desc1>
+ <desc2>Proxy cache is performing</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="applicationserverintegration" title="Application Server
integration">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <comment></comment>
+ <element name="websphereintegration" title="WebSphere integration">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>WebSphere is not supported</desc0>
+ <desc1>WebSphere support documented but not tested</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully WebSphere support</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="tomcatintegration" title="Tomcat integration">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>Tomcat is not supported</desc0>
+ <desc1>Tomcat support documented but not tested</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully Tomcat support</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="jbossintegration" title="JBoss integration">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>JBoss is not supported</desc0>
+ <desc1>JBoss support documented but not tested</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully JBoss support</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="weblogicintegration" title="Weblogic integration">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>Weblogic is not supported</desc0>
+ <desc1>Weblogic support documented but not tested</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully Weblogic support</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="geronimointegration" title="Geronimo integration">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>Geronimo is not supported</desc0>
+ <desc1>Geronimo support documented but not tested</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully Geronimo support</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="jonasintegration" title="JOnas integration">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>JOnas is not supported</desc0>
+ <desc1>JOnas support documented but not tested</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully JOnas support</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="architecture" title="Architecture">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <comment></comment>
+ <element name="loadbalancing" title="Load balancing / Failover">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No Load balancing/Failover support</desc0>
+ <desc1>Load balancing/Failover is partial or doesn't work
correctly</desc1>
+ <desc2>Load balancing/Failover is performing</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="sslsupport" title="SSL Support">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No SSL support</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partial SSL support</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully SSL support and integration</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="transactionmanagement" title="Transaction management">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No transactional support</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partial transactional support</desc1>
+ <desc2>Full transactional support</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="simpleauthentificationandsecuritylayer" title="Simple
Authentification and Security Layer">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No SASL support</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partial SASL support</desc1>
+ <desc2>Full SASL support</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment>http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="databasesupport" title="Database support">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No database support</desc0>
+ <desc1>Default database support</desc1>
+ <desc2>Database can be changed</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="ossupport" title="OS Support">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <comment></comment>
+ <element name="linux-redhat" title="Linux-RedHat">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>The software is not packaged for RedHat</desc0>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support</desc1>
+ <desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ </section>
+ <section name="functionalsection" title="Functional section">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <element name="administrationconsole" title="Administration console">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No console of administration is available</desc0>
+ <desc1>Limited and incomplete administration console</desc1>
+ <desc2>Complete administration console</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="scriptsadministration" title="Administration scripts">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No available script to administrate the server</desc0>
+ <desc1>Some scripts are available (start, stop, update,
import/export...)</desc1>
+ <desc2>Available language to write powerful scripts</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="attributemanagement" title="Attributes management">
+ <desc>Some attributes required but not in RFC</desc>
+ <comment></comment>
+ <element name="passwordmanagement" title="Password management">
+ <desc>Pre-requisites of management password in HR</desc>
+ <comment></comment>
+ <element name="managementofencryptedpassword" title="Encrypted
password management ">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No encrypted password option</desc0>
+ <desc1>Encrypted password option is documented but not
tested</desc1>
+ <desc2>Encrypted password option is available</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="managementof11previouspassword" title="Password
history">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No Management of 11 previous passwords option</desc0>
+ <desc1>Management of 11 previous passwords option is documented
but not tested</desc1>
+ <desc2>Management of 25 previous passwords is available</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="wrongpasswordcounter" title="Wrong password
counter">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No Wrong password counter option</desc0>
+ <desc1>Wrong password counter option is documented but not
tested</desc1>
+ <desc2>Wrong password counter option is available</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="templatepasswordmanagement" title="Template
password management">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No configuration of the password template</desc0>
+ <desc1>Some rules are implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>All rules are implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="accountmanagement" title="Account management">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <comment></comment>
+ <element name="lokedattribute" title="Locked attribute">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No Locked attribute option</desc0>
+ <desc1>Locked attribute option is documented but not
tested</desc1>
+ <desc2>Locked attribute option is available</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="firstconnectionattribute1" title="First connection
attribute">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No First connection option</desc0>
+ <desc1>First connection option is documented but not
tested</desc1>
+ <desc2>First connection option is available</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="monitoringsystem" title="Monitoring system">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>Don't generate any monitoring file</desc0>
+ <desc1>Monitoring file generation doesn't work correctly</desc1>
+ <desc2>Many options are available to define monitoring</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+
<comment>http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Performance_Tuning</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="integrationdevelopmentenvironment" title="Integration
Development Environment">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No IDE supported</desc0>
+ <desc1>Limited IDE integration</desc1>
+ <desc2>An IDE is delivered with LDAP server</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="integratedinassosolution" title="Integrated in a SSO
solution">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No Identity management solution available with this LDAP
server</desc0>
+ <desc1>Possible integration with external Identity management
solution</desc1>
+ <desc2>LDAP Server is delivered with an identity management
solution</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment>Integration with penrose</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="slicemodel" title="Slice model">
+ <desc>Slice model integration</desc>
+ <comment></comment>
+ <element name="portmanagement" title="Port management">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No port management</desc0>
+ <desc1>Some ports are configurable</desc1>
+ <desc2>All ports are configurable</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="partitionmanagement" title="Partition management">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>Standard installation available</desc0>
+ <desc1>Configurable installation available</desc1>
+ <desc2>Powerful installation and architecture available</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ </section>
+</document>
\ No newline at end of file
Index: OpenDS/OpenDS-1.1.qsos
===================================================================
RCS file: OpenDS/OpenDS-1.1.qsos
diff -N OpenDS/OpenDS-1.1.qsos
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ OpenDS/OpenDS-1.1.qsos 24 Oct 2008 10:36:52 -0000 1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,996 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
+<document>
+ <header>
+ <authors>
+ <author>
+ <email>address@hidden</email>
+ <name>David Pillant</name>
+ </author>
+ </authors>
+ <dates>
+ <creation>2008-10-24</creation>
+ <validation></validation>
+ </dates>
+ <language>en</language>
+ <appname>OpenDS 1.1</appname>
+ <release>1.1</release>
+ <licenseid>21</licenseid>
+ <licensedesc>SUN Binary Code License</licensedesc>
+ <url>http://www.opends.org/</url>
+ <desc></desc>
+ <demourl></demourl>
+ <qsosformat>1.7</qsosformat>
+ <qsosappfamily>LDAP</qsosappfamily>
+ <qsosappname></qsosappname>
+ <qsosspecificformat></qsosspecificformat>
+ </header>
+ <section name="generic" title="Generic section">
+ <desc>Generic criteria from QSOS version 1.6</desc>
+ <element name="intrinsicdurability" title="Intrinsic durability">
+ <desc>Intrinsic durability</desc>
+ <element name="maturity" title="Maturity">
+ <desc>Maturity</desc>
+ <element name="age" title="Age">
+ <desc0>less than 3 months</desc0>
+ <desc1>if between 3 months and 3 years</desc1>
+ <desc2>after 3 years</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment>December 2007</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="stability" title="Stability">
+ <desc0>Unstable software with numerous releases or patches
generating side effects</desc0>
+ <desc1>Stabilized production release existing but old.
Difficulties to stabilize development releases</desc1>
+ <desc2>Stabilized software. Releases provide bug fixes
corrections but mainly new functionalities</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment>V1.0 (Build 16)</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="historyknownproblems" title="History, known
problems">
+ <desc0>Software knows several problems which can be
prohibitive</desc0>
+ <desc1>No know major problem or crisis</desc1>
+ <desc2>History of good management of crisis situations</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+
<comment>https://opends.dev.java.net/issues/reports.cgi</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="forkprobability" title="Fork probability, source of
Forking">
+ <desc0>Software is very likely to be forked in the
future</desc0>
+ <desc1>Software comes from a fork but has very few chances of
being forked in the future</desc1>
+ <desc2>Software has very little chance of being forked. It does
not come from a fork either</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="adoption" title="Adoption">
+ <desc>Adoption by community and industry</desc>
+ <element name="popularity" title="Popularity (related to: general
public, niche, ...)">
+ <desc0>Very few users identified</desc0>
+ <desc1>Detectable use on Internet</desc1>
+ <desc2>Numerous users, numerous references</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="references" title="References">
+ <desc0>None</desc0>
+ <desc1>Few refences, non critical usages</desc1>
+ <desc2>Often implemented for critical applications</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="contributingcommunity" title="Contributing
Community">
+ <desc0>No community or without real activity (forum, mailing
list, ...)</desc0>
+ <desc1>Existing community with a notable activity</desc1>
+ <desc2>Strong community: big activity on forums, numerous
contributors and advocates</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="books" title="books">
+ <desc0>No book about the software</desc0>
+ <desc1>Less than 5 books about the software are
available</desc1>
+ <desc2>More than 5 books about software are available, in
several languages</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="developmentleadership" title="Development leadership">
+ <desc>Organisation and leadership of developments</desc>
+ <element name="leadingteam" title="Leading team">
+ <desc0>1 to 2 individuals involved, not clearly
identified</desc0>
+ <desc1>Between 2 and 5 independent people</desc1>
+ <desc2>More than 5 people</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+
<comment>https://opends.dev.java.net/public/misc/bios.html</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="managementstyle" title="Management style">
+ <desc0>Complete dictatorship</desc0>
+ <desc1>Enlightened despotism</desc1>
+ <desc2>Council of architects with identified leader (e.g:
KDE)</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+
<comment>https://opends.dev.java.net/public/misc/bios.html</comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="activity" title="Activity">
+ <desc>Activity of the project and around the software</desc>
+ <element name="developersidentificationturnover"
title="Developers, identification, turnover">
+ <desc0>Less than 3 developers, not clearly identified</desc0>
+ <desc1>Between 4 and 7 developers, or more unidentified
developers with important turnover</desc1>
+ <desc2>More than 7 developers, very stable team</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+
<comment>https://opends.dev.java.net/public/misc/bios.html</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="activityonbugs" title="Activity on bugs">
+ <desc0>Slow reactivity in forum or on mailing list, or nothing
regarding bug fixes in releases note</desc0>
+ <desc1>Detectable activity but without process clearly exposed,
long reaction/resolution time</desc1>
+ <desc2>Strong reactivity based on roles and tasks
assignment</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+
<comment>https://opends.dev.java.net/public/docs/dev-docs/OpenDS-Governance.html</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="activityonfunctionalities" title="Activity on
functionalities">
+ <desc0>No or few new functionalities</desc0>
+ <desc1>Evolution of the product driven by the core team or by
user's request without any clearly explained process</desc1>
+ <desc2>Tool(s) to manage feature requests, strong interaction
with roadmap</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment>https://www.opends.org/wiki/page/Roadmap</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="activityonreleases" title="Activity on releases">
+ <desc0>Very weak activity on both production and development
releases</desc0>
+ <desc1>Activity on production and development releases.
Frequent minor releases (bug fixes)</desc1>
+ <desc2>Important activity with frequent minor releases (bugs
fixes) and planned major releases relating to the roadmap forcast</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment>https://opends.dev.java.net/issues/query.cgi</comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="industrializedsolution" title="Industrialized solution">
+ <desc>Industrialization level of the project</desc>
+ <element name="independenceofdevelopments" title="Independence of
developments">
+ <desc0>Developments realized at 100% by employees of a single
company</desc0>
+ <desc1>60% maximum</desc1>
+ <desc2>20% maximum</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="services" title="Services">
+ <desc>Services offering</desc>
+ <element name="training" title="Training">
+ <desc0>No offer of training identified</desc0>
+ <desc1>Offer exists but is restricted geographically and to one
language or is provided by a single contractor</desc1>
+ <desc2>Rich offers provided by several contractors, in several
languages and split into modules of gradual levels</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="support" title="Support">
+ <desc0>No offer of support except via public forums and mailing
lists</desc0>
+ <desc1>Offer exists but is provided by a single contractor
without strong commitment quality of services</desc1>
+ <desc2>Multiple service providers with strong commitment (e.g:
guaranteed resolution time)</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+
<comment>http://blogs.sun.com/Ludo/entry/opends_un_annuaire_ldap_en</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="consulting" title="Consulting">
+ <desc0>No offer of consulting service</desc0>
+ <desc1>Offer exists but is restricted geographically and to one
language or is provided by a single contractor</desc1>
+ <desc2>Consulting services provided by different contractors in
several languages</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="documentation" title="Documentation">
+ <desc0>No user documentation</desc0>
+ <desc1>Documentation exists but shifted in time, is restricted to
one language or is poorly detailed</desc1>
+ <desc2>Documentation always up to date, translated and possibly
adapted to different target readers (end user, sysadmin, manager, ...)</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+
<comment>https://www.opends.org/wiki/page/OpenDSUserDocumentation</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="qualityassurance" title="Quality Assurance">
+ <desc>Quality assurance process</desc>
+ <element name="quality" title="Quality Assurance">
+ <desc0>No QA process</desc0>
+ <desc1>Identifies QA process but not much formalized and with
no tool</desc1>
+ <desc2>Automatic testing process included in code's life-cycle
with publication of results</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+
<comment>https://www.opends.org/wiki/page/MainQualityPage</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="tools" title="Tools">
+ <desc0>No bug or feature request management tool</desc0>
+ <desc1>Standard tools provided (for instance by a hosting
forge) but poorly used</desc1>
+ <desc2>Very active use of tools for roles/tasks allocation and
progress monitoring</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+
<comment>https://opends.dev.java.net/servlets/ProjectIssues</comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="packaging" title="Packaging">
+ <desc>Packaging for various operating systems</desc>
+ <element name="packagingsource" title="Source">
+ <desc0>Software can't be installed from source without lot of
work</desc0>
+ <desc1>Installation from source is limited and depends on very
strict conditions (OS, arch, lib, ...)</desc1>
+ <desc2>Installation from source is easy</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+
<comment>https://www.opends.org/wiki/page/OverviewOfTheQuickSetupTool</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="packagingdebian" title="Debian">
+ <desc0>The software is not packaged for Debian</desc0>
+ <desc1>A Debian package exists but it has important issues or
it doesn't have official support</desc1>
+ <desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="packagingfreebsd" title="FreeBSD">
+ <desc0>The software is not packaged for FreeBSD</desc0>
+ <desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support</desc1>
+ <desc2>A official port exists in FreeBSD</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="packaginghpux" title="HP-UX">
+ <desc0>The software is not packaged for HP-UX</desc0>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it
doesn't have official support</desc1>
+ <desc2>A stable package is provided for HP-UX</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="packagingmacosx" title="MacOSX">
+ <desc0>The software is not packaged for MacOSX</desc0>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it
doesn't have official support</desc1>
+ <desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="packagingmandriva" title="Mandriva">
+ <desc0>The software is not packaged for Mandriva</desc0>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it
doesn't have official support</desc1>
+ <desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="packagingnet" title="NetBSD">
+ <desc0>The software is not packaged for NetBSD</desc0>
+ <desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support</desc1>
+ <desc2>A official port exists in NetBSD</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="packagingopen" title="OpenBSD">
+ <desc0>The software is not packaged for OpenBSD</desc0>
+ <desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support</desc1>
+ <desc2>A official port exists in OpenBSD</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="packagingredhat" title="RedHat">
+ <desc0>The software is not packaged for RedHat/Fedora</desc0>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it
doesn't have official support</desc1>
+ <desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="packagingsolaris" title="Solaris">
+ <desc0>The software is not packaged for Solaris</desc0>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it
doesn't have official support (e.g: SunFreeware.com )</desc1>
+ <desc2>The software is supported by Sun for Solaris</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="packagingsuse" title="SuSE">
+ <desc0>The software is not packaged for SuSE</desc0>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it
doesn't have official support</desc1>
+ <desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="packagingwindows" title="Windows">
+ <desc0>The project can't be installed on Windows</desc0>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it is limited or has important
issues or just cover some specific Windows release (e.g: Windows2000 and
WindowsXP)</desc1>
+ <desc2>Windows is full supported and a package is
provided</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="exploitability" title="Exploitability">
+ <desc>Exploitability level</desc>
+ <element name="easeofuseergonomics" title="Ease of use, ergonomics">
+ <desc0>Difficult to use, requires an in depth knowledge of the
software functionality</desc0>
+ <desc1>Austere and very technical ergonomics</desc1>
+ <desc2>GUI including help functions and elaborated
ergonomics</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment>lot of tools in command line</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="administrationmonitoring" title="Administration /
Monitoring">
+ <desc0>No administrative or monitoring functionalities</desc0>
+ <desc1>Existing, functionalities but incomplete and or need
improvement</desc1>
+ <desc2>Complete and easy-to-use administration and monitoring
functionalities. Possible integration with external tools (e.g: SNMP, syslog,
...)</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment>JMX Support </comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="technicaladaptability" title="Technical adaptability">
+ <desc>Technical adaptability</desc>
+ <element name="modularity" title="Modularity">
+ <desc0>Monolithic software</desc0>
+ <desc1>Presence of hight level modules allowing a first level of
software adaptation</desc1>
+ <desc2>Modular conception, allowing easy adaptation of the
software by selecting or creating modules</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="codemodification" title="Code modification">
+ <desc0>Everything by hand</desc0>
+ <desc1>Recompilation possible but complex without any tools or
documentation</desc1>
+ <desc2>Recompilation with tools (e.g: make, ANT, ...) and
documentation provided</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment>Use of a tool of update</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="codeextension" title="Code extension">
+ <desc0>Any modification requires code recompilation</desc0>
+ <desc1>Architecture designed for static extension but requires
recompilation</desc1>
+ <desc2>Principle of plugin, architecture designed for dynamic
extension without recompilation</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment>Use of a tool of update</comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="strategy" title="Strategy">
+ <desc>Project's strategy</desc>
+ <element name="license" title="License">
+ <desc>License</desc>
+ <element name="permissiveness" title="Permissiveness (only if user
wants to become owner of code)">
+ <desc0>Very strict license, like GPL</desc0>
+ <desc1>Moderate permissive license located between both
extremes (GPL and BSD) dual-licensing depending on the type of user (person,
company, ...) or their activities</desc1>
+ <desc2>Very permissive like BSD or Apache licenses</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment>CDDL</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="protectionagainstproprietaryforks"
title="Protection against proprietary forks">
+ <desc0>Very permissive like BSD or Apache licenses</desc0>
+ <desc1>Moderate permissive license located between both
extremes (GPL and BSD), dual-licensing depending on the type of user (person,
company, ...) or their activies</desc1>
+ <desc2>Very strict license, like GPL</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment>CDDL</comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="copyrightowners" title="Copyright owners">
+ <desc0>Rights held by a few individuals or entities, making it
easier to change the license</desc0>
+ <desc1>Rights held by numerous individuals owning the code in a
homogeneous way, making relicense very difficult</desc1>
+ <desc2>Rights held by a legal entity in whom the community trusts
(e.g: FSF or ASF)</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="modificationofsourcecode" title="Modification of
source code">
+ <desc0>No practical way to propose code modification</desc0>
+ <desc1>Tools provided to access and modify code (like CVS or SVN)
but not really used to develop the software</desc1>
+ <desc2>The code modification process is well defined, exposed and
respected, based on roles assignment</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment>https://www.opends.org/wiki/page/MainQualityPage</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="roadmap" title="Roadmap">
+ <desc0>No published roadmap</desc0>
+ <desc1>Existing roadmap without planning</desc1>
+ <desc2>Versionned roadmap, with planning and measure of
delays</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment>https://www.opends.org/wiki/page/Roadmap</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="sponsor" title="Sponsor">
+ <desc0>Software has no sponsor, the core team is not paid</desc0>
+ <desc1>Software has an unique sponsor who might determine its
strategy</desc1>
+ <desc2>Software is sponsored by industry</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment>Sun Microsystems</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="strategicalindependence" title="Strategic
independence">
+ <desc0>No detectable strategy or strong dependency on one unique
actor(person, company,sponsor)</desc0>
+ <desc1>Strategic vision shared with several other free and open
source projects but without strong commitment from copyrights owners</desc1>
+ <desc2>Strong independence of the code team, legal entity holding
rights, strong involvement in the standardization process</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ </section>
+ <section name="technicalsection" title="Technical section">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <element name="rfcimplementation" title="RFC Implementation">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <comment></comment>
+ <element name="ldaprequests" title="LDAP Requests">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <comment></comment>
+ <element name="rfc4510implementation" title="RFC 4510
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4510?
+(Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Technical Specification
Roadmap)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4511implementation" title="RFC 4511
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4511?
+(The Protocol)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4512implementation" title="RFC 4512
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4512?
+( Directory Information Models)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4513implementation" title="RFC 4513
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4513?
+(Authentication Methods and Security Mechanisms)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4514implementation" title="RFC 4514
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4514?
+(String Representation of Distinguished Names)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4515implementation" title="RFC 4515
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4515?
+(String Representation of Search Filters)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4516implementation" title="RFC 4516
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4516?
+(Uniform Resource Locator)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4517implementation" title="RFC 4517
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4517?
+(Syntaxes and Matching Rules)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4518implementation" title="RFC 4518
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4518?
+( Internationalized String Preparation)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4519implementation" title="RFC 4519
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4519?
+(Schema for User Applications)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="ldapbestpractices" title="LDAP Best Practices">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <comment></comment>
+ <element name="rfc4520implementation" title="RFC 4520
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4520?
+(Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Considerations for the Lightweight
Directory Access Protocol (LDAP))</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4521implementation" title="RFC 4521
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4521?
+(Considerations for Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP)
Extensions)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="ldapextensions" title="LDAP Extensions">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <comment></comment>
+ <element name="rfc2247implementation" title="RFC 2247
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 2247?
+ (Use of DNS domains in distinguished names)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc2307implementation" title="RFC 2307
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 2307?
+(Using LDAP as a Network Information Service)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc2589implementation" title="RFC 2589
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 2589?
+(Dynamic Directory Services Extensions)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc2798implementation" title="RFC 2798
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 2798?
+(inetOrgPerson LDAP Object Class)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc2849implementation" title="RFC 2849
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 2849?
+(The LDAP Data Interchange Format (LDIF))</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc3062implementation" title="RFC 3062
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 3062?
+( LDAP Password Modify Extended Operation)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc3296implementation" title="RFC 3296
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 3296?
+(Named Subordinate References in LDAP Directories)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc3671implementation" title="RFC 3671
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 3671?
+(Collective Attributes in LDAP)
+</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc3672implementation" title="RFC 3672
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 3672?
+(Subentries in LDAP)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc3687implementation" title="RFC 3687
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 3687?
+(LDAP Component Matching Rules)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc3698implementation" title="RFC 3698
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 3698?
+(LDAP: Additional Matching Rules)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc3829implementation" title="RFC 3829
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 3829?
+(LDAP Authorization Identity Controls)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc3909implementation" title="RFC 3909
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 3909?
+(LDAP Cancel Operation)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc3928implementation" title="RFC 3928
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 3928?
+(LDAP Client Update Protocol)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4370implementation" title="RFC 4370
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4370?
+(LDAP Proxied Authorization Control)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4522implementation" title="RFC 4522
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4522?
+(LDAP: Binary Encoding Option)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4523implementation" title="RFC 4523
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4523?
+(LDAP: X.509 Certificate Schema)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4524implementation" title="RFC 4524
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4524?
+(LDAP: COSINE Schema)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4525implementation" title="RFC 4525
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4525?
+(LDAP: Modify-Increment Extension)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4526implementation" title="RFC 4526
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4526?
+(LDAP: Absolute True and False Filters)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc2247implementation" title="RFC 2247
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 2247?</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4527implementation" title="RFC 4527
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4527?
+(LDAP: Read Entry Controls)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4533implementation" title="RFC 4533
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4533?
+(LDAP Content Sync Operation)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4422implementation" title="RFC 4422
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4422?
+ (Simple Authentication and Security Layer (SASL))</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4752implementation" title="RFC 4752
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4752?
+ (The Kerberos V5 ("GSSAPI") Simple Authentication and Security
Layer (SASL) Mechanism)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfcBeheraimplementation" title="Draft Behera ldap
password policy implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the Draft behera?
+ (Password policy for LDAP directories)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="performance" title="Performance">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <comment></comment>
+ <element name="threadpooling" title="Thread pooling">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No thread pooling support</desc0>
+ <desc1>Thread pooling is partial or doesn't work correctly</desc1>
+ <desc2>Thread pooling is performing</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment>Work Queue</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="proxycachesupport" title="Proxy cache support">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No proxy cache support</desc0>
+ <desc1>Proxy cache is partial or doesn't work correctly</desc1>
+ <desc2>Proxy cache is performing</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment>Entry cache</comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="applicationserverintegration" title="Application Server
integration">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <comment></comment>
+ <element name="websphereintegration" title="WebSphere integration">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>WebSphere is not supported</desc0>
+ <desc1>WebSphere support documented but not tested</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully WebSphere support</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="tomcatintegration" title="Tomcat integration">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>Tomcat is not supported</desc0>
+ <desc1>Tomcat support documented but not tested</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully Tomcat support</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="jbossintegration" title="JBoss integration">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>JBoss is not supported</desc0>
+ <desc1>JBoss support documented but not tested</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully JBoss support</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+
<comment>http://blogs.sun.com/Ludo/entry/jboss_portal_with_opensso_and</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="weblogicintegration" title="Weblogic integration">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>Weblogic is not supported</desc0>
+ <desc1>Weblogic support documented but not tested</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully Weblogic support</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="geronimointegration" title="Geronimo integration">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>Geronimo is not supported</desc0>
+ <desc1>Geronimo support documented but not tested</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully Geronimo support</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="jonasintegration" title="JOnas integration">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>JOnas is not supported</desc0>
+ <desc1>JOnas support documented but not tested</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully JOnas support</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="architecture" title="Architecture">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <comment></comment>
+ <element name="loadbalancing" title="Load balancing / Failover">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No Load balancing/Failover support</desc0>
+ <desc1>Load balancing/Failover is partial or doesn't work
correctly</desc1>
+ <desc2>Load balancing/Failover is performing</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="sslsupport" title="SSL Support">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No SSL support</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partial SSL support</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully SSL support and integration</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="transactionmanagement" title="Transaction management">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No transactional support</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partial transactional support</desc1>
+ <desc2>Full transactional support</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="simpleauthentificationandsecuritylayer" title="Simple
Authentification and Security Layer">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No SASL support</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partial SASL support</desc1>
+ <desc2>Full SASL support</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="databasesupport" title="Database support">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No database support</desc0>
+ <desc1>Default database support</desc1>
+ <desc2>Database can be changed</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="ossupport" title="OS Support">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <comment></comment>
+ <element name="linux-redhat" title="Linux-RedHat">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>The software is not packaged for RedHat</desc0>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support</desc1>
+ <desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ </section>
+ <section name="functionalsection" title="Functional section">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <element name="administrationconsole" title="Administration console">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No console of administration is available</desc0>
+ <desc1>Limited and incomplete administration console</desc1>
+ <desc2>Complete administration console</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="scriptsadministration" title="Administration scripts">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No available script to administrate the server</desc0>
+ <desc1>Some scripts are available (start, stop, update,
import/export...)</desc1>
+ <desc2>Available language to write powerful scripts</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="attributemanagement" title="Attributes management">
+ <desc>Some attributes required but not in RFC</desc>
+ <comment></comment>
+ <element name="passwordmanagement" title="Password management">
+ <desc>Pre-requisites of management password in HR</desc>
+ <comment></comment>
+ <element name="managementofencryptedpassword" title="Encrypted
password management ">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No encrypted password option</desc0>
+ <desc1>Encrypted password option is documented but not
tested</desc1>
+ <desc2>Encrypted password option is available</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="managementof11previouspassword" title="Password
history">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No Management of 11 previous passwords option</desc0>
+ <desc1>Management of 11 previous passwords option is documented
but not tested</desc1>
+ <desc2>Management of 25 previous passwords is available</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="wrongpasswordcounter" title="Wrong password
counter">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No Wrong password counter option</desc0>
+ <desc1>Wrong password counter option is documented but not
tested</desc1>
+ <desc2>Wrong password counter option is available</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="templatepasswordmanagement" title="Template
password management">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No configuration of the password template</desc0>
+ <desc1>Some rules are implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>All rules are implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="accountmanagement" title="Account management">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <comment></comment>
+ <element name="lokedattribute" title="Locked attribute">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No Locked attribute option</desc0>
+ <desc1>Locked attribute option is documented but not
tested</desc1>
+ <desc2>Locked attribute option is available</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="firstconnectionattribute1" title="First connection
attribute">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No First connection option</desc0>
+ <desc1>First connection option is documented but not
tested</desc1>
+ <desc2>First connection option is available</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="monitoringsystem" title="Monitoring system">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>Don't generate any monitoring file</desc0>
+ <desc1>Monitoring file generation doesn't work correctly</desc1>
+ <desc2>Many options are available to define monitoring</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment>JMX support</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="integrationdevelopmentenvironment" title="Integration
Development Environment">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No IDE supported</desc0>
+ <desc1>Limited IDE integration</desc1>
+ <desc2>An IDE is delivered with LDAP server</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment>Can be integrated with netbeans</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="integratedinassosolution" title="Integrated in a SSO
solution">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No Identity management solution available with this LDAP
server</desc0>
+ <desc1>Possible integration with external Identity management
solution</desc1>
+ <desc2>LDAP Server is delivered with an identity management
solution</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment>OpenSSO-OpenSource Identity management</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="slicemodel" title="Slice model">
+ <desc>Slice model integration</desc>
+ <comment></comment>
+ <element name="portmanagement" title="Port management">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No port management</desc0>
+ <desc1>Some ports are configurable</desc1>
+ <desc2>All ports are configurable</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="partitionmanagement" title="Partition management">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>Standard installation available</desc0>
+ <desc1>Configurable installation available</desc1>
+ <desc2>Powerful installation and architecture available</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ </section>
+</document>
\ No newline at end of file
Index: openldap/openldap-2.4.11.qsos
===================================================================
RCS file: openldap/openldap-2.4.11.qsos
diff -N openldap/openldap-2.4.11.qsos
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ openldap/openldap-2.4.11.qsos 24 Oct 2008 10:36:52 -0000 1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,1005 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
+<document>
+ <header>
+ <authors>
+ <author>
+ <email>address@hidden</email>
+ <name>David Pillant</name>
+ </author>
+ </authors>
+ <dates>
+ <creation>2008-10-24</creation>
+ <validation></validation>
+ </dates>
+ <language>en</language>
+ <appname>OpenLDAP</appname>
+ <release>2.4.11</release>
+ <licenseid>27</licenseid>
+ <licensedesc>Open Content License</licensedesc>
+ <url>http://www.openldap.org/</url>
+ <desc></desc>
+ <demourl></demourl>
+ <qsosformat>1.7</qsosformat>
+ <qsosappfamily>LDAP</qsosappfamily>
+ <qsosappname></qsosappname>
+ <qsosspecificformat></qsosspecificformat>
+ </header>
+ <section name="generic" title="Generic section">
+ <desc>Generic criteria from QSOS version 1.6</desc>
+ <element name="intrinsicdurability" title="Intrinsic durability">
+ <desc>Intrinsic durability</desc>
+ <element name="maturity" title="Maturity">
+ <desc>Maturity</desc>
+ <element name="age" title="Age">
+ <desc0>less than 3 months</desc0>
+ <desc1>if between 3 months and 3 years</desc1>
+ <desc2>after 3 years</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment>The OpenLDAP project was started in 1998</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="stability" title="Stability">
+ <desc0>Unstable software with numerous releases or patches
generating side effects</desc0>
+ <desc1>Stabilized production release existing but old.
Difficulties to stabilize development releases</desc1>
+ <desc2>Stabilized software. Releases provide bug fixes
corrections but mainly new functionalities</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment>roadmap:
http://www.openldap.org/software/roadmap.html</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="historyknownproblems" title="History, known
problems">
+ <desc0>Software knows several problems which can be
prohibitive</desc0>
+ <desc1>No know major problem or crisis</desc1>
+ <desc2>History of good management of crisis situations</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment>http://www.openldap.org/its/index.cgi</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="forkprobability" title="Fork probability, source of
Forking">
+ <desc0>Software is very likely to be forked in the
future</desc0>
+ <desc1>Software comes from a fork but has very few chances of
being forked in the future</desc1>
+ <desc2>Software has very little chance of being forked. It does
not come from a fork either</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="adoption" title="Adoption">
+ <desc>Adoption by community and industry</desc>
+ <element name="popularity" title="Popularity (related to: general
public, niche, ...)">
+ <desc0>Very few users identified</desc0>
+ <desc1>Detectable use on Internet</desc1>
+ <desc2>Numerous users, numerous references</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="references" title="References">
+ <desc0>None</desc0>
+ <desc1>Few refences, non critical usages</desc1>
+ <desc2>Often implemented for critical applications</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="contributingcommunity" title="Contributing
Community">
+ <desc0>No community or without real activity (forum, mailing
list, ...)</desc0>
+ <desc1>Existing community with a notable activity</desc1>
+ <desc2>Strong community: big activity on forums, numerous
contributors and advocates</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment>HP, Google, OpenLDAP Community</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="books" title="books">
+ <desc0>No book about the software</desc0>
+ <desc1>Less than 5 books about the software are
available</desc1>
+ <desc2>More than 5 books about software are available, in
several languages</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment>Deploying OpenLDAP
+Mastering OpenLDAP
+OpenLDAP for System Administrators
+OpenLDAP par John Martin Ungar
+OpenLDAP par Volker Schwaberow</comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="developmentleadership" title="Development leadership">
+ <desc>Organisation and leadership of developments</desc>
+ <element name="leadingteam" title="Leading team">
+ <desc0>1 to 2 individuals involved, not clearly
identified</desc0>
+ <desc1>Between 2 and 5 independent people</desc1>
+ <desc2>More than 5 people</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment>Howard Chu Chief Architect, Developer
+Pierangelo Masarati Architect, Developer
+Kurt Zeilenga Advisor, Founder</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="managementstyle" title="Management style">
+ <desc0>Complete dictatorship</desc0>
+ <desc1>Enlightened despotism</desc1>
+ <desc2>Council of architects with identified leader (e.g:
KDE)</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment>Howard Chu Chief Architect, Developer
+Pierangelo Masarati Architect, Developer
+Kurt Zeilenga Advisor, Founder</comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="activity" title="Activity">
+ <desc>Activity of the project and around the software</desc>
+ <element name="developersidentificationturnover"
title="Developers, identification, turnover">
+ <desc0>Less than 3 developers, not clearly identified</desc0>
+ <desc1>Between 4 and 7 developers, or more unidentified
developers with important turnover</desc1>
+ <desc2>More than 7 developers, very stable team</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment>http://www.openldap.org/project/</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="activityonbugs" title="Activity on bugs">
+ <desc0>Slow reactivity in forum or on mailing list, or nothing
regarding bug fixes in releases note</desc0>
+ <desc1>Detectable activity but without process clearly exposed,
long reaction/resolution time</desc1>
+ <desc2>Strong reactivity based on roles and tasks
assignment</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="activityonfunctionalities" title="Activity on
functionalities">
+ <desc0>No or few new functionalities</desc0>
+ <desc1>Evolution of the product driven by the core team or by
user's request without any clearly explained process</desc1>
+ <desc2>Tool(s) to manage feature requests, strong interaction
with roadmap</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment>http://www.openldap.org/devel/</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="activityonreleases" title="Activity on releases">
+ <desc0>Very weak activity on both production and development
releases</desc0>
+ <desc1>Activity on production and development releases.
Frequent minor releases (bug fixes)</desc1>
+ <desc2>Important activity with frequent minor releases (bugs
fixes) and planned major releases relating to the roadmap forcast</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="industrializedsolution" title="Industrialized solution">
+ <desc>Industrialization level of the project</desc>
+ <element name="independenceofdevelopments" title="Independence of
developments">
+ <desc0>Developments realized at 100% by employees of a single
company</desc0>
+ <desc1>60% maximum</desc1>
+ <desc2>20% maximum</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment>OpenLDAP Core Team, OpenLDAP Engineering team, OpenLDAP
Emeritus</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="services" title="Services">
+ <desc>Services offering</desc>
+ <element name="training" title="Training">
+ <desc0>No offer of training identified</desc0>
+ <desc1>Offer exists but is restricted geographically and to one
language or is provided by a single contractor</desc1>
+ <desc2>Rich offers provided by several contractors, in several
languages and split into modules of gradual levels</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment>Different languages, certifications,..</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="support" title="Support">
+ <desc0>No offer of support except via public forums and mailing
lists</desc0>
+ <desc1>Offer exists but is provided by a single contractor
without strong commitment quality of services</desc1>
+ <desc2>Multiple service providers with strong commitment (e.g:
guaranteed resolution time)</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment>www.securetecsystems.com</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="consulting" title="Consulting">
+ <desc0>No offer of consulting service</desc0>
+ <desc1>Offer exists but is restricted geographically and to one
language or is provided by a single contractor</desc1>
+ <desc2>Consulting services provided by different contractors in
several languages</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment>www.securetecsystems.com</comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="documentation" title="Documentation">
+ <desc0>No user documentation</desc0>
+ <desc1>Documentation exists but shifted in time, is restricted to
one language or is poorly detailed</desc1>
+ <desc2>Documentation always up to date, translated and possibly
adapted to different target readers (end user, sysadmin, manager, ...)</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment>Quickstart guide and admin guide in english</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="qualityassurance" title="Quality Assurance">
+ <desc>Quality assurance process</desc>
+ <element name="quality" title="Quality Assurance">
+ <desc0>No QA process</desc0>
+ <desc1>Identifies QA process but not much formalized and with
no tool</desc1>
+ <desc2>Automatic testing process included in code's life-cycle
with publication of results</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="tools" title="Tools">
+ <desc0>No bug or feature request management tool</desc0>
+ <desc1>Standard tools provided (for instance by a hosting
forge) but poorly used</desc1>
+ <desc2>Very active use of tools for roles/tasks allocation and
progress monitoring</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="packaging" title="Packaging">
+ <desc>Packaging for various operating systems</desc>
+ <element name="packagingsource" title="Source">
+ <desc0>Software can't be installed from source without lot of
work</desc0>
+ <desc1>Installation from source is limited and depends on very
strict conditions (OS, arch, lib, ...)</desc1>
+ <desc2>Installation from source is easy</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment>Software can be installed from source with lot f
work</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="packagingdebian" title="Debian">
+ <desc0>The software is not packaged for Debian</desc0>
+ <desc1>A Debian package exists but it has important issues or
it doesn't have official support</desc1>
+ <desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment>http://pkg-openldap.alioth.debian.org/</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="packagingfreebsd" title="FreeBSD">
+ <desc0>The software is not packaged for FreeBSD</desc0>
+ <desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support</desc1>
+ <desc2>A official port exists in FreeBSD</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="packaginghpux" title="HP-UX">
+ <desc0>The software is not packaged for HP-UX</desc0>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it
doesn't have official support</desc1>
+ <desc2>A stable package is provided for HP-UX</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+
<comment>http://hpux.cs.utah.edu/hppd/hpux/Networking/Misc/openldap-2.4.12/</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="packagingmacosx" title="MacOSX">
+ <desc0>The software is not packaged for MacOSX</desc0>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it
doesn't have official support</desc1>
+ <desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment>http://openldap.darwinports.com/</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="packagingmandriva" title="Mandriva">
+ <desc0>The software is not packaged for Mandriva</desc0>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it
doesn't have official support</desc1>
+ <desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="packagingnet" title="NetBSD">
+ <desc0>The software is not packaged for NetBSD</desc0>
+ <desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support</desc1>
+ <desc2>A official port exists in NetBSD</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+
<comment>ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/pkgsrc/current/pkgsrc/databases/openldap/README.html</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="packagingopen" title="OpenBSD">
+ <desc0>The software is not packaged for OpenBSD</desc0>
+ <desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support</desc1>
+ <desc2>A official port exists in OpenBSD</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="packagingredhat" title="RedHat">
+ <desc0>The software is not packaged for RedHat/Fedora</desc0>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it
doesn't have official support</desc1>
+ <desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="packagingsolaris" title="Solaris">
+ <desc0>The software is not packaged for Solaris</desc0>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it
doesn't have official support (e.g: SunFreeware.com )</desc1>
+ <desc2>The software is supported by Sun for Solaris</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+
<comment>http://unix.derkeiler.com/Newsgroups/comp.unix.solaris/2003-04/0140.html</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="packagingsuse" title="SuSE">
+ <desc0>The software is not packaged for SuSE</desc0>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it
doesn't have official support</desc1>
+ <desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment>http://www.whitemiceconsulting.com/node/93</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="packagingwindows" title="Windows">
+ <desc0>The project can't be installed on Windows</desc0>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it is limited or has important
issues or just cover some specific Windows release (e.g: Windows2000 and
WindowsXP)</desc1>
+ <desc2>Windows is full supported and a package is
provided</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment>http://www.bind9.net/download-openldap</comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="exploitability" title="Exploitability">
+ <desc>Exploitability level</desc>
+ <element name="easeofuseergonomics" title="Ease of use, ergonomics">
+ <desc0>Difficult to use, requires an in depth knowledge of the
software functionality</desc0>
+ <desc1>Austere and very technical ergonomics</desc1>
+ <desc2>GUI including help functions and elaborated
ergonomics</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="administrationmonitoring" title="Administration /
Monitoring">
+ <desc0>No administrative or monitoring functionalities</desc0>
+ <desc1>Existing, functionalities but incomplete and or need
improvement</desc1>
+ <desc2>Complete and easy-to-use administration and monitoring
functionalities. Possible integration with external tools (e.g: SNMP, syslog,
...)</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment>Possible integration with syslog</comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="technicaladaptability" title="Technical adaptability">
+ <desc>Technical adaptability</desc>
+ <element name="modularity" title="Modularity">
+ <desc0>Monolithic software</desc0>
+ <desc1>Presence of hight level modules allowing a first level of
software adaptation</desc1>
+ <desc2>Modular conception, allowing easy adaptation of the
software by selecting or creating modules</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment>Selection of each module to be installed</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="codemodification" title="Code modification">
+ <desc0>Everything by hand</desc0>
+ <desc1>Recompilation possible but complex without any tools or
documentation</desc1>
+ <desc2>Recompilation with tools (e.g: make, ANT, ...) and
documentation provided</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+
<comment>http://www.openldap.org/doc/admin24/quickstart.html</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="codeextension" title="Code extension">
+ <desc0>Any modification requires code recompilation</desc0>
+ <desc1>Architecture designed for static extension but requires
recompilation</desc1>
+ <desc2>Principle of plugin, architecture designed for dynamic
extension without recompilation</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment>Dynamic load module mechanism</comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="strategy" title="Strategy">
+ <desc>Project's strategy</desc>
+ <element name="license" title="License">
+ <desc>License</desc>
+ <element name="permissiveness" title="Permissiveness (only if user
wants to become owner of code)">
+ <desc0>Very strict license, like GPL</desc0>
+ <desc1>Moderate permissive license located between both
extremes (GPL and BSD) dual-licensing depending on the type of user (person,
company, ...) or their activities</desc1>
+ <desc2>Very permissive like BSD or Apache licenses</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+
<comment>http://www.openldap.org/software/release/license.html</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="protectionagainstproprietaryforks"
title="Protection against proprietary forks">
+ <desc0>Very permissive like BSD or Apache licenses</desc0>
+ <desc1>Moderate permissive license located between both
extremes (GPL and BSD), dual-licensing depending on the type of user (person,
company, ...) or their activies</desc1>
+ <desc2>Very strict license, like GPL</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+
<comment>http://www.openldap.org/software/release/license.html</comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="copyrightowners" title="Copyright owners">
+ <desc0>Rights held by a few individuals or entities, making it
easier to change the license</desc0>
+ <desc1>Rights held by numerous individuals owning the code in a
homogeneous way, making relicense very difficult</desc1>
+ <desc2>Rights held by a legal entity in whom the community trusts
(e.g: FSF or ASF)</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment>OpenLDAP Foundation</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="modificationofsourcecode" title="Modification of
source code">
+ <desc0>No practical way to propose code modification</desc0>
+ <desc1>Tools provided to access and modify code (like CVS or SVN)
but not really used to develop the software</desc1>
+ <desc2>The code modification process is well defined, exposed and
respected, based on roles assignment</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment>http://www.openldap.org/devel/contributing.html</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="roadmap" title="Roadmap">
+ <desc0>No published roadmap</desc0>
+ <desc1>Existing roadmap without planning</desc1>
+ <desc2>Versionned roadmap, with planning and measure of
delays</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment>http://www.openldap.org/software/roadmap.html</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="sponsor" title="Sponsor">
+ <desc0>Software has no sponsor, the core team is not paid</desc0>
+ <desc1>Software has an unique sponsor who might determine its
strategy</desc1>
+ <desc2>Software is sponsored by industry</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment>Google, HP, AOE, Symas Corporation, etc...
+http://www.openldap.org/foundation/sponsors.html</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="strategicalindependence" title="Strategic
independence">
+ <desc0>No detectable strategy or strong dependency on one unique
actor(person, company,sponsor)</desc0>
+ <desc1>Strategic vision shared with several other free and open
source projects but without strong commitment from copyrights owners</desc1>
+ <desc2>Strong independence of the code team, legal entity holding
rights, strong involvement in the standardization process</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment>based on LDAP standard</comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ </section>
+ <section name="technicalsection" title="Technical section">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <element name="rfcimplementation" title="RFC Implementation">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <comment></comment>
+ <element name="ldaprequests" title="LDAP Requests">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <comment></comment>
+ <element name="rfc4510implementation" title="RFC 4510
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4510?
+(Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Technical Specification
Roadmap)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4511implementation" title="RFC 4511
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4511?
+(The Protocol)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4512implementation" title="RFC 4512
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4512?
+( Directory Information Models)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4513implementation" title="RFC 4513
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4513?
+(Authentication Methods and Security Mechanisms)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4514implementation" title="RFC 4514
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4514?
+(String Representation of Distinguished Names)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4515implementation" title="RFC 4515
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4515?
+(String Representation of Search Filters)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4516implementation" title="RFC 4516
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4516?
+(Uniform Resource Locator)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4517implementation" title="RFC 4517
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4517?
+(Syntaxes and Matching Rules)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4518implementation" title="RFC 4518
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4518?
+( Internationalized String Preparation)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4519implementation" title="RFC 4519
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4519?
+(Schema for User Applications)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="ldapbestpractices" title="LDAP Best Practices">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <comment></comment>
+ <element name="rfc4520implementation" title="RFC 4520
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4520?
+(Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Considerations for the Lightweight
Directory Access Protocol (LDAP))</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4521implementation" title="RFC 4521
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4521?
+(Considerations for Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP)
Extensions)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="ldapextensions" title="LDAP Extensions">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <comment></comment>
+ <element name="rfc2247implementation" title="RFC 2247
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 2247?
+ (Use of DNS domains in distinguished names)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc2307implementation" title="RFC 2307
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 2307?
+(Using LDAP as a Network Information Service)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+
<comment>http://www.openldap.org/faq/data/cache/346.html</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc2589implementation" title="RFC 2589
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 2589?
+(Dynamic Directory Services Extensions)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc2798implementation" title="RFC 2798
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 2798?
+(inetOrgPerson LDAP Object Class)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc2849implementation" title="RFC 2849
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 2849?
+(The LDAP Data Interchange Format (LDIF))</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc3062implementation" title="RFC 3062
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 3062?
+( LDAP Password Modify Extended Operation)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc3296implementation" title="RFC 3296
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 3296?
+(Named Subordinate References in LDAP Directories)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc3671implementation" title="RFC 3671
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 3671?
+(Collective Attributes in LDAP)
+</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc3672implementation" title="RFC 3672
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 3672?
+(Subentries in LDAP)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc3687implementation" title="RFC 3687
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 3687?
+(LDAP Component Matching Rules)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc3698implementation" title="RFC 3698
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 3698?
+(LDAP: Additional Matching Rules)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc3829implementation" title="RFC 3829
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 3829?
+(LDAP Authorization Identity Controls)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc3909implementation" title="RFC 3909
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 3909?
+(LDAP Cancel Operation)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc3928implementation" title="RFC 3928
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 3928?
+(LDAP Client Update Protocol)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4370implementation" title="RFC 4370
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4370?
+(LDAP Proxied Authorization Control)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4522implementation" title="RFC 4522
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4522?
+(LDAP: Binary Encoding Option)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4523implementation" title="RFC 4523
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4523?
+(LDAP: X.509 Certificate Schema)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4524implementation" title="RFC 4524
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4524?
+(LDAP: COSINE Schema)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4525implementation" title="RFC 4525
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4525?
+(LDAP: Modify-Increment Extension)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4526implementation" title="RFC 4526
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4526?
+(LDAP: Absolute True and False Filters)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc2247implementation" title="RFC 2247
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 2247?</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4527implementation" title="RFC 4527
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4527?
+(LDAP: Read Entry Controls)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4533implementation" title="RFC 4533
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4533?
+(LDAP Content Sync Operation)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4422implementation" title="RFC 4422
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4422?
+ (Simple Authentication and Security Layer (SASL))</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfc4752implementation" title="RFC 4752
implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the RFC 4752?
+ (The Kerberos V5 ("GSSAPI") Simple Authentication and Security
Layer (SASL) Mechanism)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="rfcBeheraimplementation" title="Draft Behera ldap
password policy implementation">
+ <desc>Does the LDAP server implement the Draft behera?
+ (Password policy for LDAP directories)</desc>
+ <desc0>Not implemented</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partially implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="performance" title="Performance">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <comment></comment>
+ <element name="threadpooling" title="Thread pooling">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No thread pooling support</desc0>
+ <desc1>Thread pooling is partial or doesn't work correctly</desc1>
+ <desc2>Thread pooling is performing</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+
<comment>http://www.openldap.org/pub/slim/OpenLDAP_Conn_Mgmt.pdf</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="proxycachesupport" title="Proxy cache support">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No proxy cache support</desc0>
+ <desc1>Proxy cache is partial or doesn't work correctly</desc1>
+ <desc2>Proxy cache is performing</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="applicationserverintegration" title="Application Server
integration">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <comment></comment>
+ <element name="websphereintegration" title="WebSphere integration">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>WebSphere is not supported</desc0>
+ <desc1>WebSphere support documented but not tested</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully WebSphere support</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="tomcatintegration" title="Tomcat integration">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>Tomcat is not supported</desc0>
+ <desc1>Tomcat support documented but not tested</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully Tomcat support</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="jbossintegration" title="JBoss integration">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>JBoss is not supported</desc0>
+ <desc1>JBoss support documented but not tested</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully JBoss support</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="weblogicintegration" title="Weblogic integration">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>Weblogic is not supported</desc0>
+ <desc1>Weblogic support documented but not tested</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully Weblogic support</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="geronimointegration" title="Geronimo integration">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>Geronimo is not supported</desc0>
+ <desc1>Geronimo support documented but not tested</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully Geronimo support</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="jonasintegration" title="JOnas integration">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>JOnas is not supported</desc0>
+ <desc1>JOnas support documented but not tested</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully JOnas support</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="architecture" title="Architecture">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <comment></comment>
+ <element name="loadbalancing" title="Load balancing / Failover">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No Load balancing/Failover support</desc0>
+ <desc1>Load balancing/Failover is partial or doesn't work
correctly</desc1>
+ <desc2>Load balancing/Failover is performing</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="sslsupport" title="SSL Support">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No SSL support</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partial SSL support</desc1>
+ <desc2>Fully SSL support and integration</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="transactionmanagement" title="Transaction management">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No transactional support</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partial transactional support</desc1>
+ <desc2>Full transactional support</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment>version 2.5</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="simpleauthentificationandsecuritylayer" title="Simple
Authentification and Security Layer">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No SASL support</desc0>
+ <desc1>Partial SASL support</desc1>
+ <desc2>Full SASL support</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="databasesupport" title="Database support">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No database support</desc0>
+ <desc1>Default database support</desc1>
+ <desc2>Database can be changed</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="ossupport" title="OS Support">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <comment></comment>
+ <element name="linux-redhat" title="Linux-RedHat">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>The software is not packaged for RedHat</desc0>
+ <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support</desc1>
+ <desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ </section>
+ <section name="functionalsection" title="Functional section">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <element name="administrationconsole" title="Administration console">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No console of administration is available</desc0>
+ <desc1>Limited and incomplete administration console</desc1>
+ <desc2>Complete administration console</desc2>
+ <score></score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="scriptsadministration" title="Administration scripts">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No available script to administrate the server</desc0>
+ <desc1>Some scripts are available (start, stop, update,
import/export...)</desc1>
+ <desc2>Available language to write powerful scripts</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="attributemanagement" title="Attributes management">
+ <desc>Some attributes required but not in RFC</desc>
+ <comment></comment>
+ <element name="passwordmanagement" title="Password management">
+ <desc>Pre-requisites of management password in HR</desc>
+ <comment></comment>
+ <element name="managementofencryptedpassword" title="Encrypted
password management ">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No encrypted password option</desc0>
+ <desc1>Encrypted password option is documented but not
tested</desc1>
+ <desc2>Encrypted password option is available</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="managementof11previouspassword" title="Password
history">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No Management of 11 previous passwords option</desc0>
+ <desc1>Management of 11 previous passwords option is documented
but not tested</desc1>
+ <desc2>Management of 25 previous passwords is available</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="wrongpasswordcounter" title="Wrong password
counter">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No Wrong password counter option</desc0>
+ <desc1>Wrong password counter option is documented but not
tested</desc1>
+ <desc2>Wrong password counter option is available</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="templatepasswordmanagement" title="Template
password management">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No configuration of the password template</desc0>
+ <desc1>Some rules are implemented</desc1>
+ <desc2>All rules are implemented</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="accountmanagement" title="Account management">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <comment></comment>
+ <element name="lokedattribute" title="Locked attribute">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No Locked attribute option</desc0>
+ <desc1>Locked attribute option is documented but not
tested</desc1>
+ <desc2>Locked attribute option is available</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="firstconnectionattribute1" title="First connection
attribute">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No First connection option</desc0>
+ <desc1>First connection option is documented but not
tested</desc1>
+ <desc2>First connection option is available</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ <element name="monitoringsystem" title="Monitoring system">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>Don't generate any monitoring file</desc0>
+ <desc1>Monitoring file generation doesn't work correctly</desc1>
+ <desc2>Many options are available to define monitoring</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment>Database monitor</comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="integrationdevelopmentenvironment" title="Integration
Development Environment">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No IDE supported</desc0>
+ <desc1>Limited IDE integration</desc1>
+ <desc2>An IDE is delivered with LDAP server</desc2>
+ <score>0</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="integratedinassosolution" title="Integrated in a SSO
solution">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No Identity management solution available with this LDAP
server</desc0>
+ <desc1>Possible integration with external Identity management
solution</desc1>
+ <desc2>LDAP Server is delivered with an identity management
solution</desc2>
+ <score>1</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="slicemodel" title="Slice model">
+ <desc>Slice model integration</desc>
+ <comment></comment>
+ <element name="portmanagement" title="Port management">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>No port management</desc0>
+ <desc1>Some ports are configurable</desc1>
+ <desc2>All ports are configurable</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ <element name="partitionmanagement" title="Partition management">
+ <desc></desc>
+ <desc0>Standard installation available</desc0>
+ <desc1>Configurable installation available</desc1>
+ <desc2>Powerful installation and architecture available</desc2>
+ <score>2</score>
+ <comment></comment>
+ </element>
+ </element>
+ </section>
+</document>
\ No newline at end of file
- [Qsos-commits] qsos/sheet/ldap ApacheDS/ApacheDS-1.5.4.qsos Fe...,
Hery Randriamanamihaga <=